Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ched Davis: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
Next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
nom
 
fixes / done
Line 4: Line 4:


====Nomination====
====Nomination====
{{User|Ched Davis}} – Fellow editors I think it's time that Ched got the extra tool set. A civil, helpful editor whose input across numerous project space areas has been outstanding. With arounf 4,500 edits it may seem a [[WP:EDITCOUNT|little light for some]], but add another 400 odd deleted edits from CSD tagging I see no reason to wait for some arbitary number. As ever, a brief resume;
{{User|Ched Davis}} – Fellow editors I think it's time that Ched got the extra tool set. A civil, helpful editor whose input across numerous project space areas has been outstanding. With around 4,500 edits it may seem a [[WP:EDITCOUNT|little light for some]], but add another 400 odd deleted edits from CSD tagging I see no reason to wait for some arbitary number. As ever, a brief resume;


;Main Space
;Main Space
:Over '''a third''' of Ched's edits - in particular [[Iron Maiden]] has received substantial input along with significant Talk contributions indicating the desire to collaborate.
*Over '''a third''' of Ched's edits - in particular [[Iron Maiden]] has received substantial input along with significant Talk contributions indicating the desire to collaborate.
:Significant gnoming work, mainly by hand indicating little reliance on automated tools.
*Significant and substantial gnoming work, mainly by hand indicating little reliance on automated tools.
;Project Work
;Project Work
:A good couple of hundred accurate CSD tags, AIV work and helpful thoughtful input at [[WP:ANI]]
*A good couple of hundred accurate CSD tags, AIV work and helpful thoughtful input at [[WP:ANI]]
*CSD and [[WP:AFD]] contributions demonstrating understadning of policy and guideline
:Drama free, I'm impressed with Ched as a voice of reason
*Drama free, I'm impressed with Ched as a voice of reason
:Excellent [[WP:HELPDESK|helpdesk]] contributions showing understanding and commitment.
*Excellent [[WP:HELPDESK|helpdesk]] contributions showing understanding and commitment.
;Learning
;Learning
:Some recent (and very minor) errors regarding categorising in the BLP drive where met with understanding by Ched. He's clearly capable of backing off and learning from minor errors - and I doubt major errors are likely.
*Some recent (and very minor) errors regarding categorising in the BLP drive where met with understanding by Ched. He's clearly capable of backing off and learning from minor errors - and I doubt major errors are likely.
;House Keeping
;House Keeping
:Clean Block Log
*Clean Block Log
:Rollbacker
*Rollbacker
:Sensible user page
*Sensible user page
:Great signature ''':)'''
*Great signature ''':)'''
All, this seems to me a classic [[User:Pedro/Net Positive]]. A calm, level headed editor that would do well with the tools and treat them cautiously. As [[WP:FORMER]] grows larger and the backlogs remain let's help us all out by giving Ched the tools.
All, this seems to me a classic [[User:Pedro/Net Positive|Net Positive]]. A calm, level headed editor that would do well with the tools and treat them cautiously. As [[WP:FORMER]] grows larger and the backlogs remain let's help us all out by giving Ched the tools. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
⚫
<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. -->
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. -->
Line 53: Line 53:


=====Support=====
=====Support=====
⚫
#Per my nomination and the right thing to do. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
#

<!-- Please do not submit !votes before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. -->

=====Oppose=====
=====Oppose=====
#
#

Revision as of 23:17, 11 June 2009

Ched Davis

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (1/0/0); Scheduled to end 23:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination

Ched Davis (talk · contribs) – Fellow editors I think it's time that Ched got the extra tool set. A civil, helpful editor whose input across numerous project space areas has been outstanding. With around 4,500 edits it may seem a little light for some, but add another 400 odd deleted edits from CSD tagging I see no reason to wait for some arbitary number. As ever, a brief resume;

Main Space
  • Over a third of Ched's edits - in particular Iron Maiden has received substantial input along with significant Talk contributions indicating the desire to collaborate.
  • Significant and substantial gnoming work, mainly by hand indicating little reliance on automated tools.
Project Work
  • A good couple of hundred accurate CSD tags, AIV work and helpful thoughtful input at WP:ANI
  • CSD and WP:AFD contributions demonstrating understadning of policy and guideline
  • Drama free, I'm impressed with Ched as a voice of reason
  • Excellent helpdesk contributions showing understanding and commitment.
Learning
  • Some recent (and very minor) errors regarding categorising in the BLP drive where met with understanding by Ched. He's clearly capable of backing off and learning from minor errors - and I doubt major errors are likely.
House Keeping
  • Clean Block Log
  • Rollbacker
  • Sensible user page
  • Great signature :)

All, this seems to me a classic Net Positive. A calm, level headed editor that would do well with the tools and treat them cautiously. As WP:FORMER grows larger and the backlogs remain let's help us all out by giving Ched the tools. Pedro :  Chat  23:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A:
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:

General comments

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Ched Davis before commenting.

Discussion

User:Neurolysis/Counters.js

Support
  1. Per my nomination and the right thing to do. Pedro :  Chat  23:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose


Neutral


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ched_Davis&oldid=295875713"