Jump to content

Talk:Computer/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
 
Larry_Sanger (talk)
No edit summary
Line 84: Line 84:


Any suggestions (or just plain edits) on how to improve my explanation of why Turing-completeness is important would be appreciated. [[Robert Merkel]]
Any suggestions (or just plain edits) on how to improve my explanation of why Turing-completeness is important would be appreciated. [[Robert Merkel]]

----

Yes, the new one is really looking good! --[[LMS]]



Revision as of 03:46, 8 September 2001

Is my thermostat a computer?  :-)


No it is simple feedback device unless it is programable thermostat.


Suppose it's programmable.


Then yes, it is a computer. I think a more natural way of speaking would be to say that it has a computer in it.


Well, no; it has an embedded chip...that doesn't make it a computer, does it?


We have to start with definition. To most people 'computer' means personal computer and even if thet think about supercomputer they see more powerful pc. If we however stick to the definition 'device that process data' than computer will have much broader meaning. ENIAC was a computer but it did not resemble present computers. Computer computes data therefore any device that does it can be called computer. Programable thermostat has small computer inside and one of the more sophisticated might be more powerful than ENIAC.


I think a strong connotation of computer nowadays is that it is universal, ie can perform any computational task. A thermostat can be incredibly sophisticated but it will still only tell you when to turn on the heater. A pac-man machine will only play pac-man. But a computer can do either of those things, or much more, so long as you give it instructions on how to do so.




A computer used to mean a person that computed, eventually a person

that computed using an adding machine. Many of these computers were

women. The computations were often systems of differential equations

(or other linear systems), for example, solving problems in ballistics.





I intend to give this page a serious working over as the result of some interesting discussions on Konrad Zuse/Talk and on the other "history of computing" related pages. Robert Merkel



As the author of the page (though it has been improved somewhat since) i think a complete rewrite would be nice. I wrote it mostly in desperation that so important a topic had only a one like entry. The current page is better than that but not particularly good.


However, i suggest not deleting anything from the page until you have a complete article that covers all the important stuff already there (and hopefully more!). One way might be to rule a line at the top (or bottom) and start your rewrite in a seperate section. When you have enough there the old version could be removed.


I have seen a few other pages where mediocre articles were deleted by someone who then ran out of steam before completing their rewrite, leaving something worse than the original. Leaving both versions available during the transition protects somewhat against this disaster. Best of luck here!




I didn't see the above comment until I had committed my rewrite (it was actually a good idea you had, if somebody can restore the old article and hang it somewhere that'd be good).


(Done. It's at the end of the new one. New one is looking good!)


It is approximately half "feature-complete" at this point. Seeing we already have a great deal of other material on computing topics, I intend to concentrate merely on the "what is a computer" question, with very brief overviews of the other two subheadings.



Any suggestions (or just plain edits) on how to improve my explanation of why Turing-completeness is important would be appreciated. Robert Merkel


Yes, the new one is really looking good! --LMS