|One of Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors|
Changyi, father of Zhuanxu
|Ancestral name: Gongsun (Kung-sun; 公孫)
Given name: Xuanyuan (Hsuan-yuan; 軒轅)
|Literal meaning||Yellow Emperor|
The Yellow Emperor or Huangdi, formerly romanized as Huang-ti and Hwang-ti, is one of the legendary Chinese sovereigns and culture heroes included among the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors. Tradition holds that Huangdi reigned from 2697 to 2597 or 2698 to 2598 BC. Huangdi's cult was particularly prominent in the late Warring States and early Han period, when he was portrayed as the originator of the centralized state, a cosmic ruler, and a patron of esoteric arts. Traditionally credited with numerous inventions and innovations, the Yellow Emperor is now regarded as the initiator of Chinese civilization, and said to be the ancestor of all Huaxia Chinese.
- 1 Historicity
- 2 Names
- 3 Origin and development of the myth
- 4 Elements of Huangdi's myth
- 5 Societal influence
- 6 Traditional dates
- 7 Popular culture
- 8 See also
- 9 References
- 10 Bibliography
- 11 Further reading
The renowned Chinese historian Sima Qian – and much Chinese historiography following him – considered the Yellow Emperor to be a more historical figure than earlier legendary figures such as Fu Xi, Nüwa, and the Yan emperor. His Records of the Grand Historian begins with the Yellow Emperor, while passing over the others.
Throughout most of Chinese history, the Yellow Emperor and the other ancient sages were considered to be real historical figures. Their historicity started to be questioned in the 1920s by historians like Gu Jiegang, one of the founders of the Doubting Antiquity School in China. In their attempts to prove that the earliest figures of Chinese history were mythological, Gu and his followers argued that these ancient sages were originally gods who were later depicted as humans by the rationalist intellectuals of the Warring States period. Yang Kuan, a member of the same historiographical current, noted that only in the Warring States period had the Yellow Emperor started to be described as the first ruler of China. Yang thus argued that Huangdi was a later transformation of Shangdi, the supreme god of the Shang pantheon.
Also in the 1920s, French scholars Henri Maspero and Marcel Granet published critical studies of China's accounts of high antiquity. In his Danses et légendes de la Chine ancienne ["Dances and legends of ancient China"], for example, Granet argued that these tales were "historicized legends" that said more about the time when they were written than about the time they purported to describe.
Most scholars now agree that the Yellow Emperor was originally a deity who was later transformed into a human figure. K.C. Chang sees Huangdi and other cultural heroes as "ancient religious figures" who were "euhemerized" in the late Warring States and Han periods. Historian of ancient China, Mark Edward Lewis speaks of the Yellow Emperor's "earlier nature as a god," whereas Roel Sterckx, a professor at University of Cambridge, calls Huangdi a "legendary cultural hero."
The Yellow Emperor has been referred to as Xuanyan-shi (s 轩辕氏, t 軒轅氏, p Xuānyuán-shì) and Youxiong-shi (c 有熊氏, p Yǒuxióng-shì). Third-century scholar Huangfu Mi commented that Xuanyuan was the name of a hill where Huangdi had lived and that he later took as a name. Qing-dynasty commentator Liang Yusheng (梁玉繩; 1745–1819) argued instead that the hill was named after the Yellow Emperor rather than the opposite.
According to British Sinologist Herbert Allen Giles (1845–1935); Youxiong was a name taken from Huangdi's hereditary principality; Giles also cited sources saying that Xuanyuan was the name of a village where the Yellow Emperor had lived. William Nienhauser, a modern translator of the Shiji, explains that Huangdi was originally the head of the Youxiong Clan, which lived near what is now Xinzheng in Henan.
In the late Warring States period, the Yellow Emperor was integrated into the cosmological scheme of the Five Phases, in which the colour yellow represents earth, dragons, and the center. The correlation of the colours in association with different dynasties was mentioned in the Lüshi Chunqiu (late 3rd century BC), where the Yellow Emperor's reign was seen to be governed by earth.
Origin and development of the myth
The origin of Huangdi's legend is unclear, but historians have formulated several hypotheses about it. Yang Kuan, a member of the Doubting Antiquity School (1920s–1940s), argued that the Yellow Emperor was derived from Shangdi, the highest god of the Shang dynasty. Yang's view is based on the series Shangdi 上帝 => Huang Shangdi 皇上帝 => Huangdi 皇帝 => Huangdi 黄帝, in which he claims that huang 黄 ("yellow") either was a graphic variant of huang 皇 ("august") or was used as a taboo character for the latter.
Historian Mark Edward Lewis agrees that huang 黄 and huang 皇 were often interchangeable, but, disagreeing with Yang, he claims that huang meaning "yellow" appeared first. Based on what he admits is a "novel etymology" likening huang 黄 to the phonetically close wang 尪 (the "burned shaman" in Shang rainmaking rituals), Lewis suggests that "Huang" in the Yellow Emperor's title might originally have meant "rainmaking shaman" or "rainmaking ritual." Citing late Warring States and early Han versions of Huangdi's myth, he further argues that the figure of the Yellow Emperor originated in ancient rain-making rituals in which the Yellow Emperor represented the power of rain and clouds, whereas his mythical rival Chi You (or Yandi) stood for fire and drought.
Also disagreeing with Yang Kuan's hypothesis, Sarah Allan finds it unlikely that such a popular myth as the Yellow Emperor's could have come from a taboo character. She argues instead that pre-Shang "history," including the story of the Yellow Emperor, "can all be understood as a later transformation and systematization of Shang myth." In her view, Huangdi was originally an unnamed "lord of the underworld" (or the "Yellow Springs"), the mythological counterpart of the Shang sky deity Shangdi. At the time, Shang rulers claimed that their mythical ancestors, identified with "the [ten] suns, birds, east, life, [and] the Lord on High" (i.e., Shangdi), had defeated an earlier people associated with "the underworld, dragons, west." After the Zhou overthrew the Shang in the eleventh century BC, Zhou leaders reinterpreted Shang myths as meaning that the Shang had vanquished a real political dynasty, which was eventually named the Xia dynasty. By Han times – as seen in Sima Qian's account in the Shiji – the Yellow Emperor, who as lord of the underworld had been symbolically linked to the Xia, had become a historical ruler whose descendants were thought to have founded the Xia.
The Yellow Emperor in pre-imperial times
Accounts of the Yellow Emperor started to appear in Chinese texts in the Warring States period. "The most ancient extant reference" to Huangdi is an inscription on a bronze vessel made in the first half of the fourth century BC by the royal family of the state of Qi. As Michael Puett points out, this was one of several references to the Yellow Emperor in the fourth and third centuries BC within accounts of the creation of the state.
Elements of Huangdi's myth
According to Huangfu Mi (215–282), the Yellow Emperor was born in Shou Qiu ("Longevity Hill"), which is today on the outskirts of the city of Qufu in Shandong Province. Early on, he lived with his tribe in the northwest near the Ji River (thought to be the Fen River in Shanxi), later migrating to Zhuolu in modern-day Hebei Province. He then became a farmer and tamed six different special beasts: the bear (熊), the brown bear (s 罴, t 羆), the pí (貔) and xiū (貅) which later combined to form the mythical Pixiu, the ferocious chū (貙), and the tiger (虎). From this, Ye Shuxian associated the Yellow Emperor with bear legends common across northeast Asia people as well as the Dangun legend.
The Yellow Emperor and the Yan emperor were both leaders of a tribe or a combination of two tribes near the Yellow River, in an era that modern Chinese history books often refer to as "primitive society." The Yan emperor hailed from a different area around the Jiang River (thought to be the modern Wei. Both emperors lived in a time of warfare. The Yan emperor proving unable to control the disorder within his realm, the Yellow Emperor took up arms to establish his domination over various warring factions.
In traditional Chinese accounts, the Yellow Emperor is credited with improving the livelihood of the nomadic hunters of his tribe. He teaches them how to build shelters, tame wild animals, and grow the five Chinese cereals, although other accounts credit Shennong with the last. He invents carts, boats, and clothing.
Other inventions credited to the emperor include the Chinese diadem (冠冕), throne rooms (宮室), the bow sling, early Chinese astronomy, the Chinese calendar, math calculations, code of sound laws (音律), and cuju, an early Chinese version of football. He is also sometimes said to have been partially responsible for the invention of the guqin zither, although others credit the Yan emperor with inventing instruments for Ling Lun's compositions.
In traditional accounts, he also goads the historian Cangjie into creating the first Chinese character writing system, the Oracle bone script, and his principal wife Leizu invents sericulture and teaches his people how to weave silk and dye clothes.
At one point in his reign the Yellow Emperor allegedly visited the mythical East sea and met a talking beast called the Bai Ze who taught him the knowledge of all supernatural creatures. This beast explained to him there were 11,522 (or 1,522) kinds of supernatural creatures.
According to traditional accounts, the Yan emperor meets the force of the "Nine Li" (九黎) under their bronze-headed leader, Chi You, and his 81 horned and four-eyed brothers and suffers a decisive defeat. He flees to Zhuolu and begs the Yellow Emperor for help. During the ensuing Battle of Zhuolu the Yellow Emperor employs his tamed animals and Chi You darkens the sky by breathing out a thick fog. This leads the emperor to develop the south-pointing chariot, which he uses to lead his army out of the miasma. He next calls upon the drought demon Nuba to dispel Chi You's storm. He then destroys the Nine Li and defeats Chi You before falling out with the Yan emperor, defeating him at Banquan and replacing him as the primary ruler.
The Yellow Emperor was said to have lived for over a hundred years before meeting a phoenix and a qilin and then dying. Two tombs were built in Shaanxi within the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor, in addition to others in Henan, Hebei and Gansu.
Modern-day Chinese people sometimes refer to themselves as the "Descendants of Yan and Yellow Emperor", although non-Han minority groups in China may have their own myths or not count as descendants of the emperor.
Family and descendants
According to the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor in modern-day Shaanxi, the Yellow Emperor shares ancestry with that of a Central Plains race that went by the name Ji from their position along the Ji River.
The Yellow Emperor's father was Shaodian and his mother was Fu Pao (附寶). The Yellow Emperor had a total of four wives. His first wife Leizu of Xiling bore him two sons. His other three wives were his second wife Fenglei (封嫘), third wife Tongyu (彤魚) and fourth wife Momu (嫫母). The emperor had a total of 25 sons, 14 of whom began their own surnames and clans. The oldest was Shaohao or Xuanxiao, who lived in Qingyang by the Yangtze River. Changyi, the younger, lived by the Ruo River (若水).
Later sources claimed that several emperors and three subsequent dynasties descended from the Yellow Emperor: Other dynasties besides the first three also claimed descent from the Yellow Emperor.
According to the Wei Shu and Tung Pa, the Cao family of Cao Wei were descended from Huangdi via Emperor Zhuanxu, from which the Cao family originated. They were of the same liniage as to Emperor Shun. Another account says that the Cao family was descended from Emperor Shun. This account was attacked by Chiang Chi who claimed it was people of the Tian 田 surname who were descended from Shun and not the Cao. He also claimed (Gui) Kuei 媯 was Shun's family name.
Gun, Yu, Zhuanxu, Zhong, Li, Shujun, and Yuqiang are various emperors, gods, and heroes whose ancestor was Huangdi. The Huantou, Miaomin, and Quanrong peoples were said to be descended from Huangdi.
Claims of descent
During the Tang dynasty, the Yellow Emperor, symbolic as the ancestor of the Han Chinese and founder of Chinese civilization, was also claimed by various other rulers who were not Han Chinese to be their ancestors, in order to connect themselves to the Tang. "Prestige" for the individual and "status" for their country was the goal of those non Han who made claims of descent from these prominent Han figures.
Claiming descent from Huangdi and the other five emperors was set during the Western Han dynasty in Sima Qian's time. The claim that Shennong and Huangdi was ancestors of the Chinese was written about during Tang and Song. 14 out of 25 sons of Huangdi received twelve different family names. Shennong and Huangdi were regarded as the ancestor for the majority of Chinese surnames. The practice of Chinese claiming Huangdi as an ancestor was well established in Tang and Song China, with many Chinese families writing about their ancestry from Huangdi's sons and great-grandsons, Emperor Shun, and Emperor Yao. Emperor Yao was also claimed to be the ancestor of the Han dynasty Emperor Liu Bang. Most Chinese noble families claimed descent from Huangdi.
Most Chinese genealogies trace their family ultimately to Huangdi. New families were founded by the younger sons of older families. When compared together, different Chinese genealogies frequently confirm these founding events by younger sons. Lynn Pan claims that descent from Huangdi is commonly claimed by some overseas Chinese clans. Many Chinese clans in overseas areas will have genealogies displaying their descent from Huangdi with their different surnames being explained by name changes. Huangdi granted 14 of his 25 sons different family names, These 14 family names are from which all other Chinese family names are traced to. Both many overseas Chinese and Chinese in China use genealogies which show the Huangdi as their ancestor to reinforce their being Chinese.
In 1963 during the Qingming festival Huang Zhenduo wrote the genealogy of the Huang clan. He attacked the Taipings, Yuan Shikai, Chiang Kai-shek, the Japanese, and the Communists in the preface of his genealogy, all of whom virtually destroyed China and destroyed ancient historic genealogies of various Chinese families. He lamented the destruction and despaired at how people no longer knew their ancestors. The genealogist Huang Zhenduo claimed Huangdi's six generation descendants as the ancestors of the Huang lineage of the town Huang Cun. Their surname Huang was derived from the Huang region, where they quarreled with each other. Various members of generations of the Huang family had important posts in government under King Wu of Zhou, under whom Huang Liangze served, and the governor of Xin'an (Huizhou) in 322 AD, was Huang Li of Huang Dun town. This town was near Huang Cun. One of the Huang's had no children so he adopted Cheng Keyuan, and Cheng Keyuan became Huang Keyuan and started the new Huang clan lineage from which the present day Huang clan descended.
The Yu (Yee) family of Zhangwan village, Xinhui district, Guangdong claimed descent from Huangdi's son Xuan xiao. Emperor Shun's agriculture minister, Duke Qi, was of one of the originally 15th generations of the family. The family adopted the last name Yu 30 generations after that. The Kings of Chin and Jin honored their ancestor You Yu. You moved to Shandong, he was originally from the norther China plain. Another ancestor named Yu Rui moved near the Lo river in Shaanxi province. He became a censor for the State of Qin. The family moved into Guangdong during the Ten Kingdoms and five dynasties.
The Yellow Emperor was credited with an enormous number of cultural legacies and esoteric teachings. While Taoism is often regarded in the West as arising from Laozi, Chinese Taoists claim the Yellow Emperor formulated many of their precepts. In addition the texts mentioned above, he was also credited with composing the Four Classics of the Yellow Emperor, the Yellow Emperor's Hidden Talisman Classic, and the "Yellow Emperor's Four Seasons Poem" included in the Tung Shing fortune-telling almanac. The Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon, which presents the doctrinal basis of traditional Chinese medicine, was also named after him.
The Yellow Emperor became a powerful national symbol in the last decade of the Qing dynasty (1644–1911) and remained dominant in Chinese nationalist discourse throughout the Chinese Republican period (1911–1949). The early twentieth century is also when the Yellow Emperor was first referred to as the ancestor of all Chinese.
Starting in 1903, radical publications started using the projected date of his birth as the first year of the Chinese calendar. Intellectuals like Liu Shipei (劉師培; 1884–1919) found this practice necessary in order to "preserve the [Han] race" (baozhong 保種) from both Manchu dominance and foreign encroachment. Anti-Manchu revolutionaries like Chen Tianhua (1875–1905), Zou Rong (1885–1905), and Zhang Binglin (1868–1936) tried to foster the racial consciousness they thought was missing from their compatriots, and thus depicted the Manchus as racially inferior barbarians who were unfit to rule over Han Chinese. Chen's widely circulated pamphlets claimed that the "Han race" formed one big family descended from the Yellow Emperor. The first issue (Nov. 1905) of the Minbao 民報 ("People's Journal"), which was founded in Tokyo by revolutionaries of the Tongmenghui, featured the Yellow Emperor on its cover and called Huangdi "the first great nationalist of the world." It was one of several nationalist magazines that featured the Yellow Emperor on their cover in the early twentieth century. The fact that Huangdi meant "yellow" emperor also served to buttress the theory that he was the originator of the "yellow race".
Many historians interpret this sudden popularity of the Yellow Emperor as a reaction to the theories of French scholar Albert Terrien de Lacouperie (1845–1894), who in a book called The Western Origin of the Early Chinese Civilization, from 2300 B.C. to 200 A.D. (1892) had claimed that Chinese civilization had been founded about 4200 years earlier by Mesopotamian immigrants. Lacouperie's "Sino-Babylonianism" posited that Huangdi was a Mesopotamian tribal leader who had led a massive migration of his people into China around 2300 BC and founded what later became Chinese civilization. European Sinologists quickly rejected these theories, but in 1900 two Japanese historians, Shirakawa Jirō and Kokubu Tanenori, omitted these criticisms and published a long summary that presented Lacouperie's views as the most advanced Western scholarship on China. Chinese scholars were quickly attracted by "the historicization of Chinese mythology" that the two Japanese authors advocated.
Anti-Manchu intellectuals and activists who searched for China's "national essence" (guocui 國粹) adapted Sino-Babylonianism to their needs. Zhang Binglin explained Huangdi's battle with Chi You as a conflict opposing the newly arrived civilized Mesopotamians to backward local tribes, a battle that transformed China into one of the most civilized places in the world. Zhang's reinterpretation of Sima Qian's account "underscored the need to recover the glory of early China." Liu Shipei also presented these early times as the golden age of Chinese civilization. In addition to tying the Chinese to an ancient center of human civilization in Mesopotamia, Lacouperie's theories suggested that China should be ruled by the descendants of Huangdi. In a controversial essay called History of the Yellow Race (Huangshi 黃史), which was published serially from 1905 to 1908, Huang Jie (黃節; 1873–1935) claimed that the Han race was the true master of China because it was descended from the Yellow Emperor. Reinforced by the values of filial piety and the Chinese patrilineal clan, the racial vision defended by Huang and others turned vengeance against the Manchus into a duty owed to one's ancestors.
The Yellow Emperor continued to be revered after the Xinhai Revolution of 1911, which overthrew the Qing dynasty. In 1912, for instance, banknotes carrying Huangdi's effigy were issued by the new Republican government. After 1911, however, the Yellow Emperor as national symbol changed from first progenitor of the Han race to ancestor of China's entire multi-ethnic population. Under the ideology of the Five Races in Unity, Huangdi became the common ancestor of the Han, the Manchus, the Mongols, the Tibetans, and the Hui Muslims, who were said to form the Zhonghua minzu, a broadly understood Chinese nation. Sixteen state ceremonies were held between 1911 and 1949 to Huangdi as the "founding ancestor of the Chinese nation" (中華民族始祖) and even "the founding ancestor of human civilization" (人文始祖).
The cult of the Yellow Emperor was forbidden in the People's Republic of China until the end of the Cultural Revolution. This was halted during the 1980s when the government reversed itself and resurrected the "Yellow Emperor cult". Starting in the 1980s, the cult was revived and phrases relating to the "Descendants of Yan and Huang" were sometimes used by the Chinese state when referring to people of Chinese descent. In 1984, for example, Deng Xiaoping argued for Chinese reunification saying "Taiwan is rooted in the hearts of the descendants of the Yellow Emperor," whereas in 1986 the PRC acclaimed the Chinese-American astronaut Taylor Wang as the first of the Yellow Emperor's descendants to travel in space. In the first half of the 1980s, the Party had internally debated whether this usage would make ethnic minorities feel excluded. After consulting experts from Beijing University, the Chinese Academy of Social Science, and the Central Nationalities Institute, the Central Propaganda Department recommended on March 27, 1985, that the Party speak of the Zhonghua Minzu – the "Chinese nation" broadly defined – in official statements, but that the phrase "sons and grand-sons of Yandi and the Yellow Emperor" could be used in informal statements by party leaders and in "relations with Hong Kong and Taiwanese compatriots and overseas Chinese compatriots".
After retreating to Taiwan in late 1949 at the end of the Chinese Civil War, Chiang Kai-shek ruled that the Republic of China would keep paying homage to the Yellow Emperor on April 4, the National Tomb Sweeping Day, but neither he nor the three presidents that succeeded him ever paid homage in person. In 2009 President Ma Ying-jeou presided over these rites in person and proclaimed that both Chinese culture and common descent from the Yellow Emperor united people from Taiwan and the mainland. Later the same year, Lien Chan – a former Vice President of the Republic of China who is now Honorary Chairman of the Kuomintang – and his wife Lien Fang Yu paid homage at the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor in Huangling, Yan'an, in mainland China.
Gay Studies researcher Louis Crompton has cited Ji Yun's report in his popular Notes from the Yuewei Hermitage (1800), that some claimed the Yellow Emperor was the first Chinese to take male bedmates, a claim that Ji Yun dismissed.
Although the traditional Chinese calendar did not mark years continuously, some Han-dynasty astronomers tried to determine the years of the life and reign of the Yellow Emperor. In 78 BC, under the reign of Emperor Zhao, an official called Zhang Shouwang (張壽望) calculated that 6,000 years had passed since the time of Huangdi; the court refused his proposal for reform, countering that only 3,629 years had elapsed. In the proleptic Julian calendar, the court's calculations would have placed the Yellow Emperor in the late 38th century BC rather than in the 27th century BC that is conventional nowadays.
During their missions in China in the seventeenth century, the Jesuits tried to determine what year should be considered the epoch of the Chinese calendar. In his Sinicae historiae decas prima (first published in Munich in 1658), Martino Martini (1614–1661) dated the royal ascension of Huangdi to 2697 BC, but started the Chinese calendar with the reign of Fuxi, which he claimed started in 2952 BC. Philippe Couplet's (1623–1693) "Chronological table of Chinese monarchs" (Tabula chronologica monarchiae sinicae; 1686) also gave the same date for the Yellow Emperor. The Jesuits' dates provoked great interest in Europe, where they were used for comparisons with Biblical chronology. Modern Chinese chronology has generally accepted Martini's dates, except that it usually places the reign of Huangdi in 2698 BC (see next paragraph) and omits Huangdi's predecessors Fuxi and Shennong, who are considered "too legendary to include."
Starting in 1903, radical publications started using the projected date of birth of the Yellow Emperor as the first year of the Chinese calendar. Different newspapers and magazines proposed different dates. Jiangsu, for example counted 1905 as year 4396 (making 2491 BC the first year of the Chinese calendar), whereas the Minbao (the organ of the Tongmenghui) reckoned 1905 as 4603 (first year: 2698 BC). Liu Shipei (劉師培; 1884–1919) claimed that the 1900 international expedition sent by eight foreign powers to suppress the Boxer Uprising entered Beijing in the 4611th year of the Yellow Emperor. Liu's calendar started with the birth of the Yellow Emperor, which was reckoned to be 2711 BC. When Sun Yat-sen declared the foundation of the Republic of China on 2 January 1912, he decreed that this was the 12th day of the 11th month of year 4609 (epoch: 2698 BC), but that the state would now be using the solar calendar and count 1912 as the first year of the Republic. Chronological tables published in the 1938 edition of the Cihai (辭海) dictionary followed Sun Yat-sen in using 2698 as the year of Huangdi's accession; this chronology is now "widely reproduced, with little variation."
Helmer Aslaksen, a mathematician who teaches at the National University of Singapore and specializes in the Chinese calendar, explains that those who use 2698 BC as a first year probably do so because they want to have "a year 0 as the starting point", or because "they assume that the Yellow Emperor started his year with the Winter solstice of 2698 BC", hence the difference with the year 2697 BC calculated by the Jesuits.
- The emperor appears as a ancestor hero in the strategy game Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom made by Sierra Entertainment, (owned by Vivendi until 2008). In the game he is a patron of acupuncturist and silk weaver, and has the skills needed for leading men into battle, especially the Chariot-Fort soldiers.
- The emperor serves as the hero in Jorge Luis Borges' story, "The Fauna of the Mirror". British fantasy writer China Miéville used this story as the basis for his novella "The Tain", which describes a post-apocalyptic London. "The Tain" was included in Miéville's short-story collection "Looking For Jake" (2005).
- The popular Chinese role-playing video game series for the PC, Xuanyuan Jian, revolves around the legendary sword used by the emperor.
- The emperor is an important NPC in the action RPG Titan Quest, The player must reach the emperor to learn the truth about Typhon's imprisonment. He also reveals a bit of information about the war between the gods and the titans, while also revealing that he has been following the players actions since the beginning of the Silk Road
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Yellow Emperor.|
- Herbert Allen Giles (1845–1935), A Chinese Biographical Dictionary (London: B. Quaritch, 1898), p. 338; cited in Veith 2002, p. 5.
- Sima Qian, Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji 史記, c. 100 BC), Chapter 1, "Wudi benji" 五帝本紀 ("Basic Annals of the Five Emperors"); iFeng.com (retrieved on 2010-08-22). (Chinese)
- "Huangdi". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
- Helmer Aslaksen, "The Mathematics of the Chinese Calendar," section "Which Year is it in the Chinese Calendar?" (retrieved on 2011-11-18)
- Zhao & Qin 2002, p. 142.
- "Yellow Emperor," in The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition (2008). Encyclopedia.com, retrieved on November 8, 2011.
- Ebrey 1996, p. 10.
- Chang 1983, p. 2
- Wang 2005, pp. 11–13.
- Wu 1982, pp. 49–50, and chapter endnotes.
- Puett 2001, p. 93 (description of Gu's general purpose); Lewis 2009, p. 545 (rest of the information).
- Allan 1991, p. 64.
- Allan 1991, p. 65.
- Lewis 2009, p. 545.
- Lewis 2009, pp. 545–46.
- Lewis 2009, p. 556: "modern scholars of myth generally agree that the sage kings were partially humanized transformations of earlier, supernatural beings who figured in shamanistic rituals, cosmogonic myths or tales of the origins of tribes and clans."
- Lewis 2009, p. 565; Sterckx 2002, p. 95.
- Dai & Gong 2003, p. 33.
- Nienhauser 1994, p. 1, note 6.
- Nienhauser 1994, p. 1, note 3.
- Walters 2006, p. 39.
- Lewis 1990, p. 314, note 116; Allan 1991, p. 65; Puett 2001, p. 97.
- Lewis 1990, p. 314, note 116 (huang 黄 as variant); Allan 1991, p. 65 (huang 黄 as taboo character). Yang's view has been criticized by Mitarai Masaru (Mitarai 1967) and by Michael Puett (Puett 2001, pp. 246–47, note 16). See also below for Mark Edward Lewis's and Sarah Allan's differing views.
- Lewis 1990, p. 314, note 116.
- Lewis 1990, p. 194.
- Lewis 1990, pp. 179–82.
- Allan 1991, p. 175. Allan is the one who puts "history" in quotation marks.
- Allan 1991, p. 73.
- Allan 1991, pp. 64 ("In the Xia annals of the Shiji, the Xia ancestry is traced from Yu 禹 back to Huang Di, the Yellow Lord"), 73 ("the lord of the underworld and Yellow Springs and thus closely associated with the Xia"), and 175 ("By the Han, their [the Xia] ancestor, the Yellow Emperor, originally the lord of the underworld, had been transformed into an historical figure who, with his descendant Zhuan Xu, ruled before Yao").
- LeBlanc 1985–1986, p. 53 (quotation); Seidel 1969, p. 21 (who calls it "the most ancient document on Huangdi" ["le plus ancient document sur Houang Ti"]); Jan 1981, p. 118 (who calls the inscription "the earliest existing and datable source of the Yellow Emperor cult" and claims that the vessel dates either from 375 or 356 BC; Chang 2007, p. 122 (who gives the date as 356 BC); Puett 2001, p. 112 (Huangdi's "first appearance in early Chinese literature is a passing reference in a bronze inscription, where he is mentioned as an ancestor of the patron of the vessel").
- Puett 2001, p. 112.
- Pulleybank 2000[page needed].
- Dai & Gong 2003, p. 32.
- Ye 2007[page needed].
- Haw 2007, pp. 15–16.
- Birrell 1993, p. 48.
- Wang 1997, p. 13.
- Liu Xiang (77–6 BC), Bielu 别录："It is said that cuju was invented by Huangdi; others claim that it arose during the Warring States period" (蹴鞠者，传言黄帝所作，或曰起戰國之時); cited in Book of the Later Han (5th century), chapter 34, p. 1178 of the standard Zhonghua shuju edition. (Chinese)
- Yin 2001, pp. 1–10.
- Huang 1989, vol. 2[page needed].
- iFeng.com, "The traitor Bai Ze" 背叛者白澤 (Chinese); from Xu 2008. Retrieved on 2010-09-04.
- Ge 2005, p. 474.
- Big5.china.com.cn, "Huangdi's great battle against Chi You, and the south-pointing chariot" 黃帝大戰蚩尤與指南車 (Chinese). Retrieved on 2010-08-22.
- Heiner Roetz (1993). Confucian ethics of the axial age: a reconstruction under the aspect of the breakthrough toward postconventional thinking. SUNY Press. p. 37. ISBN 0-7914-1649-6. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- China.org.cn, "Mausoleums of the Yellow Emperor." Retrieved on 2010-08-29.
- Sautman 1997, p. 83.
- Chinareviewnews.com, "The ugliest among the empresses and consorts of past ages" 歷代后妃中的超級醜女 (Chinese). Retrieved on 8 August 2010.
- Big5.huaxia.com, "Momu and the Yellow Emperor invent the mirror" 嫫母與軒轅作鏡 (Chinese). Retrieved on 2010-09-04.
- Sautman 1997, p. 81.
- Wu, p. 64
- Asiapac Editorial (2006). Great Chinese emperors: tales of wise and benevolent rule (revised ed.). Asiapac Books Pte Ltd. p. 9. ISBN 981-229-451-1. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Heiner Roetz (1993). Confucian ethics of the axial age: a reconstruction under the aspect of the breakthrough toward postconventional thinking. SUNY Press. p. 37. ISBN 0-7914-1649-6. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Asiapac Editorial (2006). Great Chinese emperors: tales of wise and benevolent rule (revised ed.). Asiapac Books Pte Ltd. p. 10. ISBN 981-229-451-1. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Howard L. Goodman (1998). Ts'ao P'i transcendent: the political culture of dynasty-founding in China at the end of the Han (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 70. ISBN 0-9666300-0-9. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Patricia Buckley Ebrey (2003). Women and the family in Chinese history. Volume 2 of Critical Asian scholarship (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 190. ISBN 0-415-28823-1. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lihui Yang, Deming An, Jessica Anderson Turner (2008). Jessica Anderson Turner, ed. Handbook of Chinese Mythology (illustrated, reprint ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 143. ISBN 0-19-533263-6. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Mark Edward Lewis (2009). China's cosmopolitan empire: the Tang dynasty, Volume 4 (illustrated ed.). Harvard University Press. p. 202. ISBN 0-674-03306-X. Retrieved February 2012 8. "occasional practice among non-Han leaders of tracing descent from the legendary Yellow Emperor himself—the founding ancestor of the Han Chinese people—or from the ancient Zhou ruling house. Such claims flattered both those who made them and their Tang recipients, who could thus assert a larger realm for their putative ancestor. The Chinese had linked themselves to more distant peoples through a common origin in the ancient sage-kings at least since the late Warring States and early Han mythic geography, the Canon of Mountains and Seas (Shan hai jing).48"
- Marc Samuel Abramson (2008). Ethnic identity in Tang China. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 154. ISBN 0-8122-4052-9. Retrieved February 2012 8. "Non-Han who had greater cultural and social pretensions imitated Han counterparts in claiming descent from Chinese culture heroes of antiquity, particularly the Yellow Emperor and King Wen of the Zhou, even while acknowledging their non-Han roots.22 Such assertions did not intend to assert or broaden the notion of Han ethnicity. Instead, they aimed to garner prestige for the claimant and to give the claimant's original homeland greater status by including it within the mythical geography of the spread of the descendants of the Yellow Emperor and the Zhou royal house. These claims highlight the extent to which public ethnic identities were predicated on both descent and geography, treated with equal importance in Chinese genealogies."
- Patricia Buckley Ebrey (2003). Women and the family in Chinese history. Volume 2 of Critical Asian scholarship (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 171. ISBN 0-415-28823-1. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Fabrizio Pregadio (2008). Fabrizio Pregadio, ed. The encyclopedia of Taoism, Volume 1 (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 505. ISBN 0-7007-1200-3. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lynn Pan (1994). Sons of the yellow emperor: a history of the Chinese diaspora (reprint, illustrated ed.). Kodansha Globe. p. 10. ISBN 1-56836-032-0. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lynn Pan (1994). Sons of the yellow emperor: a history of the Chinese diaspora (reprint, illustrated ed.). Kodansha Globe. p. 11. ISBN 1-56836-032-0. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lynn Pan (1994). Sons of the yellow emperor: a history of the Chinese diaspora (reprint, illustrated ed.). Kodansha Globe. p. 12. ISBN 1-56836-032-0. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Frank Dikötter (1997). Frank Dikötter, ed. The construction of racial identities in China and Japan: historical and contemporary perspectives. University of Hawaii Press. p. 79. ISBN 0-8248-1919-5. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Nancy Zeng Berliner, Peabody Essex Museum (2003). Yin Yu Tang: The Architecture and Daily Life of a Chinese House (illustrated ed.). Tuttle Publishing. p. 41. ISBN 0-8048-3487-3. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Nancy Zeng Berliner, Peabody Essex Museum (2003). Yin Yu Tang: The Architecture and Daily Life of a Chinese House (illustrated ed.). Tuttle Publishing. p. 42. ISBN 0-8048-3487-3. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lani Ah Tye Farkas (1998). Bury my bones in America: the saga of a Chinese family in California, 1852-1996 : from San Francisco to the Sierra gold mines (illustrated ed.). Carl Mautz Publishing. p. 4. ISBN 1-887694-11-0. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Lani Ah Tye Farkas (1998). Bury my bones in America: the saga of a Chinese family in California, 1852-1996 : from San Francisco to the Sierra gold mines (illustrated ed.). Carl Mautz Publishing. p. 5. ISBN 1-887694-11-0. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Windridge & Fong 2003, pp. 59 and 107.
- Big5.china.com.cn, "The legend of the Yellow Emperor's Four Canons" 《黃帝四經》的傳說 (Chinese). Retrieved on 2010-08-29.
- Veith 2002, p. 5.
- Hong Kong Leisure and Cultural Services Department star list, under "Algieba," the traditional name of Gamma Leonis. "Hong Kong Leisure and Cultural Services Department star list" on lcsd.gov.hk; retrieved on 2010-08-29.
- Maine.edu, "Hall of Supreme Harmony." Retrieved on 2010-08-29.
- Singtao.ca, "The Xuanyuan mirror in the Imperial Throne Room – the Hall of Supreme Harmony where the emperor held court" 金鑾寶座軒轅鏡 御門聽政太和殿 (Chinese). Retrieved on 2010-08-29.
- Duara 1995, p. 76.
- Sun 2000, p. 69 ("中华这个五千年文明古国由黄帝开国、中国人都是黄帝子孙的说法, 则是20 世纪的产品").
- Dikötter 1992, p. 116.
- Dikötter 1992, pp. 117–18.
- Dikötter 1992, p. 117.
- Original: 世界第一之民族主義偉人黄帝 (cited in Sun 2000, pp. 77–78). Chow 1997, p. 49 (Minbao translated as "People's Journal"); Dikötter 1992, p. 116, note 73 (date of and quotation from the first issue of the Minbao).
- Dikötter 1992, p. 116, note 73 cites the Minbao as well as two other examples from 1903 and 1905.
- Kai-wing Chow, Kevin Michael Doak, Poshek Fu, ed. (2001). Constructing nationhood in modern East Asia (illustrated ed.). University of Michigan Press. p. 59. ISBN 0-472-06735-4. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Hon 2010, p. 140
- Hon 2010, p. 145.
- Hon 2010, pp. 145–47.
- Hon 2010, pp. 147 (citation and explanation of how the two Japanese writers' "summary of Sino-Babylonianism demonstrated that the mythological figures in prehistoric China were actually real historical leaders who brought advanced cultural artifacts from Mesopotamia") and 149 ("In the early 1900s, it was this historicization of mythology, rather than the original text of Lacouperie's Western Origin, that attracted Chinese scholars' attention").
- Hon 2010, p. 150.
- Hon 2010, pp. 151–52.
- Hon 2010, p. 153.
- Hon 2010, p. 154.
- Hon 2003, pp. 253–54.
- Duara 1995, p. 75 (on filial piety and Chinese lineages, and on "racial vengeance against the Manchus"); Dikötter 1992, pages 71 (on lineage loyalties as merged by the notion of "race") and 117 ("Traditional ideas reinforced the construct of race. Confucian values of filial piety and ancestor worship paved the way for the cult of the Yellow Emperor. Racial loyalty was perceived as an extension of lineage loyalty."); and Hon 2010, p. 150 ("Seen in this light, Sino-Babylonianism became a call to arms for all descendants of Huang Di to wage a racial war against the Manchus").
- Liu 1999, pp. 608 (for claim) and 609 (for an image).
- Liu 1999, p. 609.
- Liu 1999, pp. 608–609.
- Sautman 1997, pp. 79–80.
- Frank Dikötter (1997). Frank Dikötter, ed. The construction of racial identities in China and Japan: historical and contemporary perspectives. University of Hawaii Press. p. 80. ISBN 0-8248-1919-5. Retrieved 4-1-2012.
- Sautman 1997, pp. 80–81.
- Schoenhals 2008, pp. 121–22.
- Chinapost.com.tw, "President Ma pays homage in person to the Yellow Emperor." Retrieved on 2010-09-04.
- Tan 2009, p. 40, cites Ma's original speech: 兩岸人民原本就同為炎黃子孫，血脈相連，文化同源，雖然在上個世紀的國共內戰後，造成兩岸的分治現實，但是台灣海峽並沒有阻隔兩岸人民血濃於水的親情，也無法切斷連結兩岸人民心靈的中華文化。中華民族與中華文化是連接兩岸人民的臍帶，更是兩岸關係發展的和平橋樑。
- Chinadaily.net, "10,000 Chinese pay homage to Yellow Emperor." Retrieved on 2010-09-04.
- Louis Crompton (1925-2009)
- LGBTQA Programs & Services: Louis Crompton Scholarship
- Louis Crompton Scholarship Fund
- Crompton 2003, p. 214. Ji Yun argued that this was probably a false attribution: "雜說稱孌童始黃帝, 殆出依托" (see Ji Yun's Yuewei caotang biji 閱微草堂筆記, chapter 12, "Huaixi zazhi er" 槐西雜志二 [Miscellaneous records from Huaixi, Part 2]).
- Loewe 2000, p. 691, referring to Book of Later Han, chapter 21A, p. 978 of the standard Zhonghua shuju edition. Original passage: 又言黃帝至元鳳三年六千餘歲。丞相屬寶、長安單安國、安陵桮育治終始，言黃帝以來三千六百二十九歲，不與壽王合。
- Mungello 1989, p. 132.
- Lach & van Kley 1994, p. 1683: "In 1686 Philippe Couplet produced a complete chronology from the beginning of the reign of Huang Ti, the third sage emperor (2697 B.C.), to the K'ang-hsi reign, or A.D. 1683."
- Mungello 1989, p. 133.
- Mungello 1989, pp. 131–32 (the citation is on p. 132).
- Wilkinson 2000, pp. 184–85.
- Kaske 2008, p. 345.
- Wilkinson 2000, p. 185.
- Mungello 1989, p. 131, note 78.
- Allan, Sarah (1991), The Shape of the Turtle, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, ISBN 0-7914-0460-9.
- Birrell, Anne (1993), Chinese Mythology: An Introduction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 0-8018-4595-5, 0-8018-6183-7.
- Chang, K.C. [張光直] (1983), Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, ISBN 0-674-04807-5, 0-674-04808-3.
- Chang, Chun-shu (2007), The Rise of the Chinese Empire, Volume 1: Nation, State, and Imperialism in Early China, ca. 1600 B.C.–A.D. 157, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, ISBN 978-0-472-11533-4.
- Chow, Kai-wing (1997), "Imagining Boundaries of Blood: Zhang Binglin and the Invention of the Han 'Race' in Modern China", in Dikötter, Frank, The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, pp. 34–52, ISBN 962-209-443-0.
- Crompton, Louis (2003), Homosexuality and Civilization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-02233-1.
- Dai, Yi 戴逸; Gong, Shuduo 龔書鐸 (eds.-in-chief) (2003), Zhongguo tongshi: xuesheng caitu ban 中國通史––學生彩圖版 ["General history of China: illustrated edition for students"], vol. 1, Shiqian, Xia, Shang, Xizhou 史前 夏 商 西周 ["Prehistory, Xia, Shang, and Western Zhou"], Revised Hong Kong edition, Hong Kong: Zhineng jiaoyu chubanshe 智能敎育出版社 ["Intelligence Press"]. (Chinese)
- Dikötter, Frank (1992), The Discourse of Race in Modern China, London: Hurst & Co., ISBN 1-85065-135-3
- Duara, Prasenjit (1995), Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-16722-0
- Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (1996), The Cambridge Illustrated History of China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-43519-6.
- Ge, Hong 洪葛 (2005), Gu Jiu 顧久, ed., Baopuzi neipian 抱朴子內篇, Taipei: Taiwan shufang chuban youxian gongsi 台灣書房出版有限公司, ISBN 978-986-7332-46-2, 9867332466. (Chinese)
- Haw, Stephen G. (2007), Beijing: A Concise History, London and New York: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-39906-7.
- Hon, Tze-ki (2003), "National Essence, National Learning, and Culture: Historical Writings in Guocui xuebao, Xueheng, and Guoxue jikan", Historiography East & West 1 (2): 242–86.
- Hon, Tze-ki (2010), "From a Hierarchy in Time to a Hierarchy in Space: The Meanings of Sino-Babylonianism in Early Twentieth-Century China", Modern China 36 (2): 136–69.
- Huang, Dashou 黃大受 (1989), Zhongguo tongshi 中國通史 ["General history of China"], Wunan tushu chuban gufen youxian gongsi 五南圖書出版股份有限公司, ISBN 978-957-11-0031-9. (Chinese)
- Jan, Yün-hua (1981), "The Change of Images: The Yellow Emperor in Ancient Chinese Literature", Journal of Oriental Studies 19 (2): 117–37.
- Kaske, Elizabeth (2008), The Politics of Language in Chinese Education, 1895–1919, Leiden: Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-16367-6.
- Lach, Donald F.; van Kley, Edwin J. (1994), Asia in the Making of Europe, Volume III, A Century of Advance, Book Four, East Asia, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-46734-4.
- LeBlanc, Charles (1985–1986), "A Re-examination of the Myth of Huang-ti", Journal of Chinese Religions, 13–14: 45–63.
- Lewis, Mark Edward (1990), Sanctioned Violence in Early China, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, ISBN 0-7914-0076-X; 0-7914-0077-8.
- Lewis, Mark Edward (2009), "The mythology of early China", in John Lagerwey and Mark Kalinowski, Early Chinese Religion: Part One: Shang through Han, Leiden and Boston: Brill, pp. 543–594, ISBN 978-90-04-16835-0.
- Liu, Li (1999), "Who were the ancestors? The origins of Chinese ancestral culture and racial myths", Antiquity 73 (281): 602–13.
- Mitarai, Masaru 御手洗 勝 (1967), "Kōtei densetsu ni tsuite 黃帝伝説について ["About the legend of the Yellow Emperor"]", Hiroshima daigaku bungaku kiyō 広島大学文学部紀要 ["Bulletin of the Literature Department of Hiroshima University"] 27: 33–59.
- Mungello, David E. (1989) , Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, ISBN 0-8248-1219-0.
- Nienhauser, William H., Jr., ed. (1994), The Grand Scribe's Records, Volume 1: The Basic Annals of Pre-Han China, Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University press, ISBN 0-253-34021-7.
- Puett, Michael (2001), The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, ISBN 0-8047-3623-5.
- Pulleybank, Edwin G. (2000), "Ji 姬 and Jiang 姜: The Role of Exogamic Clans in the Organization of the Zhou Polity", Early China 25: 1–27.
- Sautman, Barry (1997), "Myths of Descent, Racial Nationalism and Ethnic Minorities in the People's Republic of China", in Dikötter, Frank, The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, pp. 75–95, ISBN 962-209-443-0.
- Schoenhals, Michael (2008), "Abandoned or Merely Lost in Translation?", – via JSTOR (subscription required), Inner Asia 10 (1): 113–30.
- Seidel, Anna K. (1969), La divinisation de Lao Tseu dans le taoisme des Han ["The divinization of Laozi in Han-dynasty Taoism"], Paris: École française d'Extrême-Orient, ISBN 2-85539-553-4.
- Sterckx, Roel (2002), The Animal and the Daemon in Early China, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, ISBN 0-7914-5269-7, 0-7914-5270-0.
- Sun, Longji 孙隆基 (2000), "Qingji minzu zhuyi yu Huangdi chongbai zhi faming 清季民族主义与黄帝崇拜之发明 [Qing-period nationalism and the invention of the worship of Huangdi]", Lishi yanjiu 历史研究 2000 (3): 68–79.
- Tan, Zhong 譚中 (May 1, 2009), "Cong Ma Yingjiu 'yaoji Huangdi ling' kan Zhongguo shengcun shizhi 從馬英九「遙祭黃帝陵」看中國生存實質", Haixia pinglun 海峽評論 221: 40–44.
- Veith, Ilza (translation and introductory study) (2002) , The Yellow Emperor's Classic of Internal Medicine, With a New Foreword by Ken Rose, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-22936-3.
- Walters, Derek (2006), The Complete Guide to Chinese Astrology: The Most Comprehensive Study of the Subject Ever Published in the English Language, Watkins Publishing, ISBN 978-1-84293-111-0.
- Wang, Hengwei 王恒伟 (2005), Zhongguo lishi jiangtang 中国历史讲堂 ["Lectures on Chinese history"], Beijing: Zhonghua shuju 中华书局, ISBN 962-8885-24-3. (Chinese)
- Wang, Zhongfu 王仲孚 (1997), Zhongguo wenhua shi 中國文化史 ["Chinese cultural history"], Wunan tushu chuban gufen youxian gongsi 五南圖書出版股份有限公司, ISBN 978-957-11-1427-9, 9571114278. (Chinese)
- Wilkinson, Endymion (2000), Chinese History: A Manual. Revised and enlarged, Cambridge (MA) and London: Harvard University Asia Center, ISBN 0-674-00247-4.
- Windridge, Charles; Fong, Cheng Kam (2003) , Tong Sing: The Chinese Book of Wisdom Based on the Ancient Chinese Almanac, Kyle Cathie Limited, ISBN 0-7607-4535-8.
- Wu, Kuo-cheng (1982), The Chinese Heritage, New York: Crown, ISBN 0-517-54475-X.
- Xu, Lai 徐来 (2008), Xiangxiang zhong de dongwu: shanggu shidai de qiyi niaoshou 想象中的动物：上古时代的奇异鸟兽 ["Imaginary animals: the strange bird-beasts of high antiquity"], Shanghai: Shanghai wenyi chubanshe 上海文艺出版社, ISBN 978-7-80685-826-4. (Chinese)
- Ye, Shuxian 叶舒宪 (2007), Xiong tuteng: Zhonghua zuxian shenhua tanyuan 熊图腾：中华祖先神话探源 ["The bear totem: the origins of the Chinese ancestral myth"], Shanghai: Shanghai wenyi chubanshe 上海文艺出版社, ISBN 978-7-80685-826-4. (Chinese)
- Yin, Wei 殷伟 (2001), Zhongguo qinshi yanyi 中国琴史演义 ["The romance of the history of the Chinese zither"], Yunnan renmin chubanshe 云南人民出版社 ["Yunnan People's Press"]. (Chinese)
- Zhao, Chunqing 赵春青; Qin, Wensheng 秦文生 (2002), Yuanshi shehui: Dongfang de shuguang 原始社会：东方的曙光 ["Primitive society: first light on the east"], volume 1 of Liu Wei 刘炜 (editor-in-chief), Zhonghua wenming chuanzhen 中華文明傳真 ["Portrait of Chinese civilization"], Shanghai: Shanghai cishu chubanshe 上海辞书出版社, ISBN 962-07-5314-3. (Chinese)
- Chow, Kai-wing (2001), "Narrating Nation, Race, and National Culture: Imagining the Hanzu Identity in Modern China", in Chow, Kai-wing; Doak, Kevin Michael; Fu, Poshek, Constructing Nationhood in Modern East Asia, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 47–84, ISBN 0-472-09735-0, 0-472-06735-4.
- von Falkenhausen, Lothar (2006), Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1000-250 BC): The Archaeological Evidence, Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles, ISBN 1-931745-31-5.
- von Glahn, Richard (2004), The Sinister Way: The Divine and the Demonic in Chinese Religious Culture, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-23408-1.
- Harper, Donald (1998), Early Chinese Medical Literature: The Mawangdui Medical Manuscripts, London and New York: Kegan Paul International, ISBN 0-7103-0582-6.
- Jochim, Christian (1990), "Flowers, Fruit, and Incense Only: Elite versus Popular in Taiwan's Religion of the Yellow Emperor", Modern China 16 (1): 3–38.
- Leibold, James (2006), "Competing Narratives of Racial Unity in Republican China: From the Yellow Emperor to Peking Man", Modern China 32 (2): 181–220.
- Luo, Zhitian 罗志田 (2002), "Baorong Ruxue, zhuzi yu Huangdi de Guoxue: Qingji shiren xunqiu minzu rentong xiangzheng de nuli 包容儒學、諸子與黃帝的國學：清季士人尋求民族認同象徵的努力 [The Rise of "National Learning": Confucianism, the Ancient Philosophers, and the Yellow Emperor in Chinese Intellectuals' Search for a Symbol of National Identity in the Late Qing]", Taida lishi xuebao 臺大歷史學報 29: 87–105.
- Puett, Michael (2002), To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, ISBN 0-674-01643-2.
- Sautman, Barry (1997), "Racial nationalism and China's external behavior", World Affairs 160: 78–95.
- Schneider, Lawrence (1971), Ku Chieh-gang and China's New History: Nationalism and the Quest for Alternative Traditions, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Seidel, Anna K. (1987), "Traces of Han Religion in Funeral Texts Found in Tombs", in Akizuki, Kan'ei 秋月观暎, Dōkyo to shukyō bunka 道教と宗教文化 [Taoism and religious culture], Tokyo: Hirakawa shuppansha 平和出版社, pp. 23–57.
- Shen, Sung-chiao 沈松橋 (1997), "Wo yi wo xue jian Xuan Yuan: Huangdi shenhua yu wan-Qing de guozu jiangou 我以我血薦軒轅: 黃帝神話與晚清的國族建構 [The myth of the Yellow Emperor and the construction of Chinese nationhood in the late Qing period]", Taiwan shehui yanjiu jikan 台灣社會研究季刊 28: 1–77.
- Unschuld, Paul U (1985), Medicine in China: A History of Ideas, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-05023-1.
- Wang, Ming-ke 王明珂 (2002), "Lun Panfu: Jindai Yan-Huang zisun guozu jiangou de gudai jichu 論攀附：近代炎黃子孫國族建構的古代基礎 [On progression: the ancient basis for the nation-building claim that the Chinese are descendants of Yandi and Huangdi]", Zhongyang yanjiu yuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo jikan 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 73 (3): 583–624.
- Yates, Robin D.S. (1997), Five Lost Classics: Tao, Huang-Lao, and Yin-Yang in Han China, New York: Ballantine, ISBN 978-0-345-36538-5.
- Yi, Hua 易华 (2010), "Yao-Shun yu Yan-Huang: Shiji "Wudi benji" yu minzu rentong 尧舜与炎黄──《史记•五帝本记》与民族认同 [Yao-Shun and Yan-Huang: the Shiji's "Basic Annals of the Five Emperors" and ethnic identity]", China Folkore Network.
|Mythological Emperor of China
c. 2698 BC – c. 2598 BC