Women of the Wall
||The neutrality of this article is disputed. (June 2013)|
|Purpose||Women's rights advocacy|
Women of the Wall (Hebrew: נשות הכותל, Neshot HaKotel) is a multi-denominational feminist organization based in Israel whose goal is to secure the rights of women to pray at the Western Wall in a fashion that consists of singing, reading aloud from the Torah and wearing religious garments (tallit, tefillin and kippah), which some Orthodox adherents believe should be reserved for Jewish men. The group holds monthly prayer services for women on Rosh Hodesh. These actions have upset some members of the Orthodox Jewish community, sparking protests and arrests. In May 2013 a judge ruled that a 2003 Israeli Supreme Court ruling prohibiting women from carrying a Torah or wearing prayer shawls had been misinterpreted and that Women of the Wall prayer gatherings at the wall should not be deemed illegal.
According to Ronit Kampf, the groups struggle has been "the most covered women's issue in the history of the Israeli media."
From the start, Women of the Wall included Orthodox members and opted to run their service according to "Orthodox standards." Nevertheless, some Orthodox were offended, including some who call themelves Orthodox feminists. Although Women of the Wall is a multi-denominational group, including not only Reform, but Conservative and Orthodox members, some ultra-Orthodox view it as a Reform organisation.
Since 1988, the group has faced a legal battle for recognition of their right to pray at the Western Wall. Their presence is deemed offensive by Orthodox worshippers at the site and there have been numerous court proceedings to settle the issue. On the Fast of Esther 1989, ultra-Orthodox men, outraged by the women's singing, hurled chairs and verbal insults at the women, which resulted in the deployment of tear gas to quell the violence. In 2010, police arrested two Haredi men at the Western Wall plaza on suspicion that they threw chairs at a Women of the Wall group that was praying aloud at the site. In 2009, the first woman was arrested for praying with a tallit. The struggle by the Women of the Wall is seen by the Israeli Orthodox religious establishment as an attempt to undermine their influence in an effort to introduce religious pluralism. Opposition from the Orthodox also stems from Halachic concerns and from a general disdain for non-traditional ritual in an area they claim serves as an Orthodox synagogue. Orthodoxy does not permit women to constitute a minyan (prayer quorum) and while the women have not considered themselves as doing so, this has not calmed ultra-Orthodox sensibilities. Initially, the group did not receive support from Israel's primarily Orthodox religious authorities. Supporters highlighted the fact that only in Israel are Jewish women prohibited from praying according to their custom in a public location and a 2003 High Court ruling which prevented them from conducting prayer services at the wall was overturned in 2013.
Recently, some Orthodox feminist organisations have voiced support for their right to pray at the Kotel. Women of the Wall are the only Jewish group in which traditional and liberal women join together for prayer. The organisation was created by Jewish women, including some from the diaspora. and a significant number of participants are American immigrants or part of the English-speaking community. This in is part due to the differing social conditions of Orthodox women in the United States and Israel respectively. Shmuel Rosner describes the phenomena as an "American-imported battle" for religious pluralism, religious moderation and tolerance. He notes that civil right and feminism are American imports, late in coming to Israel.
Women of the Wall was founded in December 1988 during the first International Jewish Feminist Conference in Jerusalem. A group of approximately one hundred attendees praying in the women's section of the wall were verbally and physically assaulted by ultra-Orthodox Jews at the site. When the conference ended, a group of Jerusalem women continued to meet at the Kotel and formed Women of the Wall to assert their right to pray there without hindrance. Women of the Wall has fought a legal battle asserting a right to conduct organized prayer at the Kotel and challenging government and private intervention in its efforts. After demanding police protection, the government was given nine months to make arrangements that would allow them to pray unhindered. At the end of this period, the Ministry of Religion ruled that only prayer according to the "custom of the place" was to be permitted and that "the sensitivities of other worshippers" must not be offended. The Women of the Wall then petitioned the Supreme Court to recognise their right to pray at the Wall. A temporary ruling was given which stated that the status quo should be enforced until they reached a final verdict.
A 2001 law made it illegal for women to perform these religious practices.
The struggle has led to two Israeli Supreme Court decisions and a series of debates in the Knesset. In its first decision, on May 22, 2002, the Supreme Court ruled that it is legal for Women of the Wall to hold prayer groups and read Torah in the women's section of the main Kotel plaza undisturbed. Four days later, Haredi political parties including Shas introduced several bills to overturn the decision, including a bill that would have made it a criminal offense for women to pray in non-traditional ways at the Western Wall, punishable by up to seven years in prison. In response MK Naomi Chazan said "What have we become? Afghanistan? Iran?" Although the bill did not pass, the Israeli Supreme Court reconsidered its earlier decision. On April 6, 2003, the Court reversed itself and upheld, 5-4, the Israeli government's ban prohibiting the organization from reading Torah or wearing tallit or tefillin at the main public area at the Wall, on the grounds that such continued meetings represented a threat to public safety and order. The Court required the government to provide an alternate site, Robinson's Arch. Plans to construct a small prayer site at Robinson's Arch were unveiled in October 2003. WOW leader Anat Hoffman reacted harshly to the plan. "Now we're going to be praying at an archeological site, at an alternative site for the Jews of a lesser degree." The site was inaugurated in 2004.
Until recently, it was illegal for them to do so under Israeli law.
In December 2012, following pressure from non-Orthodox US Jews, Natan Sharansky, the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, was asked by the Prime Minister to find a solution to the dispute. In response to the detentions at the wall in February 2013, Sharansky said “When I listen to the very partial presentation, I am fully with them — when I listen to the other side, I have to accept that they also have logic. We do have to find a solution in which nobody will feel discriminated against." By April 2013, Sharansky had received tens of thousands of letters and emails from American Jews on the matter, but not even 100 from Israelis.
In March 2013, three women MKs used their parliamentary immunity to don prayer shawls and join the Women of the Wall in a show of support after 10 women had been arrested the previous month. MK Stav Shaffir (Labour) said "I usually do not wear a tallit, but it is my honor and duty to stand here and protect the rights of all Jews from around the world to pray as they desire and believe." Tamar Zandberg (Meretz) said: "I demand to enter. The extremist stream's interpretation of the Holy Places Law is unacceptable to me, and I refuse to leave the prayer shawl outside. I am a secular woman but I identify with these women's struggle for freedom of expression and religion." Subsequently, a number of MKs condemned their actions. MK Aliza Lavie (Yesh Atid), who herself supports the right of the women to assemble, said she was "shocked" that fellow MKs decided to blatantly disobey the law and ignore Supreme Court rulings. MK Miri Regev (Likud) called the MKs attendance a "provocation" and referred to the groups "anarchistic actions" which had "turned into a national sport among the extreme Left in Israel." MK Uri Ariel (Bayit Yehudi) called the women radicals and suggested that their "gross violations” at the site may lead to civil war.
In May 2013, after bowing to pressure from non-Orthodox diaspora Jews, the government issued a directive for the legal dispute to be solved. A subsequent Supreme Court ruling gave permission for the Women of the Wall to hold services at the site after deciding that their prayer and ritual were not against the "local custom" and since the women did not use physical or verbal violence, they could not be held responsible for any resulting disturbances. The Rabbi of the Western Wall, however, continues to view their presence as a provocation.
They have the support of large American non-Orthodox denominations, which view the issue of women's rights to pray at the at the Wall as a high-profile opportunity to promote gender-egalitarian Jewish prayer, which most Israelis have never experienced. They also want to remove the control of the holy site from the hands of the Western Wall rabbi.
The arrests have been criticized by groups promoting religious pluralism in Israel. The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), condemned the arrest of Anat Hoffman and called it a "desecration of God's name."
A poll by the Israel Democracy Institute in May 2013 found that about half of the Israel public supports the Women of the Wall, and that men (51.5%) are more inclined to support the women’s prayer group than women (46%) The poll was conducted by Professor Tamar Hermann, who noted that Women of the Wall received highest levels of support from educated, secular, Ashkenazi Israelis.
Events since the ruling of April 24, 2013
|Events since May 2013|
|May 10||Sivan||In response to the ruling allowing the Women of the Wall to hold their services at the site, between 5,000-10,000 Haredi girls converged to prevent the women from approaching. Police in turn offered protection to around 400 women who formed the largest gathering in the group’s history. The women prayed together with a group of male supporters, the first time a mixed service had been held by the organisation. They had planned to bring a Torah scroll into the women’s prayer section, but reneged upon the request of Minister of Religious Affairs Naftali Bennett. Three Haredi men were arrested for disturbing the peace. Chair of Women of the Wall, Anat Hoffman, said "We are continuing in the footsteps of the paratroopers who liberated the Western Wall."
Women for the Wall is founded to campaign against the Women of the Wall.
|May 19||Threatening graffiti was sprayed on the front door of an executive board member of the Women of the Wall organisation. It read: "Peggy, you're the first. We know where you live. Jerusalem is holy. The Western Wall will not be forfeited. The Women of the Wall are villains." MK Michal Rozin (Meretz) blamed the attack on provocative statements by ultra-Orthodox MKs, and Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat and his ultra-Orthodox deputy, Yitzhak Pindrus, denounced the act. Rabbi Shmuel Rabinovitch of the Western Wall called it "a despicable incident," which "did not represent Judaism."|||
|June 6||It was reported that Chief Rabbis Yona Metzger and Shlomo Amar had received death threats. The letters stated that if the Women of the Wall are not allowed to pray according to their ways and custom, "we will fight you with all measures, and you will return home with 100 bodies of haredim... We will no longer practice restraint. We will re-liberate the Western Wall." Rabbi Shmuel Rabinovitch had also received a similar letter. Women of the Wall said that the organization "had nothing to do with the act and that the style of these letters does not match the love of Israel spirit led by the group."|||
|July 8||Av||United Torah Judaism arranged for between 5,000-7,000 Haredi girls to assemble at the wall and for the first time in 25 years, police prevented the Women of the Wall from approaching the site. Male protesters numbered around 1,000. The women, numbering around 300, held their service at the entrance to the Western Wall plaza and were occasionally disturbed by shouting and targeted at least twice by water bombs and eggs. An Orthodox man and women were arrested for public order offenses. Gilad Kariv of the Reform Movement in Israel said the police had "given a reward to a small group of Haredi provocateurs and rabbis who deal in spreading baseless hatred." Orthodox Jerusalem deputy mayor Yitzhak Pindrus said "baseless hatred caused the greatest destruction to befall our people and we will not let a small group of agitators to continue to polarise with provocations and baseless hatred."|||
|August 27||A temporary platform for non-Orthodox egalitarian prayer is unveiled at Robinson's Arch, the archaeological site adjacent to the Western Wall plaza. Referring to it as a "sunbathing deck", Anat Hoffman criticises it as "second-rate Wall for second-rate Jews."|||
In their struggle for civil rights and religious freedom, members of the group have been willing to engage in civil disobedience and become "prisoners of conscience.".
Several members of the group have been arrested for acts that Women of the Wall members say are legal under the Supreme Court ruling. Nofrat Frenkel was arrested for wearing a tallit under her coat and holding a Torah in November 2009. She was not charged, but she was barred from visiting the Wall for two weeks.
The group's leader, Anat Hoffman, was interrogated by the police in January 2010, fingerprinted, and told that she could be charged with a felony over her involvement with Women of the Wall. The questioning concerned WOW's December service, during which Hoffman said she did not do anything out of the ordinary.
On July 12, 2010, Hoffman was arrested for holding a Torah scroll. She was fined 5,000 NIS and given a restraining order according to which she was not allowed to approach the Kotel for thirty days.
On October 16, 2012, Hoffman was arrested again. She was accused of singing out loud and disturbing the peace, and was released from police custody the following day. The following morning Lesley Sachs and board member Rachel Cohen Yeshurun were detained for "disturbing public order." Hoffman described the ordeal: “In the past when I was detained I had to have a policewoman come with me to the bathroom, but this was something different. This time they checked me naked, completely, without my underwear. They dragged me on the floor 15 meters; my arms are bruised. They put me in a cell without a bed, with three other prisoners, including a prostitute and a car thief. They threw the food through a little window in the door. I laid on the floor covered with my tallit. I’m a tough cookie, but I was just so miserable. And for what? I was with the Hadassah women saying Sh’ma Yisrael.”
On February 11, 2013, ten women who were part of WOW, including two American rabbis, were detained for praying at the wall and “as a result of them wearing the garments that they’re not allowed to wear specifically at that site.” The women were barred from returning for 15 days.
In March 2013 five women were detained; they were subsequently released without restrictions when the judge ruled that they had not been responsible for creating a disturbance, ruling instead that it was the Orthodox protesters who were creating a disturbance.
In April 2013, a group UK Progressive rabbis protested to the Israeli ambassador calling threats to arrest women saying Kaddish as "shocking."
Women of the Wall's position
The Women of the Wall have consistently claimed there is no single "custom of the place" and that their right to pray is a religious freedom enshrined in Israeli law. They repeatedly stress that the group are not Reform Jews, but come from all affiliations and that their conduct strictly adheres to Orthodox Jewish Law and that their prayer is genuine and not a political stunt. Their central mission is to "achieve the social and legal recognition of our right, as women, to wear prayer shawls, pray and read from the Torah collectively and out loud at the Western Wall."
Religious establishment's position
The Israeli religious establishment are opposed to the services conducted by the Women of the Wall. They claim that even if such a manner of prayer is theoretically permitted by Jewish Law, it is against Jewish custom. Even if support can be found in Jewish legal sources for various activities, the force of custom is equal to absolute law and it is the custom which determines proper conduct. Various legal opinions recorded in Halacha cannot be manipulated to introduce new forms of prayer. The opinion of Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, which is citied by Women of the Wall in support of their cause, is rejected by the establishment, as they view the Women of the Wall as being motivated by feminism rather than a sincere spiritual desire. Their struggle is also seen as an attempt to undermine their influence and as a strategy for non-Orthodox groups to gradually gain official recognition at state level, paving the way for the introduction of religious pluralism in Israel. In a letter to the group, Yehuda Getz, the government appointed rabbi of the Western Wall, urged them to stop "straying from the hallowed traditions of generations of Jews before you" and in 1989, the Israeli Chief Rabbi Avraham Shapiro and the Religious Affairs Minister suggested that the women "pray individually, silently, and preferably at home-not at the wall."
From the outset, the Women of the Wall have been subjected to heckling and abuse from male and female Orthodox worshipers. This is turn led to messages of support and disapproval for the women.
In 1996, UTJ MK Israel Eichler wrote: "No one prevents anyone else from praying at the wall in his own fashion, but the wall is the last place to carry out a battle for the right of a woman to wear a tallit, read from the Torah, wear a kippa and grow a beard." MK Yaakov Litzman stated that "there is no desecration greater than that of women who come to desecrate the holiness of the Western Wall with all kinds of provocations such as carrying a Torah scroll and other things reserved by Jewish law only to men" In 2009, Ovadia Yosef said: "There are stupid women who come to the Western Wall, put on a tallit (prayer shawl), and pray... These are deviants who serve equality, not Heaven. They must be condemned and warned of." Rabbi Yosef Reinman suggested that it is "not religious need," but rather "religious politics" which motivates the woman. Prominent Orthodox women have also disapproved of the group. Nehama Leibowitz likened their worship to a form of "sport," and the widow of Sephardi Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu said the group had "gone completely mad" and their actions amount to "desecration." Ultra-Orthodox former Jerusalem city councilwoman Mina Fenton said the women are "a fringe group that attracts people who read the prayer book upside down." The Religious Zionist leadership also voiced its concern in May 2013 when a group of influential rabbis issued a letter calling on public figures "not to let a small group offend the thousands of worshippers arriving to pray at this sacred place on a regular basis." They went on to state that "there are those who have been trying in recent years to change the present situation, offending many and tainting the special atmosphere of holiness of this sacred place."
The Israeli state and Ministry of Religion referred to Women of the Wall as "witches," who were doing "Satan's work"; "more like prostitutes than women"; "misled, tainted, by modern secular feminism." Yet indifference and condemnation for the women's plight came from all sectors of Israeli society, not just from the religious right. Even liberals saw their actions as a "provocation," and women's organisations in Israel viewed their behaviour as "weird and objectionable." Hillel Halkin called them "childish provocateurs" and Ithamar Handelman-Smith wondered what the Women of the Wall wanted to achieve. Israeli society in general and the secular media were also unsympathetic to their cause, possibly reflecting a general hostility to feminism. Susan Sered suggests the public saw the group as "symbolically desecrating Judaism's holiest site" and claims that many in Israel saw the group as "American Reform interlopers trying to appropriate a state symbol of national identity." Their demands were seen as radical and foreign to Israeli society and their actions "alienated Israelis of almost all political persuasions." Consequently the women have received minimal grass-roots support. Lahav explains that secular indifference results from an acceptance of the view espoused by the Orthodox establishment when it comes to religious issues and that those on the Left of the political spectrum ignore the women in an attempt to gain Orthodox support for their dovish positions on the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Popular support for the women has come mainly from Reform and Liberal communities in North America. In 1990, the Central Conference of American Rabbis encouraged its members to support Women of the Wall. In 2000, the Union for Reform Judaism declared it "warmly commends the Women of the Wall for its courageous and principled struggle to be allowed to pray at the Western Wall" and urged Reform congregations to "express solidarity with the Women of the Wall in appropriate ways." Recently, a number of non-Orthodox gatherings and services have been held publicly in America in solidarity with the Women of the Wall.
Some Jewish feminists have seen the Women of the Wall's activities as being inconsistent with feminism's liberal views. While feminism is normally noted for embracing symbols of peace, Leah Shakdiel describes the Wall as "all maleness and war," and therefore questions whether the Women of the Wall "have fallen inadvertently into the trap of maintaining Jewish national sovereignty in the Wall Plaza, Judaizing the space." Shakdiel maintains that Israeli society's general opposition to the Women of the Wall is a result of a religious and secular alliance against what they perceive as a feminist challenge. Ran Hirschl believes the conflict is "a contest for cultural hegemony between a secularist-libertarian elite and traditionally peripheral group," namely the ultra-Orthodox community. Frances Raday posits that the violent opposition by Orthodox Jews stems from the "desire of the Orthodox establishment to preserve religious patriarchal hegemony against the challenge of religious feminism," rather than an attempt to preserve Jewish Law itself.
Phyllis Chesler of Women of the Wall wrote: "We asked for our rights under civil and religious law. When we prayed, other worshipers, both men and women, verbally and physically assaulted us. We asked the Israeli state to protect us so that we could exercise our rights. The state claimed it could not contain the violence against us, and that we ourselves had provoked the violence by "disturbing/offending" the "sensibilities of Jews at worship." Women are not seen as "Jews" or as "worshipers" with "sensibilities."
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 644: "The Women of the Wall believed themselves to be liberal feminists."
- Rudoren, Jodi (December 25, 2012). "Israel to Review Curbs on Women's Prayer at Western Wall". The New York Times. Retrieved December 25, 2012.
- Haberman 2012, p. 125
- Chesler & Haut 2003, p. 184: "A third reason for choosing Orthodox services was out awareness that if we did not adopt Orthodox standards, Orthodox women would not attend our services or, in all likelihood, support our struggle. Non-Orthodox women who have been involved in the Kotel struggle have been most generous in allowing Orthodox practice to prevail, and our services at the Kotel as well as the solidarity services we sponsored elsewhere therefore have been conducted in accordance with Orthodox standards. Despite this many Orthodox women, even those who were active in women's tefillah groups and leaders of Orthodox feminism, remained reticent and ambivalent about our struggle to pray at the Kotel, and Orthodox rabbis, even those who permitted women's tefillah their synagogues, did not support our right to pray in an identical fashion at the Kotel.
- Feldman 2011, p. 115: "The movement, which is controversial, even among Orthodox feminists, myself included..."
- Robinson & Klotz 1989: "The Israeli Hebrew language newspapers have yet to call us anything but, Reformiot, signifying their refusal to acknowledge that there may be alternatives to the Orthodoxy they reject."
- Pogrebin 1990: "They have been labeled provocateurs by the mayor of Jerusalem and written off as agents of the Reform movement by the Hebrew press."
- Marx Ferree, Lorber & Hess 1999, p. 211: "The Women of the Wall, portrayed by the Israeli media as foreign, American Reform Jews, lack the social resources to force the employment of their own notions of their group as women rather than Woman."
- Starr Sered 2000, pp. 138–9: "Secular newspaper reporters and editors and other Israeli public figures have also had their say, which has not been consistently sympathetic to the Women of the Wall, who are seen as American "Reform" interlopers trying to appropriate a state symbol of national (not only religious) identity."
- Naveh 2003, p. 135: "WoW has had the image of American Reform Jews, because in Israel not only the Ultra-Orthodox but also many secular Jews look upon Reform Judaism as a brand of secularism."
- Yonah & Goodman 2004, pp. 281: "למרות האידיאולוגיה המשותפת שלהן וההכלה של כל הזרמים בתוך הקבוצה, הן הוצגו בעקיבות כ״אמריקניות רפורמיות״."
- Woods 2008, p. 89: "The WOW typically are considered outside of the religious fold because most Israelis believe they are Reform women, not Orthodox of any kind. The Reform and Conservative movements in Israel, however, are considered completely outside of Judaism to the point of being heretics."
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 644: "In many of their interviews, the Women of the Wall opted for a line of rhetoric — "we come from all streams of Judaism" — that was meaningless to Israeli society because in Israel religious pluralism is not seen as a cultural value. In fact, they continue to be seen as "Reform," an American invention."
- Maltz, Judy (April 19, 2013). "The new Orthodox face of Women of the Wall". Haaretz. Retrieved 27 June 2013.: "Although Women of the Wall is widely associated with the Reform movement, it is very much based on an Orthodox model, says Elana Sztokman, the executive director of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, an international organization based in New York."
- Rubel 2010, p. 53
- 2010 Human Rights Report: Israel and the occupied territories. U.S. Department of state. This article incorporates public domain material from this source.
- Price 2012
- Sharma & Young 1999, p. 207: "Known as "the Women of the Wall," these women, out of deference to the group's Orthodox members, have used traditional liturgical texts and have not considered themselves to be a minyan. Halakhically, at least as understood by Orthodoxy, women cannot constitute or count as members of a prayer quorum. Nonetheless, they have become the target of great opposition and occasional violence from ultra Orthodox Jews. [...] Women of the Wall continue to face opposition from ultra Orthodox Jews who are against women's prayer groups in general.
- Baines & Rubio-Marin 2005, p. 214: "The Women of the Wall organization represents a group of observant Jewish women who pray together in a minyan - a religious quorum traditionally reserved for men. This form of collective worship is not acceptable to ultra-Orthodox Jews when practiced by women."
- Chambré 2002, p. 12: "But, at the kotel, where tradition trumps individual choice, the guidelines have not changed because they are not only a matter of acknowledging the desires of this group, which itself would radically alter Jewish tradition, but because the group lacks the support of any major religious authority. At the same time, acceding to their requests might also mean giving parity to non-Orthodox denominations."
- Feldman 2011, p. 115: "Supporters of the Women of the Wall note the irony that "only in Israel, and at the site most holy to Jews...are Jewish women prohibited from praying aloud in a group with a Torah."
- Senate (US) Committee on Foreign Relations 2005, p. 552: "In 2003, the Women of the Wall, a group of more than 100 Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform women, lost their 14-year legal battle to hold formal women's prayer services at the Western Wall. The High Court ruled that the group could not hold prayer services at the Western Wall and instead would be permitted to hold them at nearby Robinson's Arch."
- Umansky & Ashton 2009, p. 28: "The Women of the Wall is unique in bringing traditional and liberal Jewish women together in prayer."
- Skinner Keller, Radford Ruether & Cantlon 2006, p. 584: "Initiated in 1988 by North American women, the Women of the Wall have been trying to pray at the Western Wall in Jerusalem with Torah reading as the women's tefillah (prayer) groups do in America."
- Starr Sered 2001, p. 202: "The story of the Women of the Wall began on December 2, 1988, when a group of approximately 100 women participants in the First International Jewish Feminist Conference in Jerusalem held a prayer service at the Western Wall. American-born women for the most part, they were accustomed to the more egalitarian religious practises that characterize American Judaism."
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 636: "The Israeli women, most of whom were American-born, pledged to return to the Wall on the first day of each month in order to carry out a prayer service."
- Ben-David 2003, p. 26: "It is not surprising that a disproportionate number of the Women of the Wall are, like Ner-David, American immigrants, or part of the larger native English-speaking Israeli community."
- Rubel 2010, p. 53: "While noted in Israel, these incidents receive far more attention in the United States. The main reason for the publicity is that the worshipers drawing ire are disproportionately American."
- Swirski 1991, p. 298: "Women of the Wall, organized to literally and metaphorically break down the barriers to women's prayer at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. Most of the initiators and participants in these activities have been immigrants from English-speaking countries."
- Satlow 2006, p. 67: "By and larger, Israeli Orthodox women focus their religious life domestically. The growing difference between the roles of women in Western and Israeli Orthodoxy is in part due to social conditions. Whereas in the United States, for example, the push toward increasing female participation in religious services is primarily driven by highly educated, professional women who experience a gap between their high-status place in the secular world and their confinement behind the mechitza in the synagogue, the achievement of higher education and high-status jobs by Orthodox women in Israel is far rarer."
- (Renee Ghert-Zand). Where ‘rock star’ Anat Hoffman turns raging feminist, Times of Israel,(April 20, 2013). ""The whole battle for the Western Wall is an Americanized and American-imported battle for religious moderation and tolerance," explains Shmuel Rosner, senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute and L.A. Jewish Journal columnist. "Women wearing a tallit is not something Israelis are used to. They don't necessarily have negative feelings about it, but it’s just strange and feels like it doesn’t belong here."" and "Many Israelis dismiss Women of the Wall as foreign interlopers, "but there is something to be said about Women of the Wall appearing non-native," Sztokman offers. "Civil rights and feminism are American imports — and late in coming. But now these things are being adapted to the local context."
- Skinner Keller, Radford Ruether & Cantlon 2006, p. 584
- Szymkowicz, Sarah. "Women Of The Wall". Jewish Virtual Library.
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 636
- 'Women of the Wall' are detained praying at Kotel, Jerusalem Post, (August 19, 2012).
- Israeli Women Defy Custom, Say a Prayer for Equality, June 5, 2000.
- "The Israeli Supreme Court Denies Women The Right to Pray at the Western Wall", Findlaw. April 23, 2003
- Backers of women’s prayer at wall weighing options after court ruling, Jewish Telegraph Agency, April 6, 2003
- Krieger, Hilary Leila; Izenberg, Dan (31 October 2003). "Women of the Wall Wail Over New Prayer Site". The Jerusalem Post.
- Sharon, Jeremy (22 May 2012). "Police Detain Women at Kotel Over Prayer Shawls". The Jerusalem Post.
- Challenging Traditions at the Heart of Judaism, New York Times, December 21, 2009. "After a lengthy legal battle, the court ultimately ruled against the women in the interest of public order. Consequently, it is illegal for them to read aloud from the Torah or to wear prayer shawls openly by the wall."
- Women of the Wall urge Jerusalem police to refrain from arrests at upcoming service, Haaretz, (April 10, 2013) "Under pressure from the non-Orthodox Jewish world, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed Sharansky several months ago to draft .."
- Western Wall plan unveiled to resolve 24-year-old prayer rights dispute, (10 April 2013)
- Rudoren, Jodi (11 February 2013). "Women Praying at Western Wall in Jerusalem Are Detained". New York Times. Retrieved 11 February 2013.
- Berger, Miriam. (April 25, 2013) Reform rabbis meet with Natan Sharansky, Movement for Reform Judaism.
- Jeremy Sharon. MKs slam colleagues who joined Women of the Wall. Jerusalem Post. (March 12, 2013)
- Gabe Fisher. Female MKs join Women of the Wall prayer service Times of Israel. (March 12, 2013)
- Jonathan Lis. Female Israeli MKs join Women of the Wall; no arrests for first time in months. Haaretz, (March 12, 2013)
- Women win the right to pray like men at Jerusalem's Western Wall, Robert Tait, Daily Telegraph, (April 25, 2013) "Women's rights campaigners won a potential landmark legal victory after a judge ruled that they should be allowed to pray at the Western Wall, Judaism's most sacred site, in a manner previously deemed only fit for men."
- Response of the Rabbi of the Western Wall to the Women of the Wall’s Provocative Act
- Women and Orthodox Waver Over Plan for Egalitarian Prayer at Western Wall, Nathan Jeffay, Forward, (May 10, 2013)
- Women of the Wall: The Controversy Continues, Israel Movement for Reform & Progressive Judaism, (March 18, 2013) "In January, 2013, WOW, the IMPJ and IRAC joined other organizations in filing a petition with the High Court of Justice against the prime minister and the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, demanding that non-orthodox Jews and women receive equal representation for managing the Wall, and requested the court “remove the control of the holy site from the hands of the Western Wall rabbi."
- At Western Wall, a clash over women praying. USA Today, (May 10, 2013)
- "Haredim Heckle and Harass Women of the Wall during Prayer". The Jerusalem Post. 10 May 2013.
- Maltz, Judith & Ettinger, Yair. Protesters hurl rocks in clashes over Women of the Wall prayer service at Kotel, Haartez (May 10, 2013).
- Nachshoni Kobi. 'Torah tag' sprayed on Women of Wall member's house, Ynet, (May 20, 2013).
- Vandals target home of Women of the Wall activist, Times of Israel, (May 20, 2013).
- Nachshoni Kobi. Chief rabbis threatened over Kotel war, Ynet, (June 4, 2013).
- Sharon, Jeremy. Thousands of haredi girls prevent Women of Wall from praying by Western Wall, Jerusalem Post, (July 8, 2013).
- Fiske, Gavriel. Women of the Wall denied access to Kotel, Times of Israel, (July 8, 2013).
- Bennett unveils new platform for egalitarian prayer, Times of Israel, (August 27, 2013).
- Western Wall egalitarian plaza greeted with skepticism, Times of Israel, (August 25, 2013).
- Chesler & Haut 2003, pp. 56–57: "But we might also have to go outside both the legal and political system. Would women be willing to do civil disobedience, get arrested? A[nat]: Absolutely! We are hoping that Shas actually passes the bill that would put us in jail for seven years. P[hyllis]: You would sit in jail for seven years? A: We have quite a few women who are willing to become prisoners of conscience. P: Prisoners of conscience . . . A: If the police weren't ready to arrest us for six months, do you think they'd arrest us for seven years? If they did, it would be very good for us, both legally and in terms of media support. Imagine what Amnesty International will do with this!"
- Police Arrest Woman Praying at the Western Wall
- The ‘Crime’ of Praying with a Tallit, and a Plea for Tolerance: First Person
- Women of the Wall Leader Interrogated by Police
- Women of the Wall website
- Sharon, Jeremy. "Police arrest Women of the Wall leader for singing." Jerusalem Post. 17 October 2012. 25 October 2012.
- Isabel Kershner, "Court Rules for Women in Western Wall Dispute", New York Times, 12 April 2013
- Rocker, Simon. (April 11, 2013). UK rabbis tell Israel: let women pray at the Wall, Jewish Chronicle.
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 637
- womenofthewall.org.il, Mission Statement, 2013.
- Starr Sered 2010, pp. 638–9
- Frimer, Arye and Dov, Women's Prayer Services Theory and Practice Tradition, 1998
- Price 2012: "The Israeli Orthodox establishment view the Women of the Wall as being a Trojan horse to introduce Jewish pluralism and establish the Reform, Conservative, and Reconstructionist strains of Judaism in Israel."
- Starr Sered 2010, p. 642
- Starr Sered 2000, pp. 138–9
- Rabbi Yosef condemns Women of the Wall
- Hirsch & Reinman 2002, p. 179
- Unterman 2009, p. 296: "Nehama rejected the argument that women's spiritual needs must be met more fully than convention currently allows. Shira Leibowitz Schmidt recalls that Nehama "unsympathetically labeled as "sport" the untraditional, demonstrative prayer by Women of the Wall..."
- Rabbanit Tzviya Eliyahu: Women of the Wall are 'Crazy', Arutz Sheva, (June 06, 2013)
- Zionist rabbis vs. Women of Wall, Kobi Nachshoni, ynet.com 9 May 2013.
- Chesler 1996
- Raday 2009, p. 231: "However, even academics, intellectuals, and journalists generally committed to a liberal point of view were overtly hostile to the WOW. In newspaper articles and public discussion, they claimed that their actions were a "provocation."
- Naveh 2003, p. 130: "The WoW group has also failed to rally support from Israeli women's organizations: their struggle was and is still considered weird and objectionable."
- Halkin, Hillel. (June 24, 2013). Women's Prayer Protests at Western Wall Are Just Childish Provocation, Forward.
- Handelman-Smith, Ithamar. Women of the Wall, what do you want?, Haaretz, (May 14, 2013).: "I really don't get this Women of the Wall thing. Is it a tasteless joke, meaningless silliness or an effort to cause aggravation and anger? What's the point of Women of the Wall's praying? What do they hope to achieve beyond provocation, media exposure, ratings and the intoxication of power..."
- Starr Sered 1999, p. 217: "The secular newspapers have been antagonistic to the Women of the Wall, thus depriving them of a major social resource."
- Starr Sered 2001, p. 203: "Still, secular newspaper reports, editors, and other public figures have also had their say. Interestingly, their stance has not been overly sympathetic to the Women of the Wall,..."
- Robinson & Klotz 1989: "The Israeli secular public cannot see why this issue is important to us."
- Halperin-Kaddari 2004, p. 170: "Significantly, there has been little sympathy or understanding in the media for the women’s cause, perhaps expressing Israeli society’s general hostility to feminist causes."
- Lahav 2000: "I fear that the general indifference at best, and hostility at worst, of the Jewish secular majority towards the Women of the Wall stems from the hostility to feminism in general. It has long been observed that feminism has not been kindly accepted in Israel."
- Starr Sered 1999, p. 211: "The Women of the Wall are themselves seen as a symbol, symbolically desecrating Judaism's holiest site."
- Swirski & Safir 1991, p. 16: "In the context of Israeli society, the demands of Women of the Wall represent unprecedented, radical demands. Jews in Israel, including the secular majority, generally accept the domination of Orthodoxy in religious matters, perhaps because they do not perceive it as meaningful to their daily lives."
- Lahav 2006, p. 133: "In Israel of the early 1990s, which experienced the surge of religion and the rise of religious political power, WOW's action was perceived as radical and unacceptable."
- Starr Sered 2001, p. 203
- Greenberg 1999, p. 157: "There has not been as much grass-roots support in Israel for the Women of the Wall."
- Lahav 2000: "A deeper reason has to do with the historical attitude of secular Zionism towards religion. From the perspective of the secular majority, Jewish religion is what the orthodox say it is. They fail to see in the women's fight a struggle to open up orthodoxy and make it more egalitarian; if they do, they do not consider it to be of any significance because they do not have an interest in religion anyway."
- Lahav 2000: "Politically, the secular majority is interested in the orthodox sector only in as much as it can support their views concerning the peace process. The Left is impatient with the Women of the Wall because they pose yet another obstacle on the road to some Orthodox support of the dovish resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Right supports the orthodox (against the women) because it wishes to strengthen its bond with the religious sector, thereby guaranteeing more support for it hawkish opposition to the formula of land for peace."
- Stevens 1990, p. 160: "Therefore be, it resolved that the CCAR encourage its members and their constituencies to support the Women of the Wall by writing to the Ministers of Religion and Justice, the Prime Minister, the Chief rabbis, public figures, and President of Israel about... b) Women having the option of joining prayer groups at the Wall."
- In Support of Women of the Wall, URJ, (June 4, 2000).
- NYC Prayer Service Supports Women of the Wall, Tablet, (May 10, 2013).
- Raday 2007, p. 266
- Raday 2007, p. 267
- Baines, Beverley; Rubio-Marin, Ruth, eds. (2005). The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudences. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052153027X.
- Chambré, Susan M. (2002). "Book Review: Women of the Wall: claiming sacred ground at Judaism's holy site". In Nussbaum, Esther. Jewish Book World, Volumes 20-21. Jewish Book Council.
- Chesler, Phyllis (1996). "Claiming Sacred Ground: Women's eight-year struggle to pray out loud at "the Wailing Wall"". On the Issues. Retrieved 25 June 2013.
- Chesler, Phyllis; Haut, Rivka, eds. (2003). Women of the Wall: claiming sacred ground at Judaism's holy site. Jewish Lights. ISBN 1580231616.
- Ben-David, Calev (2003). "The Taming of Israel: American Immigrants to Israel make their mark on Israeli Society by transporting some kinder, gentler, social policies from home". B'nai B'rith, Volumes 118-119. B'nai B'rith International.
- Feldman, Jan Lynn (2011). "Israel: Divided Jurisdiction". Citizenship, Faith, and Feminism: Jewish and Muslim Women Reclaim Their Rights. Brandeis Series on Gender, Culture, Religion, and Law. UPNE. ISBN 1611680115.
- Greenberg, Blu (1999). "Feminism, Jewish Orthodoxy and Human Rights". In Gustafson, Carrie; Juviler, Peter H. Religion and Human Rights: Competing Claims?. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 076560261X.
- Haberman, Bonna Devora (2012). Israeli Feminism Liberating Judaism: Blood and Ink. Lexington Books. ISBN 0739167855.
- Halperin-Kaddari, Ruth (2004). Women in Israel: A State of Their Own. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0812237528.
- Hirsch, Ammiel; Reinman, Yaakov Yosef (2002). One people, two worlds: an Orthodox rabbi and a Reform rabbi explore the issues that divide them. Schocken Books. ISBN 0-8052-1140-3.
- Lahav, Pnina (2000). "Up Against the Wall: Women's Legal struggle to Pray at the Western Wall in Jerusalem". Israel Studies Bulletin 16 (Fall 2000). Association for Israel Studies. pp. 19–22.
- Lahav, Pnina (2006). "A Chandelier For Women: A Tale about the Diaspora Museum and Maurycy Gottlieb's "Day of Atonement" – Jews Praying on Yom Kippur". Israel Studies 11. Indiana University Press. pp. 108–142.
- Pogrebin, Letty Cottin (1990). "Why Feminsim is Good for the Jews". In Sokoloff, Judith A. Na'amat Woman 5 (3). Na'amat USA. pp. 3–5 & 28.
- Price, Daniel E., ed. (2012). Sacred Terror. ABC-CLIO. pp. ??. ISBN 0313386390.
- Raday, Frances (2007). "Claiming Equal Religious Personhood: Women of the Wall’s Constitutional Saga". In Brugger, Winfried; Karayanni, Michael. Religion in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of German, Israeli, American and International Law. Springer. pp. 255–97. ISBN 3540733558.
- Raday, Frances (2009). "Human Rights and the Confrontation between Religious and Constitutional Authority: A Case Study of Israel's Supreme Court". In Kosmin, Barry Alexander; Keysar, Ariela. Secularism, Women and the State. ISSSC. pp. 228–232. ISBN 0692003282.
- Robinson, Geela Rayzel; Klotz, Miriam (1989). "Reclaiming the Kotel". In Borowitz, Eugene B. Sh'ma: A Journal of Jewish Responsibility. Sh'ma Inc. pp. 106–7 & 110.
- Rubel, Nora L. (2010). Doubting the Devout: The Ultra-Orthodox in the Jewish American Imagination. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231141874.
- Satlow, Michael L. (2006). Creating Judaism: History, Tradition, Practice. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231134886.
- Senate (US) Committee on Foreign Relations, ed. (2005). Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, 2004. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0160725526.
- Sharma, Arvind; Young, Katherine K., eds. (1999). Feminism and World Religions. SUNY Press. ISBN 1438419678.
- Starr Sered, Susan (1999). ""Woman" as Symbol and Women as Agents". In Marx Ferree, Myra; Lorber, Judith; Hess, Beth B. Revisioning Gender. Rowman Altamira. ISBN 0761906177.
- Starr Sered, Susan (2000). What Makes Women Sick?: Maternity, Modesty, and Militarism in Israeli Society. UPNE. pp. 138–9. ISBN 978-1-58465-050-8.
- Starr Sered, Susan (2001). "Replaying the Rape of Dinah: Women's Bodies in Israeli Cultural Discourse". In Frankel, Jonathan. Jews and Gender: The Challenge to Hierarchy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195349776.
- Starr Sered, Susan (2010). "Women and Religious Change in Israel: Rebellion or Revolution". In Hertzog, Esther. Perspectives on Israeli Anthropology. Wayne State University Press. pp. 627–650. ISBN 0814330509.
- Skinner Keller, Rosemary; Radford Ruether, Rosemary; Cantlon, Marie, eds. (2006). Encyclopedia of Women and Religion in North America: Native American creation stories 2. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253346878.
- Stevens, Elliot L., ed. (1990). Year Book of the Central Conference of American Rabbis 100. Central Conference of American Rabbis.
- Swirski, Barbara; Safir, Marilyn P. (1991). "Living in a Jewish State: National, Ethnic and Religious Implications". In Swirski, Barbara; Safir, Marilyn P. Calling the Equality Bluff: Women in Israel. New York: Pergamon Press. pp. 7–17. ISBN 0080374719.
- Swirski, Barbara (1991). "Israeli Feminism New and Old". In Swirski, Barbara; Safir, Marilyn P. Calling the Equality Bluff: Women in Israel. New York: Pergamon Press. pp. 285–303. ISBN 0080374719.
- Umansky, Ellen M.; Ashton, Dianne, eds. (2009). Four Centuries of Jewish Women's Spirituality: A Sourcebook. UPNE. pp. 27–28. ISBN 1584657308.
- Unterman, Yael (2009). Nehama Leibowitz: teacher and Bible scholar. Urim Publications. ISBN 9655240193.
- Woods, Patricia J. (2008). Judicial Power and National Politics: Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel. SUNY Press. ISBN 0791473996.
- Yonah, Yossi; Goodman, Yehudah (2004). Marbolet HaZehuiyot: Diyun Bikurti Be'Datiot U'behiloniot Be'Yisrael (in Hebrew). Van Leer.
- Chesler, Phylis and Rivka Haut (editors). Women of the Wall: Claiming Sacred Ground at Judaism's Holy Site. Jewish Lights Publishing (December 2002). A collection of 35 essays.
- Haberman, Bonna Devora, Women of the Wall: From Text to Praxis. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 13/1 (Spring 1997): 5-34.
- Shakdiel, Leah. Women of the Wall: Radical Feminism as an Opportunity for a New Discourse in Israel, Journal of Israeli History, 21(1/2) (2002)/
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Women of the Wall.|
- Official website
- Berman, Daphna. Anat Hoffman Dares to Take On Israel’s Orthodox Establishment. Can She Win?, Moment, March–April 2013.
- Katzir, Yael. Praying in Her Own Voice. Documentary film. New Love Films: 2007.