Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism:
Things you can do

Journalisted template[edit]

I've made the template {{Journalisted}}, for links to Journalisted profiles. See, for example its use on Tim Whewell. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live![edit]

WikiProject X icon.svg

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

interesting case[edit]

an interesting case, where a lawyer came to court without his clients file. Dr. nicholas bought a land with a mentle disturd woman called asha byaruhanga,the land belonged to the family of maria in mbarara , kakoba cell, kakoba ward. this land was sold by the mental disturd without the concent of the family. lcs refused to aknowdge the buying of the land and stopped nicholas to buy the land and he refused. confised asha that he is going to treat, in bwizibwera instead took her to a lawyer for land buying agreemet. which was done. NICHOLAS put a small structure in the area which was pulled down by mbarara minicipality, but Nicholas accused the old sister asha that she is the one who pulled down the small structure, mbarara municipality gave copies of the letter irastrating that they are the one who pulled the small structure because it was illigal structure and in a dispurted land. in court municipality to witness and lcs were also in court, but the ruling was that bahati is responsible of pulling down the structure and sentensed to three years. she appealed, to be released on bail, the day of attending the court for the bail, the never came with the case file to defend his body knew his intentions, suprised all peopple who were in court even the majestrate was suprised a lawyer coming to court with no file. this what we are meeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Tools for writing essays[edit]

Prompt service on writing essays — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Help on Hill+Knowlton[edit]

Hi there, I'm looking for editors who might be interested to help improve the Hill+Knowlton article, which is a public relations company with focuses including journalism and media. Currently, the article's content suffers from POV issues, as it is focused almost entirely on a handful of more controversial clients and work, while there is little to no information about the company's history and overall operations. Although H+K is one of the largest and longest-established PR companies in the United States, the article's History is just five sentences long, and the only other section in the article, the Controversies section, dominates its content.

On the Talk page, I've proposed a new draft for the article that relies on secondary sources and aims to add more information about how the company operates, and how it has developed over time. I should note: I am working as a consultant to H+K and prepared the draft with the company's input, so I'm not going to make any edits to the article myself. Instead, I'm hoping to find editors who would be interested to review the draft and move the content into the live article if they feel it is appropriate. If you'd be able to help, please take a look at the full request on the Talk page. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions at all. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Rhiannon, I am willing to take a look. A quick review of the current article shows it could use help. If you're an excellent PR firm, you're likely to have some "bad" clients, that's why you get hired. I have experience writing about the history of media companies (e.g., Brush-Moore Newspapers) and will see what I can do.--Milowenthasspoken 17:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Milowent! Looking forward to seeing your thoughts on the draft. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

kid friendly and educational app. website is posted below for detailed explanation about the app[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)