Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Children's literature
|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Children's literature page.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
Before posting your comments here, please make sure you are in the right place. Discussions about articles within this project should be posted at the Article Discussion department, and discussions of the project scope and activities may be better suited for the Project Discussion department.
|To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature:|
|WikiProject Children's literature was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 5 July 2010. If you wish to get involved with the Signpost, please visit the Newsroom.|
WikiProject X is live!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
There is a discussion on this article's Talk page Talk:Lewis Carroll#scurrilous psychobabble about the inclusion of a section discussing the possibility that Carroll was a paedophile. Those interested in contributing should look there. Myrvin (talk) 10:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Children are pre-teens, right?
User:MarnetteD suggested six weeks ago 2015-01-26 that Category:Child characters in literature --which now specifies "biologically and/or chronologically under age 21"-- should be restricted to age 12, perhaps 13 or even 14. Only today I read the notice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Category definition and replied there with observations concerning our comprehensive practices concerning of child writers and --in a word I didn't use-- children's literature. That is, we include teen/YA writers and generally include teen/YA literature.
MarnetteD cross-posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books#Category definition. I am the first to reply at either location.
- I suppose that was meant to be provocative? I would say children includes teenagers up to the age of majority, but sometimes you have to say "children and teenagers" or "children and young adults" for clarity. I've added a comment at the Novels discussion. Robina Fox (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Discussion of exactly how to categorize the ages is going to be very contentious and a long haul. Psychologists disagree among themselves and book publishers and booksellers are almost as difficult (worse, actually). The recent invention of "tween" being an example. I teach Children's Literature (and in that role I also teach Developmental Psychology) and in my Children's Literature course I teach Pre-K to YA. We begin with ABC books and end with The Hunger Games; which is rather insane, but the course is designed for Education and Creative Writing majors and we need the coverage. We are just now discussing, barely and very tentatively, about how to, maybe perhaps, tease out picture books and read-aloud books from books intended for other ages (solo reading) so we may have two different classes, or three (or Lord knows how many). That said, I would suggest not diving into trying to create new categories on Wikipedia without some serious discussion beforehand by editors who are willing to work in the different areas--and it seems at the moment that we are small town (underrepresented area), ergo dividing our resources may not be a good idea at all. HullIntegrity\ talk / 12:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Is Tigger a Tiger?
This is a weird question, but it's within the scope of this WikiProject: Is Tigger a Tiger? The question revolves around a user's addition of
|species= to the infobox and the value "Tiger". Please comment at Talk:Tigger if you'd like to weigh in. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)