Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
 | Note: This talk page should only be used for discussion about the way arbitration enforcement operates: how to use the enforcement noticeboard, who can post and why, etc. All discussion about specific enforcement requests should be routed through the main noticeboard or other relevant pages for discussion. Discussion about the committee in general should go to a wider audience at WT:AC or WT:ACN.
→ Please click here to start a new topic. ← |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|
Note about these archives In 2008 the committee amalgamated all talk pages of the various arbitration requests subpages, and from then AE-related discussion took place at WT:AC. In 2015 this decision was overturned and AE regained a stand-alone talk page (with the committee ruling that it should have one solely for procedural and meta-discussion, with it not being used to rehash enforcement requests themselves). There are therefore two distinct archives for this page. Archive 3 and onwards are from after the restoration of the talk page. Archive 1 and 2 above are the archives from before the amalgamation. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Requesting a word limit extension[edit]
What is the appropriate way to request a word limit extension? And is it frowned upon to do so? (In this case I'd like to briefly respond to a comment which mentions me directly.
Presumably I can just add a request for extension to my statement but as this would take me over the word limit I'd like to confirm that that is appropriate.
Thank you, IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Go for it, just don't use more than you need. Please keep it concise. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
How to proceed[edit]
I was told to "go to AE" regarding concerns presented here. I'm not sure how to present this as it doesn't seem possible to file a request for enforcement unless it be against a specific editor. I'm seeking guidance here on how to proceed with this. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is an issue I ran into in the wake of the Suicide of Eden Knight; I had to mangle the template and noted the request was nonstandard for the same reason. There seriously needs to be templates for requesting page-level or otherwise non-editor sanctions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Bot archived discussion which was not closed/done[edit]
Hey, could someone take a look at that? FortunateSons (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive332#Makeandtoss and M.Bitton? It looks like the last comment in that discussion was on 28 May so the discussion is probably done and it just hasn't been closed. Adam Black talk • contribs 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I do, thank you for linking to it. My reading of that is that there is not sufficient consensus for a close in either direction, and was left open for further participation which has not (yet) occurred. FortunateSons (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I haven't really read through it. I just scanned the dates. If no one has added anything in over a week, to a discussion started almost a month ago on 10 May, I think it's unlikely there's going to be further input. Adam Black talk • contribs 22:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- It needs administrative closure. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I realise that. I was meaning I think that the discussion probably is "done", not that it didn't still need closing. Adam Black talk • contribs 22:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- It needs administrative closure. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I haven't really read through it. I just scanned the dates. If no one has added anything in over a week, to a discussion started almost a month ago on 10 May, I think it's unlikely there's going to be further input. Adam Black talk • contribs 22:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I do, thank you for linking to it. My reading of that is that there is not sufficient consensus for a close in either direction, and was left open for further participation which has not (yet) occurred. FortunateSons (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
indefinite formal topic-ban from the Israel-Palestine conflict topic area[edit]
I am indefinitely topic-banned from the Israel-Palestine conflict area. Does this mean I'm not allowed to participate in discussions on article talk pages related to this topic? ☆SuperNinja2☆ TALK! 20:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- To the best of my knowledge, it includes everything everywhere on en.wiki. FortunateSons (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Super ninja2 That is correct; however, it was implemented on 8 January and is appealable (at WP:AN) after 6 months, so you would be able to do that on 8 July. Black Kite (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)