Resources · Tests
A wormhole, also known as an Einstein–Rosen bridge, is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that would fundamentally be a "shortcut" through spacetime. A wormhole is much like a tunnel with two ends each in separate points in spacetime.
For a simplified notion of a wormhole, visualize space as a two-dimensional (2D) surface. In this case, a wormhole can be pictured as the 2D surface of a tube that connects different parts of the surface. The mouths of a wormhole are analogous to the holes at either end of the tube in a 2D plane. An actual wormhole would be analogous to this but with the spatial dimensions raised by one, which can be modeled mathematically even if we find it impossible to visualize. For example, instead of circular holes on a 2D plane, a real wormhole's mouths could be spheres in 3D space.
Researchers have no observational evidence for wormholes, but the equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes. Because of its robust theoretical strength, a wormhole is one of the great physics metaphors for teaching general relativity. The first type of wormhole solution discovered was the Schwarzschild wormhole, which would be present in the Schwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole, but it was found that this type of wormhole would collapse too quickly for anything to cross from one end to the other. Wormholes which could actually be crossed in both directions, known as traversable wormholes, would only be possible if exotic matter with negative energy density could be used to stabilize them.
The Casimir effect shows that quantum field theory allows the energy density in certain regions of space to be negative relative to the ordinary vacuum energy, and it has been shown theoretically that quantum field theory allows states where the energy can be arbitrarily negative at a given point. Many physicists such as Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, and others therefore argue that such effects might make it possible to stabilize a traversable wormhole. Physicists have not found any natural process that would be predicted to form a wormhole naturally in the context of general relativity, although the quantum foam hypothesis is sometimes used to suggest that tiny wormholes might appear and disappear spontaneously at the Planck scale, and stable versions of such wormholes have been suggested as dark matter candidates. It has also been proposed that if a tiny wormhole held open by a negative-mass cosmic string had appeared around the time of the Big Bang, it could have been inflated to macroscopic size by cosmic inflation.
The American theoretical physicist John Archibald Wheeler coined the term wormhole in 1957; however, in 1921, the German mathematician Hermann Weyl already had proposed the wormhole theory, in connection with mass analysis of electromagnetic field energy.
This analysis forces one to consider situations...where there is a net flux of lines of force, through what topologists would call "a handle" of the multiply-connected space, and what physicists might perhaps be excused for more vividly terming a "wormhole".—John Wheeler in Annals of Physics
The basic notion of an intra-universe wormhole is that it is a compact region of spacetime whose boundary is topologically trivial but whose interior is not simply connected. Formalizing this idea leads to definitions such as the following, taken from Matt Visser's Lorentzian Wormholes.
If a Minkowski spacetime contains a compact region Ω, and if the topology of Ω is of the form Ω ~ R x Σ, where Σ is a three-manifold of the nontrivial topology, whose boundary has topology of the form ∂Σ ~ S2, and if, furthermore, the hypersurfaces Σ are all spacelike, then the region Ω contains a quasipermanent intra-universe wormhole.
Characterizing inter-universe wormholes is more difficult. For example, one can imagine a 'baby' universe connected to its 'parent' by a narrow 'umbilicus'. One might like to regard the umbilicus as the throat of a wormhole, but the spacetime is simply connected. For this reason wormholes have been defined geometrically, as opposed to topologically, as regions of spacetime that constrain the incremental deformation of closed surfaces. For example, in Enrico Rodrigo’s The Physics of Stargates a wormhole is defined informally as
Lorentzian wormholes known as Schwarzschild wormholes or Einstein–Rosen bridges are connections between areas of space that can be modeled as vacuum solutions to the Einstein field equations, and which are now understood to be intrinsic parts of the maximally extended version of the Schwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole with no charge and no rotation. Here, "maximally extended" refers to the idea that the spacetime should not have any "edges": for any possible trajectory of a free-falling particle (following a geodesic) in the spacetime, it should be possible to continue this path arbitrarily far into the particle's future or past, unless the trajectory hits a gravitational singularity like the one at the center of the black hole's interior. In order to satisfy this requirement, it turns out that in addition to the black hole interior region which particles enter when they fall through the event horizon from the outside, there must be a separate white hole interior region which allows us to extrapolate the trajectories of particles which an outside observer sees rising up away from the event horizon. And just as there are two separate interior regions of the maximally extended spacetime, there are also two separate exterior regions, sometimes called two different "universes", with the second universe allowing us to extrapolate some possible particle trajectories in the two interior regions. This means that the interior black hole region can contain a mix of particles that fell in from either universe (and thus an observer who fell in from one universe might be able to see light that fell in from the other one), and likewise particles from the interior white hole region can escape into either universe. All four regions can be seen in a spacetime diagram which uses Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates.
In this spacetime, it is possible to come up with coordinate systems such that if you pick a hypersurface of constant time (a set of points that all have the same time coordinate, such that every point on the surface has a space-like separation, giving what is called a 'space-like surface') and draw an "embedding diagram" depicting the curvature of space at that time, the embedding diagram will look like a tube connecting the two exterior regions, known as an "Einstein–Rosen bridge". Note that the Schwarzschild metric describes an idealized black hole that exists eternally from the perspective of external observers; a more realistic black hole that forms at some particular time from a collapsing star would require a different metric. When the infalling stellar matter is added to a diagram of a black hole's history, it removes the part of the diagram corresponding to the white hole interior region, along with the part of the diagram corresponding to the other universe.
The Einstein–Rosen bridge was discovered by Albert Einstein and his colleague Nathan Rosen, who first published the result in 1935. However, in 1962 John A. Wheeler and Robert W. Fuller published a paper showing that this type of wormhole is unstable if it connects two parts of the same universe, and that it will pinch off too quickly for light (or any particle moving slower than light) that falls in from one exterior region to make it to the other exterior region.
The motion through a Schwarzschild wormhole connecting two universes is possible in only one direction. The analysis of the radial geodesic motion of a massive particle into an Einstein–Rosen bridge shows that the proper time of the particle extends to infinity. Timelike and null geodesics in the gravitational field of a Schwarzschild wormhole are complete because the expansion scalar in the Raychaudhuri equation has a discontinuity at the event horizon, and because an Einstein–Rosen bridge is represented by the Kruskal diagram in which the two antipodal future event horizons are identified. Schwarzschild wormholes and Schwarzschild black holes are different, mathematical solutions of general relativity and Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity. Yet for distant observers, both solutions with the same mass are indistinguishable. These results suggest that all observed astrophysical black holes may be Einstein–Rosen bridges, each with a new universe inside that formed simultaneously with the black hole. Accordingly, our own Universe may be the interior of a black hole existing inside another universe.
According to general relativity, the gravitational collapse of a sufficiently compact mass forms a singular Schwarzschild black hole. In the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity, however, it forms a regular Einstein–Rosen bridge. This theory extends general relativity by removing a constraint of the symmetry of the affine connection and regarding its antisymmetric part, the torsion tensor, as a dynamical variable. Torsion naturally accounts for the quantum-mechanical, intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of matter. The minimal coupling between torsion and Dirac spinors generates a repulsive spin–spin interaction which is significant in fermionic matter at extremely high densities. Such an interaction prevents the formation of a gravitational singularity. Instead, the collapsing matter reaches an enormous but finite density and rebounds, forming the other side of the bridge.
While Schwarzschild wormholes are not traversable in both directions, their existence inspired Kip Thorne to imagine traversable wormholes created by holding the 'throat' of a Schwarzschild wormhole open with exotic matter (material that has negative mass/energy).
Lorentzian traversable wormholes would allow travel in both directions from one part of the universe to another part of that same universe very quickly or would allow travel from one universe to another. The possibility of traversable wormholes in general relativity was first demonstrated by Kip Thorne and his graduate student Mike Morris in a 1988 paper. For this reason, the type of traversable wormhole they proposed, held open by a spherical shell of exotic matter, is referred to as a Morris–Thorne wormhole. Later, other types of traversable wormholes were discovered as allowable solutions to the equations of general relativity, including a variety analyzed in a 1989 paper by Matt Visser, in which a path through the wormhole can be made where the traversing path does not pass through a region of exotic matter. However, in the pure Gauss–Bonnet gravity (a modification to general relativity involving extra spatial dimensions which is sometimes studied in the context of brane cosmology) exotic matter is not needed in order for wormholes to exist—they can exist even with no matter. A type held open by negative mass cosmic strings was put forth by Visser in collaboration with Cramer et al., in which it was proposed that such wormholes could have been naturally created in the early universe.
Wormholes connect two points in spacetime, which means that they would in principle allow travel in time, as well as in space. In 1988, Morris, Thorne and Yurtsever worked out explicitly how to convert a wormhole traversing space into one traversing time. However, according to general relativity it would not be possible to use a wormhole to travel back to a time earlier than when the wormhole was first converted into a time machine by accelerating one of its two mouths.
Raychaudhuri's theorem and exotic matter
To see why exotic matter is required, consider an incoming light front traveling along geodesics, which then crosses the wormhole and re-expands on the other side. The expansion goes from negative to positive. As the wormhole neck is of finite size, we would not expect caustics to develop, at least within the vicinity of the neck. According to the optical Raychaudhuri's theorem, this requires a violation of the averaged null energy condition. Quantum effects such as the Casimir effect cannot violate the averaged null energy condition in any neighborhood of space with zero curvature, but calculations in semiclassical gravity suggest that quantum effects may be able to violate this condition in curved spacetime. Although it was hoped recently that quantum effects could not violate an achronal version of the averaged null energy condition, violations have nevertheless been found, so it remains an open possibility that quantum effects might be used to support a wormhole.
The impossibility of faster-than-light relative speed only applies locally. Wormholes might allow superluminal (faster-than-light) travel by ensuring that the speed of light is not exceeded locally at any time. While traveling through a wormhole, subluminal (slower-than-light) speeds are used. If two points are connected by a wormhole whose length is shorter than the distance between them outside the wormhole, the time taken to traverse it could be less than the time it would take a light beam to make the journey if it took a path through the space outside the wormhole. However, a light beam traveling through the wormhole would always beat the traveler. As an analogy, sprinting around to the opposite side of a mountain at maximum speed may take longer than walking through a tunnel crossing it.
The theory of general relativity predicts that if traversable wormholes exist, they could allow time travel. This would be accomplished by accelerating one end of the wormhole to a high velocity relative to the other, and then sometime later bringing it back; relativistic time dilation would result in the accelerated wormhole mouth aging less than the stationary one as seen by an external observer, similar to what is seen in the twin paradox. However, time connects differently through the wormhole than outside it, so that synchronized clocks at each mouth will remain synchronized to someone traveling through the wormhole itself, no matter how the mouths move around. This means that anything which entered the accelerated wormhole mouth would exit the stationary one at a point in time prior to its entry.
For example, consider two clocks at both mouths both showing the date as 2000. After being taken on a trip at relativistic velocities, the accelerated mouth is brought back to the same region as the stationary mouth with the accelerated mouth's clock reading 2004 while the stationary mouth's clock read 2012. A traveler who entered the accelerated mouth at this moment would exit the stationary mouth when its clock also read 2004, in the same region but now eight years in the past. Such a configuration of wormholes would allow for a particle's world line to form a closed loop in spacetime, known as a closed timelike curve. An object traveling through a wormhole could carry energy or charge from one time to another, but this would not violate conservation of energy or charge in each time, because the energy/charge of the wormhole mouth itself would change to compensate for the object that fell into it or emerged from it.
It is thought that it may not be possible to convert a wormhole into a time machine in this manner; the predictions are made in the context of general relativity, but general relativity does not include quantum effects. Analyses using the semiclassical approach to incorporating quantum effects into general relativity have sometimes indicated that a feedback loop of virtual particles would circulate through the wormhole and pile up on themselves, driving the energy density in the region very high and possibly destroying it before any information could be passed through it, in keeping with the chronology protection conjecture. The debate on this matter is described by Kip S. Thorne in the book Black Holes and Time Warps, and a more technical discussion can be found in The quantum physics of chronology protection by Matt Visser. There is also the Roman ring, which is a configuration of more than one wormhole. This ring seems to allow a closed time loop with stable wormholes when analyzed using semiclassical gravity, although without a full theory of quantum gravity it is uncertain whether the semiclassical approach is reliable in this case.
A possible resolution to the paradoxes resulting from wormhole-enabled time travel rests on the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In 1991 David Deutsch showed that quantum theory is fully consistent (in the sense that the so-called density matrix can be made free of discontinuities) in spacetimes with closed timelike curves. However, later it was shown that such model of closed timelike curve can have internal inconsistencies as it will lead to strange phenomena like distinguishing non orthogonal quantum states and distinguishing proper and improper mixture. Accordingly, the destructive positive feedback loop of virtual particles circulating through a wormhole time machine, a result indicated by semi-classical calculations, is averted. A particle returning from the future does not return to its universe of origination but to a parallel universe. This suggests that a wormhole time machine with an exceedingly short time jump is a theoretical bridge between contemporaneous parallel universes. Because a wormhole time-machine introduces a type of nonlinearity into quantum theory, this sort of communication between parallel universes is consistent with Joseph Polchinski’s discovery of an “Everett phone” in Steven Weinberg’s formulation of nonlinear quantum mechanics.
Theories of wormhole metrics describe the spacetime geometry of a wormhole and serve as theoretical models for time travel. An example of a (traversable) wormhole metric is the following:
Wormholes are a common element in science fiction as they allow interstellar, intergalactic, and sometimes interuniversal travel within human timescales. They have also served as a method for time travel.
- Black hole
- Closed timelike curve
- Exotic star
- Gödel metric
- Krasnikov tube
- Non-orientable wormhole
- Self-consistency principle
- Ring singularity
- Roman ring
- White hole
- Everett, Allen; Roman, Thomas (2012). Time Travel and Warp Drives. University of Chicago Press. p. 167. ISBN 0-226-22498-8.
- "Space and Time Warps". Hawking.org.uk. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
- Morris, Michael; Thorne, Kip; Yurtsever, Ulvi (1988). "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition". Physical Review Letters 61 (13): 1446–1449. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61.1446M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446. PMID 10038800.
- Sopova; Ford (2002). "The Energy Density in the Casimir Effect". Physical Review D 66 (4): 045026. arXiv:quant-ph/0204125. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..66d5026S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.045026.
- Ford; Roman (1995). "Averaged Energy Conditions and Quantum Inequalities". Physical Review D 51 (8): 4277–4286. arXiv:gr-qc/9410043. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.4277F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4277.
- Olum (1998). "Superluminal travel requires negative energies". Physical Review Letters 81 (17): 3567–3570. arXiv:gr-qc/9805003. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.3567O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3567.
- Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. pp. 494–496. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.
- Ian H., Redmount; Wai-Mo Suen (1994). "Quantum Dynamics of Lorentzian Spacetime Foam". Physical Review D 49 (10): 5199. arXiv:gr-qc/9309017. Bibcode:1994PhRvD..49.5199R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5199.
- Kirillov, A.A.; E.P. Savelova (21 February 2008). "Dark Matter from a gas of wormholes". Physics Letters B 660 (3): 93. arXiv:0707.1081. Bibcode:2008PhLB..660...93K. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.034.
- Rodrigo, Enrico (30 November 2009). "Denouement of a Wormhole-Brane Encounter". International Journal of Modern Physics D 18 (12): 1809. arXiv:0908.2651. Bibcode:2009IJMPD..18.1809R. doi:10.1142/S0218271809015333.
- John G. Cramer, Robert L. Forward, Michael S. Morris, Matt Visser, Gregory Benford, and Geoffrey A. Landis (1995). "Natural Wormholes as Gravitational Lenses". Physical Review D 51 (6): 3117–3120. arXiv:astro-ph/9409051. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3117C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3117.
- Coleman, Korte, Hermann Weyl's Raum - Zeit - Materie and a General Introduction to His Scientific Work, p. 199
- "Collapse to a Black Hole". Casa.colorado.edu. 2010-10-03. Retrieved 2010-11-11. This is a tertiary source that clearly includes information from other sources but does not name them.
- Poplawski, Nikodem J. (2010). "Radial motion into an Einstein–Rosen bridge". Physics Letters B 687 (2–3): 110–113. arXiv:0902.1994. Bibcode:2010PhLB..687..110P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.029.
- Poplawski, Nikodem J. (2010). "Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation". Phys. Lett. B 694 (3): 181–185. arXiv:1007.0587. Bibcode:2010PhLB..694..181P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.056.
- Other computer-rendered images and animations of traversable wormholes can be seen on this page by the creator of the image in the article, and this page has additional renderings.
- Elias Gravanis; Steven Willison (2007). "`Mass without mass' from thin shells in Gauss-Bonnet gravity". Phys. Rev. D 75 (8). arXiv:gr-qc/0701152. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75h4025G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.084025.
- Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. p. 504. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.
- Fewster, Christopher J.; Ken D. Olum; Michael J. Pfenning (10 January 2007). "Averaged null energy condition in spacetimes with boundaries". Physical Review D 75 (2): 025007. arXiv:gr-qc/0609007. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75b5007F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.025007.
- Visser, Matt (15 October 1996). "Gravitational vacuum polarization. II. Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum". Physical Review D 54 (8): 5116. arXiv:gr-qc/9604008. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..54.5116V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5116.
- Graham, Noah; Ken D. Olum (4 September 2007). "Achronal averaged null energy condition". Physical Review D 76 (6): 064001. arXiv:0705.3193. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..76f4001G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064001.
- Urban, Douglas; Ken D. Olum (1 June 2010). "Spacetime averaged null energy condition". Physical Review D 81 (6): 124004. arXiv:1002.4689. Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81l4004U. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124004.
- Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. p. 502. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.
- Wormholes and Time Travel? Not Likely
- Everett, Allen; Roman, Thomas (2012). Time Travel and Warp Drives. University of Chicago Press. p. 135. ISBN 0-226-22498-8.
- The quantum physics of chronology protection
- Deutsch, David (1991). "Quantum Mechanics Near Closed Timelike Lines". Physical Review D 44 (10): 3197. Bibcode:1991PhRvD..44.3197D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197.
- Brun et.al (2009). "Localized Closed Timelike Curves Can Perfectly Distinguish Quantum States". Physics Review Letters 102 (21): 210402. Bibcode:2009PhRvL..102.210402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.210402.
- Pati, Chakrabarty, Agrawal (2011). "Purification of mixed states with closed timelike curve is not possible". Physical Review A 84 (6): 062325. arXiv:1003.4221. Bibcode:2011PhRvA..84f2325P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062325.
- Rodrigo, Enrico (2010). The Physics of Stargates. Eridanus Press. p. 281. ISBN 0-9841500-0-5.
- Polchinski, Joseph (1991). "Weinberg’s Nonlinear quantum Mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox". Physical Review Letters 66 (4): 397. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..66..397P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.397.
- DeBenedictis, Andrew and Das, A. (2001). "On a General Class of Wormhole Geometries". Classical and Quantum Gravity 18 (7): 1187–1204. arXiv:gr-qc/0009072. Bibcode:2001CQGra..18.1187D. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/7/304.
- Dzhunushaliev, Vladimir (2002). "Strings in the Einstein's paradigm of matter". Classical and Quantum Gravity 19 (19): 4817–4824. arXiv:gr-qc/0205055. Bibcode:2002CQGra..19.4817D. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/19/302.
- Einstein, Albert and Rosen, Nathan (1935). "The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity". Physical Review 48: 73. Bibcode:1935PhRv...48...73E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.48.73.
- Fuller, Robert W. and Wheeler, John A. (1962). "Causality and Multiply-Connected Space-Time". Physical Review 128: 919. Bibcode:1962PhRv..128..919F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.919.
- Garattini, Remo (2004). "How Spacetime Foam modifies the brick wall". Modern Physics Letters A 19 (36): 2673–2682. arXiv:gr-qc/0409015. Bibcode:2004gr.qc.....9015G. doi:10.1142/S0217732304015658.
- González-Díaz, Pedro F. (1998). "Quantum time machine". Physical Review D 58 (12): 124011. arXiv:gr-qc/9712033. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58l4011G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.124011.
- González-Díaz, Pedro F. (1996). "Ringholes and closed timelike curves". Physical Review D 54 (10): 6122–6131. arXiv:gr-qc/9608059. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..54.6122G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6122.
- Khatsymosky, Vladimir M. (1997). "Towards possibility of self-maintained vacuum traversable wormhole". Physics Letters B 399 (3–4): 215–222. arXiv:gr-qc/9612013. Bibcode:1997PhLB..399..215K. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00290-6.
- Krasnikov, Serguei (2006). "Counter example to a quantum inequality". Gravity and Cosmology 46: 195. arXiv:gr-qc/0409007. Bibcode:2006GrCo...12..195K.
- Krasnikov, Serguei (2003). "The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts". Physical Review D 67 (10): 104013. arXiv:gr-qc/0207057. Bibcode:2003PhRvD..67j4013K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104013.
- Li, Li-Xin (2001). "Two Open Universes Connected by a Wormhole: Exact Solutions". Journal of Geometrical Physics 40 (2): 154–160. arXiv:hep-th/0102143. Bibcode:2001JGP....40..154L. doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(01)00028-6.
- Morris, Michael S., Thorne, Kip S., and Yurtsever, Ulvi (1988). "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition". Physical Review Letters 61 (13): 1446. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61.1446M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446. PMID 10038800.
- Morris, Michael S. and Thorne, Kip S. (1988). "Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity". American Journal of Physics 56 (5): 395–412. Bibcode:1988AmJPh..56..395M. doi:10.1119/1.15620.
- Nandi, Kamal K. and Zhang, Yuan-Zhong (2006). "A Quantum Constraint for the Physical Viability of Classical Traversable Lorentzian Wormholes". Journal of Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems 9: 61–67. arXiv:gr-qc/0409053. Bibcode:2004gr.qc.....9053N.
- Ori, Amos (2005). "A new time-machine model with compact vacuum core". Physical Review Letters 95 (2). arXiv:gr-qc/0503077. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95b1101O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.021101.
- Roman, Thomas, A. (2004). "Some Thoughts on Energy Conditions and Wormholes". arXiv:gr-qc/0409090 [gr-qc].
- Teo, Edward (1998). "Rotating traversable wormholes". Physical Review D 58 (2). arXiv:gr-qc/9803098. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58b4014T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.024014.
- Visser, Matt (2002). "The quantum physics of chronology protection by Matt Visser". arXiv:gr-qc/0204022 [gr-qc]. An excellent and more concise review.
- Visser, Matt (1989). "Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples". Physical Review D 39 (10): 3182–3184. arXiv:0809.0907. Bibcode:1989PhRvD..39.3182V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.3182.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Wormholes.|
- What exactly is a 'wormhole'? answered by Richard F. Holman, William A. Hiscock and Matt Visser.
- Why wormholes? by Matt Visser.
- Wormholes in General Relativity[dead link] by Soshichi Uchii.
- White holes and Wormholes provides a very good description of Schwarzschild wormholes with graphics and animations, by Andrew J. S. Hamilton.
- Questions and Answers about Wormholes a comprehensive wormhole FAQ by Enrico Rodrigo.
- Large Hadron Collider – Theory on how the collider could create a small wormhole, possibly allowing time travel into the past.
- animation that simulates traversing a wormhole
- renderings and animations of a Morris-Thorne wormhole
- N.A.S.A's current theory on wormhole creation