Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:29, 29 October 2005

[[:|WP:AER
or WP:RFAr/AER]]

This page lists requests by the Arbitration Committee that it feels need to be enforced by Administrators. Admins are not required to enforce these rulings but they are required to not stop those that do. Only Arbitration Committee members can add new items to this page. If a block is needed, then the Admin who conducts it should indicate so after the listed item. Newer requests at top.

This page contains only active parts of a decision. For the full ruling, please see the respective decision page.

Lightbringer banned from editing articles relating to freemasonry

Lightbringer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from editing articles relating to freemasonry pending resolution of the arbitration case concerning him Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Lightbringer/Proposed_decision#Lightbringer.

Rktect banned from editing weights and measures

Rktect (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned indefinitely from editing any article which relates to weights and measures (metrology). Rktect may be briefly blocked should he do so, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rktect#Remedies

Ban on editors involved in Bogdanov Affair

All user accounts used by participants in the external controversy (involving the Bogdanov Affari) are banned from Wikipedia pending resolution of this matter. The criteria for determining external involvement shall be a review of their edit history, it being presumed that if the vast majority of their edits were to the Bogdanov Affair and related pages such as this arbitration that they are not Wikipedia editors but persons involved in the external dispute. This group includes: YBM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), XAL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), ProfesseurYIN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Igor B. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), CatherineV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 82.123.187.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Laurence67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), EE Guy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 82.123.46.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 82.123.57.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), Luis A. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and all others who meet the criteria. Rbj (talk · contribs), a regular Wikipedia editor, and User-multi error: "Ze_miguel" is not a valid project or language code (help)., a new editor who has edited other areas, are banned from editing Bogdanov Affair, pending resolution of this matter.

A less restrictive injunction Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Proposed decision#Ban on editing Bogdanov Affair is under consideration and may replace the total bans. Fred Bauder 19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Additional editors included

LLL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 00:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Doctor No (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 00:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Laurent s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:12, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Gannon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 21:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Baumer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 21:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Solar S (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 21:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
80.11.18.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 21:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Marc Perroud (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 21:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
82.123.236.96 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 03:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Corector (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 12:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
82.123.190.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 12:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cohen P (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 22:14, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
198.80.150.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 22:14, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
82.123.111.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
82.123.116.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Herbert s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
195.175.37.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
193.253.29.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Forumer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
IGB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
RhiannonH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Fred Bauder 14:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zen-master

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zen-master
Zen-master is placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year from the date of closing this case. Should any sysop feel that it is necessary that Zen-master be banned from an article where they are engaged in edit warring, removal of sourced material, POV reorganizations of the article, or any other activity which the user considers disruptive, they shall place a template {{Zen-master banned}} at the top of the talk page of the article, and notify them on their talk page. The template shall include the ending date of the ban (one year from this decision) and a link to Wikipedia:Probation. The template may be removed by any editor, including Zen-master, at the end of the ban. If Zen-master edits an article they are banned from, they may be briefly blocked from editing Wikipedia, up to a week for repeat offenses.
Zen-master is banned for one week for making personal attacks.

James F. (talk) 16:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Limited ban on ArmchairVexillologistDon

2.3) User:ArmchairVexillologistDon is banned from the editing of any Wikipedia page related to vexillology, fascism, or Canada pending a decision their arbitration case. What constitutes "Vexillogy," "fascism," or "Canada" shall be interpreted broadly. Fred Bauder 21:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yuber and Guy Montag

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yuber
Yuber and Guy Montag are each placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year from the date of closing this case. Should any sysop feel that it is necessary that either Yuber or Guy Montag be banned from an article where one of them is engaged in edit warring, removal of sourced material, POV reorganizations of the article, or any other activity which the user considers disruptive they shall place a template {{Yuber banned}} or {{Guy Montag banned}} as appropriate at the top of the talk page of the article, and notify them on their talk page. The template shall include the ending date of the ban (one year from this decision) and a link to Wikipedia:Probation. The template may be removed by any editor, including Yuber and Guy Montag, at the end of the ban. If Yuber or Guy Montag edit an article they are banned from, they may be briefly blocked from editing Wikipedia, up to a week for repeat offenses.
Yuber is instructed to use only this account, and no anonymous IPs. What editing constitutes Yuber's is up to any sysop to decide. If Yuber violates this, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to a week.
Guy Montag is banned from editing any article related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for three months from the date of closing this case.

James F. (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AI

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/AI
AI (under any username) is banned from Wikipedia pending the final resolution of all legal disputes with Wikipedia. Any edits AI attempts to make until this time, under any account or IP, should be immediately reverted.
AI is instructed to use only this account, and no anonymous IPs. What editing constitutes AI's is up to any sysop to decide. If AI violates this, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to a month for one-off offences, and up to a year for repeat offences.
Further, AI is banned from refactoring dialogue on talk pages, or rearranging any talk page, including material which constitutes "personal comments" or personal attacks (this applies to all talk pages except AI's own user talk page), and also banned from editing any article related to the Church of Scientology. If AI violates either of these, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to 24 hours for one-off offences, and up to a week per violation for repeat offences.

James F. (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OldRight

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/OldRight
OldRight (under any username) is placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year. This means that any administrator, in the exercise of their judgement for reasonable cause, documented in a section of this decision, may ban Old Right from any article he disrupts by inappropriate editing. OldRight must be notified on his talk page of any bans and a note must also placed on WP:AN/I. Should Old Right, using any account, edit any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly banned from Wikipedia, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.

James F. (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielsimon

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Gabrielsimon
Gabrielsimon (under any username) is banned from editing Wikipedia for one month. Should Gabrielsimon (talk · contribs) return using any sockpuppet or anonymous IP during any one month ban, the sockpuppet shall be banned indefinitely and the ban shall be extended to two months.

Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 09:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dot Six temporary injunction

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix
DotSix, using any IP is prohibited from editing any Wikipedia page other than his talk page and the pages of this Arbitration case until a final decision is made in this case.

Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 22:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Skyring

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Skyring
User:Skyring is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year for wikistalking from August 12, 2005
~~Ban reset for one year from September 1, 2005 for further wikistalking~~
The ban was reset several times over the past month, and now expires, subject to no further editing, on 20th October 2006. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 14:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Internodeuser

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Internodeuser
User:Internodeuser is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year from June 20, 2005
Ban reset for one year from July 28, 2005 for further legal threats

Irate (personal attack parole)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Irate#Personal_attack_parole_2
User:Irate has been placed on personal attack parole for one year starting 13:08, 25 July 2005 UTC
Banned by Jimbo Wales, see Wikipedia:Banned users#Irate

Zivinbudas

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zivinbudas
User:Zivinbudas has been banned for one year from 22 July 2005
Blocking admin: Rama 15:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tkorrovi and Paul Beardsell

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tkorrovi and Paul Beardsell
Paul Beardsell is banned indefinitely from editing artificial consciousness
Tkorrovi is banned for three months from editing artificial consciousness
Both users are subject to a six month personal attack parole
both users are prohibited from re-adding any unreferenced or poorly referenced material in the article artificial consciousness (for Paul Beardsell this would apply only if he were unbanned from the article at any point)

Netoholic

Netoholic is banned from all pages in the wikipedia and template namespaces for twelve months from 4 May 2005. He is restricted to one revert per day per page. These restrictions can be enforced by any admin with blocks at their discretion. see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Netoholic 2

Trey Stone

Effective immediately, July 16, 2005, until resolution of the arbitration case he is involved with Trey Stone (talk · contribs) is banned from editing articles which concern politics, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Trey_Stone_and_Davenbelle/Proposed_decision#Temporary_ban.

Njyoder

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Njyoder#Final_decision
User:Njyoder is banned for one year from editing articles related to gender or sexuality.
User:Njyoder is placed under a one-year personal attack parole, and specifically warned against ruleslawyering in this area. Should any administrator consider one of his edits a personal attack, he may be blocked for up to 24 hours.

LevelCheck

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/LevelCheck
The account "User:LevelCheck is to be blocked indefinitely as a disruptive potential sockpuppet.
Blocking admin:
- Blocked as of right now. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

John Gohde

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/John Gohde
John Gohde is to be banned for one year
Blocking admin: Snowspinner and —Charles P. ^(Mirv) 21:01, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Rex071404

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 3
Rex's self-imposed six-month ban shall officially be imposed and he and his IP, [[User:216.153.214.94|], shall be blocked until 16:28 15 October 2005.

Irate

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Irate
User:Irate is banned for a total of three months.
Blocking admin: Snowspinner 22:17, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

Baku Ibne, et al.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Baku Ibne, et al.
The accounts LIGerasimova, Osmanoglou, Outhmanoglou, Osmaanoglou, Oussmannoglou, Osman Oglou, Tony Sideaway, Sikeyim, Tony Sidaways, Suckabloke, Blockasock, Hostman Ugly, Goastman Oglou, Postman Oglou, Fuxtony Sidaways, Fux Djclayworth, Jeanvaljeanvaljean, Smegman, Hadagoodlaugh, Pansee, -Tabib, -duk, Dubistdas Letztearschloch and Kiramtu Kunettabib are blocked indefinitely as abusive sockpuppet accounts. (some of these may already be blocked)
Blocking admin: I've got 'em. Snowspinner 19:21, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
If there is any doubt, this decision includes all new sockpuppets this user may use Fred Bauder June 30, 2005 12:39 (UTC)

Xed

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Xed
Effective 9 March, 2005
Xed is placed on standard personal attack parole for one year, until 9 March, 2006.

JonGwynne

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/JonGwynne
Effective 6 March, 2005
JonGwynne is limited to one revert per 24 hour period on articles related to global warming

CheeseDreams and Rienzo

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams 2
Effective 3 Mar, 2005
User:CheeseDreams is banned for a total of one year until 3 Mar, 2006.
- already implemented as part of a previous injunction
User:Rienzo is banned for 6 months until 3 September, 2005.
- Blocking admin: Snowspinner 16:13, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
CheeseDreams is restricted to editing from the account User:CheeseDreams
CheeseDreams is a vexatious litigant. As such she is prohibited from initiating any requests for comment or requests for arbitration.

WikiUser

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/WikiUser
Effective 26 Feb, 2005
WikiUser is banned for one year, until 26 Feb, 2006 or one year after he last made legal threats.
- Blocking admin: User:Rdsmith4/Sig 16:43, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
If he returns after the ban period, WikiUser will be on a 6 month probation.

Robert the Bruce

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Robert the Bruce
Effective 18 February, 2005
Robert the Bruce and associated sockpuppet accounts are banned for one year, until 18 February 2006
- Blocking admin: CryptoDerk 23:58, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
Robert the Bruce is banned from all articles relating to sex or gender (in particular those relating to foreskin and circumcision) for a further year, until 18 February 2007

Herschelkrustofsky

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche 2
Effective 17 February, 2005
Herschelkrustofsky is restricted to one account for editing.
Herschelkrustofsky is placed on POV parole for up to and including one year, until 17 February 2006. (Reset to 30 September 2006.[1])
Herschelkrustofsky is banned from editing any article relating to Lyndon LaRouche for up to and including one year, until 17 February 2006. (Reset to 30 September 2006.[2])

Gzornenplatz

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Gzornenplatz#Final_decision
Effective 00:33, 7 Feb, 2005 (UTC)
Gzornenplatz has been found to be Wik and is therefore subject to a hard ban.
- 00:33, 7 Feb 2005 Rdsmith4 blocked "User:Gzornenplatz" with an expiry time of indefinite (ArbCom ruling) User:Rdsmith4/Sig 00:35, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

ChuckF

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Chuck F
Effective 6 Feb, 2005
ChuckF (and all user accounts and IP addresses used by him) are banned from editing any article related to libertarianism, socialism, or political ideology.
For 1 year, Chuck F is limited to 1 revert per article per day and must discuss all reverts on the relevant talk page. Until 6 Feb 2006.

Vfp15

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Charles Darwin-Lincoln dispute
Effective 4 Feb, 2005
User:Vfp15 is banned from Charles Darwin, Abraham Lincoln and their talk pages for one year, until 4 Feb, 2006

Antifinnugor

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Antifinnugor
Effective February 1, 2005
Antifinnugor is banned from Finno-Ugric languages, Uralic languages and related articles for one year
Antifinnugor is placed on standard personal attack parole for one year, until February 1, 2006.

Rienzo, Lady Tara, Baffinisland, Nasse (Piglet) and NahChyps

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rienzo
Effective 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Rienzo, NahChyps, Lady Tara, Baffinisland, Nasseis placed on a one year personal attack parole, until 28 Jan, 2006.

''See also "CheeseDreams and Rienzo" above.

Libertas

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Libertas
Effective 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Libertas and all sockpuppets are banned for a year, until 28 Jan, 2006.
Blocking admin:
- 0:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Nutrosnutros (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Anilingus (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Billclinton (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Fylc (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Viewvista (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Dean12 (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Suna (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Jennypratt (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Razalah (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Ollieplatt (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:51, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Salazar (expires 20:51, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
- 20:50, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Libertas (expires 20:50, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
Libertas is limited to one revert per twenty-four hour period
Libertas is prohibited from having any sockpuppet accounts

-lothario-

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/168.209.97.34
Effective 22 January, 2005
-lothario- (168.209.97.34) is placed on POV parole for one year, until 22 January, 2006.
Further vandalism by -lothario- (168.209.97.34) may result in temporary blocks of up to a week by any administrator at the administrator's discretion.

HistoryBuffEr

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg
Effective 16 January 2005
HistoryBuffEr is prohibited for a period of one year from editing any article which relates to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict except in a restricted manner (see decision for full details). Until 16 January, 2006.

CheeseDreams

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams
Effective January 13, 2005
CheeseDreams may not revert any page more than twice in any 24-hour period, except for simple vandalism. Admins may enact blocks of up to and including 24 hours for violations.

See also "CheeseDreams and Rienzo" above.

Ciz

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ciz
Effective January 10, 2005
Ciz (using whatever account or IP address) is banned from editing Zoophilia and its closely related articles, including their talk pages.
Ciz (using whatever account) is placed on standard personal attack parole indefinitely.

Alberuni

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Alberuni
Effective January 10, 2005
Alberuni is banned for one year from editing Wikipedia, until January 10, 2006.
- 04:14, 10 Jan 2005, Fennec blocked Alberuni (expires 04:14, 10 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (By Arbitration Commitee decree: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Alberuni#Final decision Alberuni is banned for one year from editing Wikipedia, until January 10, 2006.) -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 04:17, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lir

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Snowspinner vs. Lir
Effective January 1, 2005
Lir is banned for one year from editing Wikipedia, until January 1, 2006; see his userpage for updated ban expiry

Irismeister

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Irismeister 3
Effective November 20, 2004
Irismeister is banned for one year from editing Wikipedia, until November 20, 2005.

Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily
Effective December 22, 2004
Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily may be banned for up to 24 hours for reverting the same page more than once in 24 hours, or for failing to discuss a revert on the associated article's talk page.

See also "Gzornenplatz" above

Jimmyvanthach, Celindgren, and Tran Van Ba

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jimmyvanthach
Effective November 6, 2004
Jimmyvanthach/Celindgren (blocked indefinitely for other reasons) and Tran Van Ba (blocked indefinitely for other reasons) are banned from editing articles which relate to the royal family of Vietnam and articles which relate to the recent history and politics of Vietnam.
Edits by Jimmyvanthach, Celindgrenand and Tran Van Ba and obvious sockpuppets to articles which relate to the former royal family of Vietnam or to the recent history and politics of Vietnam may be removed by any user. In the event the banned users attempt to restore removed edits they may be banned by any administrator for a brief period (a day or less but up to a week in the event of repeat offenses).

Kenneth Alan

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kenneth Alan
Effective October 2, 2004
Kenneth Alan is banned for one year, until October 2, 2005.
- User:Borderer was identified as a sockpuppet of Kenneth Alan, and on 1 Mar 2005 was blocked accordingly. This resets the ban until 00:00 March 2, 2006.

PolishPoliticians

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/User:PolishPoliticians
Effective September 18, 2004
PolishPoliticians, and also any new acounts involved with the same disputes, are on a personal attack parole.

Cantus

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Cantus vs. Guanaco
Effective November 24, 2004
Cantus is banned from editing Clitoris and Siberia and the articles' associated talk pages for a period of one year until November 24, 2005
Cantus is limited to one revert per article per 24 hour period. Should he violate this, an admin may ban him for a short period of time (up to a week).

Mr-Natural-Health

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mr-Natural-Health
Mr-Natural-Health is indefinitely instructed to refrain from editing Iridology and its talk page.
- Note: currently editing under User:John Gohde (12:49, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC))

See also "John Gohde" above

@@ Line 320: / Line 320: @@
 ** Note: currently editing under [[User:John Gohde]] (12:49, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC))
 ''See also "John Gohde" above''
-==William Connolley's parole - enforcement==
-* User William M. Connolley is violating the parole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/William_M._Connolley_and_Cortonin#Temporary_injunction].
-: I missed this bit of junk before... that was a temporary iunjunction during the arbcomm case, as it says. It no longer applies. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 22:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC).
-* See e.g. the page on "Skeptical Environmentalist" Bjorn Lomborg [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bj%C3%B8rn_Lomborg&diff=26303176&oldid=26302390] where he reverted the page without explaining his reasons on the talk page, although he is specifically forbidden to do so. Together with MichaelSirks, we are looking for tools to enforce the parole. Could you please help us? Thanks, --[[User:Lumidek|Lumidek]] 15:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
-* At least one violation of the 1 rv in 24 hours restriction took place.
-** 10:24, 28 October 2005 (hist) (diff) Peat (→Peat fires - Change pic to one also showing increase.   Leave text.)  (top) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26716313]
-** 09:54, 28 October 2005 (hist) (diff) Peat (rv to WMC. Its perfectly clear from the graph that there was no such boost to explain) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26714164]
-— ([[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] 17:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC))
-* A lack of Talk updates is also apparent in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=William+M.+Connolley&offset=0&limit=500 Special:Contributions&target=William+M.+Connolley].   Some are rvv, but being locked up may mean someone else has to save the grandmother next door from a fire.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=26542081] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26513307] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climate&diff=prev&oldid=26462307] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climatology&diff=prev&oldid=26474771] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gulf_Stream&diff=prev&oldid=26344951] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_winter&diff=prev&oldid=26204568] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Milankovitch_cycles&diff=prev&oldid=26035161] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Barton&diff=prev&oldid=26031139]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Meteorological_Organization&diff=prev&oldid=25996788] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_climate_model&diff=prev&oldid=25991651] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25929391] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25922400]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change&diff=prev&oldid=25863768] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change&diff=prev&oldid=25863502] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ross_McKitrick&diff=prev&oldid=25862698] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25772439] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25768701]   [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ice_core&diff=prev&oldid=25574162]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25462488] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25454145] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25453837] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urban_heat_island&diff=prev&oldid=25424558] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=25360543] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Svante_Arrhenius&diff=prev&oldid=25360522] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Stott&diff=prev&oldid=25304873] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Stott&diff=prev&oldid=25304432] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ross_McKitrick&diff=prev&oldid=25125347] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth%27s_atmosphere&diff=prev&oldid=25124895] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=25049945] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyoto_Protocol&diff=prev&oldid=24900506] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Schneider&diff=prev&oldid=24883862] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=24827748] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=prev&oldid=24815760] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Effects_of_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=24815622] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerosol&diff=prev&oldid=24815603] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=prev&oldid=24548376] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=prev&oldid=24504684] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_potential&diff=prev&oldid=24421376] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyoto_Protocol&diff=prev&oldid=24388095] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carbon_dioxide&diff=prev&oldid=24387963]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_effect&diff=prev&oldid=24142175] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heidelberg_Appeal&diff=prev&oldid=24107540] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=24107504] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyoto_Protocol&diff=prev&oldid=23982573] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urban_heat_island&diff=prev&oldid=23981873] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas&diff=prev&oldid=23981791] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_dimming&diff=prev&oldid=23937208] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=23841364] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ozone_depletion&diff=prev&oldid=23779763] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climatology&diff=prev&oldid=23769094] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Last_Glacial_Maximum&diff=prev&oldid=23518794] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_effect&diff=prev&oldid=23518756] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=23471707] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas&diff=prev&oldid=23471595] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ice_age&diff=prev&oldid=23354641]
-I may have missed some and only looked at the recent 500.  — ([[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] 17:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC))
-This is the tedious old climate wars again with the same old suspects. SEW has stuffed this page with a pile of gross irrelevance.
-* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=26542081  - this is explained perfectly in the edit comment ''rm new link - appears to be just a link to a scan of a paper; of questionable use and probably copyvio''
-* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climate&diff=prev&oldid=26462307 - don't need heinlein here; doubt he is originator anyway: rv to Andres
-I can't be bothered to go through the full list - as SEW himself says (is he mad?) ''Some are rvv'' - SEW is just trouble making. If he has a serious complaint, he needs to winnow it down to real cases and remove the dross. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC).
-Oops, missed some more dross: SEW supposed viol of 1RR: ''Peat fires - Change pic to one also showing increase.   Leave text.)  (top) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26716313]'' - *its not a revert*. This is just malice/trolling. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC).
-===Comment by Rd232===
-Since this is about WMC's parole, let's remind ourselves of the key part of that text: "Due to a long history of reverting, often without giving adequate explanation for the reverts, William M. Connolley is hereby prohibited for six months from reverting any article relating to climate change more than once per 24 hour period (vandalism excepted). Each such revert must be backed up by a talk page comment where a reputable source is cited or asked for as appropriate."
-:which I interpret as 1. no more than 1 [[revert]] in 24 hrs, i.e. a return to previous page state; 2. this excludes responses to vandalism; 3. where there is a dispute about sourcing a Talk page explanation is required, unless 3a. adequate explanation can be fitted into an edit summary, and is provided. I interpret 3a as a reasonable extension 3. as it otherwise imposes needless burden on others - to visit Talk page to see every WMC edit summary, instead of seeing in watchlists. If this is way off base from what was intended or what others think, sorry; but I comment below on this basis.
-*1. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bj%C3%B8rn_Lomborg&diff=26303176&oldid=26302390] WMC came in and supported Orsetto (and Tsavage?) in dipute with MichaelSirks, over major revision of page; it seems difficult to interpret this as a breach of the citation/Talk page requirement.
-*3,4. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26716313], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26714164] - the initial edit from Mikkalai wasn't a revert (removed some material only); one revert from SEWilco, with adequate edit summary (not regarding a citation); one edit to change picture, not a revert
-Picking some WMC contributions from SEWilco's lengthy list:
-*5.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=26542081] is removal of 2 of 3 links over 2 edits a reversion?
-*10.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_winter&diff=prev&oldid=26204568] is a straightforward re-addition of an internal link, with explanation;
-*20.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25772439] was with edit summary and discussed on Talk by others who agreed
-*25. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25453837] - two edits that day, neither reverts, and discussed on Talk;
-*30. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Stott&diff=prev&oldid=25304432] not a revert (only restored deleted statement and fixed link after major addition)
-*35. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Schneider&diff=prev&oldid=24883862] not a revert (and a removal of his section after my rewriting of which I didn't object to!);
-*40. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=prev&oldid=24548376] related to a dispute over citation, in which WMC didn't ''quite'' revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=24548376&oldid=24533497] but didn't explain properly either. It included WMC changing a link (in the intro) from [URL URL] to [URL],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=24563334&oldid=24562099] which SEWilco reverted with edit summary "rv WMC's destructive wiki edit" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=24581578&oldid=24563334], which someone else remarked was "inflammatory and uncalled for".[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solar_variation]
-*45. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_effect&diff=prev&oldid=24142175] a revert of vandalism
-*50. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas&diff=prev&oldid=23981791] not a revert and had clear edit summary
-*55. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Last_Glacial_Maximum&diff=prev&oldid=23518794] reverted removal of link/citation on basis link was dead but citation still useful
-*59. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ice_age&diff=prev&oldid=23354641] removal of vandalism.
-Of which only this comes close:
-*[15] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25929391] explained on Talk; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Individuals]; WMC tried to justify second revert in 24h by reference to vandalism [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=25929391&oldid=25927936] which a dubious interpretation. But since WMC didn't revert the subequent readdition, it not's much to hang a man by. I would suggest that after four months of a six months parole a minor slip is grounds for gentle reminder, no more; Wikipedia is not a police state. If there are more serious/demonstrable violations in SEWilco's list, it's entirely his fault for padding it with irrelevancies and trivialities.
-All in all this looks like renewed animosity on the part of a number of people, sparked by the recent return of a contributor ('return' as he made only 4 edits between 20 July and 14 October) involved or at least affected by the case. This is now four months into WMC's parole and in that time I haven't seen any disputes on this (not that I've been looking for them). So it looks a bit like a settling of old scores, given that SEWilco's trawl of WMC's edits (imagine how time-consuming that must have been!) reveals so little.
-Finally, I have concerns about this remark on my talk, a reply to a request by WMC to check out this enforcement request and comment if appropriate: ''Hi. Let me mention that WMC has brutally violated the rules of Wikipedia, and if you follow his order, you will be a violator, too. --Lumidek 20:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC)'' Which further supports my concern that this enforcement issue is being raised as a vendetta. Finally-finally, I've spent an hour+ seeing whether there was a basis for the accusations; time that could have been spent more productively. Let's get back to actually working on Wikipedia. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 22:58, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
-:: I find your "defense" of WMC bizarre. It's like someone who is accused of 50 murders and someone else proving that the killer is innocent because 20 of the victims were actually just children. There are well-defined rules here on Wikipedia and they have to be obeyed unless we want to support the tendencies that damage the Wikicommunity and its goals. --[[User:Lumidek|Lumidek]] 00:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
-Looking over, the diffs, it appears that Rd232 is correct in his assessment.  I don't think WMC has done anything wrong.  On the other hand, Lumidek's and SEWilco's actions have the appearances of a vendetta.  Like Rd232, I received the same threats from Lumidek.  His comments on this page are bizarre and, IMO, constitute personal attacks.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 02:29, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
-==== SEWilco comment on Rd232 ====
-I'd thought some of WMC's edits looked odd, but hadn't looked at the situation until this complaint popped up.  Anybody monitoring?  No parole officer?  There are still a number of oddities; without reexamining the last 500 edits there are still 8 items listed below, from Rd232's list.
-* I had interpreted "(vandalism excepted)" as imposing the penalty upon vandalism by parolees, but it being an rvv exception fits the phrasing better.
-* "unless 3a. adequate explanation can be fitted into an edit summary, and is provided." is an exception which is not in the Remedy.  You might not recall that Talk descriptions were required due to a history of problematical edit summaries.
-* I provided the link to WMC's Contributions because it is easy to see oddities there. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=William_M._Connolley&offset=0&limit=500]
-Some remaining items in Rd232's partial list:
-*1. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bj%C3%B8rn_Lomborg&diff=26303176&oldid=26302390] ''WMC came in and supported Orsetto (and Tsavage?)...'' I see no group rv exception in the ruling.  I didn't try to judge whether this was a group revert war because a war is not a requirement either.
-*3,4.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peat&diff=prev&oldid=26714164] - ''...revert from SEWilco, with adequate edit summary...'' Actually, there was an unsigned Talk entry with a graph-reading explanation to counter the removed sourced statement.  Is trying to interpret a graph the required "reputable source"?
-*5.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=26542081] ''is removal of 2 of 3 links over 2 edits a reversion?'' It is an rv, labeled rm, of the link created during the preceding 2 edits. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=26514849] '''Required Talk missing.'''
-*10.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_winter&diff=prev&oldid=26204568] ''is a straightforward re-addition of an internal link, with explanation;''  '''Required Talk missing.'''
-*20.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change&diff=prev&oldid=25772439] was with edit summary and discussed on Talk by others who agreed''' '''Required Talk missing.''' (nearest Talk edit over 11 hours later)
-*40. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=prev&oldid=24548376] ''...WMC didn't ''quite'' revert...'' ''... but didn't explain properly either.'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_variation&diff=24548376&oldid=24504684 Comparison with WMC's previous version] shows it was a revert with a destructive citation conversion added. '''Required Talk missing.''' (nearest Talk edit 5 hours later)  This conversion replaced
-** {{Web reference | title=What the Sunspot Record Tells Us about Space Climate | work=Submitted to Solar Physics 2004/08/31 | URL=http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/papers/hathadh/HathawayWilson2004.pdf | date=March 11 | year=2005}}
-*: with only the less descriptive URL:
-** [http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/papers/hathadh/HathawayWilson2004.pdf]
-*50. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas&diff=prev&oldid=23981791] ''not a revert and had clear edit summary'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas&diff=23981791&oldid=23784443 Comparison with 3rd preceding version] shows it was revert with two phrases also changed.  '''Required Talk missing.'''
-*55. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Last_Glacial_Maximum&diff=prev&oldid=23518794] ''reverted removal of link/citation on basis link was dead but citation still useful'' A good and necessary edit which violates parole.  '''Required Talk missing.'''
-— ([[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] 05:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC))
-=== SEWilco comment on WMC ===
-* Connolley points out the injunction link is to a temporary injunction.  That is correct.
-* Connolley neglected to point out there is a revert parole elsewhere in the document. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/William_M._Connolley_and_Cortonin#William_M._Connolley:_Six-month_revert_parole_on_certain_articles]
-— ([[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] 05:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC))
-=== Creation of this item ==
-''"Only Arbitration Committee members can add new items to this page."'' Is [[User:Lumidek|Lumidek]] on the Committee? Don't see an entry on [[WP:AC]].  ([[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] 06:05, 29 October 2005 (UTC))
-:Absolutely right.  Didn't realise that.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 14:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)