User talk:Jigglyfidders

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your email

Perhaps you should clarify which template you are talking about. Salafi and Quran only movements are mentioned on the Islamic denominations page. In any case do have a look at WP:BOLD. Regards-Shahab (talk) 05:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

in the purple "islam topics" box, only sunni, shia, sufi, ibadi are mentioned

not salafi or quranist (quran-only)

could you add these 2 denominations in the purple islam topics box please?

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Zakir Naik. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include strong reliable sources, not just a personal blog and a wiki page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit request

This isn't really my area - I'd suggest leaving a message on Talk:Islam, if the article is semi-protected and you think there's a problem that needs to be addressed. --McGeddon (talk) 13:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

I concur with McGeddon above. I haven't edited in this area. Consider contacting the relevant Wikiproject (Wikiproject Islam?). From a quick look, the linked word Sects seems to cover them in the template. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Islam. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 17:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of converts to Buddhism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McGeddon (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to List of Bahá'ís. Zhang He (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Adopted!

Drop me a line on my talk page and we'll begin! Airplaneman ^talk 00:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I'll take a look and will decide by tomorrow. Thanks, Airplaneman ^talk 03:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Qur'an alone. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello Jigglyfidders, over the past several days I've noticed that you have been making edits such as these [1] and [2] in a few articles. Posting these kinds of "personal observations" or "personal observations" is regarded as a violation of our policies forbidding "original research". Please see WP:OR. It's a good idea to be especially careful when making any edits like these in potentially highly controversial articles such as those concerning subjects like religion and politics. I note that you've recently been "adopted" by another editor; I'd like to suggest that you seek advice from them regarding proper editing practices before continuing to add material to the encyclopedia. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 03:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Please take the advice given to heart. Another good thing to look at is WP:RS for reliable source guidelines. Questions are always welcome on my talk page! Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 14:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, I'm curious what your name means, Airplaneman ^talk 15:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Islamic schools and branches. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Qur'an alone. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Salah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deconstructhis (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Please seek advice from your adopter User talk:Airplaneman before adding any more unreferenced claims to Wikipedia. This is a final warning. thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Editprotected template

This edit ({{Editprotected}} hi, could you add the Salafi denomination to the Islam template please?) was removed from User talk:MSGJ - you need to place the {{editprotected}} template and the changes to be made to the appropriate Article's talk page. The presence of the template will flag up a free admin to examine the request.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Shii has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. RA0808 (talk) 22:57, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Islamic schools and branches. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 03:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello good sir, please read WP:RS before making any future edits Shii (tock) 05:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to North Africa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deconstructhis (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic schools and branches, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deconstructhis (talk) 15:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Internal links

Please use square brackets to produce internal links. For example [[Islam]] produces Islam. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

allright, i will from now on okay

But you didn't when you posted on Talk:Islam today. Please try to remember. And please can you sign your posts by typing ~~~~? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Kitab-i-Aqdas

The Kitab-i-Aqdas says it's "a central book", not "the central book". The Kitab-i-Aqdas, for example, doesn't go over a lot of the main teachings of the religion, such as progressive revelation, etc. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Final warning

Since you have already received a dozen warnings, I am going to be quite direct about this. This is your final warning. If you change a properly sourced and cited statistic again ([3], [4]), you will be blocked from editing. The same goes for using an internet source to replace or contradict a reliable, third-party, published sources ([5]). No additional warnings will be issued. — Kralizec! (talk) 12:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)