User talk:Asgardian

Applause

For what it's worth ... I recently was reading the Red Hulk article, which provided me with some interesting reading on the talk page for a while ... but I although we have little contact, most of my recent path crossing with your editting I've been quite please with. I noted a good degree of thoughtfulness in your edits, comments and responses which is impressive ... if not exemplar. So in short, a bravo to you, it seems clearly well deserved. Best of luck in cosmic Marvel-land it seems you're doing great virtual guardianship of it. -Sharp962 (talk) 02:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC).

"Unfortunately we don't do issue by issue movements - just significant events."

So what do you call what you're doing to the Abomination article? Or is Abomination fighting Angel in X-Men #74 a significant event? --DrBat (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

But what's the point about saying he appears in "What If?" or "Code of Honor" if you're not going to give any info about what he did? And he's made enough appearances that if he guest-starred in a title and nothing of importance happened to him, it's not worth mentioning. --DrBat (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Topic ban

Per Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Administrator_topic_bans and WP:ARBMAC, specifically concerning decorum, I am page banning you from Abomination (comics) and Rhino (comics) for a period of one month or until the dispute is resolved via use of the talk page of the respective article. This page ban can be appealed at the administrators' noticeboard, or the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. If there is no consensus on how to deal with the situation, then a request for clarification or appeal may be filed to the Arbitration Committee. I apologise for taking this measure, but I believe it will prevent disrupting the articles in question through either edit warring or page protection. In the future, if you find yourself in dispute with another editor, please do not edit war over the issue. Instead try to reach a resolution via the dispute resolution process. Any editing you make to the page prior to a resolution of the dispute will result in a block, initially for 24 hours but escalating to a maximum period of one month. Hiding T 11:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

• Please use a draft page if required to aid in the dispute: Talk:Abomination (comics)/Draft or Talk:Rhino (comics)/Draft. Hiding T 11:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Abbreviations

I've asked several times in the past; you agree and then renege. Please do not use non-WPC-MOS abbreviations in WikiProject Comics articles. "March" is not "Mar.", "April" not "Apr." and "Sept." not "Sep." This is not new information: You know this, and it is very unfair to make other editors return abbreviations to the consensus-approved versions that help to give comics articles consistency. Thank you. -- Tenebrae (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Categories

How many links/categories should be featured in a character article? DCincarnate (talk) 17:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Request

I've tried to help, on my Talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Awesome Android

I've responded on that article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Topic ban

You admitted to deliberately making the article unreadable to prove your point; are you going to apologize for that?

And yes, I did try to compromise; by leaving your version but removing the unimportant issues (such as X-Man). You reverted my edits. --DrBat (talk) 04:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

ThuranX didn't agree with your version; he just said "This is revert warring. stop it and use talk page."

And you admitted you deliberately made the article unreadable to prove your point.

And again, how is something like Abomination fighting X-Man or Angel important to his character? --DrBat (talk) 04:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Request for clarification regarding Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Asgardian-Tenebrae#Asgardian restricted

I have made a request fro clarification regarding the scope of the following editing restriction imposed for one year in December of 2007 in the above case, namely that you were: "limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should he exceed this limit or fail to discuss a content reversion, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below." Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Asgardian-Tenebrae and add a statement regarding your position at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Statement by other user. Thanks. Hiding T 11:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)