Is there are reason you didn't include the NPR interview with Sue Gardner last Sunday on sock puppets? It was posted on one of your Talk Pages last weekend along with a direct link to the interview. LizRead!Talk! 20:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Liz – that was an oversight on my part, and purely my fault. I saw that when I read last week's edition (to which I did not contribute much and thus not read very carefully), and when I went to write this week's it completely slipped my mind. I apologize. GoPhightins! 02:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the explanation, GoPhightins!. I just wanted to know for future sharing of news, whether or not to post it to the Signpost talk pages. LizRead!Talk! 12:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sue Gardner explains sockpuppets In a brief interview with NPRs Rachel Martin, Gardner explained what sockpuppets and why they are "part of the bargain" of producing a good quality crowd sourced encyclopedia. NE Ent 10:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone at The Signpost is interested, I can walk over to Paul's Senate office Monday (since I assume it's closed tomorrow), and see if they're more likely to give a statement in person. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 01:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm interested, and I am hereby appointing you - you work for the Signpost. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um... "in lesser-developed countries, namely Africa, ..." Seriously? Africa is not a country. – Quadell(talk) 14:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
