Judiciary of India: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 12:1512:15, 29 September 2024‎ Arjayay talk contribs‎ m 76,259 bytes −4‎ Duplicate word removed undo
curprev 08:1708:17, 29 September 2024‎ Magentic Manifestations talk contribs‎ 76,263 bytes −1,182‎ Trim and rewrite lead undo

curprev 08:2808:28, 8 September 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,541 bytes −247‎ The case is uncited. I tried searching for it everywhere including the official website of NHRC. The diary no. is either completely wrong or ill-added (wrongly written). Only strongly referenced statements should be added for these contentious topic(s)! undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 15:5015:50, 3 September 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,788 bytes −223‎ Restored revision 1241156890 by CardboardWolf (talk): Judges count and ratio of people and judges should be made on citations and reports from the NJDG and World Bank etc. respectively (or any other important and reliable citaion). It should not be done on its own!! undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

curprev 16:5716:57, 19 August 2024‎ CardboardWolf talk contribs‎ m 75,788 bytes +2,964‎ Reverted 1 edit by 2409:4081:702:6753:0:0:289C:48A5 (talk) to last revision by Vanamonde93 undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 16:5216:52, 19 August 2024‎ 2409:4081:702:6753::289c:48a5 talk‎ 72,824 bytes −2,964‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 21:3121:31, 7 July 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 75,817 bytes +21‎ Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar undo
curprev 08:3008:30, 7 July 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,796 bytes −490‎ Reverted good faith edits by Nuts5070 (talk): In your citation, DM is pressurizing the victims. DMs are part of the administrative service and *not* the judicial service undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

curprev 05:1705:17, 30 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ m 75,796 bytes +3‎ typographical correction undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 05:1605:16, 30 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,793 bytes +156‎ data added undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 05:1005:10, 30 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,637 bytes +7‎ Restored revision 1230194535 by Rodw (talk): Translation changes undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

curprev 04:4604:46, 27 June 2024‎ 2405:201:6832:a862:a93a:c03e:2a2b:40e talk‎ 75,630 bytes −2‎ →‎top undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
curprev 04:4404:44, 27 June 2024‎ 2405:201:6832:a862:a93a:c03e:2a2b:40e talk‎ 75,632 bytes −5‎ →‎top undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

curprev 08:2508:25, 21 June 2024‎ Rodw talk contribs‎ m 75,637 bytes +23‎ Disambiguating links to CJI (link changed to Chief Justice of India) using DisamAssist. undo

curprev 17:3817:38, 6 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,614 bytes +2‎ the should be used instead of a undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 18:4018:40, 4 June 2024‎ Pur 0 0 talk contribs‎ 75,612 bytes −93‎ Corrected the ISO transliteration and the infobox. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 16:3216:32, 3 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,705 bytes +52‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 16:3016:30, 3 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,653 bytes −84‎ uncited statement in these contentious topics should not be acceptable. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 16:2716:27, 3 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 75,737 bytes −876‎ The Pune car accident case is completely unrelated to Judicial Corruption. There is no question of Judicial corruption in the bail given to Agarwal. Indian laws are very flexible for '''juvenile''' cases (and are also not too strict for MVA cases). In India, all the laws are made with the concept of "Bail is rule, Jail is exception". So, this case is contrary to this topic! undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 16:2216:22, 3 June 2024‎ TheProEditor11 talk contribs‎ 76,613 bytes +8‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 16:5016:50, 21 May 2024‎ Openbook10 talk contribs‎ 76,605 bytes +876‎ Added Judicial Corruption undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 21:3921:39, 13 May 2024‎ 2409:40d2:c:6ae2:8000:: talk‎ 75,729 bytes −109‎ →‎Backlog: Information was repeated in the paragraph undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit