Zoste patrikia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Zōstē patrikía (Greek: ζωστὴ πατρικία) was a Byzantine court title reserved exclusively for the woman who was the chief attendant and assistant to the Empress. A very high title, its holder ranked as the first woman after the Empress herself in the imperial court. More often than not, the zōstē was a relative of the Empress.

History and functions[edit]

The title means "girded lady-patrician", often translated into English as "Mistress of the Robes", and was used for high-ranking court ladies who were attached to the empress as her ladies of honour.[1] Its origin or date of institution are unclear.[2] Disregarding a clearly anachronistic reference to Antonina, the wife of the great 6th-century general Belisarius, as being a zostē patrikia, the title is first attested in circa 830 for Theoktiste, the mother of Empress Theodora.[1][3] The title is attested in literary sources (the Skylitzes Chronicle) until 1018, when it was conferred to Maria, the former Empress of Bulgaria, and finally in a series of lead seals dated to the late 11th century (see below). It disappears thereafter, along with many other titles of the middle Byzantine period, following the reforms of Emperor Alexios I Komnenos (r. 1081–1118).[1][2]

In Philotheos's Klētorologion of 899, the dignity is placed very high in the imperial order of precedence, coming before the magistros and after the kouropalatēs.[4] Her exceptional status is further illustrated by the fact that she was one of only six dignitaries who dined at the imperial table, and by the prominent role she played in imperial ceremonies.[5] The zōstē patrikia functioned as the chief attendant to the empress (to whom she was usually related) and the head of the women's court (the sekreton tōn gynaikōn), which consisted mostly of the wives of high-ranking officials.[5][6] Indeed, hers was the only specifically female dignity: other women bore the feminine versions of their husbands' titles. A zōstē patrikia is therefore, in John B. Bury's words, "the only lady who was πατρικία" (a patrician) "in her own right", and not to be confused with a simple patrikía, who was the spouse or widow of a patrikios.[3][7][8] Although it appears that, in common with the other supreme dignities with which it is associated, there was a single holder of the dignity at each time, at the reception of Olga of Kiev, the plural form zōstaí is used, indicating the presence of at least two.[9]

According to the Klētorologion, her insignia of rank were a pair of ivory tablets, and she was raised to the rank in an elaborate ceremony in the Theotokos of the Pharos palace chapel, which is recorded in the De Ceremoniis of Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos (r. 913–959).[10] Her distinctive dress, however, which gave the zōstē her name, was the broad belt or loros worn at the ceremony of promotion. A descendant of the ancient Roman consular trabea, the golden lōros was the "most prestigious imperial insignium", and was also worn by the Byzantine emperor and a select few of his highest dignitaries such as the Eparch of Constantinople or the magistroi.[9][11]

List of known holders[edit]

Miniature from the Madrid Skylitzes depicting the wedding of Miroslava of Bulgaria to the Byzantine-Armenian aristocrat Ashot Taronites. The couple fled to Byzantium, where Miroslava was appointed zōstē patrikia.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Kazhdan 1991, p. 2231.
  2. ^ a b Cheynet 2000, p. 187.
  3. ^ a b Bury 1911, p. 33.
  4. ^ Bury 1911, p. 22.
  5. ^ a b McClanan 2002, p. 132.
  6. ^ Garland 1999, pp. 5, 245, 264; Maguire 2004, p. 183.
  7. ^ Kazhdan 1991, p. 1160.
  8. ^ Cheynet 2000, pp. 179–180.
  9. ^ a b c Cheynet 2000, p. 180.
  10. ^ Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos. De Ceremoniis, I.50; Bury 1911, pp. 22, 33
  11. ^ Maguire 2004, p. 44.
  12. ^ Cheynet 2000, pp. 180–181.
  13. ^ Cheynet 2000, pp. 180, 182.
  14. ^ Davids 2002, pp. 74–75.
  15. ^ a b c Cheynet 2000, p. 181.
  16. ^ Cheynet 2000, p. 182.
  17. ^ Cheynet 2000, pp. 181–182.
  18. ^ Cheynet 2000, p. 183.
  19. ^ Cheynet 2000, pp. 184–185.

Bibliography[edit]