Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
WikiProject Linux (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux:

Contents

Multi-pointer X[edit]

Currently, there is a lot of confusion about multi-pointer X as opposed to multi-touch support in X (which basically doesn't exist yet). I think the Wikipedia article about Multi-Pointer X should distinguish between multi-pointer and multi-touch more clearly, perhaps in a separate header, to avoid this confusion. HTML guru (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

OpenSSI[edit]

Quick note, I've radically stubbed OpenSSI, as it appeared to be mostly copied from here. If anyone has the time, I think it'd have a lot of potential to be rebuilt. SQLQuery me! 05:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Portal[edit]

Check out the Linux portal. :)

Request for Comment[edit]

An RfC for the naming issue has been opened here. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Release History[edit]

I've tried to implement this release history table on many Linux/open-source articles: Release history table

Can you please try to implement this on as many pages as possible? And can someone help me template it so it has this format {{software-release-table}}. I'm not sure how you do that.

Please PM me if you use it, but you don't have to.

Security-Enhanced Linux needs sources[edit]

Security-Enhanced Linux has been tagged "This article does not cite any references or sources" since Nov 2007. Can anybody help with this? -- Writtenonsand (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

maemo task force[edit]

I'd like to see about putting together a task force to work on improving all maemo and maemo-related articles (with some spillover into more general embedded-Linux stuff including Ubuntu Mobile, and GNOME Mobile stuff). Who do I need to talk to to get the ball rolling on something like this? GeneralAntilles (talk) 18:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Another FOSS logo bites the non-free dust[edit]

Per a RFD on the Commons, the Fedora Project logo is now considered non-free. ViperSnake151 11:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

"Now considered non-free" is a strange way of putting it; there is no indication, anywhere, that it was ever under a free license. Love, Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 17:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject:Software[edit]

WikiProject Software Hello WikiProject Linux. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage and == WikiProject Software Centralized Announcement System ==

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}}

to the top of your talk page.

If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page:

== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Software|WikiProject Software]] Invite == {{subst:Software invite|~~~~}}

Thanks,
~~~~

Ubuntu GA Help, please![edit]

We're almost done with readying Ubuntu for Good Article status. However, the GA reviewer has asked that the prose in the Package classification and support section be fixed. If others could have a look at it, that'd be great! I'll look over it as well. I'd also like someone to give the Alternate Installation a look over and copy edit, as I massed it together earlier. Thanks! --Falcorian (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Let's see if we can WP:FA it. ffm 14:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme[edit]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

A discussion[edit]

An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ? " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - , member of WikiProject Council. 15:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles flagged for cleanup[edit]

Currently, 367 articles are assigned to this project, of which 168, or 45.8%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place a template on your project page.

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of distributions[edit]

Are people in this project comfortable with all the fringe articles being created for distros that seemingly have no notability? Refer to the List of Linux distributions or Comparison of Linux distributions. A lot of these are somewhat trivial forks/mods of major distros. They haven't received any significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. I'm not deeply knowledgeable of the Linux community or trends so it would be preferable if someone who is could go through the list and use their judgment about whether some of these articles really belong on WP. Ham Pastrami (talk) 00:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Please see my comment in next section. StuRat (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD list[edit]

Since StuRat has accused me of acting in bad faith, I'll make it easy for everyone to decide for themselves. Here's the full list of Linux distros that I have sent to AfD. Some "borderline" cases were not renominated, due to the objection of "mass deletion" (both Stu and DGG expressed that they were bothered by the quantity of articles; which to me is strange because I'm pretty sure that this is not a factor in whether an article should be deleted or not). As a concession I'm limiting the renoms to some of the worst offenders. I'll also reiterate here (as I did in the AfDs) that these are procedural noms -- notability is uncertain to me, I don't necessarily think they should be deleted. But as a matter of policy, if these articles don't have any reliable sources to back them up they probably don't belong here. Ham Pastrami (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Web sources for Linux[edit]

This project's members may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Linux websites that I have started. The aim is to determine which sources may be usable for Linux-related articles. Feel free to add your own comments regarding the websites or suggest a website of your own. Ham Pastrami (talk) 02:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Mass deletion of Linux articles[edit]

Note that Ham Pastrami seems to have an interest in the mass deletion of Linux-related articles and other computer-related articles. He first put a tag on dozens of articles saying they would be deleted in 5 days due to a lack of notability, even though many are clearly notable, such as the Novell Open Enterprise Server article. After I removed those tags he then started nominating each for the AfD process. I suggest you follow his actions through his contributions list to determine what he will try to delete next. StuRat (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

LOL. I nominated a number of Linux distros (what Stu refers to as "mass deletion of Linux-related articles and other computer-related articles") that were of questionable notability, as far as I could tell, per my comment in the immediately preceding section. (Really Stu, you can't even make a fair representation of the issue without injecting hyperbole?) I could be wrong about some of the nominations, and that's fine -- simply vote to keep them or provide a reliable source to verify them and I'll withdraw the nom. What StuRat has done is tried to shoot down every nomination based on his objection to the single Novell article. So yes, the natural course of action was to take it to AfD since Stu cannot disingenuously dismiss the nominations there. I will tell you what I plan to do next -- I'm going to wait for the AfDs to be settled, and in the meantime, I'll be busy replying to all the love letters that Stu is leaving me on my talk page. Ham Pastrami (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

State of affairs[edit]

The X Window System core protocol article is listed as a featured article on this page in the section "State of affairs", yet in reality it is no longer featured.--DustWolf (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Linux[edit]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

"Canvassing" for input on Wikipedia:Deletion_review#NimbleX[edit]

Not a star distribution, but definitely notable I'd say. See the AN/I thread for some arguments as well. VasileGaburici (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Puppy Linux needs update re v4.00[edit]

Puppy Linux says "The latest release is 4.00, released on 2008-05-04." Section "History" discusses Puppy Linux 3, 2, and 1, but not 4. Can anyone update? Thanks. -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

GA Sweeps review of KDE[edit]

KDE has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review of GNOME[edit]

GNOME has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Linux Mint[edit]

Hi guys, not sure if this is the right place to ask, since I'm not officially a member or anything, but I'm working on the Linux Mint page to try and update it and clean it up a bit. If anyone feels like lending a hand, feel free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Marcus (talkcontribs) 23:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll be helping out too. BTW you can join by adding the userbox to your user page. Wei2912 (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
I will also be trying to help. I LOOOVE Linux Mint! And I am rather new to Wikipedia and this is my first WikiProject--is there anything I do as a member aside from work on the to-do list? Thanks. AFisch99 (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Nova Linux / Nova (Linux)[edit]

Added a request to [Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet]:
Nova Linux / Nova (Linux) (Not sure preferred format). - Distro being developed by Cuba to assist independence from Microsoft and other U.S. companies. http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Cuba-Launches-Own-Linux-Variant-to-Counter-US/?kc=rss
- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

FYI: List of Linux distributions has a redlink for this at Nova Operating System, which I'm not sure is the best article title.
A couple of articles cited in http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba -- http://www.ecualug.org/2009/02/13/blog/jonas/una_nueva_distro_nova_linux_cubana (Español)
-- http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ge32NldFm5UB9gLB-QqQY-N6gFnQ (Español, Google cache)
-- Official page of the project -- http://www.nova.uci.cu/website/ (Español).
-- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Edit war on Fedora page[edit]

There seems to be an edit war going on as to whether Fedora (operating system) should be classified as the Linux family or Unix-like family. I don't know which is correct. Can one of you guys go over and try to calm this down? Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group[edit]

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts[edit]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:21, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Importance in Assessment[edit]

Recently, I introduced the Importance scale in WPLinux template in order to further categorize the articles related to Linux. All members of WPLinux are invited to assess the articles for importance. 414 articles remain to be assessed as I write this and I think that we should aim to reduce this to at least 100 if not less. Pmlinediter  Talk 15:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ubuntu discussion[edit]

Ubuntu was recently moved to Ubuntu (operating system). There's an RFC underway on Talk:Ubuntu about which article the redirect from the old location should point to: the distro, Ubuntu (philosophy), or Ubuntu (disambiguation). Since one of the participants has been WP:CANVASSing over at African WikiProjects, I figured I'd better let you folks know as well. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Popular pages[edit]

I have requested a list for this project on [1]. --Ysangkok (talk) 01:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Pageview stats[edit]

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Linux to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 04:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD: makeself[edit]

Project members might be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makeself. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

WRG45G connecting to a power saver[edit]

Can the WRT 54G be connected to a power saver without it altering any of the settings when it goes in stand-by mode. regards.

Glenn  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.61.172.234 (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 

WikiProject Java and Portal[edit]

Hi guys! We just opened the Wikipedia:WikiProject Java for business and would appreciate if you could put a link to it in your 'Related projects' section. Thanks in advance!
--  Alain  R 3 4 5 
Techno-Wiki-Geek
19:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi guys! We just opened the Java portal for business and would appreciate if you could put a link to it in the 'Related portals' section of your portal. Thanks in advance!
--  Alain  R 3 4 5 
Techno-Wiki-Geek
19:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

To get this cool Duke, you can paste something like:

Wave.svg
Java

{| cellspacing="0px;" style="width:100%;border:solid 0px #FFFFFF;background-color:transparent;align:center;padding:0px;padding-top:1em;"
| style="width:25%;align:center;" |
<div align="center">
<imagemap>Image:Wave.svg|35px
default [[Portal:Java|Java]]
desc none</imagemap>
</div>
|-
! style="text-align:center;width:25%"|'''[[Portal:Java|Java]]'''
|}

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Windows fanboys[edit]

Hi! Im an anonymous IP user, AC, or whatever you want to call it. I visited the Wintel article and, amazingly enough, it said nothing about the name being used as a despective way to name the alliance between the two companies to improve each one's monopoly. /* Reverted for vandalism in < 5 minutes */ I added 7 links to prove it's usage and got reverted again. --201.253.132.192 (talk) 22:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

BLPs of Unix people tagged as having no references[edit]

Lacking a Unix WikiProject, I'm posting all of them here (ain't too many, thankfully):

Regards, Pcap ping 03:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:Linux[edit]

I added[2] a new row: “System arrangement and features”. It may be a bad English name for it, but I am unable to invent something better for various low-level system specific topic interesting not for general public, but for geeks, programmers and sysadmins. There are a new article Linux console there, and also a Linux framebuffer. IMHO there should be also placed a link on Linux networking (IP over Linux), but I did not find an article on such general topic.

Also, I added the link module (linux), which is now a redirect. I think that we should distinguish the concept of loadable kernel module (also known as a modular kernel in some sources) and its implementation in the Linux kernel. So, I propose the article loadable kernel module to be splitted. Confusing one and another may also eventually lead to mess in the interwiki. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot[edit]

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.
There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.
If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 00:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

FAR[edit]

I have nominated OpenBSD for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Davem[edit]

Hello. After having survived AfD, the David S. Miller article is being worked on. Some help would be appreciated. Thank you, Comte0 (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Linux distributions template (navigation box, navbox)[edit]

The template {{Linux distributions}} has a talk page at Template talk:Linux distributions

In particular I'd like to point out to the newest discussion at Template talk:Linux distributions#April_2010_anonymous_revamp. We've recently had the navbox format changed to be not just a top-10 list as it was before, instead it's significantly expanded, but again we're having issues deciding on the threshold. Input is welcome. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

GNU[edit]

There is a content dispute on the GNU article -the problem is basically where and how to put the current usability status of GNU in the article lead. There is a long discussion between me and User:Yworo on the talk page about that and it seems we're unable to reach a compromise. Expert attention would help. Thanks.--Cyclopiatalk 00:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

New subcategory for Category:KDE[edit]

Hi, you might be interested in my suggestion for a new subcategory of KDE here. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Linux articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release[edit]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Linux articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Damn Vulnerable Linux is redlink. Anybody care to create stub?[edit]

Damn Vulnerable Linux: "a Linux system that was as vulnerable as possible ... a learning tool for security students." http://www.damnvulnerablelinux.org/

Sounds interesting. Anybody care to create a stub on this?

-- 187.67.203.186 (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip; I'll start it. –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 21:54, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject cleanup listing[edit]

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

GNOME peer review[edit]

I would like to advance our precious GNOME to FA. The first step is a peer review, which, after my copyedit and restructure, I think is now appropriate, so I have nominated it. Please take a look at the article and provide me your feedback. Thanks! –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 02:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Lightweight Linux distribution[edit]

I just de-PRODded the article/list Mini Linux and renamed it Lightweight Linux distribution because I think it just needs attention. It could use your help! --Pnm (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Citation templates now support more identifiers[edit]

Recent changes were made to citations templates (such as {{citation}}, {{cite journal}}, {{cite web}}...). In addition to what was previously supported (bibcode, doi, jstor, isbn, ...), templates now support arXiv, ASIN, JFM, LCCN, MR, OL, OSTI, RFC, SSRN and Zbl. Before, you needed to place |id={{arxiv|0123.4567}} (or worse |url=http://arxiv.org/abs/0123.4567), now you can simply use |arxiv=0123.4567, likewise for |id={{JSTOR|0123456789}} and |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/0123456789|jstor=0123456789.

The full list of supported identifiers is given here (with dummy values):

  • {{cite journal |author=John Smith |year=2000 |title=How to Put Things into Other Things |journal=Journal of Foobar |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=3–4 |arxiv=0123456789 |asin=0123456789 |bibcode=0123456789 |doi=0123456789 |jfm=0123456789 |jstor=0123456789 |lccn=0123456789 |isbn=0123456789 |issn=0123456789 |mr=0123456789 |oclc=0123456789 |ol=0123456789 |osti=0123456789 |rfc=0123456789 |pmc=0123456789 |pmid=0123456789 |ssrn=0123456789 |zbl=0123456789 |id={{para|id|____}} }}

Obviously not all citations needs all parameters, but this streamlines the most popular ones and gives both better metadata and better appearances when printed. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Peter MacDonald (computer programmer)[edit]

I recently deleted this article as an uncontested prod but the subject of the article has asked me to restore it. However, since it's an unsourced BLP I moved it to the incubator instead. (link)

Once this article is sourced it can be moved back into article space. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

RFC on the inclusion of a table comparing SI units and Binary prefixes[edit]

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns this table which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Linux --RaptorHunter (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Notification of nomination for deletion of GNU/Linux naming controversy[edit]

This is to inform the members of this Wikiproject, within the scope of which this article falls, that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNU/Linux naming controversy. - Ahunt (talk) 12:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Who wrote 3.0[edit]

The article is now public on lwn.net, and I think we can take advantage of this to improve our coverage of notable kernel hackers. I copied the last list of the article (the most consistent developers) here:

Jonathan Corbet is currently a redirect to lwn.net, an article on him might be a good thing to document his V4L work.

Any other thoughts ? Regards, Comte0 (talk) 12:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Linux kernel names and List of programmers already exist; List of Linux kernel programmers might be a good article to create. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

The Wikipedia article "Comparison of Windows and Linux" - bad things are being said about Linux. Please help![edit]

The Wikipedia article Comparison of Windows and Linux has been heavily modified to deliberately distort the truth about Windows security versus Linux security, claiming that Windows is more secure and has vulnerabilities fixed faster etc. There's also more biased statements, recently added, which are deliberately trying to make readers' believe that Windows is faster than Linux in certain areas e.g. networking, graphics performance etc. I've spent months and hours of my spare time improving that page, only to find that a few editors have destroyed all that work. Please help!

Cheers. TurboForce (talk) 12:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I skimmed over the article and it doesn't seem overly lopsided, at least on the surface - but I don't know that much about the topic. I added a template calling for a Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security expert onto what appeared to be the most contentious section. | Je mir (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

article is largely useless[edit]

I'm wiki'ing LS because I don't know how to use it. How about putting some common DOS command equivalents? Like, how do I do "dir *.txt /s" with ls? "ls *.txt -R" doesn't work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.109.18.224 (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I strongly suggest that you read the fine manpages (use the man command) for the commands you are trying to use. Wikipedia is not a manual or howto guide, so we will not be adding a lot of that to our articles. Also, your Linux distribution should have online forums available where you can find basic FAQs and ask questions. It'd probably be a good idea for you to look them up. For your particular question, you need to place the switch before the arguments: ls -R however, adding "*.txt" will not work as you expect, because the "*" glob works in the current directory and expands arguments prior to running the command. You really want something more like find . -name "*.txt" -print Elizium23 (talk) 20:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion: Comparison of Windows and Linux[edit]

This may of interest to some members here; I have proposed this article for deletion due to serious WP:SYNTH and WP:OR reasons. If you wish please comment on the deletion discussions. cheers. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Gnome proposal[edit]

I've proposed the creation of WikiProject Gnome. Please comment. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Linus-pronounces-linux.ogg[edit]

File:Linus-pronounces-linux.ogg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) has been proposed to be deleted. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 09:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Subdivision[edit]

Should this project not be a subproject of wikiproject software? IRWolfie- (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

List of Participants[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux#Participants is a bit of a mess. The list includes a user who only made two edits five years ago[3] and one who retired from Wikipedia and deleted his username.[4][5][6]. Some entries are dated, some are not. The list is neither alphabetical nor chronological - some names were added at the bottom, some at the top.

I propose the following cleanup:

  • Any user name that redirects to a new user name will be changed to the new user name.
  • Registered users who have not made an edit in five years will be deleted, with a note placed on their user talk page saying that the name will be re-inserted on request.
  • Usernames that have been deleted, retired, stuck out from the list or indefinitely banned from Wikipedia will be deleted after two years.
  • All dates will be removed from the list and the list will be alphabetized. An instruction will be added to insert your name alphabetically and sign with three tildes instead of four.
  • Alternative to above: Dates will be added to names that are currently without them and the list will be sorted chronologically. An instruction will be added to insert your name at the bottom of the list.

Suggestions for better ways to clean up the list are welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipoject:Linux Barnstar[edit]

I noticed that this Wikiproject doesn't have it's own barnstar yet, so I went ahead an designed one. Any suggestions are welcome. I'll add this to the iwkipoject barnstars page once I receive a few comments of approval. 16bitz 18:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Linuxbarnstar.png


I love it! AFisch99 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup and Redesign of wikiprojct: Linux[edit]

I have spent the last week or so organizing and redesigning this wikiproject. you can see my proposed redesign here in my sandbox. I encourage you to leave any suggestions you have for improvement in this section. If you'd like to contact me personally, please leave a message on my talk page. I will continue to modify my template based on suggestions I receive. I will update all of wikiproject:Linux with my reorganization once there seems to be a general consensus of approval among project members. 16bitz 21:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ad snuck into SystemRescueCD page?[edit]

Hello all - love the project, keep it up!

FYI: Just looked over the SystemRescueCD page, and the last "External Link" looks to me like an ad was snuck into the page. It links to a rescue product from "Lazesoft" software, which doesn't seem to be related to the SystemRescueCD project. Am I right about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.192.207 (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

You're right, it doesn't really seem appropriate there so I went ahead and removed it. Thanks. - SudoGhost 14:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Ubuntu (operating system)#Ubuntu as "Adware"[edit]

I have started an RFC at Talk:Ubuntu (operating system)#Ubuntu as "Adware". Please join the discussion there. Elizium23 (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments: Establish standards for version history tables in software articles[edit]

I'd like to introduce the Template:Version template to Wikipedia with the goal to establish one standard for version history tables (or lists). It simplifies creation of release histories, standardizes release stages and makes the content more accessible. Please comment on the template talk page (there already is some discussion). Thanks for your contribution. Jesus Presley (talk) 07:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

elementary OS[edit]

Hi everyone, I'm a former Wikipedian who came back to create an article about elementary OS. As you can see, there were previous attempts at this, all of which resulted in deletion. I've created what I believe to be a notable, neutral, verifiable base article at User:Kennethsime/sandbox, and copied it to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/elementary OS. Unfortunately, I believe that an administrator must actually create the page at elementary OS, as I seem to be unable to myself. If anyone can offer help, please let me know. Kennethsime (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure if the current beta version justifies notabiliy. An interesting project nonetheless - however, has it received substantially more media coverage? Check the reasons for deletion, and decide yourself if you want to re-open discussion for this article. I recommend writing the article in your userspace as a starting point for discussion. Moving it to the article namespace is done within seconds. Sorry, realized you already did that. Jesus Presley (talk) 11:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I actually think there has been quite a bit of media coverage. Webupd8, OMG Ubuntu, and Tech Drive-In are all listed in sources in my "beta" article, and it's not hard to find others. How would I go about pursuing this? Kennethsime (talk) 04:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
"The page title you have tried to create has been protected from creation. The reason given is: AfD - see also Elementary (software project). [...] If you feel this page should be created, please raise the matter at deletion review, being careful to quote the exact page name or address and the reasons you feel the page should now be created. Pages are usually only blocked from creation after significant discussion or disruption, so good reasons for seeking review are usually required. You will also need to show that the previous concerns are no longer a problem.". Also, give the users that deleted the article a note on their talk page, that's always good to get things rolling. I will weigh in with my support. Jesus Presley (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I hadn't found that, I did create an article for creation page although that process is apparently backlogged. The last admin to delete the page advised something along the lines of "if it makes it through AfC then the recreate will not be controversial." I will pursue the matter on deletion review as well. Thanks! Kennethsime (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Any news here? I found out that there is an article on german and on french WP. Jesus Presley (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
PS: Partial Support. Last deletion was March 2009. Distro is available now and under active development, with some more secondary sources. I think it's worth at least a stub. Jesus Presley (talk) 11:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Seeking community feedback regarding the Chakra_(operating_system) article...[edit]

Hello,

As Chakra_(operating_system) is noted on its talk page as being within the scope of WikiProject Linux, I would like to offer folks an opportunity to voice their opinions on an ongoing thread atTalk:Chakra_(operating_system)#Regarding_notability_tag....

Thanks in advance for your time and attention,

--Kevjonesin (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Announcement -- WikiProject Open![edit]

Hi WikiProject Linux people,

I'd like to invite you to check out what we are doing with WikiProject Open. Current participants come primarily from a background in open educational resources and open access publishing, but we do share an interest in free and open source software, have many Linux users etc. We would like this WikiProject to complement and support existing efforts to collaborate around these kinds of content on Wikipedia, and would welcome any input from WikiProject Linux or others in the open space. (If any of you know of active WikiProjects that would be relevant, please let us know on our project talk page.)

If any of you would like to join an planning webinar, we have two scheduled for this week; see our WikiProject Open planning page for details. -Pete (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linux From Scratch[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linux From Scratch could use some help. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Discussion about reliable sources for LInux[edit]

If you are an experience Wikipedian and known the policy about reliable sources, please join the discussion:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#http://desktoplinuxreviews.com_and_http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk -- Jorge (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

OS family in Linux distros[edit]

There is an open dispute about OS family in Linux distros (OS family infobox field) on Template_talk:Infobox_OS#OS_family_in_Linux_distros. It may require RfC. --Rezonansowy (talkcontribs) 21:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to help craft a proposal[edit]

Surveillance awareness day is a proposal for the English Wikipedia to take special steps to promote awareness of global surveillance on February 11, 2014. That date is chosen to coincide with similar actions being taken by organizations such as Mozilla, Reddit, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Feedback from members of this Wikiproject would be greatly appreciated. Please come join us as we brainstorm, polish, and present this proposal to the Wikipedia Community. --HectorMoffet (talk) 12:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update[edit]

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal[edit]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject progress[edit]

One interesting QA tool in Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games is their progress meters. This could be turned into a template and be useful for all WikiProjects.

Here it is the progress for WikiProject Linux:

1% of articles and lists FA-Class or FL-Class: 16% complete
(1/6.25)
5% of articles and lists GA-Class or better: 9.6% complete
(3/31.25)
10% of articles B-Class or better: 48% complete
(30/62.5)
20% of articles C-Class or better: 80.8% complete
(101/125)
75% of articles Start-Class or better: 82.1% complete
(385/468.75)

84.127.80.114 (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Standard date format for references in all Linux articles[edit]

I propose to use the date format used by

namely the ISO 8601 date format, in references for all articles that belong more than to any other WikiProject to the WikiProject Linux or one of its sub-projects.

A common standard will make editing, reading and in- and outgoing sharing for all Linux-related articles easier.

This proposal does not cover the article texts itself. They can stay the way they are. But currently one can see inconsistencies in reference sections, e.g. the article Linux uses at least three [sic!] date formats in the reference section. 80.134.94.228 (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This edit harmonized three formats into one, saving 857 characters in the reference section. 80.134.94.228 (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Per WP:MOSDATE, I believe there is a preference for dates to be spelled out as Month dd, yyyy. Further, in the diff you've given (which I have reverted), most of the dates were already in that apparently preferred format and the few that were not should be changed to that preferred format, not all of them into purely numeric format. Msnicki (talk) 05:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Per WP:MOSDATE. Also, Wikipedia doesn't follow what other sites do. There are too many different sites with their own way. Bgwhite (talk)
  • Comment. The long debate started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software. This should be considered forum shopping. Bgwhite (talk) 07:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)