Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Internet culture/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Overlap WikiProject (Merge?)
I just stumbled upon this WikiProject while tagging articles for the Internet pop culture WikiProject. It seems to me that the two projects have enough overlap to warrant a potential merge. Both projects suffer from a lack of participants (just over a dozen on WP:IPC; even fewer on this one) and putting everyone's heads together might get a lot more accomplished.
I think this is also a good idea I will check out WP:IPC soon thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thaicares (talk • contribs) 20:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Relevant AFD - Everybody Draw Mohammad Day
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everybody Draw Mohammad Day. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Newgrounds up for deletion
FYI, Newgrounds has been sent to AfD for deletion. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 05:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Facebook at GAR
Thought this project might like to now. Issues are mainly short paragraphs, sourcing, and fair use images. Tezero (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Creation of Jessi Slaughter
I believe this article should be created as it clearly passes WP:GNG. However, I don't know enough about the subject to create it. Christopher Connor (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, Can you tell me why you thnk there should be an article? I could try to figure it out. ReginaldTQ (talk) 07:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
New article: Twackle
I've added Twackle (with help from the nice folks at AFC). It looks like it might be of interest to this project --Dmh (talk) 22:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Relevant AFD discussion page
- Please see Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia.
- AFD discussion is at, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 13:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Relevant AFD - The Bridge (2006 drama)
Relevant AFD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bridge (2006 drama). -- Cirt (talk) 06:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Request for comment (eHarmony)
I am posting this here because "online dating service" is a member article of this project. Please visit eHarmony's discussion page for a discussion regarding the use of a citation that is critical of eHarmony. Some feel that it is a commentary by a notable competitor and should be presented as such, but others consider it too biased to be reliable. Shawnc (talk) 07:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Justine Ezarik/1
Be advised that there is a reconsideration of a delisting going on at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Justine Ezarik/1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to participation!
Hello!
As you may be aware, the Wikimedia Foundation is gearing up for our annual fundraiser. We want to hit our goal and hit it as soon as possible, so that we can focus on Wikipedia's tenth anniversary on January 15 and our new project: Contributions. I'm posting across these Wikiprojects to engage you, the community, to work to build Wikipedia by finance but also by content. We seek donations not only financially, but by collaboration in building content. You can find more information in Philippe Beaudette's memo to the communities here.
Visit the Contribution project page and the Fundraising page to find out how you can help us support and spread free knowledge. Keegan, Wikimedia Fundraiser 2010 (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Exploding whale — Featured Article Review
I have nominated Exploding whale for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
Scope question
Is this project limited to "pop" culture on the Internet (memes etc)? My reason for asking is that I run a blog exploring the impact of the Internet on society ([Human 2.0]) and am interested in the large scale ways in which society is being transformed. (As covered for example by The Virtual Revolution documentary). Let me know if this stuff is relevant here and I will get involved. Thanks Alexbowyer (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's an interesting topic area, and I'd be happy to collaborate with you. It might be best to start collaborating on some articles, attract other participants, and see where it fits the best. There are a lot of related articles in Category:Computing and society.
- As you can see, this project is fairly inactive. I think its scope could be more useful if it were modified and expanded to cover computing and society, or technology and society. --Pnm (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps. As a sociologist of the Internet, and member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology, I'd like to note that I think all subjects covered by this project fall under WikiProject Sociology. Of course, they also fall under WikiProjects Internet, and Culture... I'd assume that Internet and society is part of this project scope. Computing and society, and technology and society, are however broader themes. C and S may not fall under Culture, and T and S may not fall under Internet, as they are broader.
- On the sociological theme, members of this WikiProject may be interested in the existence of the Communication and Information Technologies Section of the American Sociological Association, which is very much the "Internet sociology" section, and AFAIK the closet professional body in scope to that of this WikiProject (note that ASA has also a separate Science, Knowledge, and Technology section, which is the one that deals broadly with non-computer/Internet "technology and society" aspect). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
New article: Net.wars
New article, created, at Net.wars. Additional assistance in research would be appreciated, feel free to help out at the article's talk page. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Semi-active
Considering the low activity here, I am marking this WikiProject as semi-active. Feel free to disagree :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
aXXo GA reassessment
One of the articles under this project, aXXo, is having its good article status reassessed, and may be delisted. Feel free to comment on the review at Talk:AXXo/GA2. Swarm X 20:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
twitter/facebook and Arab regime change
wondering if this should be mentioned here. Does social media have its own project? Going to go look. Elinruby (talk) 02:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)elinruby
- Sadly, no. This project is barely active, and so, frankly, is WP:SOCIOLOGY. You are more then welcome to join them and help us breath some more life into them! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Santorum (neologism)
This article has recently been expanded with additional sources and referencing improvements. There is also some ongoing discussion about that, at the article's talk page. If you are interested, please have a look at Santorum (neologism) and the associated talk page discussion at Talk:Santorum (neologism). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
New article - Slender Man
I'm trying to get this article on its feet, and any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Cougar Draven (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
PORTAL ASAP
I think it's extra important to get a Portal for this project up. It would help with the organization for editing as well. I'm new to editing so could be mistaken and there may even be a portal already...? I might not even have the correct understanding of a Portal. Let me know! :) MrJosiahT (talk) 03:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Request for comment - Santorum (neologism)
Request for Comment discussion started, please see Talk:Santorum_(neologism)#Proposal_to_rename.2C_redirect.2C_and_merge_content.
Want to advertise your WikiProject?
I have started making a Wikipedia page purely to advertise GOOD and ACTIVE WikiProject some users may find interesting. It's hard for new users to find a good WikiProject. That's why I'm starting this project, to help new users find WikiProjects that are interesting and can give them a few simple jobs. I've selected this WikiProject as one of the few I initially want to see advertised on this very special page. This will bring in a lot of new members to your WikiProject, so make sure you are ready! To get started, all you need is a statement, userbox or any form of advert-so leave a message on my talk page and I'll see what I can do! RDN1F (talk) 19:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Project
This seems to have slowed down a bit :(
Has there ever been a discussion on the validity of each (well known - origins and use citable) meme having it's own article? Who.was.phone (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't know but I would suggest to put all the memes in one article named "Meme" and redirecting individual pages to this article --Spiningpunk360 (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Logo
.jpg)
Why is the logo for this project a photo of the Earth? Why not a lolcat or some such thing? --B (talk) 05:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
botnet
you gotta be joking rigt? you mean i can try and send you these comments and you'll never get 'em back or the machine might as well die out on me so i can try and try to send this maessage over and over again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.173.54.11 (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia#Criticism_and_controversy
Uncyclopedia#Criticism_and_controversy needs to have its page content spread throughout the article. Having a single "criticism and controversy" section like that is NOT good writing WhisperToMe (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
possible hoax
I discovered a new article about a hoax or Internet meme which I suspect may itself be a hoax. I'd be grateful if someone from this project would look into it: Wyoming Conspiracy. —Stepheng3 (talk) 04:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Internet Culture to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet Culture/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 22:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Request for comments at Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism
Hi there. I've added an RfC to this discussion at Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism and am looking for additional input. Thanks. SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 02:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Where are the "examples" of flaming?
In the section "Examples of flaming" there isn't a single example of flaming. It gives examples of topics that are frequently involved in flaming but zero examples of flaming. If the authors of this particular wiki wish to refrain from regurgitating examples of flaming then please re-title the sections to reflect the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.26.107 (talk) 15:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Facepalm article for deletion
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facepalm (3rd nomination). — Cirt (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- I will check it out. LMK if I can help weigh in ReginaldTQ (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Request for Tagged article
Hi.
There seems to be a stalemate in discussion (and possible COI issues) with the Tagged social media article. Any advice, contributions or general help by internet culture project editors would be appreciated. Thanks NCSS (talk) 04:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I will check it out soon(ish). ReginaldTQ (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Rage comics
Good news everyone! Rage comics, the new internets lingua franca, now has an article and has even been verified by a contentious AfD! Now we just have to improve it!
So I'm putting the call out to all interested editors to lend a hand!
--Qwerty0 (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- I rewrote the content that was there and adopted a consistent citation style. Hope that gets it off to a good start! – Pnm (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nice... I think I can add to it with an 'appears in' section. ReginaldTQ (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- So I did a 'see also' section, but it was remoed by someone. I would not mind doing some work for appears in altho would that get removed too? ReginaldTQ (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I was the one who removed it. When something like that happens, feel free to post on the article talk page: Talk:Rage comic. Editors don't always agree about the best way to handle content, style, layout, so we try to reach consensus through discussion. There's a good essay on the bold, revert, discuss cycle which describes the approach I was taking.
- The Wikipedia style manual gives some advice on See also sections which says, "as a general rule the 'See also' section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes." Since Internet meme was already linked from the lead sentence, and 4chan was linked from the relevant sentence, I don't think they need to be in the See also section, too. – Pnm (talk) 21:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
The category viral videos is a subcategory of Internet memes. Yet everything in the categorized as a viral video is also categorized as Internet meme. Shouldn't this be changed? JDDJS (talk) 21:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Probably so. For a few I checked that did not seem to be the case, but this one was in both categories so I removed it from Category:Internet memes. – Pnm (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Qian Zhijun/Little Fatty debate
Hi! There is a debate over whether Qian Zhijun is now notable enough for Wikipedia,. Please see: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Qian_Zhijun Especially for people who know Chinese, it is appreciated if you review the noticeboard post! WhisperToMe (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Shay Carl article
I am working on an article for Shay Carl under my user space which could eventually be moved into the Shay Carl name space. Please feel free to help and contribute at User:Aaronmchale/Shay Carl. --Aaron McHale (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
WP Internet Culture in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Internet Culture for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- cool! I will check it outReginaldTQ (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
I am still not sure this project is very active. I'd love to be proven wrong, by let's say three editors disagreeing with me here over the next week :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sadly, this project is still semi-active at best; I am going to restore the semi-active tag. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you're right about that. Drop me a line at the WikiProject Desk if activity at this project ever picks up. -Mabeenot (talk) 05:49, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Relevant AfD
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Shavershian for the relevant discussion. Thank you, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 23:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Assessment on an expanded article?
Would someone be kind enough to take a look at Internet relationship and see if it counts as more than a "Start" now? A bunch of students have been working on it. Thanks. Invertzoo (talk) 18:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
"All your base are belong to us" translation
There's a disagreement at Talk:All your base are belong to us#More accurate English translation about the need to list a sample of sentences from the video game cutscenes. There are three possibilities being suggested:
- Include the quotes in Japanese and the broken Engrish translation original from the video game.
- Include the quotes in Japanese, the broken Engrish translation, and an accurate English translation.
- Remove the table.
The existence and contents of the table have been debated several times through the years at the talk page. Please join in to help achieve a strong consensus. Diego (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Red vs. Blue FAR
I have nominated Red vs. Blue for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 09:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Chuck Norris facts Peer Review
Please see Wikipedia:Peer review/Chuck Norris facts/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web 1.0 (2nd nomination)
- Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web 1.0 (2nd nomination). — Cirt (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
file:AmandaToddVideo.jpg
image:AmandaToddVideo.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.250.26 (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Request help at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U Pom Gana?
There is a page at AFC awating review for what is apparently a big online meme in Bangladesh. The editor is new and not quite familiar with coding, and I'm not quite sure how the conventions go for sourcing and documenting Internet Culture issues, so if anyone has any assitance for him, that would be appreciated. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Morara standard.PNG
File:Morara standard.PNG has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Amanda Todd - 01.jpg
File:Amanda Todd - 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion, see WP:PUF -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
File:M Meier.jpg
File:M Meier.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Tyler Clementi.jpg
File:Tyler Clementi.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
RyanHalligan.jpg
image:RyanHalligan.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Beck v. Eiland-Hall for Peer Review
I've placed the article up for Peer Review.
Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Created category for Streisand effect
I've gone ahead and created the category for Category:Streisand effect.
Please feel free to populate it with related articles.
Discussion is welcome at Category talk:Streisand effect.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Lolspeak
I would like to start a Wiki focusing mainly on the linguistics behind lolspeak for my language lifecycles class. If anyone has any advice or anything that they think should be on the page please let me know.
Thanks! Abueche — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abueche (talk • contribs) 05:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
cracle
Cracle like to eat other sites, for example Na tabanu, agresively take room of other sites. Banditism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.222.253 (talk) 02:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Streisand effect
Can editors offer some outside opinions about a certain problem at Streisand effect. Here's the talkpage topic: Talk:Streisand_effect#Labatt-Magnotta_example.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Merge proposal for Nakoula Basseley Nakoula
A discussion has begun here to decide if the article Nakoula Basseley Nakoula should be merged to Innocence of Muslims Please discuss this at the talkpage indicated to keep all discussion centrally located. An AFD was recently closed as "Keep" with the suggestion that the article could be proposed for merger. Please help collaborate on a consensus. Thank you.--Amadscientist (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
We have an edit war beginning that I wish to nip in the bud (one way, or the other). Guidelines suggest asking at the involved projects and I am very much about Wikipedia WikiProjects so....... I am asking if the film article Innocence of Muslims should include a full section detailing the protests or just a mention alone in context and with secondary sources be included?--Amadscientist (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
YTF Legacy article for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YTF Legacy, an article that is listed under this project, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YTF Legacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. --Tea with toast (話) 23:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Racism on social networks
Are there are any articles that cover racism and discrimination on social networks? For example, today, the hashtag #unbonjuif ("a good Jew") was the 3rd most popular French hashtag, setting off a firestorm and condemnations by anti-racist groups, who may pursue legal action against Twitter as well (many of the tweets were anti-Semitic and racist, example, "A good Jew is a dead Jew"). No doubt, there are plenty of Facebook groups that are used to post racist comments on all types of races, religions, ethnicities, and minorities. I think that we can definitely create a comphrensive article on this topic, if one does not exist already.
Thoughts? --Jethro B 03:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Freedom of speech = New WikiProject
Hi there, I'm notifying this WikiProject due to its relevance to Freedom of speech. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
- List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
- Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
- Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
- Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
- Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Apps Proposal
A proposal for a WikiProject Apps has been made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Apps. As WikiProject Internet culture is a related WikiProject, members of this WikiProject are invited to join the discussion. Thank you. XapApp (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Yamal 402 does not appear on the estimated orbit
Satellite " Yamal -402 " did not come into orbit _ttp://www.interfax.ru/news.asp?id=280005. I think that the Russian government should do more simple and logical - to sell all of its oil and gas plants to close, let the workers around the world and themselves as soon as possible to move to Switzerland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.187.143.231 (talk) 01:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Merger discussion
A merger has been proposed from the "Michael Brutsch" article to a general article about Controversial Reddit communities. Please weigh in if you are interested in participating. Thanks! Breadblade (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Request for comments
There is an WP:RFC at Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet)#Orlando Figes' sockpuppetry? as to whether the historian Orlando Figes belongs on the page. --Andrewaskew (talk) 03:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't really know how to go about this. But currently the "controversy" section on Flickr about the redesign reads like a prosecutor's brief-- wholly one sided, and immediately apparent that the 2-3 authors that have been writing it for 5 days are interested only in magnifying the controversy and focusing solely on negative aspects. What makes it worse is that there appears to be a concerted effort to cite the Flickr Wikipedia page as further "evidence" of the controversy in the only place it exists, more or less in the Flickr Help forum. No idea how to fix this without getting involved in a revert was. Jakerome (talk) 07:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep in mind Jakerome has a consistent bias in support of the Flickr redesign. CaffeinAddict (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Flickr RfC
People familiar with or who want to join the discussion on an ongoing dispute in the Talk:Flickr page about the 2013 redesign controversy are encouraged. We need more voices. CaffeinAddict (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:Internet Culture
Would you please add text to that page as to what belongs in that category and what does not. Category:Internet culture is a subcategory of Category:Computing culture which, in turn, is a subcategory of Category:Computing and society. So there are things that are "Computing and Society" that are not "Computing Culture", but which things are included in culture and which are not is not obvious, at least not to me. It would also seem that, since there is no "Internet and Society" category, those things (assuming some exist) should be categorized "Computing and Society", right? Thanks, 50.136.247.190 (talk) 05:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Rating
Could somebody rate the article Sporcle for me? I don't know what the rating should be. Thanks! buffbills7701 14:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation of Computerized
I'm concerned that the term "computerized" is being oversimplified when linked as part of a term or phrase on wikipedia, especially with recent efforts to clean up DAB pages. Please join the talk:computerize discussion. Oicumayberight (talk) 19:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Discussion at Template_talk:WikiLeaks
You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:WikiLeaks. Neutral assistance requested. At issue is whether the template for wikileaks should show "Chelsea Manning" or "Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning" or some other formulation. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 00:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Shibe Inu Doge meme.jpg
File:Shibe_Inu_Doge_meme.jpg Has been nominated for deletion Retartist (talk) 03:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Assassination market article - anyone want to help?
After the in-depth Forbes article on the Bitcoin/Tor-based Assassination Market website, this article (about the general concept of an assassination market, not the Internet implementation) is looking a bit out of date.
If it's within the remit of this project, anyone want to help out with updating it? Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Adrianne Wadewitz deletion discussion notice
There is an ongoing deletion discussion taking place now about whether or not to have a biographical article about Adrianne Wadewitz on Wikipedia.
The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz.
For those newer to Wikipedia, you may wish to read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Notability.
— Cirt (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
GAR notification
Frank Underwood (House of Cards), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Internet culture photos
I don’t want to sound like I’m insulting the current Wikipedia standards; but scince most, if not all, Internet memes have no copyright owners, it is nearly impossible to add images to this project. Can an exception be made to articles and images in this poject? I mean, if someone actually wanted to be credited for a photo, wouldn’t they care to actually get a copyright on that photo? Please tell me your thoughts. 〜Britannic124 (talk) 02:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- The internet usually works on appropriation (taking something that isn't theirs in the first place); doubly so with Memes. I doubt that, say, Dancing Baby, was intended to be public domain. Hence why some memes have been brought to court for copyright issues (and found to be fair use); see Downfall. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Archived some threads
I've archived some threads that were notices to discussions which have since been closed.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 22:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Meme Template
Hi All.
I was browsing some meme pages today and found myself frusturated with the lack of a navbox for internet memes. Per WP:BOLD, I took it upon myself to create one. You can see the results at Template:Memes. I originally created it using a script at User:Allanlw/navbox.py which parsed the List_of_Internet_phenomena into a navbox format. I also added the template to a few meme pages, which of course you can see at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Memes. I currently don't have the time to add it to all of them (I'm a college student who should be studying for finals...), but I added it to a few that I thought it definitely was fit for.
The template is currently a bit too big, too broad and could probably be pruned down a bit, but I think it's a good start. Hopefully you all over here at WikiProject Internet Culture will agree!
Let me know if you have any comments!
Thanks. -- Allanlw 22:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Seems to be gone now. Sounds like a good idea, tho, maybe someone could see about making a better version of it without violating WP:CSD? Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Social Hacking - new submission to Wikipedia
I'm Alien Breakfast - I just created an entry on Social Hacking for a Wikipedia class project. It's going live soon, stay tuned! --AlienBreakfast (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Looking forward to it, thanks! Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Hi, I'm working on an article for a course participating in the Wikipedia Education Program. As part of our learning experience, we are to introduce ourselves to a WikiProject that relates to our topic. --Sarlisah (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Welcome! If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to ask a member! Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Adrianne Wadewitz for Peer review
I've nominated the article Adrianne Wadewitz for Peer review.
Discussion is at the peer review subpage, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Adrianne Wadewitz/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 04:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
List of rage faces
We've got List of Internet phenomena and List of successful rickrolls, but until now no List of rage faces. We still don't, but I've got a draft going on User:Supernerd11/List of rage faces, any help would be great! Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 19:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to User Study
Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 23:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC).
Polandball?
Why does Wikipedia seem to have an article on Polandball in almost every language except English? Is there some sort of a commmunity decision against it? MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- There was one a while ago, but it's since been deleted, then created later on and deleted again. I'm not entirely sure why it's considered non-notable, but I've got a subpage on it and so do some other users working on getting it good enough to stay. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 12:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wow...that's a major malfunction of our community's understanding of deletion policy if something this notable can be deleted twice. This cannot stand. User:Supernerd11, do you know the other users also working on such a page? Do you need assistance? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- User:Babelia/Polandball actually appears to be the only one, the rest of the links are for stuff like the ArbCom case dealing with it, MezzoMezzo. Mine's simply copypasted from simple.en and working it up from there, Babelia's is much different (possibly pre-deletion?). It looks to me reading through the ArbCom like it was just a big issue based on national pride that got it deleted. As for whether I want any help, sure! (I probably won't be around so much these next few months due to a lot of meatspace obligations, FYI). Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 04:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxxy (2nd nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxxy (2nd nomination). Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 00:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT Internet culture may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Leaflet For Wikiproject Internet Culture At Wikimania 2014
Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 11:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Kleargear AFD deletion discussion notice
Discussion about whether or not to delete article for Kleargear, discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination). — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Polandball
There's a discussion going on at my talk page about the possibility of a Polandball article and recent issues with it. Any input would be greatly appreciated! Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 06:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC) ] You got it! ReginaldTQ (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unrelated to my draft but still very much about Polandball: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 November 1, the discussion about whether or not to undelete Polandball. It was deleted in April 2012, so quite a bit of time has passed and new arguments, sources, etc are surfacing. Any input is greatly appreciated! Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 19:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion for Internet meme
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck her right in the pussy. — Cirt (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification of RfC
The people of this WikiProject are cordially invited to participate in a discussion about the notability guidelines as it pertains to YouTubers. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 16:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
R U Professional peer review
I've started a peer review for the WP:GA quality article, R U Professional.
Comments to help further improve quality would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/R U Professional/archive1.
— Cirt (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a TFA nomination
In the past, there have been requests that discussions about potentially controversial TFAs are brought to the attention of more than just those who have WP:TFAR on their watchlist. With that in mind: Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties has been nominated for an appearance as Today's Featured Article. If you have any views, please comment at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
New article on viral video - From The Doctor to my son Thomas
I've created a new article on viral video From The Doctor to my son Thomas.
Help or suggestions with additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:From The Doctor to my son Thomas.
Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Flash mob
An extended discussion has been taking place at Talk:Flash mob about the application of the term "flash mob". The conversation has exhausted itself from any seeming resolution and additional feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have notified the WikiProject Internet culture as Flash mob falls under its scope. Thank you, Mkdwtalk 21:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
New article on webcomic Bucko
I've created a new article on webcomic Bucko.
Help or suggestions with additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Bucko.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 04:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
WP:VG comments subpages cleanup
Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#VG comments subpages regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Internet culture articles that would be affected by this action are these:
If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Internet culture's use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Have your say :) --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 22:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration
Gamergate has an arbitration request open Retartist (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
GA article discussion about Quote boxes
WP:GA article From The Doctor to my son Thomas had a couple quote boxes at time of promotion to GA quality.
Now there's a discussion about use of those quote boxes.
Please see discussion, at Talk:From_The_Doctor_to_my_son_Thomas#Quote_boxes.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Epic Meal Time's GAR
Epic Meal Time, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Streisand effect category deletion discussion
- Category:Streisand effect
- Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_12#Category:Streisand_effect
Category:Streisand effect has been nominated for deletion, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_12#Category:Streisand_effect.
Feel free to participate there.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 02:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Know Your Meme videos
I know that Know Your Meme isn't a reliable source, but what about their videos? The fact-checking should make it clear WP:RS, I'd think. Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 14:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Supernerd11 Some KnowYourMeme content, including the videos, might be reliable sources. Arguments that the videos meet reliable source guidelines include that the videos are made by a professional editorial and review team which does more factchecking than others in the field. Blue Rasberry (talk)
- Okay, sounds good, thank you. Should we cite the videos to KYM or YouTube? Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 14:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:Internet culture articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Anyone got any qualms about adding us to the sub list? I don't see any reason not to. Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 17:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
SCP Foundation
I'm currently working on a draft for the Draft:SCP Foundation, an online writing community. Would anyone be able to look over the draft for errors? Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- As in the horror game SCP? sure --RetΔrtist (разговор) 02:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- In my brief look i found nothing wrong with it, its a very well written article and i would recommend moving it to WP:AFC where i would consider taking a deeper look at it (reading the sources) and if that goes well the article will be created :) --RetΔrtist (разговор) 02:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- You can't review it, you dont have 500 article space edits. But as someone just on the border of 500 article edits, I'd be willing to quickly break through the barrier and approve/reject it on your behalf, if you want to look through and make a summary of why it should pass/fail. Or is that loop holing the rules too much? (I'd also be willing to look through the article myself if you want.) Bosstopher (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate a review, especially on sourcing since I feel that this may be borderline as far as notability requirements go. Also, possible CIO issue that I should get out now. I asked SCP staff to look over the draft and offer suggestions, and I've communicated with them about policy and whatnot. I'm not a site member, nor have I received any benefit from this. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC) .
- You can't review it, you dont have 500 article space edits. But as someone just on the border of 500 article edits, I'd be willing to quickly break through the barrier and approve/reject it on your behalf, if you want to look through and make a summary of why it should pass/fail. Or is that loop holing the rules too much? (I'd also be willing to look through the article myself if you want.) Bosstopher (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- In my brief look i found nothing wrong with it, its a very well written article and i would recommend moving it to WP:AFC where i would consider taking a deeper look at it (reading the sources) and if that goes well the article will be created :) --RetΔrtist (разговор) 02:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Looked good to me! ReginaldTQ (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you everyone for looking my SCP Foundation draft over. I've worked on it some more, and have officially nominated it at AfC for creation. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Recruiting interested editors to improve the Newgrounds article
If anyone has some spare attention for an article in this neighborhood, I'd love to get some extra interest in Newgrounds. I've done a lot of work over the last few weeks trying to dust it off, updating it and removing the cruft-- it needs sources and cites; I've detailed some areas of concern and stuff I don't have access to in the talkpage. I'm going to go over to WikiProject Websites to make a similar inquiry, but in any case I'll be happy to see any new editors peek in. BlusterBlasterkablooie! 21:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Extremely Decent deletion discussion about Canada sketch comedy group
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extremely Decent for deletion discussion about Extremely Decent, Canada sketch comedy group.
Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I have just proposed a YouTube Wikiproject that would cover any Articles relevant to YouTube People, Culture, Organisations and Business
I would love to get lots of support for this --- :D Derry Adama (talk)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
- What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
- When? June 2015
- How can you help?
- 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
- 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
- 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
Category for discussion
I believe, for many LGBT YouTubers, especially those who have found fame or increase fame through a coming out video, being an LGBT YouTuber is a defining characteristic, just like the Gay politicians or Gay writers category. However, a user has nominated the category LGBT YouTubers for deletion. [see the discussion here] AusLondonder (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
RfC for naming conventions of online "TV" series
Hello, all. I recently started an RfC that might be of interest to this WikiProject. It is to help determine whether articles like Jessica Jones (TV series) or Daredevil (TV series) are using a proper disambiguator since they technically don't air on TV, but rather get streamed online. Please feel free to join the discussion. Thanks. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
RfC: Should all of the urls for this website [The Pirate Bay] be included in the infobox?
An RfC "Should all of the urls for this website [The Pirate Bay] be included in the infobox?" has been posted at Talk:The Pirate Bay#RfC - 24 July 2015. Interested users are invited to comment.- MrX 16:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Created new article on the Free Speech Flag
I've created a new article on the Free Speech Flag.
If anyone's got ideas for possible additional sources, comments are welcome, at Talk:Free Speech Flag.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Free Speech Flag for Featured Picture
I've nominated the Free Speech Flag for Featured Picture.
Discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Free Speech Flag.
— Cirt (talk) 18:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
R U Professional - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the song "R U Professional" for Featured Article consideration.
It's a satirical song and a form of parody music using sampling.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R U Professional/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
"Deep Web"
The usage and primary topic of Deep Web is under discussion, see talk:Dark Web -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
From The Doctor to my son Thomas - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the video From The Doctor to my son Thomas for Featured Article consideration.
The article is about a message sent from actor Peter Capaldi in-character in his role as the Doctor on Doctor Who, to console an autistic young boy over grief from the death of his grandmother.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/From The Doctor to my son Thomas/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The Signpost (Wikipedia) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Signpost (Wikipedia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Signpost (Wikipedia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Can anyone update this article? Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Please swing by and help improve this new article! :D--Coin945 (talk) 03:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:YouTube
I would like some discussion with other users at Template talk:YouTube#Request/question before overhauling that template. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 04:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Really would like someone to acknowledge me before I ask a bot to edit hundreds of articles. Once again, the discussion is at Template talk:YouTube#Request/question. 117Avenue (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The changes have now been made, and I have now nominated Template:YouTube user for deletion, you can find that discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 24. 117Avenue (talk) 04:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles for Deletion discussion of DataLounge
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataLounge -- Softlavender (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Social justice warrior - move discussion
- Notifying this WikiProject talk page as article is relevant to the topic
There is a move discussion ongoing related to this WikiProject.
- Article = Social justice warrior
- Move discussion at Talk:Social_justice_warrior#Requested_move_6_April_2016.
Feel free to comment however you wish.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 02:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Deletion to Quality Award
I've created the WP:Deletion to Quality Award.
This recognizes editors who've taken a page previously considered for deletion — to Featured Article or Good Article quality.
The award is inspired by the Wikipedia:Million Award, the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement.
Please see Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 00:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
L.A. Beast here!
I've been looking for ways to improve the article for L.A. Beast in order to reach 'Good Article' status. Any help would be appreciated. ImWithStoopid13 (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Revival of the Webcomics Task Force
The past few months, I've been putting effort into reviving the Webcomic Task Force, with little results. I contacted WikiProject Comics about it, but for some reason, it didn't even cross my mind to contact this WikiProject. It seems indisputable to me that this topic in general would be of interest to WikiProject Internet Culture. One of the articles I have created last month was History of webcomics, one which I rated of high importance to this project. The inactivity of the webcomics project has resulted in increasingly few webcomic articles have been made in recent years. I don't believe we have any articles whatsoever on webcomics started in 2014 or later. Meanwhile, stubs created ten years ago do not meet Wikipedia's guidelines anymore.
I've started a few discussions on the WikiProject's talk page. Feel free to comment and follow the page if you are interested. ~Mable (chat) 11:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Notice of discussion regarding the {{tl:Goodreads}} template
A discussion regarding the {{Goodreads}} template is being held at WP:External_links/Noticeboard#Is_Goodreads_an_appropriate_EL.3F. – S. Rich (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Overwatch and pornography merge?
Seeing as the discussion just keeps dying down, I figured I might as well ask for some input here about the merge discussion of Overwatch and pornography. See Talk:Overwatch (video game) for details. ~Mable (chat) 13:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
There is a deletion discussion about Timeline of popular Internet services, please have a look.
Your help might also be needed in establishing inclusion criteria for that article once the deletion discussion has been closed.
--Fixuture (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
RFCs on citations templates and the flagging free-to-read sources
See
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access locks: Visual Design RFC
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access Locks: Citation Template Behaviour RFC
Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Internet culture/Archive 2 Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Fake news website - move discussion
Article is Fake news website.
- Requested move discussion at: Talk:Fake_news_website#Requested_move_7_December_2016. Sagecandor (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
New Wikileaking organization
Check out the new article on MormonWikiLeaks.
Sagecandor (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of YouTubers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of YouTubers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTubers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oliverrushton (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Baby mugging
The article Baby mugging has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Extremely limited content, little to no chance of expansion. Fails to pass 4 and 8 - The article, the link from from Internet Phenomena, and all of the references (except for the daily mail which appeared to be of extremely limited content) mentioned the creator by name and associated website. The article sounds like a free plug for the bloggers website, or a misguided bio of a living person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sawta (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
PROD Baby Mugging
- Note: The WP:PROD request has been declined. I am going to resubmit for AfD, as I still believe the content of the article falls within the confines of deletion. I am going to submit the AfD shortly; I have not submitted either a PROD or AfD request before, there will be a lag time between this post and the AfD request. Sawta (talk) 00:48, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Link to the AfD discussion page. Twinkle really simplified things! Sawta (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
List of Internet phenomena - a snowball fight game
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_Internet_phenomena&type=revision&diff=764021893&oldid=760780754 Dawid2009 (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Spotted, article
Where is in ENwiki (or in Wiki) the article about Spotted? Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet culture/Archive 2/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Internet culture, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Discussion of interest to WikiProject Internet culture
There is a discussion at Talk:Crowdsourcing#Addition To Modern Methods which may be of interest to members of this Wikiproject. Input from related Wikiprojects is invited. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Proposal to rename Category:Animated internet series
There is a proposal to rename Category:Animated internet series to Category:Animated web series. The discussion is located here. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 15:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Tony Chang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Chang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Chang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Input on name change and new draft for Uproxx and Brobible owner
Hello! I'm reaching out here to see if members of this WikiProject are interested to review some updates for digital media company, Uproxx Media Group (formerly Woven Digital), which owns sites including Uproxx and BroBible. On behalf of the company, I have written an updated draft to improve the current article and in my edit request, I've also proposed moving the article to the company's new name, Uproxx Media Group. As I do have a conflict of interest, I'm looking for neutral editors to review the proposed draft and provide thoughts on the name change suggestion. Would anyone here be able to help? Thanks in advance. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Elijah Daniel for deletion
ResolvedA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Shorty Awards
As far as I can tell, the page Shorty Awards is a matter-of-fact listing of the historical events in a chronological fashion.
A user has come by with drive-by-tagging of {{COI}} and {{Advert}}, refusing to give any specifics as to why.
Attention would be appreciated, at Talk:Shorty Awards.
Thank you !
Sagecandor (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
RfC at /r/The_Donald
You're invited to participate in an RfC at /r/The_Donald about whether the lead sentence should or should not define and identify this forum community as alt-right. --Dervorguilla (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Liza Koshy needs an article. Unfortunately, I do not have time to do it. Can anyone create one? -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Ssilvers, I reworked an old draft, she is plainly notable now, see Liza Koshy (actress)--Milowent • hasspoken 18:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- The article has been nominated for deletion. You can comment here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza Koshy (actress) -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
#MeToo
Are there any project members who care to help improve the Me too (hashtag) article, or participate in any of the related ongoing discussions? ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
RFC of interest to members of this project:
See Here. Thank you. --Jayron32 19:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Email addresses? providers?
I have a problem with understanding which email is connected to which provider. Such as: Hotmail - apparently it is a Microsoft email but how would you know it? iCloud is an Apple email but who would know except a Apple user/device owner? I have actually called Microsoft for help with a Google email problem. Could there be an article which lists some of the various "@example.com " sites or addresses out there? I have to sign on to some devices I have with a "Microsoft account" or an "Apple account" but didn't know which of my emails was considered Microsoft. (It is sort of a dyslexia type problem with me). Can anyone help? It would very much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonDenom (talk • contribs) 20:54, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Content discussion notification
There is an informal RfC/discussion at the Diamond and Silk article talk page found here that members of this project might interested in taking part in. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 02:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Category talk:Internet-related lists#External links to listed items concerning the external links in Internet-related lists, as to whether individual items can be followed by a reference linking to the item on the Internet. wumbolo ^^^ 19:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Should we expand the project scope of WikiProject YouTube to include other online videos/video platforms? Zoom (talk page) 19:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
RfC Notification
There is an RfC at the Diamond and Silk talk page found here that members of this project might interested in taking part in. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 03:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Split discussion
There is a split discussion at Talk:List of most streamed artists on Spotify#Split proposed that members of this project might interested in taking part in. Hddty. (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Foursquare COI edit requests
Hi all! Over on Foursquare's talk page, I've shared some COI edit requests for community review and feedback. If anyone here is interested in taking a look, sharing your thoughts, and potentially implementing whatever you feel looks good, I welcome discussion. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
HELP WANTED
For a number of years we have been experiencing a steady decline in the number of administrators as a result of attrition and a declining number of editors willing to consider adminship. Things have reached a point where we are starting to experience chronic backlogs in important areas of the project including noticeboards, requests for closure, SPI, CSD & etc. If you are an experienced editor with around two years (or more) of tenure, 10k edits give or take and no record of seriously disruptive behavior, please consider if you might be willing to help out the community by becoming an administrator. The community can only function as well as we all are willing to participate. If you are interested start by reading WP:MOP and WP:RFAADVICE. Then go to WP:ORCP and open a discussion. Over the next few days experienced editors will take a look at your record and let you know what they think your chances are of passing RfA (the three most terrifying letters on Wikipedia) as well as provide you with feedback on areas that might be of concern and how to prepare yourself. Lastly you can find a list of experienced editors who may be willing to nominate you here. Finally, I may not have this page on my watchlist, so if you want to reply to me directly please ping me. Thank you and happy editing... -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 November 23#File:Dril.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Social media addiction
Hi there and thanks for having me. I was wondering why this was considered to be an issue of low importance. We are unable to see this because of our cognitive biases sometimes. I need help with overlinking as well - I am overlinking to attempt to address readers cognitive biases, showing exactly what happened in Guardian Media Group, with Kanye West, and the Australian political situation. This crisis is not taken seriously, apart from people as important as the editor of JAMA Paediatrics. Thanks E.3 (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Requested move notification
Please see Talk:List of Internet phenomena#Requested move 28 December 2018, about moving List of Internet phenomena to List of Internet memes. As the article is of top importance to this wikiproject, it may have a large impact. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 10:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Feedback requested at Alternative for Germany
There is currently a discussion going on about whether it would be appropriate to include material about a supposed connection between the political party Alternative for Germany and German Wikipedia's administration. Your feedback would be appreciated at this discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Help with updates for Reddit article
Hi WikiProject Internet culture! I am looking for editors to review a request at Reddit. Specifically, I've drafted updates to the History section that I believe are an improvement to the article. I've shared drafted changes for the section and a detailed explanation at the Reddit Talk page. In full disclosure: I'm making these suggestions on behalf of Reddit, as part of my work at Beutler Ink, so I will not make any direct edits to the article myself. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 22:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Done This is has been done. I will have other requests for the article, so if you're interested, your help would be welcome and I hope that you'll check out the Talk page. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Discussion of Softpedia (softpedia.com) and The Hacker News (thehackernews.com) at the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of Softpedia (softpedia.com) and The Hacker News (thehackernews.com, not to be confused with Hacker News) at the reliable sources noticeboard. If you are interested, please participate at WP:RSN § Softpedia (softpedia.com) and The Hacker News (thehackernews.com) for UGNazi. — Newslinger talk 12:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Social Media Statistics
There is a proposal at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Social Media Statistics that will affect many articles within the scope of this project. Please share you thoughts there. Thryduulf (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Discussion of Dexerto (dexerto.com) on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion of the reliability of Dexerto (dexerto.com) on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at WP:RSN § Dexerto. — Newslinger talk 03:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
There is a dispute about the non-free files used on the page. The dispute is over whether one of the files needs to be the complete video or if a single frame from this video sufficiently illustrates the given points. There is also a smaller point about whether or not both non-free images are needed and/or justified. The discussion currently involves two editors, myself and the file's uploader, so more input is needed. The discussion is at Talk:Overwatch and pornography#Animated video again. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 20:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
RfC on Dexerto (dexerto.com) on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is an RfC on the reliability of Dexerto (dexerto.com) on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § RfC: Dexerto. — Newslinger talk 20:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Request for Comment on Facebook
There is an RfC on Facebook at Talk:Facebook#RfC_on_inclusion_on_HuffPo_source's_claims that may be of interest to members of this project. Thanks. BC1278 (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Move discussion
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:MarbleLympics that may interest this project. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Rule 34 image
There is a discussion at Talk:Rule 34 (Internet meme) about what image, if any, should be inlcuded on the page. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 03:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion on reliability of DBase (dbase.tube) on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of DBase (dbase.tube), a YouTube statistics aggregator, on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Dbase.tube. — Newslinger talk 08:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
SEAL Chassereaux (talk) 21:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
New discussion
New discussion on Talk:List of most-liked YouTube videos--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 08:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering if any members of the WikiProject could kindly take a look at the review for this article that I nominated. Internet culture, somewhat! With many kind thanks --[E.3][chat2][me] 14:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
New game: "Bloodstreams Battles Online"
Hi,
This may be a request, but Bloodstreams Battles Online may or may not need an article creation. It's a brand new web browser game (like Cookie Clicker) I had conceived around October 2017 that I'm currently making under the Bloodstreams Corporation name, set for a November 10, 2019 release date.
Info about the game: Online will feature over 214+ characters, a character creation tool (remember this from Soulcalibur III and/or Mortal Kombat: Armageddon?), stage creation (from Super Smash Bros. Brawl and future titles), and a story mode where Lyndon Johnson travels in time to defeat both historical figures and fictional characters of the Bloodstreams Battles series as an attempt to deceive "Corruption Dragon", who starts a fictional war called in-game as "World War III", as a result of him losing the tournament the game prior, which not only follows, but is the unknown 2017 title, Bloodstreams Battles: Zero Hour.
137.25.211.247 (talk) (Jayden Montoya, CEO of Bloodstreams Corporation) —Preceding undated comment added 19:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Shock Sites Revisions
Hello! I have been revising the Shock Site page as previously there was very little information about it. I integrated the old information into the sections I added about History, Legality, Morality and Media when I first revised the page. Would anyone be willing/able to look at the site and make recommendations of any more changes to make? Additionally, another user asked to add back the original information at the end under "Examples", which means the information is now duplicated. I am considering removing it from the other sections, but that means the Media section will likely have to be removed as there will be little information and leaving BestGore out of the History section feels like missing part of the story (so to speak). Do you have any advice on what I should do? -Bcstanley1 (talk) 05:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I would like for an uninvolved and neutral contributor to weigh in here, please. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
How to Cite Twitter (to use as a reference)?
I know that Wikipedia wants Wiki articles to utilize written published articles as references. When the subject is mostly about activity on twitter: How does one properly cite & reference twitter? Tinting2020 (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- The template to achieve this is {{cite tweet}}. However, ProveIt makes the process easier as the template is built into the gadget. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Name
My name doesn't show up on the member list for some reason. Any ideas why? —Melofors 20:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Project YouTube
Hi, WikiProject YouTube appears to be inactive/defunct, i.e., there are no obvious activities, also see WT:WikiProject YouTube#Closing shop? with some related alerts since December 2019. Zombie projects are bad for lots of reasons, and one possible way to fix this could be to merge everything YouTube to your project, because a project with a focus on one Google company is anyway odd, e.g., Social in the City is (now) about Internet culture including Instagram, Twitch, and YouTube.
I'm talking about roughly 1,200 pages, and some (many?) are already also covered here. Counter-example, so far Kim Iversen is not covered here, journalism on YouTube is fine, but not exactly my idea of "Internet culture". Similar example, Emma Blackery as VidCon + SitC panelist should be okay here, but if she were only a musician on YouTube this wouldn't be clear.
What do you think of "inheriting" project YouTube almost wholesale, assuming that it ends up as defunct and not only inactive? Presumably that would be a bot job, for all talk pages in namespace 1 (article talk pages) remove project YouTube and if necessary add project Internet culture. –84.46.53.188 (talk) 04:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- What are those "lots of reasons"? Please link or list. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- WT:WikiProject YouTube#Closing shop?
Apart from checking AFDs + PRODs projects could help with reassessments on the way to class=A and/or offer up to date article guidelines. One good example I'm aware of is the project for albums. –84.46.52.151 (talk) 04:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- WT:WikiProject YouTube#Closing shop?
Jasleen Kaur harassment controversy
I'm in gray here. Do you people think this article is in the scope of this wikiProject?
Draft:Jasleen Kaur harassment controversy
It's about a woman who posted on Internet about sexual harassment against a man which got viral and led to an image assassination of the man and him losing his job, and later it turns out that man was innocent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazingcaptain (talk • contribs) 05:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
WP:Articles for Creation has a new sort tool, you can see all pending Internet Culture drafts here: Wikipedia:AfC sorting/Culture/Internet culture
Just in case there are folks here who might be interested in reviewing drafts awaiting article status that are particular to this WikiProject. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Rule 34 move discussion
There is a move discussion at Talk:Rule 34 (Internet meme)#Requested move 25 September 2020 — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of InnerSloth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InnerSloth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InnerSloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Right cite (talk) 13:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
"Internet" vs. "internet"
Please see Talk:Internet#Request for comment: should "internet" be capitalized as a proper noun?
There's some debate there about the difference between "the Internet" and "an internet", about what a proper name is, and about whether news style guides (cf. WP:NOT#NEWS policy) should be considered reliable for how to write about technical topics. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 14:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
"Tech nonprofits" categorization
Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organizations#"Tech nonprofits" categorization issues. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 08:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Help with revision of article on YouTube racial equity special
Hi. There is a discussion about revising the lead to the article Talk:Bear_Witness,_Take_Action#Request Edit November 19th, a series of livestreams being put on by YouTube as part of its $100 million initiative to support Black creative and to address racial inequity and civil unrest in America following the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and many others. Bear_Witness,_Take_Action This article has been rated mid-importance for the Internet culture (You Tube task force) Project. Your participation in the discussion would be welcome. I have a disclosed COI on the page. Thanks!Oceans87 (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Shudu Gram
I recently made an article for Shudu Gram. It was tagged for deletion, but I believe it was unjustified. Any help improving the article would be really appreciated. Thank you! Thriley (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Daniel Hardcastle at AfD
Daniel Hardcastle has been nominated for deletion. See the nomination page for more details. SK2242 (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
February Online Edit-a-thon
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Organized_Labour/Online_edit-a-thon_Tech_February_2021 - Online and global about trade unions and technology ~ Shushugah (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion on reliability of Tubefilter
There is a noticeboard discussion on the reliability of Tubefilter. If you are interested, please participate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Tubefilter. — Newslinger talk 11:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Pallas's cat at DYK
Hi! Could you please take a look at this discussion:
I personally think that a DYK fact prominently mentioning the number 9000 has high "click potential", do you? --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
UwU Is face
The better UwU
ပ⩊ပ
나는 누구인가? 당신? (talk) 03:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
RfC: Notability of Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai
Greetings,
Your valuable comments on notability are requested at Draft talk:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai#RfC: Is this topic notable or not ?
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 08:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:ONEWAY questions and case study
Hello: I'm curious to know if there's a precedent for dealing with the following issue:
Suppose some online community exists that is focused on some given theme. If both the community and the theme have wiki pages, and the community page links to the theme page, what sort of standard of notability (or otherwise) should be used to decide whether the theme page should link to the community page?
The specific practical version of this question that I'm concerned about now is whether links should be included from Masturbation to NoFap. This is discussed on the relevant talk page: Talk:Masturbation#MEDRS. Critics have suggested that NoFap is not notable and that it represents a "fringe" view. However, it has 200000 members at present and has been around since 2011, so to me it seems stable and significant enough to mention, if it is suitably contextualised. There are plenty of articles in the popular press linking the topics, and some research articles as well. However, there is some disagreement on the issue, given that NoFap is not "mainstream". Please comment on the above-mentioned talk page if you have a chance. Thanks! I'll be interested to learn your point of view. Arided (talk)
- A belated answer: NoFap is notable. It is just that WP:ONEWAY applies to the article Masturbation. There are many phenomena which are notable because of WP:FRIND WP:RS, but we do not mention them in articles upon mainstream topics. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar
Introducing the Internet culture Barnstar. Jerm (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Twitter Verification Update
I recently updated the Twitter verification article. Is anyone able to review to see if it is still considered a stub? JenPatt87 (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Reorganized content on: Online Deliberation
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I made a pretty substantial update to Online deliberation. It was listed as a start-class, but I think the changes are substantial enough that it could be upgraded. UWCLStudentSpring2021 (talk) 23:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Internet culture articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:Internet culture articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 21:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Input requested
There are a couple of discussions regarding changes to the List of most-viewed online videos in the first 24 hours, which has been indicated to be in your project's purview. Please join in the discussion here. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Removing unreliable sources from articles
Unreliable internet culture sources are currently present in most if not all articles relating to the subject. Sportskeeda for one is cited 1,300+ times. Just wanted to ask other editors to identify and remove these sources if they notice them. SK2242 (talk) 19:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Bryce Hall (internet personality)#Requested move 12 June 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bryce Hall (internet personality)#Requested move 12 June 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SK2242 (talk) 18:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Section move discussion for History of YouTube
An article that may be of interest to this WikiProject (History of YouTube) has a section that is proposed to be moved to another article (YouTuber). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at the appropriate talk page proposal. Thank you. Alduin2000 (talk) 13:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Seedfeeder at AfD
Project members may be interested in participating in the ongoing AfD re: Seedfeeder. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
(Redacted) Christine Weston Chandler
Chris Chan has had at least two articles about them deleted and salted. There is no doubt that they meet notability standards now. A google search reveals sources by the New York Post, Yahoo, the Insider and more. Chris is the poster child for internet bullying and trolling and any article we make will be brutalized regularly. How should we proceed? --AdamF in MO (talk) 00:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chris Chan. You may also be interested in WP:NYPOST. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have redacted her deadname from the section title. She is a vulnerable private individual and we should not be bandying her name (never-mind her deadname!) about like this. It only helps the trolls. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have redacted her deadname from the section title. She is a vulnerable private individual and we should not be bandying her name (never-mind her deadname!) about like this. It only helps the trolls. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- 1.) I'm curious why you consider her a private individual. She approved a book written about her [1], and makes public videos and tweets for thousands of followers on youtube and twitter.
- 2.) This is just my opinion, but by not having a non-pov and well-sourced article about her, I believe you achieve the exact opposite in regards to helping trolls. Assuming it meets notability standards, a wikipedia article would act as a counter-balance to sites like kiwifarms and sonichu.com, which are written with an anti-Christine agenda.Hoponpop69 (talk) 14:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- She is an extremely vulnerable person who is relatively easily tricked into agreeing to things that are not in her interests and which can be dishonestly presented to make her look bad. I have no idea whether she really did approve that book in any meaningful way. The book is self-published, by an non-notable author, and absolutely worthless when it comes to demonstrating notability anyway. I don't believe that a non-POV article is possible as pretty much the only people who write about her publicly are people who have, at least to some degree, bought into the sick harassment cult that is hounding her. Maybe they don't approve of the harassment but they have been persuaded that there is a legitimate subject of interest in her and that really is not the case. I don't believe that there is any way to write an article about her that does not implicitly legitimise the doxxing and harassment. There is no BLP in this! Where there is scope for limited and very careful coverage is in the harassment cult itself. The legitimate article here is one about KF. They are the story. Chandler is just one of their victims. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- The story is now gaining mainstream coverage such as its feature on Fox News in a primetime segment and The New York Post article. Whether or not you agree with its culture war framing by right wing outlets is another matter, but it has breached the mainstream and absolutely is notable enough for an article at this point. It has been trending on Twitter for nearly two weeks, with coverage not only from the press but celebrities, reporters (Dave Weigel of the Washington Post off the top of my head), and countless other Internet personalities of a higher profile (including a plethora of videos about the subject on YouTube). Suffice to say, the cat is out of the bag on this one and it is now both mainstream news and an undeniable part of Internet history that played a huge role in shaping the culture of numerous sites that *are* notable enough for an article (4chan, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Kiwi Farms, etc.). It is not equivalent at all to doxxing at this point because almost of the details have been covered by traditional publications. Whether or not it is in their interest is irrelevant to the notability of the subject for Wikipedia. This needs an article. 2603:8000:B343:77B1:9108:DAE9:4AFA:523D (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- The story is now gaining mainstream coverage such as its feature on Fox News in a primetime segment and The New York Post article. Whether or not you agree with its culture war framing by right wing outlets is another matter, but it has breached the mainstream and absolutely is notable enough for an article at this point. It has been trending on Twitter for nearly two weeks, with coverage not only from the press but celebrities, reporters (Dave Weigel of the Washington Post off the top of my head), and countless other Internet personalities of a higher profile (including a plethora of videos about the subject on YouTube). Suffice to say, the cat is out of the bag on this one and it is now both mainstream news and an undeniable part of Internet history that played a huge role in shaping the culture of numerous sites that *are* notable enough for an article (4chan, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Kiwi Farms, etc.). It is not equivalent at all to doxxing at this point because almost of the details have been covered by traditional publications. Whether or not it is in their interest is irrelevant to the notability of the subject for Wikipedia. This needs an article. 2603:8000:B343:77B1:9108:DAE9:4AFA:523D (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- She is an extremely vulnerable person who is relatively easily tricked into agreeing to things that are not in her interests and which can be dishonestly presented to make her look bad. I have no idea whether she really did approve that book in any meaningful way. The book is self-published, by an non-notable author, and absolutely worthless when it comes to demonstrating notability anyway. I don't believe that a non-POV article is possible as pretty much the only people who write about her publicly are people who have, at least to some degree, bought into the sick harassment cult that is hounding her. Maybe they don't approve of the harassment but they have been persuaded that there is a legitimate subject of interest in her and that really is not the case. I don't believe that there is any way to write an article about her that does not implicitly legitimise the doxxing and harassment. There is no BLP in this! Where there is scope for limited and very careful coverage is in the harassment cult itself. The legitimate article here is one about KF. They are the story. Chandler is just one of their victims. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Mod (video games)#Requested move 20 August 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mod (video games)#Requested move 20 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Jordan Maron#Requested move 27 July 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jordan Maron#Requested move 27 July 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 02:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I thought that this conversation about the big internet company Cloudflare might be of interest to this group: Talk:Cloudflare/Archives/2021#Request for Comment: Cloudflare Controversy section. It was an RfC but it now just a discussion on the best language to introduce the Controversy section, which touches on some high profile subjects related to internet culture. Thanks very much. Ryanknight24 (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Instagram Kids
Hello, I recently created an article for Instagram Kids, an application Instagram has been planning to release for use by children. There have been a number of recent events about the app and controversy about its design. Any help improving the article would be appreciated. Thank you, Thriley (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
FAR for 4chan
I have nominated 4chan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Streamline Yahoo History section
Hello, editors! My name is Spencer and I work for Yahoo. I posted an edit request on the Yahoo Talk page to update the History section last week. This is a large edit request, should editors want to consider it in smaller sections, I can break the request up. Just let me know. Is anyone available to review it? Due to my COI, I am not able to update the article myself. Thanks! Spencer at Yahoo (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Proposed Split of TikTok/Douyin
Hi everyone. Please take a look at my split proposal for Douyin, TikTok's Chinese sister app, at Talk:TikTok#Proposing split for Douyin. Thank you, Bkenny44 (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Bentinho Massaro article
Hello all,
I recently created an article on Bentinho Massaro, who may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
Any additional eyes on this article would be greatly appreciated. QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: WP:BLP, WP:SUSPECT, WP:BLPPUBLIC, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE.
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, WP:BLP protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused.
Requesting well studied, carefully thought inputs @ RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Recommended sources list
Might we compile a list of recommended sources for participants of the project to use for internet culture topics?
Some wikiprojects link lists like that. on their project page. The Daily Dot is the only source dedicated to internet culture at WP:RSPS, so we could compile our own list, since that list is just for perennially discussed sources. Two others I can come up with are First Monday and Le Monde's "Pixels" section which has both a French and English edition. Chillabit (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Rahul Ligma
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Rahul Ligma. ––FormalDude (talk) 19:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Hacking
Need help editing the page about the new hacker group: KiraSec. Samuels99917 (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:KiraSec# Samuels99917 (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temu flag fixes
Hi, I have just posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company) that should address the final issues raised in a flag for the page. I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu. I want to follow the correct process for COI users. So I am asking members of this WikiProject, which is relevant to the page, to possibly review the proposal. Temu’s app has been the most downloaded phone app in the United States in recent months so it seems like the subject might be of interest to you. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Mark Hunter (photographer) aka The Cobrasnake
I recently created an article for Mark Hunter (photographer), a pioneering photographer whose website was one of the major places to track “hipster” culture before the rise of social media. Any help with expansion would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Is Drew Durnil famous enough to have a page?
Drew Durnil is an American YouTuber known for his reaction videos focusing mainly on geography and history memes and has over 1.31M subscribers. Klaushouse2222 (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- You might want to check out Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for Wikipedia guidelines on what warrants an article. I'd say do a Google search of the guy, and if you find at least two reliable third-party sources (meaning news articles, profiles, book mentions etc. that aren't published by him or someone associated with him) and there's enough verifiable and notable information to fill out an article, you're probably good. You also might want to check out other YouTuber articles like Hbomberguy, Anthony Fantano, and Jenna Marbles to get an idea of what notability in that area looks like. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
A new "is AfterEllen (website) a reliable source" discussion (July 2023)
The last one was in July 2020.
New discussion at WP:RS/N > "Is AfterEllen a reliable source for BLP reporting?".
Presented as a question about use in a BLP ... come see where it goes. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 02:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Twitter
Twitter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I recently created a draft for the Stanford Internet Observatory. Any help would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 22:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Griffin Maxwell Brooks review request
Can I get some eyes on this draft? Griffin Maxwell Brooks is a prominent LGBTQ TikTok personality and socialite, affiliated with people like Chrissy Chlapecka and Susanne Bartsch (in addition to being a noted Princeton Tigers athlete). Invisiboy42293 (talk) 23:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is WikiProject YouTube, you might be looking for WikiProject TikTok. EnbyPie08 (talk) 01:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Looking for help to improve Plastic Love
Hey everyone, I've been working the last month or so to improve the article for "Plastic Love" with the goal of getting to GA or FA in the future. I think I've scoured the internet thoroughly enough to find and use most reputable English-language sources, and I've been able to find a handful of Japanese ones with the help of Google Translate. That being said, I think the article could still use some work - specifically on its critical reception and on the actual recording process of the song itself. As it is right now, the article relies mostly on English-language sources, so I'm not sure it's at the best state it could be.
Ideally, this article would include contemporaneous media coverage in the 80s of the album (think album reviews, news pieces, etc.), modern articles which discuss the song from a critical or retrospective lens, or interviews with Takeuchi herself. However, I don't speak or read Japanese, so I'm kind of limited in how I can research here. If anyone who does have a knowledge of Japanese and has access to these sorts of resources is able, I would greatly appreciate your help in this research. Toa Nidhiki05 19:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
A deletion discussion is occurring about an article possibly relevant to project members. CT55555(talk) 18:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:TikTok food trends#Requested move 26 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:TikTok food trends#Requested move 26 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Lightoil (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for KevJumba
KevJumba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Dropout (streaming platform) and CollegeHumor
An article which may be of interest to members of this project—Dropout (streaming platform)—has been proposed for merging with CollegeHumor along with a proposal on renaming the latter article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Rahul Ligma
An article which may be of interest to members of this project—Rahul Ligma—has been proposed for merging with Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
"Danbooru" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Danbooru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 18 § Danbooru until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
"Booru" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Booru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 18 § Booru until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Requested input on Talk:Shipping (fandom)
There's a discussion on Talk:Shipping (fandom) about whether (or not) to add a section about antis/anti-shippers to the article. Your input would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
B-checklist in project template
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists. This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted-in to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Rfc - Richard D. Gill and Kate Shemirani
There's an ongoing RfC at Talk:Richard D. Gill#Rfc - Kate Shemirani radio show appearance of relevance to this project. Structuralists (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
El Politigato AFD
Re-listed for the third time at AFD, needs more feedback: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Politigato. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Ligma joke#Requested move 4 November 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ligma joke#Requested move 4 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 22:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Shaylee Mansfield
I have nominated Shaylee Mansfield for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Help beefing up Gig economy
This was in article space for a month and a half before being redirected to Temporary work for a year and a half and gig worker for 4 years. Since the gig economy is composed of corporate entities, gig workers and customers, we need to distinguish this article from gig workers. This will appear on the main page in a couple of weeks or months in the WP:DYK section. Please help beef it up.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Troll (slang)#Requested move 1 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Troll (slang)#Requested move 1 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – Hilst [talk] 14:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)