Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check/Opentasks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
Main / Talk
Resources
Main / talk
Guidelines
Main / talk
Open Tasks
Main / talk
Participants
Main / talk


Request for Assistance with International Space Station[edit]

Hi folks - we recently failed a FAN for this article, and one of the main complaints was that it apparently needs a good review of citations. If you could spare some time to go over the article for us and give us the OK, it'd be much appreciated! Colds7ream (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

topic[edit]

Checking the English traduction of ITEM it should be important to take account in English the sense of this word in Spanish. We in Spanish speak about TOPIC as an item of a discussion or retorics generally about there is not any fiable empirical or dialectic probatory so to include this item in the discussion generally inducts to limit the depth or fiability of the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.248.43.71 (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Pyramids[edit]

I have a question about the pyramids I'm hoping someone can help answer. Obviousley there are different theories on how they were construsted, one involving the cutting of giant stones using brass tools and then dregging the stones across the land, up ramps on rollers with cattle like animals... I think it could be much more simple, could they have made the bricks/stone and set them up there as it would have been much easier to get all of the materials to where they needed, opposed to carting huge stones. Similar to the greeks and chinese.. Please let me know if this can be disproven — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.18.134 (talk) 04:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Foresight or incorrect date[edit]

Here there is a section talking about somthing that hasn't happened yet as it is scheduled for about 2 weeks time. Can someone sort this out? TF { Contribs } 19:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Oops! Looks like it now says November 16 not December 16. Never Mind, Eh? TF { Contribs } 10:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)