User talk:C'est moi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Thanks
For the user page revert!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 19:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I removed the Choke information on purpose, it has no business being there. by having that information and the biased slant that it has is reducing the integrity of the article since it is not an impartial statement of fact, it is a fan based biased opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.153.112.34 (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RFA thanks
RFA thanks 
:.
[edit] Hospital Ship
And what's wrong with field hospital, the army equivalent of a navy hospital ship, being in the see also section? If it's a stub, it's also a med stub. 70.51.8.220 (talk) 04:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:67.142.130.24
Hi, C'est Moi. I've put your vandalism warnings into a new section. Are you alright with that? SchfiftyThree 00:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, thank you very much. —C'est moi Parlez 00:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] a shiny
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For beating me to the punch way too many times, I hereby award you this barnstar. J.delanoygabsadds 18:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
And hey, while you're reading this, I can get a few reverts in. :P J.delanoygabsadds
- Great!! My first Barnstar hehehe. Thank you, thank you very much, i'll put this beautiful barnstar in my userpage =P. Regards, —C'est moi Parlez 18:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Thanks for your politeness... Obviously I am a new user - what I am trying to do is to move the page to one with a middle initial. I know it seems trivial, but it's actually relevant. Where is the move button? Thanks.WOOps100 (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- The move button will appear for you in 4 days, you're a new user. When you are an autoconfirmed user, you'll be able to move pages or edit semiprotected pages. Why do you want to move the page? —C'est moi Parlez 04:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Troll
Sometimes I welcome people who create a userpage that is vandalism in hopes that they will reform. Ah bien. J.delanoygabsadds 02:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand why my comments were deleted, they were 100% true. Please don't abuse the fact that anyone can edit wiki discussion--67.234.220.13 (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your warning to Rtyags
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on 2008 Indian Premier League. Thank you.
I have recently visited the page User talk:Rtyags, and I notice you issued a warning for an "unconstructive test edit". Looking at the edit in question, all Rtyags did was to add an extra bowler to the "Most Wickets" table due to Zaheer Khan (the 6th bowler) having the same number of wickets as bowlers 4 and 5. You might not have agreed with this change (given that the purple cap award has a tie-breaker for when bowlers are on equal wickets), but this was arguably a positive edit and clearly not a test edit. Please do not give warnings to people simply because they have made an edit that they thought was warrented but that you did not.
