Wikipedia talk:Summary style
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Summary style page. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Archives: 1, 2 | |||
|
|
|||
| WikiProject Manual of Style | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Restore previous name
This editing guide was renamed as a MoS guide last year on an understanding that an agreement had been made during a discussion on this page. As this has always been an editing guide, and the advice here is still about making an editing decision rather than a style or formatting one, I feel it should be returned to an editing guide, and the previous name of WP:Summary style restored. The discussion linked above referenced this guideline in order to make editing decisions during the MoS consolidation drive, but there was no discussion regarding bringing the guideline itself into the MoS. I have informed the editor who made the move. Views are encouraged. SilkTork *YES! 12:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Contentless sections
A problem I note with a lot of articles (for example, Milton Keynes Dons F.C.) is that when articles are split, people just cut-and-paste sections into new articles and leave the parent articles devoid of information. Obviously, this fails the spirit of WP:SUMMARY, as "summary style" means that a main article should give a summary and give links to "main articles" if it makes an article too unwieldy to combine all the information, but it seems not to be an important part of the policy. Should this be rectified or not? Sceptre (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- There is never any reason to have a section with no content at all. or a section other than the EL section at the end that has nothing but links. So I would say yes, it should be rectified. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] help
does this site let you monitor who is watching your computer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.219.183 (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nasa
It has come to my attention that there is a group, a system, a design. One might base a conclusion from following cause and effect. In conjunction with my this insight I believe in one common goal, to reach for the skies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.157.202 (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
