User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions
→Re: A-class review of Armia Krajowa: response |
|||
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
I was refering to the version of the article at the time I posted my comment. One sentance acknowledging that there are different views on AK in the intro seems to represent the article's content so is in line with [[WP:LEAD]]. Please note that I have very little knowledge of this particular topic, and can't comment on the article's accuracy. --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 11:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
I was refering to the version of the article at the time I posted my comment. One sentance acknowledging that there are different views on AK in the intro seems to represent the article's content so is in line with [[WP:LEAD]]. Please note that I have very little knowledge of this particular topic, and can't comment on the article's accuracy. --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 11:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:On a related topic, I think that non-positive aspects of topics should be included in introductions when this is relevant and reflects the article's content. For instance the lead in [[Timor Leste Defence Force]] (which I recently played the lead role in bringing to FA class) is pretty damming of the military's effectiveness. If I were writing an article on the Red Army or US Army I'd include their problems as well (eg, the Soviets insensitivity to casualties and the US Army's poor record in counter-insurgency). --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 11:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
:On a related topic, I think that non-positive aspects of topics should be included in introductions when this is relevant and reflects the article's content. For instance the lead in [[Timor Leste Defence Force]] (which I recently played the lead role in bringing to FA class) is pretty damming of the military's effectiveness. If I were writing an article on the Red Army or US Army I'd include their problems as well (eg, the Soviets insensitivity to casualties and the US Army's poor record in counter-insurgency). --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 11:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
::It was the version at the time I made my post - which from the diffs you posted was the one you prefer. Miyokan seems to have been mistaken about the version at the time I made my post. --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 08:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Congress Poland == |
== Congress Poland == |
Revision as of 08:43, 11 April 2008
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (moved 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (moved 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (moved 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (moved 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (moved 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 (moved 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (moved 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (moved 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (moved 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (moved 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (moved 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (moved 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (moved 8 April, 2008)
If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that I will either:
at my discretion
Current RfAdminship
POSTSee my post at Talk:Stanisław Krysicki Huns over the walls!FYI Can't believe this! I'm too busy right now for WP, so can you monitor/influence this... hopefully he/she was to lazy to fix the created redlinks... leaving things more or less intact, but I find it hard to think of a 1632 article which didn't/doesn't/shouldn't reference and link to this page! Sheesh! // FrankB 14:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Polish culture during World War IICongratulations and keep up the good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemlock Martinis (talk • contribs) 15:27, April 2, 2008 Propaganda manipulation in Armia KrajowaThe text below is manipulation, it hides facts. After the quote I will write what is hidden by the author.
Alledged report by SS uses communist propaganda language which makes it curious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_partisans_in_Poland Communist propaganda routinely referred to the anti-Soviet Polish underground army as "bands of White Poles." According to another propaganda directive, the Polish underground was to be referred to as "the protégés of the Gestapo."[2] On 23 June 1943, the Soviet partisan leadership authorized the denouncing of the Polish underground to the Nazis. Later, orders went out to “shoot the [Polish] leaders” and “discredit, disarm, and dissolve” their units.[2] --ObywatelKwak (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Józef BakaHej, czy nie chciałbyś może zrobić stuba z pl:Józef Baka? Jest właśnie w rozbudowie, i za parę miesięcy będzie z tego medal. Przy tym szkoda, żeby nie było w en-wiki artykułu o Takiej Postaci :), a jakbym sam to próbował pisać, pewnie wyszłoby zupełnie po murzyńsku. Pozdr., 83.6.13.111 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC) (Laforgue). Official propose.Hello Piotrus, are you want become bureacruat on EN-Wiki? Alden or talk with Alden 20:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
MEBUY.PLHello Piotrus, Could you please help me i really don't understand what that is not accepted with mebuy.pl. the text that you don't accept could youplease remove it and keep this information page. thank you for your support Tintin72 (talk) 06:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Very weak keep for that one. The website has relatively high Alexa rank 66th in Poland (but see also WP:ALEXA and Alexa concerns) and notable ownership—Agora and gazeta.pl. Some informations about rank in Polish blog hosting services and website notable awards (if any) should be added into the article to fill WP notability guidelines. I've tagged it as unreferenced, OR and no assertion of notability. Visor (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC) GA reviewI've read somewhere that the maximum duration for the hold period in the GA review is seven days. Is it a strict limit or do reviewers have some discretion to extend that period in difficult cases? You have indicated that you'll correct the Łódź insurrection article as time permits; roughly what timeframe have you got in mind? --Doopdoop (talk) 22:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Good Administrator Award
Witaj. Wprowadziłem datę śmierci pani prof.[[2]], po czym poprawka zniknęła z enwiki, a w historii edycji brak danych, kto usunął i czemu. Potwierdzenie faktu jest np. w nekrologu Gazety Wyborczej [3], zresztą o tym wiele źródeł pisało, więc nie wiem czemu ktoś usunął i czemu nie wiadomo kto. Czy mógłbyś to wyjasnić. Jeśli możesz to odpowiedz na mój adres plwiki [[4]]. --156.17.102.70 (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC) Odnośnie tego. Przetłumaczyłem ile tylko potrafiłem. Przydałaby się mała pomoc - dwa zdania zostawiłem po polsku. PS. Stworzyłem ostatnio też ze 10 artykułów dotyczących kuchni śląskiej - (Category:Silesian cuisine) Jeśli znajdziesz kiedyś trochę czasu to może warto przejrzeć bo mogą być błędy. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL (talk) 19:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC) AWARD
knight of Wikipedia
A break?Hey, it sounds to me like you need a break... I sincerely suggest you take a short break (did you notice it's spring outside?) There is more to life than wiki. Renata (talk) 03:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
DYKI've found very interesting article about it at the http://web.mst.edu/~microbio/BIO221_1998/Proteus_0x19.html. An excellent candidate for DYK. Visor (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC) ProposalAs a prominent Slavic editor, I'd like to here your opinion here. Thank you. The Dominator (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC) A-class review of Armia KrajowaIn March you've commented on the Armia Krajowa article, which have eventually passed the A-class review. Since then I have been steadily expanding the article (my goal is to FA it one day), but in recent days a content dispute is threatening to destabilize this article; your comments would be much appreciated here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
MOSDABHi, Piotrus! Do you have any further plans regarding what to do with this thread? I don't see it going anywhere, and would hate to see it closed in this hung state. Maybe it would make sense to undo the whole revision and have its supporters to formally submit it for community's consideration instead of allowing them to quitely pass it behind everybody's backs. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
DYKThanks for info, but I can't make myself to create inline refs, if all article is based on one source. You can put them in places you like ;-) Pibwl ←« 20:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Polish JewsSorry, I wasn't aware of that. I will post a rationale, but essentially it's this: every other equivalent article is called "History of the Jews in..." (see the template at the bottom). Biruitorul (talk) 21:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Mix up
I really appreciate his contributions into a demoscene, but nn and no V&RS. Prod? Visor (talk) 12:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Hi Piotrus, Could you be so kind to merge the page Adam Kieslowski into Eva & Adam? I don't really know how that works, sorry. Thanks in advance Adam-Kieslowski (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Hi again, Thanks for your reply. I've tried my best to merge it in. I'm not feeling discouraged at all because of your comments, you put them down very correctly, I don't have any problems about that. I do have a problem about how some people around here act towards others trying to do a good thing. Apparently this is accepted, which does discourage me. Wikipedia should be all about sharing and contributing, not flaming others about a few mistakes. Nice way to discourage newbies around here. It's time people act against people at that discussion page. Adam-Kieslowski (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Do you think the article meets WP:N. I am confused. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: A-class review of Armia KrajowaI was refering to the version of the article at the time I posted my comment. One sentance acknowledging that there are different views on AK in the intro seems to represent the article's content so is in line with WP:LEAD. Please note that I have very little knowledge of this particular topic, and can't comment on the article's accuracy. --Nick Dowling (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Congress PolandHi, I was looking for someone to proof-read my re-write of Congress Poland, and you seem an ideal candidate! As I said on the talk page, it was mostly to clean up language and referencing, I did my best to base it on what was on the page but my grasp of Polish history is nil. Would you mind checking my work? WLU (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
|