Nicholas Wade: Revision history

17 May 2021

• curprev 16:3116:31, 17 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,167 bytes +495‎ →‎Career: Restored refs undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 16:2816:28, 17 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 8,672 bytes −427‎ Cut self-sourced claim about Wade's ancestor. This would need to be discussed in an independent source for it to be considered notable. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 12:2112:21, 17 May 2021‎ RandomCanadian talk contribs‎ 9,099 bytes −1,161‎ Restoring revision 1019218297 by Generalrelative: rv last stable version (before the huge reverts) and per WP:ONUS - the inclusion of material (Wade's reply) requires consensus for it (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Undo

15 May 2021

• curprev 16:0816:08, 15 May 2021‎ Stonkaments talk contribs‎ m 10,260 bytes +10‎ →‎Career: add page number undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 16:0616:06, 15 May 2021‎ Stonkaments talk contribs‎ 10,250 bytes +484‎ →‎Career: add sources undo Tag: Visual edit

14 May 2021

• curprev 20:1220:12, 14 May 2021‎ Stonkaments talk contribs‎ 9,766 bytes +358‎ restore to original version undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 19:5619:56, 14 May 2021‎ MjolnirPants talk contribs‎ 9,408 bytes +1,538‎ Undid revision 1023168871 by Stonkaments (talk) No, get consensus undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:4319:43, 14 May 2021‎ Stonkaments talk contribs‎ 7,870 bytes −1,538‎ No, get consensus undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• curprev 18:3018:30, 14 May 2021‎ MjolnirPants talk contribs‎ 9,408 bytes +345‎ →‎Career: the only offered version that's garnered any appreciable support at talk undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 14:1114:11, 14 May 2021‎ MjolnirPants talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes +1,193‎ Undid revision 1023119563 by John2510 (talk) Stop edit warring over this: leave it alone while it's being discussed undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 13:4713:47, 14 May 2021‎ John2510 talk contribs‎ 7,870 bytes −1,193‎ Undid revision 1023117969 by Generalrelative (talk) As you noted when you removed Wade's defense, the onus to reach a consensus is on the editor. If a consensus to include one, but not the other, is reached, it will be restored. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 13:3513:35, 14 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes +1,193‎ Undid revision 1023116129 by John2510 (talk) Please do not edit Wikipedia to prove a WP:POINT. There is an ongoing discussion about this matter on the talk page. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 13:2013:20, 14 May 2021‎ John2510 talk contribs‎ 7,870 bytes −1,193‎ →‎Career: Removed quotes from criticism pending any consensus to include them in the absence of his defense. I've left the footnotes so that any reader may explore the issue further if he chooses to. undo Tag: Reverted

13 May 2021

• curprev 21:4821:48, 13 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes +490‎ Undid revision 1023022609 by 2A02:C7F:18AE:4900:B988:AE8E:43B:E59C (talk) I agree with this edit and its rationale, but reverting on principle since there is an ongoing discussion on talk. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:3821:38, 13 May 2021‎ 2a02:c7f:18ae:4900:b988:ae8e:43b:e59c talk‎ 8,573 bytes −490‎ →‎Career: A political scientist is not a valid source for genetics/biology undo Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 18:0118:01, 13 May 2021‎ MPants at work talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes +486‎ Undid revision 1022992329 by Bonewah (talk) I fail to see how this is a compromise: it looks more like making a point undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:5117:51, 13 May 2021‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 8,577 bytes −486‎ →‎Career: Per talk, i a proposing a compromise edit. undo Tag: Reverted

12 May 2021

• curprev 20:1120:11, 12 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes −667‎ Undid revision 1022837619 by John2510 (talk) That's not what WP:DUE says. And per WP:ONUS, "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:4519:45, 12 May 2021‎ John2510 talk contribs‎ 9,730 bytes +667‎ Undid revision 1022533973 by Generalrelative (talk) If the accusation is "due," notable, etc. - then so is his response. I suggest you take this to talk for any further debate. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:2618:26, 12 May 2021‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 9,063 bytes −23‎ Alter: website. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | Linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | #UCB_webform_linked 1017/5316 undo

11 May 2021

• curprev 01:2801:28, 11 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,086 bytes −667‎ Undid revision 1022532744 by 98.116.80.134 (talk) Nope, we would need a WP:SECONDARY source to attest that his view is notable. See also WP:ONUS before restoring disputed content. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 01:1801:18, 11 May 2021‎ 98.116.80.134 talk‎ 9,753 bytes +667‎ Undid revision 1021516143 by Generalrelative (talk) Keeping the first person reply is relevant to the article. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

8 May 2021

• curprev 07:1907:19, 8 May 2021‎ WOSlinker talk contribs‎ m 9,086 bytes −13‎ remove unused blockquote tag undo

5 May 2021

• curprev 03:5803:58, 5 May 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,099 bytes −667‎ Undid revision 1021513015 by Dcrellin (talk) That's not how WP:DUE weight works. We would need a WP:SECONDARY source to attest that his view is notable. See also WP:ONUS before restoring disputed content. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 03:3103:31, 5 May 2021‎ Dcrellin talk contribs‎ 9,766 bytes +667‎ The content of Wade's reply is in regards to the actual content of the book in question, for which Wade carries sufficient weight, being its author undo Tags: Undo Reverted

22 April 2021

• curprev 03:5703:57, 22 April 2021‎ Generalrelative talk contribs‎ 9,099 bytes −667‎ Wade's reply is WP:UNDUE when weighed against the stated view of over 100 geneticists and biologists. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

30 March 2021

• curprev 05:2305:23, 30 March 2021‎ Silver seren talk contribs‎ 9,766 bytes +17‎ →‎References: Add template undo

25 January 2021

• curprev 18:5918:59, 25 January 2021‎ Monkbot talk contribs‎ m 9,749 bytes +3‎ Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 9 templates: hyphenate params (3×); undo Tag: AWB

15 June 2020

• curprev 16:3616:36, 15 June 2020‎ Alcaios talk contribs‎ 9,746 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit

5 May 2020

• curprev 08:0108:01, 5 May 2020‎ DannyS712 talk contribs‎ m 9,745 bytes −1‎ Fixing the location of periods / full stops undo

16 April 2020

• curprev 03:3903:39, 16 April 2020‎ Freeknowledgecreator talk contribs‎ m 9,746 bytes −1‎ formatting undo

15 April 2020

• curprev 23:1923:19, 15 April 2020‎ DemonDays64 Bot talk contribs‎ m 9,747 bytes +1‎ HTTPS security. Tell me if there's an issue with my edit. (via WP:JWB) undo

20 March 2020

• curprev 04:2504:25, 20 March 2020‎ Freeknowledgecreator talk contribs‎ m 9,746 bytes −1,174‎ Reverted 1 edit by 24.38.253.50 (talk) to last revision by Capewearer (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 04:0504:05, 20 March 2020‎ 24.38.253.50 talk‎ 10,920 bytes +1,174‎ No edit summary undo Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLP shouting

17 March 2020

• curprev 12:2712:27, 17 March 2020‎ Capewearer talk contribs‎ 9,746 bytes +42‎ Filled in 1 bare reference(s) with reFill 2 undo
• curprev 12:0012:00, 17 March 2020‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 9,704 bytes +32‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Fact}} {{Cleanup bare URLs}} undo
• curprev 09:5909:59, 17 March 2020‎ Racoon Virus talk contribs‎ 9,672 bytes −56‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:5709:57, 17 March 2020‎ Racoon Virus talk contribs‎ 9,728 bytes 0‎ →‎Early life and education undo
• curprev 09:5609:56, 17 March 2020‎ Racoon Virus talk contribs‎ 9,728 bytes +704‎ No edit summary undo

10 January 2020

• curprev 05:0005:00, 10 January 2020‎ Grayfell talk contribs‎ 9,024 bytes −547‎ This quote is far too long and potentially arbitrary. Murray, as a political scientist, is not qualified to speak on the scientific validity of genetics. undo

29 December 2019

• curprev 17:5717:57, 29 December 2019‎ Pengortm talk contribs‎ 9,571 bytes −73‎ Undid revision 933016821 by 2600:1700:FDF0:C3E8:2D41:3449:37D4:9C21 (talk) doesn't seem to fit with Wiki page for bell curve undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:2414:24, 29 December 2019‎ 2600:1700:fdf0:c3e8:2d41:3449:37d4:9c21 talk‎ 9,644 bytes +73‎ →‎Biography: Added omitted content about “The Bell Curve” being considered eugenics and pseudoscience undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 December 2019

• curprev 22:2822:28, 11 December 2019‎ DaRonPayne talk contribs‎ 9,571 bytes +10‎ Changed the wording. It's strongly POV language to describe the research that Wade describes in his second book as "unsavoury" or "less savoury" undo Tag: Visual edit

27 April 2019

• curprev 07:2707:27, 27 April 2019‎ Cfhosford talk contribs‎ m 9,561 bytes +9‎ →‎Biography undo

27 April 2018

• curprev 22:2922:29, 27 April 2018‎ Kenneth Beadles talk contribs‎ 9,552 bytes +202‎ + 4 categories using HotCat undo

24 April 2018

• curprev 16:3516:35, 24 April 2018‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 9,350 bytes +245‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("PRH01" from rev 833977809) undo
• curprev 16:0116:01, 24 April 2018‎ Goethean talk contribs‎ 9,105 bytes −557‎ →‎Biography: we don't cite blurbs. undo

3 April 2018

• curprev 08:4708:47, 3 April 2018‎ Ashmoo talk contribs‎ 9,662 bytes −13‎ →‎Biography undo
• curprev 08:4508:45, 3 April 2018‎ Ashmoo talk contribs‎ 9,675 bytes +18‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4408:44, 3 April 2018‎ Ashmoo talk contribs‎ 9,657 bytes −18‎ No edit summary undo