Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History
This is the central discussion area for WikiProject History. Feel free discuss any topics relating to history here.
It is recommended that members watchlist this page
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject History page.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4|
|WikiProject History||(Rated Project-class)|
|WikiProject History was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 March 2014. If you wish to get involved with the Signpost, please visit the Newsroom.|
|WikiProject History was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 November 2007. If you wish to get involved with the Signpost, please visit the Newsroom.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot II. Any threads with no replies in 120 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
- 1 Leaflet For Wikiproject History At Wikimania 2014
- 2 Wiki Loves Pride 2014
- 3 Royal intermarriage Good Article nomination
- 4 Leaflet For Wikiproject History At Wikimania 2014 (updated version)
- 5 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Jews in Nepal
- 6 Madeleine McCann requests for comments
- 7 Interpreting Domesday
- 8 100th Anniversary of World War I
- 9 Wiki Education Foundation hiring an experienced humanities editor
- 10 Majestic 12
- 11 Draft:Division of Korean History by period
- 12 New essay: Historical portraits
- 13 Requesting verification on Battle of Lyncestis
- 14 Proper terminology for the lead of Almohad Caliphate
Leaflet For Wikiproject History At Wikimania 2014
Are you looking to recruit more contributors to your project?
We are offering to design and print physical paper leaflets to be distributed at Wikimania 2014 for all projects that apply.
For more information, click the link below.
Adikhajuria (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT history may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Royal intermarriage Good Article nomination
I've been working on expanding the Royal Intermarriage article now for a little while and have just nominated it for Good Article Status. As it falls within the scope of the portal, a review from any of you would be much appreciated. Many thanks. Sotakeit (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Leaflet For Wikiproject History At Wikimania 2014 (updated version)
Please note: This is an updated version of a previous post that I made.
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Adikhajuria (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's only up for deletion because Ubikwit (talk · contribs) was stalking Sairp (talk · contribs). Sairp made a trivial copyedit, so Ubikwit had to burn the whole article down to the ground. As far as I can tell, Ubikwit has now driven Sairp off wikipedia, and I'm not going to volunteer for that treatment again, so I'm staying well away from the AfD. bobrayner (talk) 01:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- I took a look at that Wiki cluster-bleep yesterday and about halfway down something in my brain clicked and said "Nope. An apparition of the Virgin Mary could not persuade me to touch this mess." Filed under reason 1027 for why I have zero interest in being an Admin. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Madeleine McCann requests for comments
- @126.96.36.199: No, your RfCs are at Talk:Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Historians. Is anyone able/willing to provide a little assistance in interpreting sources regarding entries in the Domesday Book? I'm unfamiliar with the terms used and don't want to misinterpret anything. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 08:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
100th Anniversary of World War I
Does anyone know why the 100th anniversary of arguably the most important geo-political event since the French Revolution is getting such short shrift on the Front Page? Even the "On this day" section has, with very few exceptions, almost studiously ignored the events that lead up to, and now the actual outbreak of the Great War. -Ad Orientem (talk) 12:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation hiring an experienced humanities editor
Wiki Education Foundation is hiring two experienced Wikipedia editors for part-time (20 hours/week) positions: Wikipedia Content Expert, Sciences and Wikipedia Content Expert, Humanities. The focus of these positions is to help student editors do better work, through everything from advice and cleanup on individual articles, to helping instructors find appropriate topics for the students to work on, to tracking the overall quality of work from student editors and finding ways to improve it. We're looking for clueful, friendly editors who like to focus on article content, but also have a strong working knowledge of policies and guidelines, and who have experience with DYK, GAN, and other quality processes.--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion on the Fringe Theories Noticeboard concerning the article Majestic 12 that may be relevant to this project. Comments from interested editors are welcome. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
New essay: Historical portraits
I've been drafting a new essay that I thought people in this project might be interested in: User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Historical portraits. Comments welcome! Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Do you expect comments at the talkpage of the draft in your userspace or you intend to move this draft to the main space?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Requesting verification on Battle of Lyncestis
I'm hoping someone at this WIkiProject can take a look at Battle of Lyncestis. I originally tagged it as a suspected hoax, because a google search for the title yielded zero results and the refs are poorly formed. The author has pointed to some references, but none seem to identify the battle by name. Could someone please take a look at this article, make sure the content is valid, and figure out if there's a better title that's backed up by sources? Thanks so much! —Swpbtalk 14:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Proper terminology for the lead of Almohad Caliphate
For those interested, there is currently a discussion at Talk:Almohad_Caliphate#Caliphate.2C_dynasty regarding whether the Almohad Caliphate should be referred to as a caliphate or a dynasty in the lead. MezzoMezzo (talk) 16:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)