Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Victoria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Australia / Victoria (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon WikiProject Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Victoria.
 


Bon Voyage[edit]

From all of us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia - best wishes for the new project and the christmas season !SatuSuro 15:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Not actually a Victorian, but...[edit]

Hope I can help with some of the tasks, particularly those in the geographical or political sphere. Orderinchaos 15:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

He's in the West Australian project and a fine participant there! SatuSuro 15:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

A couple of questions...[edit]

  • Will there be a conflict with residents of Victoria, British Columbia?
  • Does this project specifically exclude Melbourne, or will Melbourne-based-topics be included in both the Melbourne and Victoria wikiprojects? -- Chuq 00:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Re second - maybe they might take a clue from the WA project - we have tried to keep WA=yes items separate from Perth=yes items -as most of the subjects/articles are one or the other. SatuSuro 00:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Re the first - if Victoria BC ever gets its own project, they can always call it Greater Victoria as any article would have to include Saanich, Oak Bay, Sooke etc...
Re the second - my suggestion would be the following schema:
If it relates to the state as a whole, or (state) government, should be in WP Victoria
If it is outside of the region which Melbourne takes responsibility for, should be in WP Victoria
Melbourne has taken responsibility for all areas including and enclosed by the Shires of Mornington Peninsula, Cardinia, Yarra Ranges, Nillumbik and Melton, and the Cities of Hume and Wyndham.
This is only my thoughts - feel free to add, clarify, disagree etc Orderinchaos 02:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

"I was born, lucky me, in the land that I love." Victoria, Ray Davies.

There is a more famous Victoria. Hmm, another project idea. The name is likely to lead to confusion. I also think the canadian state and other 'Victorias' scattered around globe would justify a project merely to list them. See also Victoria. Best wishes for new project Fred 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Awards[edit]

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 20:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Is anyone interested? -- Punk Boi 8 07:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Tasmania is now up and running as well[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania SatuSuro 03:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE NOTE[edit]

To anyone considering creating stubs for this project - please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting carefully - regarding processes involved - so as to avoid issues with WP WSS D (which can mean both discovery and delete :) ) SatuSuro 02:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Assessment templates[edit]

Does this project really need to use such a *loud* (and dare I say, ugly) template? An example is at Talk:Melbourne. (diff)? Could it be toned down a little to better match the remainder used? -- Longhair\talk 06:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

For those who click after this point - the "GA" green icon was previously three columns high and just over half a page wide. It was very green, and very loud. Orderinchaos 07:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
My personal opinion - does it even need one at all? The WA and Tasmanian wikiprojects have been able to get by just fine with the generic Australian one, marking "This is supported by Wikiproject ____" using the tags. A big advantage in doing things this way is updatability - the less things you have to update, the more likely they are to be properly updated. Also shared resources - the WP Australia assessment team is capably and well staffed, whereas WP Vic has a low membership at the present time (although will grow) so is not really in the position to assess its own articles just yet. By the time it is, we'll probably have figured out a way to incorporate that into WP Australia. I did fix what appeared to be a colspan error in the WP VIC box which created the loud look :P Orderinchaos 07:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm brainstorming a system where all Australian articles will share the one assessment system, based on the Military history model. Hopefully we'll end up with a 'one shoe fits all' type of arrangement, where the master project provides for sub-project assessments by default. -- Longhair\talk 22:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Nhill railway station[edit]

Nhill Railway Station is now served by the Overland. As every other station served by a passenger service in Victoria has a page, can Nhill have one too and be linked to the other pages? Thanks. JROBBO 10:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Timbarra[edit]

Not sure if this is a suburb or other locality? Does this need deleting or improving?Garrie 00:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons gallery page[edit]

Not sure how active this project is at present, but for those interested I have created a gallery page for Victorian towns at commons:Towns of Victoria. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 21:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Inactive?[edit]

Is this wikiproject inactive? I guess there are several active editors working on Victoria related articles that are members of this Wikiproject, but this is not being utilised as a collaboration tool. Thoughts? aliasd·U·T 00:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure how active this project has ever been. I have found the project tag/s useful, but this page has seen much use at all. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 04:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
This is all true, we created it admittedly more as a classification device anticipating that it had the potential for use as a collaboration tool later on. Ultimately it means we don't have stuff drifting around in Australian Places with noone knowing of its existence :) I think also quite a few people are on wikibreaks or busy offline atm which doesn't help. Orderinchaos 08:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
To be clear, I am all for keeping this project (and establishing projects for SA and Qld as well) for the reasons you state above. All it takes is a two or three keen editors to get started and these project pages will become useful and it gives people a place to start if they want to start some collaboration on Vic. articles. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 10:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

School Categories[edit]

Just looking to cleanup "Category:Schools in Victoria", so that it can be like many of the other school categories in Australia. Basically i want to delete "Category:Schools in Melbourne" and "Category:Schools in Geelong", so that what is left is state-based categories, such as; "Category:Private schools in Victoria", "Category:Public schools in Victoria" and "Category:High schools in Victoria". For a good example, look at "Category:Schools in Western Australia. Please leave comments below. Twenty Years 15:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Railway line merges[edit]

At present was have a whole stack of railway line articles that consist of no more than lists of stations - see Template:VictorianRailwayLines. In addition, each physical line is divided up into multiple subsections based upon what V/Line services operate on it, and the history of all lines are mashed together at Rail transport in Victoria.

I carried out a merge of all railway lines into the relevant regions are used by V/Line - Seymour railway line, Victoria, Ballarat railway line, Victoria, Bendigo railway line, Victoria, Geelong railway line, Victoria, and Gippsland railway line, Victoria, and intended to move the history of each 'main line' and relevant 'branch lines' into one of the five relevant line pages, but it got reverted.

At the present time we just have stubs everywhere of station listings. So what are other people's thoughts? Wongm 09:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The merges were complete original research - no one uses these groups according to "physical lines" as you put it. All of these lines are commonly viewed as seperate lines, and are - in effect - seperate lines that branch off a couple of main ones. There's tons of room for expansion of all of these articles - history, technical details, etc - it's been one of my planned projects for ages. I see no purpose for these merges apart from to make things more confusing. Rebecca (talk) 03:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
There are a number of definitions of the lines. The two we should probably consider here would be:-
  • The V/Line Passenger model of Intercity lines with Interurban branches/continuations. See the key on this V/Line map.
  • The "Railways" model of mainlines and branch lines. See this interactive map at Vicsig.
I'm not sure which would be better... --Evan C (Talk) 10:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd go with the latter. It's the one we've used for historic railways in the past, and it's also the one that makes most sense to laypeople. Any move that means that someone looking for the Swan Hill line gets redirected to the Bendigo line is just going to elicit confusion. Rebecca (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Swan Hill redirecting to Bendigo is more logical than Shepparton redirecting to Albury. --Evan C (Talk) 05:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Apologies to watchlisters[edit]

If you had a whole bunch of former LGAs watchlisted, you probably saw a lot of me on your watchlist today :) The reason for this was finally getting hold of the actual ABS census figures for the articles I wrote earlier for Victoria. Orderinchaos 03:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes I did, nice work :)--Melburnian (talk) 08:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

I have just proposed the following "Did You Know" at [1]:

=== Articles created/expanded on April 30 ===

I am hoping that the fact that it includes references to two separate articles may be given some weight. Lindsay658 (talk) 23:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Post Offices[edit]

A useful online resource is the Premier Postal History list of Victorian Post Offices past and present with opening/closing dates etc.-Whilst designed for philatelists this has been meticulously researched over the years and highly accurate, the primary sources mainly being PO archives. Part has been published in book form. Ive added a few -see Wodonga, Victoria -There appears to be a lot of work to be done on the establishment (reason for coming into existence)and history of towns and the date of PO opening is a good indication of the first appearance in an area of a modest population The code is ref name = "b"Premier Postal History, Post Office List, retrieved 2008-04-11 /ref (with the brackets added) Photos of POs may be available for use if you ask I will be doing the odd one but dont have a lot of time Epistemos (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that - that should be quite useful! Always good to see new resources coming onstream. Orderinchaos 10:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Railway Station Photos[edit]

Someone deleted the Ararat Station pages for "improper license". I thought these photos had been freely provided for use on Wikipedia? Can someone please put them back - I can't find the page they came from. Alternatively, is someone able to go to Ararat and take some new photos of the platforms? JRG (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi JRG. See User talk:Rebecca#Victorian rail images for some background on this topic. I suspect there may be many more deleted unless the licensing is sorted out quickly. My knowledge of licencing requirements is nil unfortunately. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
They're fine in the wake of the last conversation we had with the photographer, although I believe we do still need to clarify the exact free license that they're under. If you find one that has been deleted, please send me the image link (find it in the history) and I'll undelete it and explain the image situation on the talk page. I did this yesterday with Barnawartha, and I'm happy to do others as well. Rebecca (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
From the email I received mentioned in the other discussion:
He suggested the following tag be used (and gave me a link to where I could find the wording):-
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted."
I advised Andrew that I was happy for him to add this tag.
I just need to know more about this OTRS caper or whatever it is called, and how we link it to the huge set of images. Wongm (talk)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme[edit]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Victoria geography stub discussion at WP:WSS/P[edit]

Hi all - this is just to let you know there's a discussion going on at the stub-sorting project about how best to split up Category:Victoria geography stubs into subcategories. To cut a long story short, that category is getting over-full, so regional subcategories are being considered, probably each with individual templates for different counties or districts). The main problem is how to break the state into regions. Please feel free to make any comments/recommendations at WP:WSS/P. Cheers.

As an unrelated aside, BTW, is there any reason this project isn't listed in Category:Australia-related WikiProjects?

Grutness...wha? 00:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Victoria[edit]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group[edit]

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts[edit]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:50, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Help with Pronunciation[edit]

How is pronounced the name of Cowangie locality in Victoria? We want in ru-wiki to make article about this locality but don't know how to transcribe it into Russian. Thanks in advance. --Koryakov Yuri (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know the answer to your question but you might get a better response at WP:AWNB. This page isn't watched by many people. Good luck -- Mattinbgn\talk 20:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
The locality's name is mentioned in the narration (at 1:00) of this youtube video about Larry Perkins, the "Cowangie Kid", pity Perkins himself doesn't say it for "authentication". Melburnian (talk) 01:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
IPA [kaʊænˈdʒi] = Кауанджий possibly? (Not sure if the last й is necessary but I've never seen a Russian word end in и.) Orderinchaos 04:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much, guys! It's really Кауэнджи then. There are lot of them: ru:Таити, ru:щи, ru:жалюзи, etc., but you're right there's no original Russian nouns (in singular) ended in -и. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koryakov Yuri (talkcontribs) 14:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject North-East[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject NorthEast is now up and running. If anyone would like to participate, please do so. ContrillionAU (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Consider renaming this, as it stands it could refer to NorthEast England, NorthEast Canada, NorthEast Vietnam, just about anywhere. And perhaps consider deleting it altogether - is it really neccessary when you have Victoria Project? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Agree on the vagueness of the name. And indeed, this would function better as a task force of WikiProject Victoria, if anything (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NorthEast#Merge with Wikipedia:WikiProject Victoria). –xenotalk 13:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Strongly support move to make this a task force. It is not even clear that the task force would work. The project page and its talk page were started on August 16th and have not been edited since then apart from a comment I have just put on the talk page. --Bduke (Discussion) 08:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed with Bduke - the project appears unsustainable. Orderinchaos 06:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this project has led to any co-ordinated article improvement, and its two participants have been inactive since its creation in August 2010. It should be made a task force and renamed or possibly deleted if it continues to have no active participants. Melburnian (talk) 06:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
The second participant's last edit was signing up as a participant. The guy who set it up has not edited since a few day after he set it up last September. On reflection I do not think we need a task force as it would start with no members. I think we just delete it. Could someone put it up to MfD? I will have to take a wikibreak from tomorrow. --Bduke (Discussion) 07:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
MFD'd. Orderinchaos 09:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

EPA Victoria[edit]

(moved from top of page) Hi all, I've been engaged by EPA itself to help develop the Wikipedia article for EPA Victoria. You can find more explanation about this (COI issues, etc.) on my user page.

It'd be great to have some help with this, even if all you do is tell me what I'm doing wrong :)

I do a lot of work with government agencies, helping them use Web 2.0. Hopefully EPA is just the first of many Victorian agencies that will responsibly maintain its own article... Thanks

--Mattcooperrider (talk) 03:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

It is not "their" article. It is a Wikipedia article about a giovernment agency. Any editor can edit it. Just so long as you and they understand that. They have no approval rights over the page content. First off you need to find reliable sources that assert the notability of the organization. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Victoria articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release[edit]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Victoria articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject cleanup listing[edit]

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Article alerts[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Victoria/Article alerts has been created; generating Article alerts for this WikiProject. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedians to the Games[edit]

If there are any sport fans lurking around, Wikimedians to the Games is a collaboration drive to improve Australian Paralympic articles, with the most active contributors having an opportunity to go attend the Paralympic Games and to cover the Games behind the scenes with a press pass. The top two contributors will get their airfare and accommodation paid for. :) The drive official starts on 10 January 2012. --LauraHale (talk) 10:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Victorian events[edit]

If you're participating or considering in participating in Wikimedians to the Games, you may be interested in attending the events below. They may provide an opportunity to get information to write a Wikinews article or to take pictures for points on Commons. If you're not participating, it would still be great to see people attending these events to take pictures for use on Wikipedia and Wikinews. If you do decide to attend, consider hosting a Wikimedia meetup at the end or the evening of the event, or even just letting HOPAU organisers know you are planning to attend. If you leave a message on my talk page, I can help you promote the meetup. :) If you need help with organising attendance because of transport cost issues or accessibility in terms of wanting press access, again please get in touch. :) --LauraHale (talk) 06:54, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Athletics
  • Saturday 19 May 2012 12:30pm - 02:00pm,Great Ocean Road International Marathon [2]
Blind cricket
  • 25/2 Glenferrie V St Paul’s[3]
  • 3/3 Burwood V Institute[4]
  • 10th and 11th March 2012 Grand Final [5]


Boccia
  • Saturday 10 March 2012 - Sunday 11 March 2012 08:00am - 05:00pm Victorian State Boccia Titles [6]
Golf
  • 19th to 23rd March 2012 2012 Australian Amputee Golf Open Huntingdale Golf Club Moorabbin VIC [7]
Lawn bowls
  • Monday 20 February 2012 - Saturday 25 February 2012 08:00am - 05:00pm Australian Open -Lawn Bowls Darebin International Sports Complex, Darebin, VIC, AUS [8]
Surfing
  • Sunday 25 March 2012 08:00am - 05:00pm "Lets Go Surfing" Day [9]
Wheelchair basketball

8 Saturday 19 May 2012 - Sunday 20 May 2012 08:00am - 05:00pm Gippsland Wheelchair Basketball Tournament [10]

  • Fri 24/Feb RSL Queensland Spinning Bullets vs Adelaide Thunder Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Fri 24/Feb Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs Wollongong Roller Hawks Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Fri 24/Feb The Be Active Perth Wheelcats vs Sydney Uni WheelKings Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sat 21/Apr Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs Adelaide Thunder Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sat 24/Mar Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs RSL Queensland Spinning Bullets Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sat 25/Feb Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs The Be Active Perth Wheelcats Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sat 25/Feb Wollongong Roller Hawks vs Adelaide Thunder Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sat 25/Feb Sydney Uni WheelKings vs RSL Queensland Spinning Bullets Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 22/Apr Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs Adelaide Thunder Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 25/Mar Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs RSL Queensland Spinning Bullets Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 26/Feb Wollongong Roller Hawks vs The Be Active Perth Wheelcats Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 26/Feb RSL Queensland Spinning Bullets vs Victoria Dandenong Rangers Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 26/Feb Adelaide Thunder vs Sydney Uni WheelKings Dandenong Basketball Stadium
  • Sun 3/Jun Victoria Dandenong Rangers vs Sydney Uni WheelKings Dandenong Basketball Stadium (Map)


Wheelcair Rugby
  • Friday 02 March 2012 To Sunday 04 March 2012 Location : Melbourne National Wheelchair Rugby Series [11]

Requested moves of 30+ Melbourne street names[edit]

Editors here may be interested in this multiple RM that I have initiated. My preamble:

These articles are all concerned with street names in Melbourne. (I would have include another 17, but the template has a limit of 30.) I do not support these moves; but I know that some very active editors do. It is time to air the matter, once and for all. Is it better to have an article on Collins Street in Melbourne called simply Collins Street, or to have it called Collins Street, Melbourne as at present? Which option serves the needs of Wikipedia's worldwide readership better? In almost all cases that I list there is no content in the destination article, just a redirect. And in almost all cases there is no Wikipedia article that very closely resembles the Melbourne-oriented one. There are, for example, no other Collins Streets with their own articles.

Your vote ("Support" or "Oppose") would be welcome, along with your reasons.

NoeticaTea? 12:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Victorian Honour Roll of Women[edit]

I could use some help identifying women from the Victorian Honour Roll of Women. Specifically, there are several inductees from 2001 for which we only have a name. All of them are from Victoria or somehow associated, but I have been unable to determine who they were or why they might have been inducted onto the honour roll. The List of inductees provides no additional help except perhaps the occasional title or order. Gobōnobo + c 22:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I'd suggest asking this at WP:AWNB. It has many more watchers who may be able to help. Jenks24 (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Australian Roads[edit]

Hi folks - anyone with any interest - there is a new Australian project Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads - please have a look. sats 02:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014[edit]

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in Oceania may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)