Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:45, 10 May 2015

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Caution

@Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Salvio giuliano, Seraphimblade, and Thryduulf:

While I won't oppose this PD, I would instead request to change it from "via Wikipedia email, IRC, on their user talk pages, or any other off-wiki method without obtaining the express permission of the Committee on-wiki" to "via Wikipedia email, on their user talk pages without obtaining the express permission of the Committee on-wiki".

There is no proof or even single diff where I misrepresented sources, editors, events or anything ever. I have already provided enough evidence about the mass misrepresentation and fabrication regarding both on-wiki and off-wiki matters by others related who are related with this case. In the light of it, I believe that we should consider relying only on those sorts of contacting methods that can be backed up with some "evidence" and not fabrication. Emails, IRC logs can be fabricated, similar to Windows live and Yahoo messenger chat logs. Thus keeping it limited to "wikipedia email" and "user talk pages" would be a better idea. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with OZ and I suggest to modify to "via email, IRC, on their user talk pages, or any other off-wiki method without obtaining the express permission of the Committee on-wiki" otherwise OZ will start flooding inboxes. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:11, 10 May 2015 edit OccultZone (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 224,089 edits →‎Caution: + ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:45, 10 May 2015 edit undo Magioladitis (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 908,554 edits →‎Caution: + Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	There is no proof or even single diff where I misrepresented sources, editors, events or anything ever. I have already provided enough evidence about the mass misrepresentation and fabrication regarding both on-wiki and off-wiki matters by others related who are related with this case. In the light of it, I believe that we should consider relying only on those sorts of contacting methods that can be backed up with some "evidence" and not fabrication. Emails, IRC logs can be fabricated, similar to Windows live and Yahoo messenger chat logs. Thus keeping it limited to "wikipedia email" and "user talk pages" would be a better idea. [[User:OccultZone\|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top\|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone\|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone\|Log]])</small> 03:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		There is no proof or even single diff where I misrepresented sources, editors, events or anything ever. I have already provided enough evidence about the mass misrepresentation and fabrication regarding both on-wiki and off-wiki matters by others related who are related with this case. In the light of it, I believe that we should consider relying only on those sorts of contacting methods that can be backed up with some "evidence" and not fabrication. Emails, IRC logs can be fabricated, similar to Windows live and Yahoo messenger chat logs. Thus keeping it limited to "wikipedia email" and "user talk pages" would be a better idea. [[User:OccultZone\|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top\|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone\|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone\|Log]])</small> 03:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

			:I disagree with OZ and I suggest to modify to '''"'''via email, IRC, on their user talk pages, or any other off-wiki method without obtaining the express permission of the Committee on-wiki'''"''' otherwise OZ will start flooding inboxes. -- [[User:Magioladitis\|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis\|talk]]) 06:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)