Wikipedia:Copyright problems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:48, 1 August 2005

[[:|WP:CP]]

This page is intended for listing and discussing copyright problems on Wikipedia, including pages and images which are suspected to be in violation.

For requesting copyright examination before including questionable content to a Wikipedia article use Wikipedia:Requested copyright examinations instead.

Notice to copyright owners: If you believe Wikipedia is infringing your copyright, you may choose to raise the issue using Wikipedia:Request for immediate removal of copyright violation. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Wikipedia's designated agent under the terms of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act.

On the other hand, if you see an article somewhere else which you believe was copied from the Wikipedia without attribution, visit the GFDL compliance page or meta:Non-compliant site coordination.

Instructions

If you list a page or image here which you believe to be a copyright infringement, be sure to follow the instructions in the "Copyright infringement notice" section below. Page titles should stay listed for a minimum of 7 days before a decision is made. Add new reports under today's section at the bottom of this page.

Pages where the most recent edit is a copyright violation, but the previous article was not, should not be deleted. They should be reverted. The violating text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it. .

Copyright infringement notice

Actions to take for text

Remove the text of the article, and replace it with the following:

{{copyvio|url=''place URL of allegedly copied material here''}}~~~~

Where you replace "place URL of allegedly copied material here" with the Web address (or book or article reference) that contains the original source text. For example:

{{copyvio|url=http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/hovawart.htm}}

After removing the suspected text violation add an entry on this page under today's section at the bottom of this page.

Optionally, add template:nothanks to the article creator's talk page, to notify them of the problems with posting copyrighted material to wikipedia.

Actions to take for images

If you suspect an image is violating copyright, add the following to the image description page:

{{imagevio|url=<place URL of allegedly copied image here>}}~~~~

After adding the text to the image information page add an entry on this page under today's section at the bottom of this page.

Finally, do not forget to add a note to the uploader's talk page to notify them that the image's copyright status is murky and it has been listed here.

In addition

In addition to nominating potential copyright violations for deletion, you could:

Replace the article's text with new (re-written) content of your own: This can be done on a temp page, so that the original "copyvio version" may be deleted by a sysop. Temp versions should be written at a page like: [[PAGE NAME/temp]]. If the original turns out to be not a copyvio, these two can be merged.
Write to the owner of the copyright to check whether they gave permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!).
Ask for permission - see wikipedia:boilerplate request for permission, Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission

Instructions for special cases

Amazon copyrights: Please list any amazon image copyright issues at Wikipedia:Images from Amazon.com.

Pokémon images: The discussion on Pokémon images has been moved to Template talk:Pokeimage.

Category:Unfree images: These may be listed, if they indeed are not available under a free license or a reasonable fair use rationale. Note that some of these may not actually be unfree images, but rather images which are released under multiple licenses.

Category:Images with missing copyright information: These should replaced and many should be listed for deletion. Those that are currently orphaned can be listed on images for deletion.

These images are available for use on the Wikipedia web site, but are not released under the GFDL. According to Jimbo Wales, we cannot use images that are not GFDL and are not usable under a fair use rationale [1]. Images from these categories may be listed here, but be sure that the image is not also available under a free license, and that a fair use claim cannot be made.

From the mailing list:

As of today, all *new* images which are *non commercial only* and *with permission only* should be deleted on sight. Older images should go through a process of VfD to eliminate them in an orderly fashion, taking due account of "fair use". (Jimbo) :Full Email, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Listings of possible copyright problems

Older than 7 days

Below are articles and images that have been listed here for longer than a week, but have not yet been dealt with for specific reasons.

Poster claims to be the author or to have permission

When you originally report a suspected copyright violation, do not add it here, but at the very bottom of this page (under the heading for today's date). Typically, the issue will be resolved within the usual seven days. This section is intended for cases where a second opinion is needed, or where someone should follow-up by e-mail, and which thus need a little more time.

Fair use claims needing a second opinion

Image:Mrtlrt system map.gif from [3]. Claimed as PD, but the LTA's Conditions of Access explicitly say otherwise. Jpatokal 16:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute: Its a mere system map, which I uploaded out of convenience. There is basically no creative effort in the map whatsoever, especially since its schematic, with no cartological precision. I could basically duplicate it on memory on a piece of paper or using gimp/mspaint/etc. and it would look just as good, except it would be tedious to duplicate all 50+ stations mentioned. Is a non creative work eligible for copyright? I hardly think its intellectual property. -- Natalinasmpf 20:17, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The LTA may well think otherwise! Transport for London charges quite handsomely for the rights to reproduce its system map... Physchim62 20:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting information from Physchim62. I feel that fair use or fair dealing should apply here. The image is created for disseminating information. Fair use still protects the copyright holder, in case wikipedia go commercial in future, (hope not). Vsion 22:10, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. A schematic map does have creative effort put into it, more so than a more accurate map. As such, it is very definitely covered by copyright. --Carnildo 23:20, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If it was a tourist map complete with illustrations, then yes. The LTA map is pretty simplistic, only tedious and repetitive - nothing creative. I could basically reproduce it manually myself, since its just the order of the stations, with my own colour scheme, except it would take say, 15-30 minutes to add every station. It becomes purely a mathematical thing, nothing creative. -- Natalinasmpf 18:47, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Carnildo that schematic maps have creative effort, but let's not forget that it only needs the slightest creative effort to trigger copyright. The system map in its present form could not just be created from a mathematical function of the positions of the stations. It's copyright, and if the LTA don't want to let us use it under GNU then there's nothing we can do. Physchim62 17:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, until someone contacts the LTA and clarifies the matter, the image should not be used. If someone wants to reproduce it (tediously) by hand, they're certainly welcome to. Alex.tan 02:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It is NOT fair use. It CANNOT be fair use. It is on a server in Singapore and therefore the copyright law of Singapore applies as well as the copyright law of the United States. The copyright law of Singapore is based on British principles, modified by local acts after independence. British law does not have fair use, it has the much more restricted fair dealing. In order to use pictures downloaded from foreign servers people getting those pictures MUST obey the copyright laws of the nation where the server is physically located. David Newton 17:16, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dead wrong - we go by the copyright laws of America. Say America had no copyright, Singapore will do what to the American Wikipedia since no American laws were violated? Nothing, it has no duristiction as to the copyright laws (or any other laws) in another country.

Since this image is designed for public consumption, is publically available I say fair use is more than satisified under the Image use policy and Wikipedia:Fair_use going by the United States Copyright Act of 1976 thus I say keep via fairuse, although I am open to reducing the resolution by some factor to push it more firmly into the center of fair use territory. --ShaunMacPherson 22:05, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ShaunMacPherson, please refrain from trying to "reason out" legal concerns. This is not something which can be dealt with in that manner. Either you know the case law involved or you don't. If you are going to contribute your own opinion, then you should at least know what international treaties bear on the problem, and how previous cases have been decided. Without that information your hypothetical is simply not useful. What's more is the damage that such an attitude could do to WP. For example, if a country feels that WP is explicitly ignoring their IP laws, they might require local ISPs to block access to it. I don't think a subway map is worth that, do you? -Harmil 14:02, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ShaunMacPherson, you very adequately describe your own opinion there. You are dead wrong, and citing American copyright law does nothing to alter that fact. The server is located in SINGAPORE. It is therefore the copyright law of SINGAPORE that applies to the images on the server.

Judging by the university that you graduated from, you may very well live in Canada. If you do, then it is Canadian copyright law that applies to you.

The Wikipedia itself is located in the United States. It is thus the copyright law of the United States that the Wikipedia itself is governed under.

I am located in the United Kingdom. It is thus British copyright law that governs me.

Hypothetically, let's say I was the one who had uploaded that image. I would have violated the copyright law of Singapore by using the image otherwise than that law dictates. To quote from the terms and conditions of the website, "By accessing this website and/or using the services offered through this website, you agree that Singapore law (including without limitation, the provision of the Evidence Act (Cap. 97) and the Electronic Transactions Act (No 25. of 1998) shall govern such access and the provision of such services and you agree to submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Singapore courts." Merely accessing the website after reading the terms and conditions means that you are bound to obey the laws of Singapore. So, if I had downloaded the image to my own PC, I would also be bound by British copyright law, and its fair dealing copyright exceptions, due to my physical location. Nowhere in those does it allow the reproduction of images for the purposes the uploader clearly intends for that image. The copyright law of the United States may also not be a defence. Claiming fair use is not a carte blanche to use the image as some assert. Besides, as I have already demonstrated, fair use CANNOT be claimed for images off websites where the servers are located outside of the United States where those images fall under copyright with all rights reserved or similar.

For public domain images outside the United States, or images outside the United States under copyleft licences it is an entirely different position. We are not talking about that here. We are talking about a copyrighted image the use of which, without the written permission of the copyright holder, violates the copyright law of Singapore, and possibly the copyright law of the country the person who uploaded the image comes from. David Newton 18:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this still up for debate. This is clearly a copyright violation. Someone sat down and drew that map, deciding how to represent the system, which symbols to use, etc. Under U.S. copyright law, anything more than a de minimous amount of creativity qualifies for copyright. Since the whole map has been uploaded, it does not qualify as fair use. We should have been done with this discussion a long time ago. If you don't like the outcome, lobby congress to change the law. Chuck 18:10, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Technetium.jpg in article Technetium. The source cited is online, but the picture looks to me like the one in the "Life Science Library" series book Matter. Either way, it is not clear to me that the fair use claim is justified. -- Dominus 12:48, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

image:SharbatGula1984.JPG and Image:SharbatGula2002.JPG from http://www.stevemccury.com/web/gallery/]] same issue as above, listed as fair use but photographer's website specifically forbids use and distribution without permission from author. Jtkiefer July 5, 2005 23:17 (UTC)

Comment Hopefully these images fall under fair use but I listed here because I am not sure and this and the following image seems to fall into a grey area. Jtkiefer July 5, 2005 23:27 (UTC)

- I think they should be deleted and replaced with the original national geographic cover.--nixie 07:55, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is this listed here. There is no concept under fair use that allows you to copy an entire picture from a photographers website. This is a copyvio. Chuck 18:10, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Full Plot Summary: not sure if such a detailed summary is fair use or not. Note that the owner is well-funded and has a history of litigious behaviour in relation to this copyright. —Ashley Y 02:50, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Does the plot-summary contain direct quotations from the book? Not that I can see. If it doesn't then there is no copyright problem to worry about. Since its source is acknowledged we don't need to worry about plagiarism either. David Newton 18:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It could be argued that this is a derivitve work, and that the degree of "suubstantiality" in the amount of the work based on the original takes it outside of fair use. Of course I incline to think it should be deleted for otehr reasons, but that is up to VfD. DES 18:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at its current Vfd several people have referred to situations where very similar large summaries got sued. As it is, I could easily read this to know exactly what's what without ever buying the book! This matter deserves discussion (preferably on the Copyright Problems talk page) as we really need a definitive answer for future purposes. Garrett^Talk 02:39, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Google Capemaypoint.jpg - google copyright visible, no fair use or licence assertation, apparently used only in User:Anthony_DiPierro/Google_Earth --bd_ 19:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded this image because I believe any parts which may be copyrighted by others are fair use. I am not allowed to discuss this issue further, and invite anyone to come to my talk page to discuss things. anthony 23:49, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:London2005Bus.jpg: The claim is that this is fair use, but it seems clear to me that it is not. This photo is copyright, all rights reserved, and used on the commercial BBC website on a page of photos. It's evident that they derive significant value from it. And we display this image on the Main Page! We're practically begging to be sued. Some photo related to this event would really be helpful for the article, though. Deco 21:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deco correctly observes that this image is copyright and all rights reserved. This does not, however, preclude a fair use claim on this image. Fair use is a legal concept used legitimately to reproduce such images which are copyrighted. This includes news reportage!

Furthermore, BBC News operates for the public good. The corporation is a public non-profit entity and is funded by license fees paid by British television users. The BBC news website is not "commercial" (as asserted above) - none of the pages carry advertising and the BBC does not generate revenue through its news website. The BBC derives no direct commercial value from this photo, as Deco has claimed on my talk page. The idea that the BBC would sue another non-profit entity is risible. Can someone please explain, with reference to the fair use criteria, why this is inelligble for fair use? TreveX^talk 21:27, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm, I'm still unsure. Our non-profit status does give us some leeway. It is a low resolution image. I wasn't aware that the BBC was a non-profit organization - I always thought they were a corporation like the New York Times. However, the BBC may have purchased rights to use the image from a professional photographer or a commercial news corporation, in which case we'd still be in trouble. U.S. legislation about fair use of media for news may not apply, partly because the copyright owner may be in Britain and partly because we're not technically a news website. I suppose as long as we have OCILLA there's no real harm in leaving it up, but I'm not sure if this image is covered by the criteria on Wikipedia:Fair use (you reach #9, "Does the nature of the image and source (if known) suggest it is intended for wide distribution?" but I'm not sure if it fails this). It seems like a murky enough case that I wouldn't bet money that it's fair use, at least if I weren't a copyright lawyer. At this point I don't really care all that much though. Deco 22:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The image page is still locked, as it was recently on the main page. I have added a fair use rationale to the discussion page instead]]. TreveX^talk 12:25, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that it is a current news event. The copyright holder (apparently the bbc) wants to benefit from the work. Our reproduction of the image harms them in that it makes their website slightly less useful compared to ours, reduces the number of BBC web site users and slightly lowers their reputation as a bearer of unique news information. While I think it unlikely that they would sue, I think a fair use claim would be hard to defend. Wikipedia is non-commercial and the use of the image is transformative (in making an encyclopedic article), but the image is not an historical record so the nature of the image detracts from a fair use claim. The work is entirly reproduced - although at web resolution. The third factor is partially fulfilled. And surely there is an effect on the potential market, although the BBC might not be intending to sell the image, they hope to benefit from it in other ways. The BBC has an unusual status, deriving much of it's revenue from the licence fee and with a public service charter. But it's not a non-profit in the same way that we are. They are probably unlikely to sue, but I don't think that should be a major consideration. I think based on the nature of this image, our use isn't fair, and the image should be deleted as a copyright violation. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 14:30, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Dispute Er... correct me if I'm wrong, but I am sure that the image in question was from a London CCTV camera. As such, the BBC has no copyright claim on it. Cynical 13:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is full of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of images from news websites which are tagged as fair use. The current events section articles and the main page image for current events rely heavily on such images. Can I ask on what basis may any images taken from news websites be used on wikipedia as fair use? I cannot distinguish between this image and inumerable other similiar images which have never been listed on this page. TreveX^talk 14:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright infringements without online source

These need a thorough check for online sources, and if none are found, a check for offline sources.

Women's healthcare in 20th century China has that certain scent to it - it's the in-text citations and the slanted quotation marks around “China” that give it away for me... could be someone's paper for school. -- BDAbramson ^talk 04:14, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
Italian exports and Islam in Italy all smell like copyvios but I can't tell where from. They were all put up by User:82.43.213.217, and share the same writing style. Dave6 05:44, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- No copyvio notices on these articles. -- Infrogmation 14:21, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I agree that these are almost certainly copyright violations, although they might be school papers this guy wrote. I can't find the sources either. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 15:55, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
Listed by User:Denni on VfD: The articles Sardinian (horse), Salerno (horse), Pleven (horse), and Russian Trotter were all posted within seven minutes of one another. They show remarkable consistency in format, almost as if they had been taken from a book on horses. A Google search for copyvio does not turn up any hits, which shows only that if these are copyvios, they are not from web resources. - Mike Rosoft 17:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
User_talk:Aristotelles#Are_you_having_a_charming_day.3F - Am I mistaken, or are these lyrics copyrighted? - Mike Rosoft 21:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Alfred Lord Tennyson died in 1892. This poem, therefore, has been out of copyright since 1962. EldKatt (Talk) 09:36, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sharon Creech - I don't know the URL but this seems to be a direct copy and paste. Ted Wilkes 28 June 2005 12:11 (UTC)
Jacobo Arenas - This article appears to be a direct copy & paste of some (offline?) source(s), though I don't know for sure what would be the specific URL/source employed in the process.Juancarlos2004 2 July 2005 00:56 (UTC)

Additionally, the user responsible for this suspected copyvio is also behind a proven copyvio in the Manuel Marulanda / Manuel Marulanda Velez articles.Juancarlos2004 2 July 2005 00:55 (UTC)

JX Williams seems like an obvious copyvio, though I haven't yet found a source. Still looking. Gamaliel 04:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Pentecostal Assemblies of the World - article was created fully formed (check the second edit on the history). Looks suspiciously like something you'd find in a leaflet or a web page. Google couldn't find the original. See also Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion#Pentecostal Assemblies of the World. --cesarb 5 July 2005 16:06 (UTC)
Image:Mailman.jpg has an AP watermark but thus far I can't find the image online. The uploader has been posting dozens of photos without licensing tags, in spite of several requests to do so. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:49, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mary Wollstonecraft (Marriage section) "cribbed" (the original editor's characterization) from an episode of Simon Schama's History of Britain. See Wollstonecraft's Talk page for more details. (This item has also been discussed below in July 9th New Listings.) -Cate8 04:36, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Fullpower - I am new to wikipedia and I have permission to use this information regarding fullpower. I welcome a discussion or education on Wikipedia and this article. thank you.
Inri cristo. Looks like a cut and clean copyvio. Also is in a foreign language... not sure what to do with it. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 03:14, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
Persian or Farsi ? includes the notice: Source: Akbarzadeh, Pejman. "Persian or Farsi? What Is the English Name of Our Language?". Namak Magazine, No.4, Los Angeles, Summer 2005.. That magazine exists, see [4] but I can't verify if it contained this article. It looks like a copyvio, however. DES 20:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Neilson - I haven't tagged it because I'm unsure, but it looks just a bit too polished: nothing online, but it has a crime magazine flavour to it. Tearlach 02:29, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pletal - At least the dosage information looks like it came directly from the drug manufacturer. --cesarb 00:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Others

FHM-US's 100 Sexiest Women 2005 - this compilation of opinion is the property of FHM-US. Rick K 06:51, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

- How is this different than any other similar list, many of which are also the basis for a Wikipedia article? MK2 04:32, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this one. More opinions needed. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 11:44, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
- FHM had creative input into the list, both in ordering and selection. See Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service#Implications. —Korath (IANAL) 12:29, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
  - FHM actually had no input on the ordering or selection. Both are the result of a reader poll. FHM's editorial content would be the selection of the pictures and text which accompanied the poll results and neither is included in the Wikipedia article. MK2 00:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This is a fascinating dillemma. On the one hand, I can't see why this list couldn't be copyrighted. On the other hand, we list the Oscar winners and runner-ups, and the Nobel Prize winners and nominees, which are essentially the same thing. I can't imagine it would be a problem to say "She was listed as one of FHM's sexiest women of 2005" in each woman's article, so why would it be a problem to list them in one article? I'd tend to vote keep, but if a lawyer wants to chime in, we'd all be obliged. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 18:10, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
100 Greatest Cartoons - from [5] - intellectual property of Channel 4. RickK 00:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- I question that a straight list can be copyrighted Burgundavia 03:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
  - See above. —Korath (Talk) 18:04, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
Seeing as we don't seem to be reaching a consensus here, I've raised this issue at the Village Pump. MK2 15:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I agree with Korath that the FHM list is copyright as the "creative input" of the author(s) is non-zero. The list would have sui generis protection in other jurisdictions even if it were not copyright in the US. Physchim62 18:10, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree that a reader's poll (with just the result list, no pictures, writing, etc.) has "creative input" from the magazine. I don't understand how either of these lists are copyrightable, where is the creative work by FHM or Channel4? They are both just results of readers polls.--Duk 15:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The magazine chose to use to poll however. Superm401 | Talk 01:14, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
I think a list like this is not copyrightable. I ask you to consider the following analogy: Some organizers had a sort of a contest. The results were made known, along with a a lot of interesting detail concerning the contestants and the contest itself. Later, a second party posted the rankings of the contestants. Did the second party violate the first party's rights in any way?

Example Organizers Contest Method 2nd Party

1 Major League Baseball Baseball team standings Played a bunch of games Newspaper Sports page

2 FHM Sexiest women rankings Asked a bunch of people Wikipedia

Why is example 2 any different than example 1?

However, that the New York Times disagrees with me. They have pursued action against other publications that have re-published their best-seller list. For example, they went after www.amazon.com [6] for using the New York Times bestseller list as a basis for providing purchase incentives (books on the lsit were to be discounted). This was quickly settled [7] with Amazon agreeing to certain terms, including; listing the books alphabetically instead of in-order, and sharing sales information with the New York Times. Since this didn't make it to a legal ruling, it does not set a legal precedent. Maybe someone can find an example that did go to court? Johntex 02:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Canovas three graces in hermitage.jpg, Image:Three graces canova duke.jpg - These are claimed as {{pd-art}}, presumably on the grounds that they are "slavish reproductions of the original". But I'm fairly sure you can't claim that for photographs of statues or other three-dimensional works. --Carnildo 07:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've moved the village pump to Talk:FHM-US's 100 Sexiest Women 2005 to save it from getting deleted, in case you need it? Steve block 7 July 2005 19:07 (UTC)

Bistro - copyright is claimed, but permission to use is given, provided copyright notice stays on page. Please advise... humblefool ® 04:02, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wb-57 - data dump from http://www.nasa.gov/missions/research/b-57_feature.html, but it's a government site, and I'm not sure if that falls under copyvio or not. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 01:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I think not, in this case: [8] says "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted.". I suggest a cleanup tag is appropriate for the article, however. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 01:06, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Steven Chu. Article asserts it uses text available under GNU liscense from http://nobel-winners.com. 216.218.244.9 asserts that text is taken from the Encylopedia Brittanica, and is protected under copyright. {{copyvio}} has not been added to the article, but I am making note of this here. Not sure how to proceed. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 08:15, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New listings

July 21

Codex Belli - the article is a translation of this document which is copyrighted (2002) but encourages non-commercial distribution. this is not GFDL-compatible. Not the whole article is copyvio. Brighterorange 19:01, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As the original contributor and translator I have removed the copyvio'ing section from the article. Would be nice if someone could add a rundown of the basic rules instead. Since the rules encourage re-distribution AND modification, I wasn't aware the translation was not GFDL-compatible. Sorry for that. Would it work if I hosted the translation on a seperate server and linked it? -- Ashmodai 06:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically the non-commercial clause makes it not compatible with the GFDL. I think the GFDL article does a good job at explaining the basic principles. (Yes, an off-site link would be fine.) Brighterorange 17:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 23

Rivka Golani has bits and pieces pulled from [9]; I can't tell if there's a clean version in history or not; would appreciate if someone else would revert, repair, or place a copyvio template on as appropriate. - RedWordSmith 23:08, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

July 24

Cheese on Bread from [10] Denni ☯ 00:07, 2005 July 24 (UTC)
Russian Orthodox Autonomous Church from [11]. -- Scott e^iπ 00:31, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Resolutions (Voyager episode) from [12]. -- Scott e^iπ 00:38, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
John Dory from [13] -- Hadal 01:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ISO/IEC 13213 from [14] -- Beland 02:54, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Viking#Icelandic_sagas from [15] -- Econrad 03:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
John Campbell Arbuthnott, 16th Viscount of Arbuthnott/Temp, from a geneology site? -- Beland 03:56, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lactic acid formation from [16] Goplat 06:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cher calvin and its redirect to Cher Calvin from [17] - Lucky 6.9 06:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Timmonspromo1.jpg from [18]. Image was previously used on an article that has been deleted due to copyvio as well. RedWolf 07:19, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Randomajestiq from [19]. John Barleycorn 07:23, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Legacy will is a text dump credited to "Legacy Wills, (c)2005, by Mona Lisa Wallace, Esq." - Lucky 6.9 07:57, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
EUMA from [20] --Ngb 09:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
James Thin from [21]. Angela . 09:39, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Desert Vista High School from [22] —Cryptic (talk) 11:07, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ricky Paull Goldin from [23] Eclipsed 12:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OneNewsAsia from [24] Uncle G 12:36, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Onenewsafrica from [25] Uncle G 12:36, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hebe Tien from [26] — Pekinensis 14:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Waterloo (song) song lyrics. Dunc|☺ 14:19, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fagaras Castle from [27] lots of issues | leave me a message 14:39, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Egor Ivanovich Zolotarev from http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Zolotarev.html --Joel7687 14:53, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Theodor Pallady Museum from [28] Rl 15:00, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Museum of Romanian History from [29] Rl 16:43, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unirea shopping center from [30] Rl 16:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Theodor Pallady from [31] Rl 16:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
KZZP from [32]. JYolkowski // talk 17:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Matenadaran from [33]. There might be an article on the group, however. humblefool ® 18:16, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Area 19 from [34] -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:27, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
WinPcap from [35] -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:27, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Guerino Mazzola from [36] -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:27, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Sergei Slonimsky from [37] -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:27, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Gresik from [38]. NatusRoma 18:29, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Gun (video game) from [39] -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 18:41, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
On Raglan Road from [40] -- Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:48, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Botetort was copied from www.famousamericans.net/norborneberkeleybotetourt/ Seano1 19:00, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Optical splitter from [41]. Still refers to "Figures" mentioned in external link. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 19:01, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mathsat from [42]. JYolkowski // talk 19:27, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Héctor Lavoe from [43]. -- Dan Granahan 20:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Earl roberts of kandahar from [44] Seano1 20:26, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Muffs from [[45]] Rl 20:57, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rosmertadrawing.jpg, stolen from [46] The user who uploaded also has a long history of uploading other no-source HP drawings -- I believe all of them are stolen, but I'll have difficulty tracking down every source. Aris Katsaris 21:53, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
W. Ralph Basham from [47] DES 22:02, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ngvision from [48] - Site says that its licensed Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 , but my understanding is that that is incompatible with the GFDL. --Diderot 22:07, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Ceremonial Battle from [49]. dbenbenn | talk 22:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Peter Lougheed Provincial Park from [50] RedWolf 22:42, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Tonkshp.jpg from [51] uploaded by the same user who's uploaded lots of HP drawings without indicating source. Aris Katsaris 22:51, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
* Image:GuernicaGernikara.jpg is a picture by User:Error of a tiled wall reproducing Guernica (painting). It was uploaded as GFDL and Cc-by-sa-2.0. User:Saperaud has changed it to fair-use ("you can't make an image and think you have the copyright on what you photographed"). Can you clear if the picture can be under some explicit license or just fair use? --Error 23:12, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keaton Simons from [52] ♥purplefeltangel 23:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
An anonymous user[53] created several articles copied directly from the same site: Computer Security Incident Response Team, Business Strategy Team, Change Control Board, Business Strategy Team, Branding Strategy Team and Architecture team. They also appear to be advertising and aren't wikified. added my sig Mmmbeer 00:06, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Some more (the above reported by someone else):
  - Content Management Team
  - Contact Center Management Team (Call Center Management Team)
  - Configuration Management Team
  - Database Team
  - All are taken from various pages of [54]. -Splash 23:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 25

The Sicilian is copied from [55]
Moshe ben Nahman Gerondi is a text dump from [56]. jglc | t | c 15:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Conde McCullough - The text is very similar to the 2nd external link, [57], which doesn't have a (c) notice on the page but has an overall (c) on the front page of their site, All Rights Reserved. This could benefit from a rewrite and/or additional sources, or seek permission, same for picture. -Kwh 01:47, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
List of Good Times episodes from [58]. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
G. John Ikenberry from http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/AuthorBiography.aspx?AuthorId=153 --- Mike 02:15, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yangzhou university is a text dump from [59] - Lucky 6.9 02:58, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Krauskopf is a cited dump from [60] could have permision but doubtful - Yasth 03:03, 25 July 2005 (UTC)~~ User claims own reasonable enough[reply]
Vincent (song) from [61], copyright notices and all. - Lucky 6.9 03:27, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Face The Music (TV game show) is an obvious C&P, but I can't find it. - Lucky 6.9 03:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wes Craven - the majority of the article was taken verbatim from [62] with no mention that permission had been granted for use. TheMonkofDestiny 03:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hubert Sumlin from [63] Denni ☯ 04:31, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
Zyxel from [64] --Svencb 06:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:M 2004235161111.jpg and Image:M 2004233092034.jpgfrom Getty Images. --nixie 06:44, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Platydemus manokwari - Copied and pasted from [65]. Wrote to author to request permission to use. --Howcheng 16:15, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Leona Lo. Obviously copy and pasted. The artcile itself says "(c) 2003 Singapore Press Holdings Limited" --Dmcdevit·t 07:25, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Stone age habitats from [66]. Spotted by someone else but reported by RHaworth 08:15:25, 2005-07-25 (UTC)
Marjorie Lord from [67]. -- Hoary 08:48, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Polycom from [68] Tearlach 10:44, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sue Hendrickson, from [69]. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 10:48, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dhillon, from [70] --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 12:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reachout, from [71] --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 12:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kevin_pietersen.jpg from [72] Stephen Turner 14:19, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Raymond03.jpg from [73]. Stephen Turner 14:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tremlett.jpg from [74]. Stephen Turner 14:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mayor-mwinter.jpg from [75]. --Wikiacc (talk) 15:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Antiviral treatment is a dump from [76]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 16:03, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Cedric Benson - the bio was taken word for word from [77]. The page was copyrighted. (see bottom of the page) --Krystyn Dominik 16:21, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sudoku cross hatching example.png was created from another image (Jan1.gif) already deleted due to copyright violation, so whatever applied to that image should apply to this one.
Kings transport from [78]. -Splash 17:50, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mount Wilson Observatory Association from [79]. -Splash 18:00, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mitch James from [80] CDC (talk) 18:03, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Caribbean archaeology from [81]; direct cut/paste. --Durin 18:20, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bacp from [82]; direct cut/paste. --Durin 18:24, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
XM9 Pistol Trials from [83] --Dmcdevit·t 19:57, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Atomiswave from http://www.system16.com/other/hrdw_atomiswave.html. There are probably others. Ken Arromdee 20:37, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fax Information Services from [84] --Alan Au 20:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CEO Reputation seems to rearrange text from [85] or some other site presenting the same news story/press release. DES 20:55, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
John Rouse Merriott Chard#News entire section purports (without ellipsis) to be direct quote from

Electronic Telegraph June 13 1996

By John Keegan, Defence Editor

Keegan is, BTW, a major book author -- not to suggest we should steal from minor journalists.
--Jerzy·t 21:26, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

James Beckford from [86] - Darwinek 21:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Studio azzurro from [87] CDC (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Impei.jpg from [88]. Uploaded by new user. --Muchosucko 22:45, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Works and Days from [89] — Gwalla | Talk 22:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Savannah monitor - copy vio from url in template. Dan100 (Talk) 23:04, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Nail Patella Syndrome from [90] - Lucky 6.9 23:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Penukonda from [91] - Lucky 6.9 23:27, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SAR21 from [92] --Doc (?) 23:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
How do Internet Routers work from [93] - Lucky 6.9 23:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Angel20.jpg from [94] explicitly copyrighted - Pete C ^✍ 23:48, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 26

Incipient Jomon stolen from [www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/jomo/hd_jomo.htm]
Touching the Game-The Story of the Cape Cod Baseball League from [95] Eclipsed 00:34, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Voldemortdrawing1.jpg stolen by User:T1v37r who's in the habit of doing that, from [96] Aris Katsaris 00:37, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Moneywort from [97] - MPF 00:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bellatrixlestrange.jpg, stolen from [98] -- Alex Nisnevich (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Jason White from [99] humblefool ® 01:01, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sputnik 29 from [100] humblefool ® 01:12, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gustav VI Adolf.jpg ([101]) and Image:Ingridsweden1910-75.jpg (I don't know the exact source, but he says it's from WorldRoots), all from Worldroots. --Matjlav 01:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC) (Sorry, forgot to sign previous post)[reply]
Group nbt from [102]. -Splash 01:26, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
10 Years from [103] --Alan Au 01:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Luna_Lovegood from [104] -- Alex Nisnevich (talk) 02:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Brook Burke.JPG is a Stuff Magazine photo, complete with watermark stating as such, which is in violation of the Terms and Conditions of [105] -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 02:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Inframarginal from [106]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 02:44, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Sylvie Guillem from [107]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 02:56, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies from [108]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 03:26, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
INTP Preferences from [109]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 03:33, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
EC-130 | from [110] Bollar 03:42, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
U.S. Army Regimental System from [111]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 03:43, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Lacolle River, Quebec from [112] Fawcett5 05:39, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Battle of Lacolle Mills (1814) from [113] Fawcett5 05:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lacolle, Quebec from [114] Fawcett5 05:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Feral (comics) from [115] --DNicholls 05:59, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Colonel Joel Stone from [116] Fawcett5 06:07, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Les Givral's from [117]--DNicholls 06:28, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Aaltuit from [118] cohesion | talk 06:45, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
New Holland, North Lincolnshire from [119] cohesion | talk 07:15, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Seymour_stedman from [120] --malathion ^talk 07:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sistan and Baluchistan from [121] Zora 08:33, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Turing.jpg from [122] --Muchosucko 08:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bogra_District#History - section copied from the link in template Dan100 (Talk) 08:44, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Seleucid dynasty from [123] -- Zora 08:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Alvah C. Roebuck from [124] -- Darwinek 12:01, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy from [125]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 12:11, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Progressive spongiform leukoencephalopathy from [126]. feydey 12:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Bethesda System cites [127] as a source, but also quotes it in its entirety. DS 13:53, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sexualities, Genders and Rights in Asia: 1st. International Conference of Asian Queer Studies - (what a concise name) from [128] --Doc (?) 14:00, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:002 G.jpg from [129], as the uploader was kind enough to point out. -- Visviva 14:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to me like it might qualify as fair-use under {{promo}} however. Would need to be labeled as such. Wikibofh 14:50, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gentry Lee from [130] andy 16:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Frank kahler from [131] (click "Inductees", click back to 1980, click the right picture, then the "click for more details" link) ----Howcheng 16:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Listings from Category:Possible copyright violations Duk 16:14, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wr21cs.jpg - CV. I was the original uploader (as User:H1523702), no longer have source info Mark 17:00, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
EXTRA CITY from [143] - Lucky 6.9 17:13, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CitizenJoe from [144]. --Wikiacc (talk) 17:54, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Video painting from [145] Dan100 (Talk) 18:13, July 26, 2005 (UTC) -- i would like to comment on this being infringing on copyright: i am the author of the article and i am also the owner and author of the URL in question (namely, nomig.net). so there's no copyright issues as they are both written by myself. thanks, NomIg.

Ben Gerstein link in template Dan100 (Talk) 18:10, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Dresden class cruiser, which cited [www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk] as a reference; that site has a copyright notice, though, "© COPYRIGHT 2004 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CRANSTON FINE ARTS". jglc | t | c 17:58, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:02,property=Bild.jpg from [146] (from homepage: "Copyright 2005 Bild.T-Online") --Wikiacc (talk) 19:18, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Image:19100491.jpg from [147] ("Copyright © 2005, Frontline") --Wikiacc (talk) 19:35, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Adairsvillehistmarker.jpg from [148] (© Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia) --Wikiacc (talk) 19:51, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Yug Purush duplicates [149]Theo (Talk) 19:56, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Chiefvann.jpg from [150] (© 2004 - Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR)) --Wikiacc (talk) 20:00, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Aston Martin DBR9 from [151] Dan100 (Talk) 20:01, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Image:12caf020.jpg from [152] --Wikiacc (talk) 20:06, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Image:0307rowson512.gif from [153] (© Martin Rowson 2005) --Wikiacc (talk) 20:31, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Iconda duplicates [154] --Howcheng 20:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:3a041marcos-manotoc.jpg from [155] (Copyright © 2005, Adventist News Network) --Wikiacc (talk) 20:39, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Image:AVAZ-finis.jpg from [156] --Wikiacc (talk) 21:17, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Congressman John Andrew Martin from [157] - Lucky 6.9 21:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Although this appears to be identical to the cited web page, the page itself is only a transcription of a 1918 book, which would be in the public domain. DS1953 04:12, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Don Prudhomme from [158] Dan100 (Talk) 22:10, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Mechanical puzzle from [159] --Dmcdevit·t 22:32, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
Part of Nick Baker (disputed conviction) pasted in from [160] Dan100 (Talk) 22:44, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
The Saga Begins from copyrighted lyrics of Weird Al Yankovic. --DNicholls 22:59, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
W. Garner Robinson from [161] Mark 23:01, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
H2R from [162]. Copyright notice at bottom of page --Rlandmann 23:05, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Douglas A-2 from [163]. Note that despite the .mil host, USAF museum pages are not public domain. --Rlandmann 23:28, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Frozenfar. Source cited but the page consists of verbatim copy of [164] with no original content Mark 23:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 27

Off By One (web browser) copied (with citation) from [[165]]. The copyright notice on the web site reads "© 2001 - 2005 Off By One Productions, a division of Home Page Software Inc." jglc | t | c 16:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bombardier CL 415 copied from [166] as the contributor helpfully notes. Copyright notice at bottom of page. --Rlandmann 00:22, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Serbian Airforce History from [167]. Copyright notice at bottom of page. --Rlandmann 00:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CAMCOPTER S-100 from various pages of manufacturer's website. Compare [168] for large-scale lifting. Copyright notices at bottom of each page. --Rlandmann 00:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agrippina Vaganova from [169] - FreplySpang (talk) 01:00, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Enrico Cecchetti from [170] - FreplySpang (talk) 01:04, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Everglo from [171] - FreplySpang (talk) 01:10, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Runner's High from [172] - FreplySpang (talk) 01:37, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Robin Hood: Defender of the Crown from [173] - FreplySpang (talk) 01:58, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Port Hardy, British Columbia from [174] Samw 03:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Subliminable Messages from [175] Denni ☯ 03:11, 2005 July 27 (UTC)
Image:Mark_48_Torpedo_testing.jpg from [176] with copyright notice at [177] The article attributes the source images to the US Navy. This is not correct, as they were taken by the Royal Australian Navy (the linked slideshow says "Photos and Mk-48 Torpedo information provided by Maritime Headquarters and DSTO Australia. Photos by PO Scott Connolly and AB Stuart Farrow"), which has the its copyright notice at [178], which states that you may "reproduce this material in unaltered form only". However, I don't know if this will require the image to be deleted and replaced with an original, or just deleted altogether, or whether because it was placed on the US Department of Defence sites, whether public domain then applies. A photo from the sequence is at [179], and I have also seen a video of the whole sequence (both on the Internet and at Defence Jobs displays) but I can't find the URL to it.--Nthnl 03:37, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The submitter is claiming that *he* is allowed to license the image simply because he pasted together other images he has no rights to? Taking images from elsewhere and putting them together does not mean you have a copyright that you can then choose to license out to people, that's not how things work at all. DreamGuy 04:37, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Stoneman Lake, Arizona is a 9k text dump from [180] - Lucky 6.9 03:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Jackson United from [181] --Alan Au 04:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Red Alert (Transformers) from [182] --DNicholls 05:36, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ari Inkiläinen from [183]. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 08:00, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Little Smoke, from [184] --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 08:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
New Order (Stargate SG-1) from [185]. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 08:09, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Avalon (Stargate SG-1) (Part 1 of 3) from [186]. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 08:19, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Uppinangadi say it's copied from an article in the original article. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 08:20, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Shibari,_Japanese_bondage from [187]. Besides, we already have an article on japanese bondage, with a redirect there from Shibari.
The history of Japanese bondage from [188]. Similar copyvio to above by same user. Yelyos 08:31, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Our Lady of Ransom School from [189] --Dmcdevit·t 08:47, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
"scrolling TrackPad" from [190] cohesion | talk 09:01, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Avalon (Stargate SG-1) (Part 2 of 3) from [191]. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 09:24, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Prangin Mall from [192] cohesion | talk 09:35, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Mariano Zabaleta from [193] cohesion | talk 09:44, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Midland Red from [194] --Brumburger 09:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mew (band) Dan100 (Talk) 10:33, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Fida International from [195]. NSR (talk) 11:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Leonie Schaller from [196] --DrTorstenHenning 11:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zwen has made strenuous claims that she owns the copyright to this material and that as she contributed it, this page does not constitute a copyvio. (I happen to believe that the page should still be deleted on other grounds, but we should not dismiss this claim without evidence). L upin 12:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Becharre from [197] --DrTorstenHenning 11:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
KEBA from [198] Uncle G 12:12:47, 2005-07-27 (UTC)
Ningthoujam from [199] Charles Matthews 14:39, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Peter Whalley stright cut&paste from [200] which is one of the first sites returned by a google search on "Peter Whalley" + Cartoon. I was actually looking for info to clean up this new article, but found it was a clear copyvio. DES 15:10, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
image:Rugby tackle small.jpg. Appears to be Josh Lewsey being tackled by Matt Burke, but obviously under copyright. Dunc|☺ 15:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
On Thermonuclear War Dan100 (Talk) 15:27, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
(OWTEN) from [201] Meelar (talk) 16:41, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
- (OWTEN)I am the co-webmaster for "OWTEN"'s own webpage along with Cathy Thornley and the Wikipedia article was cut and pasted from OWTEN's home page and Our Mission pages. There is no copyright infringement here. Womennet has also the same portion cut and pasted from our home page. Thanks, Cana Balay (User:Canab)
Danny britt from [202]. [[smoddy]] 16:56, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Compass Group, the Americas Division from [203] Mark83 18:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Motion City Soundtrack - bio copied word for word from [204] (their official website's bio) --Idont Havaname 19:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Leslie Edward "Ted" Geary (1885-1960) cut & paste from [205] --Big_Iron 21:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Stuart Eizenstat appears to be lifted verbatim from his copyrighted agency bio. Please remove offending text and revert to older version. - Thatdog 21:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:ACdre The Prince of Wales, RNZAF.jpg, Image:Officer Cadet Wales.jpg and Image:AM The Prince of Wales.JPG. Claimed to be Crown copyright, but it is not. The copyright notice for the site actually reads: "© Copyright Clarence House and the Press Association Ltd 2005. All rights reserved. This service is intended for personal use only and no part of the service may be displayed in public, broadcast or used for any business purpose without the consent of Clarence House and the Press Association Limited." David Newton 21:15, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ZERI from [206] drini ☎ 22:22, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ahmo Hight - copy and pastes from at least two websites, maybe more. Dan100 (Talk) 22:25, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Aslambeg.jpg — from [207]. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ACME Communications from [208] (a word changed here and there) - FreplySpang (talk) 23:00, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Philadelphia, Here I Come from http://www.culturevulture.net/Theater9/Philadelphia.htm -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 23:42, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 28

Image:TheFalseProphet.jpg - Magic the Gathering ( www.wizards.com/magic/ ) card image, taken without permission from a website ( http://vaso.webzdarma.cz/gallery/F/page_01.htm ) using the image (and tons of others) without the copyright holder's permission. DreamGuy 00:27, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Werewolves.jpg from Blizzard-art.com, as original uploader even mentioned. DreamGuy 00:27, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Vampires.jpg from Blizzard-art.com, as original uploader even mentioned. DreamGuy 00:27, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Starsphere from [209] - FreplySpang (talk) 00:41, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Business Partnerships and Charities from [210] (or more likely from an eigoMANGA press release) FreplySpang (talk) 00:56, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
bid rigging says it is from Wells, J.T.(2004). Corporate Fraud Handbook: Prevention and Detection. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. RJFJR 00:57, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Phoenix_Raven, the linked copyrighted article was exactly the same text. The anon user has created a number of articles. Mmmbeer 02:09, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Haywood is taken verbatim from http://und.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/haywood_michael00.html (the source is acknowledged)
Maritime Special Pourpose Forces, is taken directly from [211]. Mmmbeer 02:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Direct Action Platoons, another one, I'm thinking that everything from this user is copyvio. Mmmbeer 02:16, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Long Range Surveillance Units, here's yet another by the same one; from here. Fernando Rizo T/C 02:18, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Marine Long Range Reconaissance Battalions, per above. Mmmbeer 02:19, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Heidemarie Martha Stefanyshyn-Piper from [212] (about a NASA astronaut candidate) Gazpacho 02:34, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rick Leventhal from [213]. -- Jonel | Speak 02:56, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Leonie Schaller from [214]~~ Denni ☯

03:13, 2005 July 28 (UTC)

Listed yesterday - please comment below. Striking this through to avoid fragmented discussion. L upin 15:06, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rock cycle 800x609.jpg originally from Dietritch RV. 1979. Geology and Michigan:Forty-nine questions and anwsers, has been used in many textbooks and website since, but Dietritch would hold the copyright --nixie 03:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Alexis Bledel.jpg - check out the image itself. A definite copyvio. - Ta bu shi da yu 04:00, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kuwait Steve McCurry 1991.JPG - http://www.stevemccurry.com/ -- related to same dispute as [:Image:SharbatGula1984.JPG]] and Image:SharbatGula2002.JPG above but probably even less likely to qualify as fair use because image is not an iconic news item.
Aranuka from [215] --Alan Au 04:32, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Footf.jpg from [216]. Clearly a copyvio. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 04:36, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Eric mandat from [217]. — JIP | Talk 04:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dennis Genpo Merzel from [218]. - Nat Kraus e 05:15, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Steven quale now redirects to Steven Quale from [219]--nixie 05:24, 28 July 2005 (UTC) and RHaworth 07:28:56, 2005-07-28 (UTC)[reply]
Josefa Ortíz de Domínguez from [220]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 05:28, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
National Association of Service and Conservation Corps - NASCC from [221]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 05:35, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Exploration summer program from [222]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 05:38, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Baixia District from [223]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 05:48, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Ernie Davis from [224]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 05:54, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Otto Carius from [225]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 06:16, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Energy industries council from [226]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 06:19, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Abelisaurus [227] --fvw * 06:41, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
The Art Institutes International Minnesota from [228]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 06:43, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Michael Richey from http://www.library.georgetown.edu/dept/speccoll/cl223.htm --Pyroclastic 06:45, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Jodie marsh.jpg is a magazine scan from an issue of FHM magazine. Clear copyvio. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 06:49, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Messerschmitt Me 265 from [229]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 06:54, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Southeastern Oklahoma State University from [230]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 06:59, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Bill Durodie from [231] Edward 08:03:08, 2005-07-28 (UTC)
First paragraph of On-demand from [232] --S.K. 08:22, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Felanil Baaks from [233] --gkhan 08:37, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Ajvtime.jpg — The image's title at William Gardener reads "copyright ajv private collection". Uncle G 09:40:33, 2005-07-28 (UTC)
- Notwithstanding the misapplication of the word "copyright" in the caption of the image, the accompanying text and the obvious age of the undated photograph make it clear that the photograph is at least 100 years old and would be in the public domain. My mistake, I only meant this comment for the two photographs DS1953 23:29, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
  - Err, this isn't a photo; it's a computer generated timeline. It's very hard to believe it's 100 years old. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:34, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Ajvwg.jpg — The image's title at William Gardener reads "copyright ajv private collection". Uncle G 09:40:33, 2005-07-28 (UTC)
- Notwithstanding the misapplication of the word "copyright" in the caption of the image, the accompanying text and the obvious age of the undated photograph make it clear that the photograph is at least 100 years old and would be in the public domain. DS1953 23:29, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Ajvms.jpg — The image's title at William Gardener reads "copyright ajv private collection". Uncle G 09:40:33, 2005-07-28 (UTC)
- Notwithstanding the misapplication of the word "copyright" in the caption of the image, the accompanying text and the obvious age of the undated photograph make it clear that the photograph is at least 100 years old and would be in the public domain. DS1953 23:29, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Dspam from [234] cohesion | talk 09:56, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Everything I Do (I Do It for You). Nothing but song lyrics, which are definately copyvio. No URL to present. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 11:09, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Association Management from [235]. Thryduulf 11:24, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
STA Travel from [236] or [237]. Thryduulf 11:24, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fat cats from [238]. Thryduulf 11:24, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Striped Skunk from [239]. - UtherSRG 11:59, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Maharaja Sayajirao University from here
Beauregard claim from [240]. -Edcolins 12:05, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Filipino Basque from from [241] Tearlach 13:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: poster claims permission (see here) - but only on a no-edit condition incompatible with Wikipedia. Tearlach 01:35, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20030901085014mariahB.jpg from [242] --Wikiacc (talk) 14:07, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:319217-small.jpg from [243] --Wikiacc (talk) 14:18, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image:ABLETT5.JPG from [244] --Wikiacc (talk) 14:36, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Ethyl telluride from [246] --Doc (?) 15:00, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Website templates from http://www.phpbb-design.com/website_templates/]--Outlander 15:06, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Kasmir valley from [247] (and a spelling mistake for a title too)
Image:YorkSchool.jpg from [248]. --Durin 17:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Chakra Browser from [249] [[smoddy]] 17:39, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Listings from Category:Possible copyright violations Duk 17:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Fletcher Dan100 (Talk) 18:34, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
Jonathan Downes from [257] --Doc (?) 19:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vivas Healthcare from [258] --Kiand 19:09, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Nick Gravenites from [259] Charles Matthews 19:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sequioa Capital from [260] - I do have some doubts as bits of the text appear elsewhere. If this is not a copyvio, please mark for a POV cleanup --Doc (?) 19:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vernon Kell article copied directly from [261]. Chuck 19:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SuperVision article copied directly from [262].--Zxcvbnm 23:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hans-Ulrich Goller copied from [263]. >>sparkit|TALK<< 23:52, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

*Sirpa Masalin copied from [264]. >>sparkit|TALK<< 23:57, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Withdrawn. I was looking at an old version that has since been wikified. >>sparkit|TALK<< 00:16, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

July 29

Mint. from [265]. Bearcat 18:45, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Known vandal User:unknown566 added text to Catwoman (game) that is seemingly copied from [266], which cites "T.J. Deci, All Game Guide" as the source. jglc | t | c 16:55, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Diaphragm seal from here. ike9898 15:40, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Re-written at/temp --Duk 20:06, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yashwantrao II from google cache. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 00:07, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Risale-i nur from [267] Babajobu 00:46, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A Bouquet of Lovers--nixie 00:48, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Group conflict appears clearly copypasted from an essay I can't find on the web. See history. Yelyos 00:50, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Nz warriors seems to be a direct copy from [268] Rx StrangeLove 01:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pitbull daycare from [269]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 01:46, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
WEUP from [270]; the introduction is copied word for word from a paragraph toward the bottom. The rest may be original.M412k 02:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bible Society In Australia from [271] humblefool ® 03:30, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Biodegradable Products Institute from [272] humblefool ® 03:48, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Physiophony is a 54k text dump from [273] - Lucky 6.9 03:50, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BeliSMS is a cut-and-paste from [274]. DS1953 03:56, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Steve murrell from [275] - Lucky 6.9 04:32, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Queen Mother full England.jpg - taken from [276]. The owner of the site contacted me as I uploaded images from his site (which have now been deleted), but I didn't upload this one and the owner claims artistic rights for it (under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Act).
Lockdown is a cut and paste from [277]. RasputinAXP 05:05, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hard Justice from [278] --Alan Au 05:06, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Victory Road from [279] Jobe6 05:24, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
TNA Against All Odds from [280] Jobe6 05:24, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Rare cancer from here. The source is mentioned, but it forbids duplication and is hence GFDL non-compliant. JFW | T@lk 06:48, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bedtime_Story(madonna_song) is the lyrics to a song by Madonna. LisaCarrol 08:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cherie Lunghi Credits cut and pasted from [281] William Avery 10:35, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Obersalzberg from [282] [[smoddy]] 12:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer Davis Group from [283] --Brumburger 13:39, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kate_Barker taken directly from the linked Observer magazine article. Mmmbeer 14:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Jarno Saarinen from [284] --202.78.174.3 16:03, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gandhiportrait.jpg. Photo from Henri Cartier-Bresson who died in 2004. There are many other PD photos of Gandhi. Also it was already deleted. Yann 16:09, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Clinical research associate from [285]. --Edcolins 17:06, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Clinical data manager from [286]. --Edcolins 17:09, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Mahmoud ahmadi nejad from [287] - FreplySpang (talk) 17:12, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
List of contract research organizations from [288]. --Edcolins 17:13, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Good clinical practice from [289]. --Edcolins 17:17, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
International Conference on Harmonisation from [290] (try also [291] if the first link does not work). --Edcolins 17:20, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Nausea (band) from [292] Rl 17:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Institutional review board from [293]. --Edcolins 17:24, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Federal government works are public domain. Chuck 17:40, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but even public domain works shouldn't be copy-pasted directly. Ashmodai 18:16, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? We start almost all the 1911 Britannica articles by copy-pasting. Public domain is public domain is public domain. There is no exception that says "no copy pasting allowed". This may be more of a clean-up issue, rather then a copyright issue. Eclipsed 18:56, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So Keep is the conclusion. feydey 19:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ibpassociation has created the article. He has literally flooded wikipedia with articles which are copied pasted from federal sources (or not). He has probably just used this strategy to insert a bunch of links (these links: [294]), which are in almost all his contributions. This is spamdexing, and I suppose vandalism. User contributions: [295]. Please help to cope with this elaborate vandalism. I have started cleaning the mess (removing the links, checking for copyvio, adding cleanup tag when appropriate and so on), but I am seriously fed up with it. And he is back under 64.187.12.2: [296].--Edcolins 21:12, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Yet another clone: User:Intbiopharm (contrib: [297]), always with the same links. --Edcolins 21:28, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Xeronine copied from [298] Chuck 17:35, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site from [299] Rl 18:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)~~ (this and several other articles on historic sites are based on material by the National Park Service, in the public domain, and therefore okay) Rl 20:15, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Peony Pavilion from [300] - FreplySpang (talk) 18:35, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Rev. Brian J. Shanley, O.P. from [301] - FreplySpang (talk) 18:40, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Big bang theroy from [302], besides which the title is misspelled, the content is a personal essay, and there's already an article on the Big bang. --Alan Au 18:53, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Colleen Marie.jpg image certainly from a Playboy photoshoot. feydey 19:01, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Now and Later(candy) from [303] Dan100 (Talk) 19:02, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Blessed Luigi Orione from [304] (does anyone else see the irony in copyvio-ing from your church) --Dmcdevit·t 20:08, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
- And now forked to Saint Luigi Orione --Dmcdevit·t 21:02, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
- The latest version of the page seems to have fixed the copyvio. Can we just delete the copyvio versions from the history? Pburka 17:46, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
Sistine Choir from [305]. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 20:23, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Bonnie Lee Panda from [306] Capitalistroadster 20:30, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Clinical investigator from [307]. --Edcolins 20:31, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Kriger Research Center from [308]. --Edcolins 20:36, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Presa-canario-canary-dogs-07.jpg from [309] --Trysha 20:44, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Corke from [310] —Fleminra 20:47, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Tom Costello from [311] —Fleminra 20:47, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Carl Quintanilla from [312] —Fleminra 20:47, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
All 11 of the photos/video captures on Natasha Henstridge —TarquinSidebottom 21:21, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
County Executive, from the Mississippi state code. Under Mississippi law, the laws of Mississippi are copyrighted by the state of Mississippi [313]. Any new article should be written at the correct title of county executive (note the lower-case "e"), not at the title listed on VfD. --Carnildo 21:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ibpassociation from [314]. --Edcolins 21:37, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Krystal meyers from [315] (click on "bio" - it's Flash, so I can't post a link directly to the biography) FreplySpang (talk) 21:38, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Shilpakalavedika from [316] --Dmcdevit·t 22:01, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
The_Counts_Buonaccorsi_di_Pistoia found the source identically copied from here[317]. Mmmbeer 22:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
EZ Rollers from [318]. Junkyard prince 22:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 30

Blue lobster from [319] 10:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Japan Ministry Health from [320] -Splash 00:19, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Christopher_S._Foote well meaning copvio from [321] which conflict with © on [322]Mmmbeer 01:52, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mona Rivera from [323] The img appears at that site too. - Wetman 02:03, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Easykart from [324]. -Splash 02:19, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Tibetan paintings from [325] Antandrus (talk) 02:49, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Alternating_current_motor is directly from here.
CALICO from [326] Michael 03:34, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
Leopold Szondi copy and pasted (right down to punctuation errors) from [327] Rx StrangeLove 03:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Aluin Levitation copy & pasted text straight from [328] User: Bnielsen
Foxy (group) from [329]. Wikified somewhat. Yelyos 05:23, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
William Welch Deloitte straight copy & paste from [331]. Notice on the site: "Copyright ©2005 by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved." Page created by the same anon user as George Touche above, specifically 68.184.221.191. DES 05:53, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article was just fine on July 27, and had been built up over the course of 200+ edits. Under the circumstances, doesn't it make more sense just to revert it to that point. Is the copyvio notice sacrosanct? Mwanner 12:17, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

The instructions above say to revert in this situation. So, I did. Vsmith 20:54, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Very Reverend Charles William Kerr, DD. from [333] Charles Matthews 07:10, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Gathering (Testament album) from [334] -- Cyrius|✎ 07:29, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ruby (Egyptian singer) — from [335]. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 07:38, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rex: A Dinosaur Story from [336] Rl 08:58, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ultraman Ace from [337]; the formatting seems to indicate cut-and-paste from some external source, but the only verifiable Google hit was a cached copy of a forum posting. --Alan Au 09:02, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Frederick Natusch Maude from [338] Cool Cat ^{My Talk}
Sistine Chapel Choir [339] --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 11:18, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only a single subsection of that page is copied from the above site. The author of the page asserts that he/she wrote the other three sections, and they are not protected under copyright. See the relevant talk page for further information. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 11:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Public domain Catholic Encyclopedia, restore text, add, {{Catholic}} to the bottom.--Duk 01:17, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Daniele formica [340] --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 11:56, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Great Stupa from [341] - Nat Kraus e 12:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~AIDS origin~~ from [342] --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From the page in question: All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

Source: Original text from the article in Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia: AIDS --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 12:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is actualy funny. But you are right. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 13:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The True Meaning is just a dump of the copyrighted lyrics to a song by Cormega. The rewrite article contains a proper stub. Uncle G 12:34:31, 2005-07-30 (UTC)
China Red Cross [343] --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 13:13, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
De La Salle-College of St. Benilde Rmcsamson 13:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Andrei Gavrilov [344] --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 13:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mapua Institute of Technology Rmcsamson 13:36, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sleepytime Gorilla Museum from [345] (specifically the musician biographies [346], [347]). Tearlach 13:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Makli Hill is taken from here. Mmmbeer 14:12, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Listings from Category:Possible copyright violations Duk 15:31, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Botnar octav From [348]
CampusByAir alerts students, faculty and staff.
Charles Harrison Mason From [349]
City of a Thousand Pillars From [350]
Colwyn Jestyn John Philipps, 3rd Viscount St Davids
Dana Wells From [351]
David Lipsey From [352]
De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde
Image:Clip1.jpg
Image:Clip2.jpg
Image:Clip3.jpg
Image:Clip4.jpg
Image:Clip5.jpg
Image:Clip6.jpg
Image:Clip7.jpg
Indian health ministry From [353]
La Revancha del Tango From [354]
Peepal From [355]
Securitize
Image:LC Greenwood.jpg From [356]
Image:Mauser m98k.jpg From [357]
Image:Natasha henstridge various 192.jpg
Image:Natasha1.jpg
Image:Natasha2.jpg
Image:Natasha3.jpg
Image:Paul Erdös.jpeg
Image:Willie trabbie.gif

De La Salle University Rmcsamson 15:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
More from Ajeet robins (talk · contribs) --Duk 16:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vicaima from [358] Denni ☯ 17:15, 2005 July 30 (UTC)
The Blend from [[359]]--Takver 17:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Eddie trunk, from [360]. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 17:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The God Who Wasn't There from [361] - perhaps not all , but certainly the second half --Doc (?) 19:02, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This allegation is false. I wrote the original material in question--a standard plot summary--and released it to the public domain. Microcinema, Wikipedia, IMDb or anyone else is free to use it. Administrators please note that this is a controversial film that Christians have a habit of attacking through inappropriate means. This likely won't be the last time. Brian Flemming
- The author provides this presskit with a "public domain" disclaimer. The material can be used by Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Greg Bissonette from [362]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 19:14, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
Carlos Gracie from [363]. — Kirill Lokshin | Talk 19:20, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
Edwin A. Finn Jr. from [364] -- Cyrius|✎ 19:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AFAIK, someone's corporate bio is not copyrighted. They're created with the express purpose of disseminating a person's vital data. If you want to get rid of it, just to be absolutely sure, that's fine, but I think it's an overreaction. —thames 17:13, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Corporate bios are most definitely copyrighted. The company may allow Wikipedia to use it as the basis for an article, but without explicit permission we have to assume the opposite. sjorford →•← 10:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marine.jpg from [365]. http://www.photoatlas.com/disclaimer.html seems to say pictures are only for noncommercial use unless they are from "the Library of Congress online Country Studies" in which case they are PD. I don't know about this particular image. -- Paddu 19:56, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Leonard Koren from [366] Rl 20:07, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dendride from [367] Rl 20:13, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest delete. It's actually about a dendrite in the metallurgical sense. Tearlach 20:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- I deleted this--as per Tearlach, the article is not only a possible copyvio, it is written under a misspelt title and a correctly titled article on the subject already exists. JeremyA (talk) 02:32, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Paper Mill, about online plagarism, copies the text directly from here. Irony anyone? Mmmbeer 21:38, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bit-tech, most text copied from [368]
- That's because I wrote the text in the first place on the Website. You could have contacted the editor regarding this before resorting to editing the page.
28 Days (movie), from http://www.ram.org/ramblings/movies/28_days.html
Mike Milosh from [369] Denni ☯ 23:25, 2005 July 30 (UTC)
George Lee from [370] Tearlach 23:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Think Twice, It's Alright - article consists entirely of song lyrics. Was marked {{move to Wikisource}}, but as the author was born in 1941, clearly they aren't PD. —Cryptic (talk) 23:47, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SuperShadow from [371] --Klestrob44 01:07, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

July 31

St._Augustine's_College - March of article taken from various pages on college's website (histroy, about us, etc). 69.134.50.153 20:27, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:BHMechanism.gif - This image is taken directly from the journal article listed on the image's talk page. ~K 00:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Make sure you open the html [372] to see the picture that was taken. It's on pg. 148, copyrighted by American Chemical Society (that sounds kind of illicit (-:).
Neat is a dicdef from [373], which the entry was kind enough to point out. - Lucky 6.9 01:56, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"executive pastor" from [374] with only slight differences. - Lucky 6.9 02:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Leontochir from [375] - Lucky 6.9 02:14, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bomarea from the same anon as above. Found at [376] and others. - Lucky 6.9 02:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dan doctoroff from [377] - Lucky 6.9 02:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cheshire Community Church from [378] - Lucky 6.9 02:30, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Coatzacoalcos River from [379] drini ☎ 04:49, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hika Reid from [380]. —Stormie 04:50, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Olsentwins.jpg - picture if from a photoshoot [381] (notice the montage on the upper left corner). Copyrighted. Redux 05:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Georgii Boreskov from [382] with slight modifications. Yelyos 05:14, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Tear it Up from [383] although last digit of url is sometimes 4 according to google. Also from [384] it looks like his standard description for avertisement <drini ☎> 05:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Universidade Federal de Itajubá from [385] and [386] <drini ☎> 06:28, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Zao (zeuhl) from [387]. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 08:53, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Grameen Foundation USA from [388] lots of issues | leave me a message 10:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
From 67.149.188.224 (talk · contribs) --Duk 14:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian Patriotic Party From [389]
Kurdish Toilers' Party From [390]
Kurdistan Islamic Union From [391]
Kurdistan Socialist Democratic Party From [392]
Iraqi Turkmen National Party From [393]

Stonecare From [394] --Duk 14:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Listings from Category:Possible copyright violations Duk 14:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The text is also on Murdoch's own personal site. And as a promotional text. I don't think he'd mind. (I copied and pasted this from a different computer) (unsigned 66.98.152.31 (talk · contribs))

Code Fragment Manager, from Apple developers site
Gracklstugh From [402] --Duk 15:42, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Punchestown From [403] --Duk 15:42, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Stachybotrys chartarum - unless the californiia agency has released it to the PD [which is possible but i can find nothing of the sort]. This link is Broken 15:52, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Stichometry Comes from [404]. Rx StrangeLove 16:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Joint application development, first paragraph from [405] RedWolf 16:32, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
You Know What They Do To Guys Like Us In Prison, is basically the lyrics to a song. I couldn't find Wikipedia's © policy regarding song lyrics, but they're definitely copyright of the owner. Mmmbeer 17:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Serpula lacrymans from [406]. This link is Broken 17:12, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A Long Time Comin' is just the text from the All Music Guide review. --Cherry blossom tree 17:37, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Arthur Weigall is using text from [407]. Tobycat 18:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC) The material I posted comes from the summary of 'A passion for Egypt: a biography of Arthur Weigaill' by Julie Hankey. I have her permission to quote this material and wrote the web page from which it comes - I am the author's husband. But thank you for your vigilance. Peri Hankey[reply]
Mason Durie uses text from [408]--Fito 18:36, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Caulbearer from various sections at [409]. Joyous (talk) 18:58, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Waterloocitystock.jpg from [410] --rbrwr^± 19:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: in that case copyvio might apply to all the images they've added (all London's tube lines) --Vamp:Willow 19:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, it would seem so (see [411] and the other rolling stock pages linked on the left hand side). I've left a message on the user's talk page asking for clarification and have marked their other images (not from those TFL pages) as "unverified". --rbrwr ^± 20:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
FC Sportul Studentesc from [412]. -Splash 20:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Marxism Alive from [413]. -Splash 20:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Paul T. Finger, MD, FACS from [414] - Lucky 6.9 20:28, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Buttonweed from [415] NSR (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Trevor Rieger from [416]. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fred Zabitosky from [417]. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:53, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Shinan Wayne Donivan from [418]. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:04, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Super 8 Motels from [419]. Aerion //talk 22:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mevlevihane -- from [420] --Mysidia 23:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

John Keane (hurler) from [421]. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 23:25, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1 August

Image:Dodder.jpg from [422] - MPF 00:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bentgrasses from [423] – ABC D? 00:53, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Faith Hubley from [424] – ABC D? 01:47, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Chikara taken directly from here. Mmmbeer 02:01, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Way Of Walking Along from http://www.angelfire.com/weird/tchjdaedn/alone.html and many other places. Surely we aren't allowed to reproduce things like this? Agentsoo 02:19, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remembering Never, from multiple sources. Not sure which is the original source, though.--Kross 02:25, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Pendulum clock history section identical to indicated about.com page, specifically the four paragraphs under the heading Accurate Mechanical Clocks.
El Vez originally from Kembrew McLeod, All Music Guide, see [425]
Gandhinagar New Capital of Gujarat from [426]. It's a Word document available by pulling down the "Regional/Town planning" dropbox. The site does say "The contents from these papers may be used, provided the source is quoted", but I am not sure this is adequate for use by Wikipedia. Perhaps we should ask for explicit permission.-gadfium 05:07, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The statement for reconstructing Islam from [427] CDC (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Edits by 67.126.4.216 (talk · contribs): Macromedia_Flash, FLV, Sorenson Squeeze--Hhielscher 05:32, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Havaldaar Lalak Jan Shaheed from [428]. Idleguy 06:34, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
The old cemetery from [429]. The source is written in Dutch, and when I caught the copyvio there was apparently an attempt to translate it. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 07:13, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Jorgenpfhartogs (talk · contribs), the creator of this article, has claimed on the talk page that his translation of the Dutch-language copyvio is somehow not a copyvio. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 07:29, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Stateroom of city hall from [430] (check the article's history to see the original Dutch-language version, apparently translated by Jorgenpfhartogs (talk · contribs), like The old cemetery, above). sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 07:42, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Kapel in het Zand from [431], another Dutch-language copyvio translated into English by Jorgenpfhartogs (talk · contribs) (see history). sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 07:47, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Intellimetric from [432] (PDF). Angela . 08:22, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Jessica Esquivel, from [433]. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 08:46, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-Partisan Guerrilla Warfare Badge from [434].Geni 08:54, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
More London Underground images taken from the TFL website (one was reported yesterday). The uploader already removed them from the articles after being asked about their copyright status. --rbrwr^± 09:23, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:A Stock.jpg and Image:Elondonstock.jpgfrom [435]/[436]
- Image:Stock.jpg from [437]/[438]
- Image:H-cstock.jpg. Image:Hcstock.jpg, Image:Districtstock2.jpg and Image:Circlestock.jpg from [439]/[440]
- Image:Bakerloostock.jpg from [441]/[442]
- Image:Centralstock.jpg, Image:W-cstock.jpg and Image:Waterloocitystock.jpg (reported here yesterday) from [443]/[444]
- Image:Jubileestock.jpg from [445]/[446]
- Image:Northernstock.jpg from [447]/[448]
And also...
- Image:Piccadillytrain.jpg from [449]
- Image:Centraltrain.jpg from [450]
- Image:Districtstock.jpg and Image:Districttrain.jpg from [451]
- Image:Circle.jpg from [452]
...all of which are from [453] but have been cropped to remove that site's captions. --rbrwr ^± 09:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
FEU-NRMF Rmcsamson 09:32, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Danny Kirwan from [454] Michael 09:46, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
image:torso muscles.jpg source unknown, but the image has copyright information overlaid.ByeByeBaby 09:58, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CORDIS - Community Research & Development Information Service from [455] Michael 10:03, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Frameserver from [456] Michael 10:18, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Haflinger (horse) from [457] Michael 10:21, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Zack Scrivner from [458] Michael 10:25, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Zurkhaneh from [459] Michael 10:29, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Cedric Gracia from [460]. Not quite identical content, may be from an older version, or slightly edited. Vclaw 11:32, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hindu College from [461] [[smoddy]] 11:47, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Inclusive Democracy from [462], which doesn't exist, but Google cached version is here [[smoddy]] 11:57, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cauld Lad of Hylton from [463] (not working today but the Google cache is). -- RHaworth 13:15:41, 2005-08-01 UTC)

Wikipedia's current date is September 28, 2024. Before appending new notices, please make sure that you are adding them under the right date header. If the header for today's date has not yet been created, please add it yourself.

@@ Line 138: / Line 138: @@
 ::::The image page is still locked, as it was recently on the main page. I have added a fair use rationale to the [[Image talk:London2005Bus.jpg|discussion page]] instead]]. [[User:TreveX|TreveX]]<sup>[[User talk:TreveX|talk]]</sup> 12:25, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 :::::The problem here is that it is a current news event. The copyright holder (apparently the bbc) wants to benefit from the work. Our reproduction of the image harms them in that it makes their website slightly less useful compared to ours, reduces the number of BBC web site users and slightly lowers their reputation as a bearer of unique news information. While I think it unlikely that they would sue, I think a fair use claim would be hard to defend. Wikipedia is non-commercial and the use of the image is transformative (in making an encyclopedic article), but the image is not an historical record so the nature of the image detracts from a fair use claim. The work is entirly reproduced - although at web resolution. The third factor is partially fulfilled. And surely there is an effect on the potential market, although the BBC might not be intending to sell the image, they hope to benefit from it in other ways. The BBC has an unusual status, deriving much of it's revenue from the licence fee and with a public service charter. But it's not a non-profit in the same way that we are. They are probably unlikely to sue, but I don't think that should be a major consideration. I think based on the nature of this image, our use isn't fair, and the image should be deleted as a copyright violation. [[User:Zeimusu|Zeimusu]] | [[User talk:Zeimusu|(Talk page)]] 14:30, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
+:::::::'''Dispute''' Er... correct me if I'm wrong, but I am sure that the image in question was from a London CCTV camera. As such, the BBC has no copyright claim on it. [[User:Cynical|Cynical]] 13:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 ::::::Wikipedia is full of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of images from news websites which are tagged as fair use. The current events section articles and the main page image for current events rely heavily on such images. Can I ask on what basis may any images taken from news websites be used on wikipedia as fair use? I cannot distinguish between this image and inumerable other similiar images which have never been listed on this page. [[User:TreveX|TreveX]]<sup>[[User talk:TreveX|talk]]</sup> 14:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
@@ Line 806: / Line 807: @@
 ====[[1 August]]====
 *[[:Image:Dodder.jpg]] from [http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/dodder.htm] - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 00:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
-*[[Bentgrasses]] from [http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/plantanswers/turf/publications/bent.html] &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]]''[[Special:Contributions/ABCD|C]][[User talk:ABCD|'''D''']]''[[Special:Emailuser/ABCD|✉]] 00:53, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
+*[[Bentgrasses]] from [http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/plantanswers/turf/publications/bent.html] &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]]''[[Special:Contributions/ABCD|C]][[User talk:ABCD|'''D''']]''[[Special:Emailuser/ABCD|?]] 00:53, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
-*[[Faith Hubley]] from [http://www.pbs.org/itvs/independentspirits/faith.html] &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]]''[[Special:Contributions/ABCD|C]][[User talk:ABCD|'''D''']]''[[Special:Emailuser/ABCD|✉]] 01:47, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
+*[[Faith Hubley]] from [http://www.pbs.org/itvs/independentspirits/faith.html] &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]]''[[Special:Contributions/ABCD|C]][[User talk:ABCD|'''D''']]''[[Special:Emailuser/ABCD|?]] 01:47, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 *[[Chikara]] taken directly from [http://www.theddt.com/sites/mikequackenbush/chikarapro/faq.shtml here]. [[User:Mmmbeer|Mmmbeer]] 02:01, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 *[[The Way Of Walking Along]] from http://www.angelfire.com/weird/tchjdaedn/alone.html and many other places. Surely we aren't allowed to reproduce things like this? [[User:Agentsoo|Agentsoo]] 02:19, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
@@ Line 865: / Line 866: @@
 [[fr:Wikipédia:Pages soupçonnées de copyright]]
 [[hu:Wikipédia:Szerz&#337;i jogok valószín&#369; megsértése szerkesztés alatt]]
-[[ja:Wikipedia:著作権問題]]
+[[ja:Wikipedia:?????]]
 [[lb:Wikipedia:Copyrightproblemer]]
 [[pt:Páginas sospechosas de violar copyright]]
 [[sv:Wikipedia:Möjliga upphovsrättsbrott]]
+[[th:??????????:??????????????]]
-[[th:วิกิพีเดีย:ปัญหาลิขสิทธิ์]]
-[[vi:Wikipedia:Có vấn đề bản quyền]]
+[[vi:Wikipedia:Có va^'n ?e^` ba?n quye^`n]]
-[[zh:Wikipedia:删除投票/侵权]]
+[[zh:Wikipedia:????/??]]