Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ohio/Assessment
|WikiProject United States / Ohio||(Rated Project-class)|
- Generally, every three days. It's automated by a bot. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 13:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Do they all need to rank as "High" on the importance scale just because they are FA? Nine Inch Nails (and their discography) aren't high on my list of important things about Ohio. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Just saw this. My thinking was the article's subjects are important enough for people to work towards them becoming featured that they should be top priority so WP:Ohio can keep those articles looking good. Of course this can always be changed. Anyone else have an opinion on the matter? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 03:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
How to rate articles by importance
So how do we want to do this? The generic thing I've seen is all GAs are high, FAs and FLs are top and other are up to discretion. Seems like we need our system.
"DRAFT" WikiProject Ohio importance scale: The article's importance, regardless of its quality, particularly in terms of Ohio geography, history, demographics, cities and towns, law and government, economy, transportation, education, and professional sports.
Rate articles on overall importance. Use the basic descriptions, guided by the general examples when available. Always give the highest rating suggested by general examples at different levels.
|Top||Subject is a must-have for Category:Ohio
|High||Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
|Mid||Subject fills in more minor details
|Low||Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial
Thanks for your consideration,