Talk:Emma Louisa Turner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleEmma Louisa Turner is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 9, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 19, 2020Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 9, 2022.

Copyright[edit]

Turner's pictures should, I reckon, be out of copyright at the end of 2015. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emma Turner (photographer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note in Reference section[edit]

I believe that reference 41 belongs in the Notes section, as it is an explanatory footnote. Tyrone Madera (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; and done. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linking Short Cites to Cited works via Harvp[edit]

Adding the Harvp template to the shortened citations would link them to their respective cited works in the Cited works section. This would not change the format of the citations, as the format is the same, but would link to the works in case future sources are added. For these reasons, I propose adding the template to all short citations in the article. Tyrone Madera (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from my talk) Tyrone Madera, please leave it alone. The referencing is consistent and there is no mandatory referencing system required for FAs unless I've missed something. I don't like Harvp, I don't use it, and if and when I update the text I'll carry on with the style that I've adapted up till now, so the referencing then won't be consistent (unless I revert your changes, of course). I appreciate that you have good intentions, but this is change for the sake of it. If it ain't broke... Cheers, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jimfbleak, Okay, will do. Just wanted to discuss it. Cheers :) Tyrone Madera (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]