Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigi Mon Mathew: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:49, 26 April 2008

Gigi Mon Mathew

References include only three links, which all contain almost the exact same text. There's not wide enough coverage on this person either. A Google Search comes up with only those articles and some other links linking back to Wikipedia mirrors. I've tried to get more sources for verification, but have been unable to find any. vi5in^[talk] 16:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Similar to Vivin (talk · contribs), I was also unable to find significant coverage in other WP:RS/WP:V sources. Cirt (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any significant notability here. WP:BLP1E comes to mind. Powers ^T 21:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It is clearly bad faith nomination by User:Vivin. The reprisal initiated when the moment I reverted his pov pushing on Nair article. The details are here. Ok coming to the point, I’d already added my rationale removing prod template added by the same user at articles talk page. Please note that notability is judged by coverage in reliable sources per WP:N and WP:RS. In this case, three main references from Middle East’s reputable sources such as tradearabia.com & albawaba.com etc. Apart from these, it was published by local news papers such as Malayala Manorama, Mathrubhoomy etc. The news was an item by a TV channel that during its Gulf news special telecast program. Also note that we have dozens of Wikipedia article created for Lottery winners. We have indeed a Category:Lottery_winners for that also. Many of these winners don’t have any prior notability at all. They are all notable because of they got bagged a huge amount of jackpot. If User:Vivin’s rationale is reasonable, all these articles also should be fleshed-out. Another reason to keep is that it is one the rarest news in its nature, as it is the biggest prize ever offered in the UAE by a publicly owned nationalized bank on promotion of their credit cards. A first and last promotion and an unusual incident in its nature. Therefore, we have plenty of strong reasons to keep it. The rationale provided by the nominator (User:Vivin) is that the References include only three links, which all contain almost the exact same text. There's not wide enough coverage on this person either. He is a lottery winner and he is notable only through this rarest contest therefore what else news you need about him? The article doesn’t have any original research as all materials written with the support of available references per WP:TRUTH. It is a real TRUTH whether you believe it or not and no matter whether you like him or not.Thanks. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 04:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *'''Delete.''' Similar to {{user|Vivin}}, I was also unable to find significant coverage in other [[WP:RS]]/[[WP:V]] sources.  [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 17:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete.''' I don't see any significant notability here.  [[WP:BLP1E]] comes to mind.  [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 21:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' - It is clearly bad faith nomination by [[User:Vivin]]. The reprisal initiated when the moment I reverted his pov pushing on [[Nair]] article. The details are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nair&action=history here]. Ok coming to the point, I’d already added my rationale removing prod template added by the same user at articles [[Talk:Gigi_Mon_Mathew|talk page]]. Please note that notability is judged by coverage in reliable sources per [[WP:N]] and [[WP:RS]]. In this case, three main references from Middle East’s reputable sources such as tradearabia.com & albawaba.com etc. Apart from these, it was published by local news papers such as Malayala Manorama, Mathrubhoomy etc. The news was an item by a TV channel that during its Gulf news special telecast program. Also note that we have dozens of Wikipedia article created for Lottery winners. We have indeed a [[Category|Category:Lottery_winners]] for that also. Many of these winners don’t have any prior notability at all. They are all notable because of they got bagged a huge amount of jackpot. If User:Vivin’s rationale is reasonable, all these articles also should be fleshed-out. Another reason to keep is that it is one the rarest news in its nature, as it is the biggest prize ever offered in the UAE by a publicly owned nationalized bank on promotion of their credit cards. A first and last promotion and an unusual incident in its nature. Therefore, we have plenty of strong reasons to keep it. The rationale provided by the nominator (User:Vivin) is that the ''References include only three links, which all contain almost the exact same text. There's not wide enough coverage on this person either''. He is a lottery winner and he is notable only through this rarest contest therefore what else news you need about him? The article doesn’t have any original research as all materials written with the support of available references per [[WP:TRUTH]]. It is a real TRUTH whether you believe it or not and no matter whether you like him or not.Thanks. --'''[[User:Harjk|<span style="color:00CC33">Tomb of the Unknown Warrior</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Harjk|<span style="color:#6666CC">tomb</span>]]</small>''' 04:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)