Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RMTR)
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests[edit]
Uncontroversial technical requests[edit]
- Clover Park (Florida) → Clover Park (currently a redirect instead to Clover Park, New Zealand) (move · discuss) – I've made the old article a redirect and added 'New Zealand' as disambiguator for it. Other topic fails notability and is a redirect so the stadium is a clear primary topic here. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- KMW+Nexter Defense Systems → KNDS (currently a redirect back to KMW+Nexter Defense Systems) (move · discuss) – Official company name has changed to 'KNDS'. The 'KMW+Nexter' name is no longer used in official communications. TorreAzzurro (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Suez Rajan → St Nikolas (ship) (move · discuss) – The oil tanker Suez Rajan has since been renamed to St Nikolas. The new name is, in my opinion, equally notable as the previous one, as the tanker is known for two very similar events, each of which happened under one of these two names.
I think going with "St Nikolas (ship)" as the new article name would be best since the page without the "(ship)" suffix already exists and is a redirect to "St. Nikolas", which is a disambiguation page.
Of course, the ship name should remain italicized, too. Yours truly, 79.186.231.26 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Can you provide sources to this? The above is a human event and not a ship, or am I getting it wrong here? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves[edit]
Contested technical requests[edit]
- David TC Davies → David T. C. Davies (currently a redirect back to David TC Davies) (move · discuss) – Per MOS:INITIALS. While the subject may prefer it styled this way, the reliable sources do not follow suit, which is the key point in the policy grounds for an exception style SchroCat (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC) - SchroCat (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SchroCat: The article was moved from David T. C. Davies to its current title less than a year ago, so this would require further discussion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)- Over two years ago, actually. But yes, there needs to be a requested move discussion before restoring this reverted move. You can open an RM by clicking "discuss" on this request. SilverLocust 💬 05:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
@SilverLocust Both actually. It was moved in February 2022 (over two years) and again in June 2023 (less than a year). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)- The talk page was moved in June 2023 without moving the article. SilverLocust 💬 16:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Over two years ago, actually. But yes, there needs to be a requested move discussion before restoring this reverted move. You can open an RM by clicking "discuss" on this request. SilverLocust 💬 05:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SchroCat: The article was moved from David T. C. Davies to its current title less than a year ago, so this would require further discussion. --Ahecht (TALK
- Oyer and terminer → Oyer and Terminer (currently a redirect back to Oyer and terminer) (move · discuss) – legal title of a court deisenbe (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Deisenbe: Google Ngrams shows very mixed use on whether to capitalize. MOS:CAPS defaults to lowercase when there isn't a substantial majority for capitalizing. This move is potentially controversial, so it would require a requested-move discussion, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Monte Mars → Mont Mars (currently a redirect instead to Monte Mars) (move · discuss) – "Mont Mars" is far more widely sourced on the Internet that "Monte Mars". --Simoncik84 (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Simoncik84: The rest of the pages in Category:Mountains of the Biellese Alps use Monte. If you want to make an argument that they should all be renamed, that would need a formal move discussion. See WP:RMPM for instructions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)- I'm talking here about Mont Mars only. Among the pages of this category, it's the only one with an entirely French name. Some of the other summits of this category which stay on the water divide between the Province of Biella and the Aosta Valley. In the latest, French is co-official with Italian, these summits have therefore two official names (in Italian and in French), as you can see in the articles' introduction, but not Mont Mars. Simoncik84 (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Simoncik84: The rest of the pages in Category:Mountains of the Biellese Alps use Monte. If you want to make an argument that they should all be renamed, that would need a formal move discussion. See WP:RMPM for instructions. --Ahecht (TALK
- Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation → Nisqually Indian Tribe (currently a redirect back to Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation) (move · discuss) – Change name to match name of tribe on the Federal Register Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 05:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not Nisqually tribe (or Nisqually Tribe or Nisqually Indian tribe)? Also, is "Indian" the best word choice here? — BarrelProof (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sources are mixed on use of "indian", even the tribe's official website uses it. As to the title, I'm not sure entirely whether we should use the federal register or dive deeper to find the common name via sources, I'm leaning towards the second (not sure if there's a special convention here though) ASUKITE 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer a full RM given that Native American-related discussions on Wikipedia are not uncontroversial and have attracted some outside attention; the WP:CR#Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27#Category:Unrecognized tribes in the United States references news coverage. Local consensus on the topic has also not been uncontroversial—for example, Talk:Lily Gladstone#"Native American" actress left open the question that whether WP:NDNID (an essay) overrides the what the usual WP:RS say (Aquillon and others) and whether it is uncontroversial for NDNID to be in MOS:BIO (voorts). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it follows that because some Native American topics have been controversial that all of them are. I don't think it's controversial to ask that the article use the name used on the tribe's website and on the Federal Register. But I'm fine with a full RM if other editors insist on that. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 21:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer a full RM given that Native American-related discussions on Wikipedia are not uncontroversial and have attracted some outside attention; the WP:CR#Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27#Category:Unrecognized tribes in the United States references news coverage. Local consensus on the topic has also not been uncontroversial—for example, Talk:Lily Gladstone#"Native American" actress left open the question that whether WP:NDNID (an essay) overrides the what the usual WP:RS say (Aquillon and others) and whether it is uncontroversial for NDNID to be in MOS:BIO (voorts). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going by the name of the tribe as listed on the Federal Register as well as on the tribe's website. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 21:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sources are mixed on use of "indian", even the tribe's official website uses it. As to the title, I'm not sure entirely whether we should use the federal register or dive deeper to find the common name via sources, I'm leaning towards the second (not sure if there's a special convention here though) ASUKITE 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not Nisqually tribe (or Nisqually Tribe or Nisqually Indian tribe)? Also, is "Indian" the best word choice here? — BarrelProof (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This can be discussed by clicking the "discuss" link in the header above if you wish ASUKITE 20:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Meath → Meath (disambiguation) (currently a redirect back to Meath) (move · discuss) – It should be made a disambiguation page so Meath can be redirected to County Meath, which is the primary topic. TwinBoo (talk) 14:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably worth a discussion, as the historical Kingdom of Meath clearly has a long-term significance as well. Navigation statistics show that around 30% of viewers on the dab page go there, which is reasonably high given that County Meath is a current extant county where people live... Might be worth a discussion? — Amakuru (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ysleta del Sur Pueblo → Tigua (currently a redirect back to Ysleta del Sur Pueblo) (move · discuss) – Page is about both a pueblo and corresponding tribe, both sometimes called Tigua. "Tigua" therefore makes more sense to describe both together, and already redirects to that page. — Moriwen (talk) 00:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just as a note, we have the page Tiwa Puebloans as well, which purports to talk about Tigua people... and if the article Ysleta del Sur Pueblo is intended to refer to a geographical location, perhaps it should remain thus. The situation is a bit confusing to be honest, and perhaps an RM involving those who know about this topic would be advisable. — Amakuru (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seconded, there's too much going on and we might make it worse. ASUKITE 17:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just as a note, we have the page Tiwa Puebloans as well, which purports to talk about Tigua people... and if the article Ysleta del Sur Pueblo is intended to refer to a geographical location, perhaps it should remain thus. The situation is a bit confusing to be honest, and perhaps an RM involving those who know about this topic would be advisable. — Amakuru (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You can open a discussion by clicking the "discuss" link in the header above if you wish. ASUKITE 17:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dhives Akuru → Dhives akuru (currently a redirect back to Dhives Akuru) (move · discuss) – Change to sentence case. PepperBeast (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)