Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 15: Line 15:
==== {{la|Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit}} ====
==== {{la|Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit}} ====
'''Indefinite semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', Frequent target of childish vandalism. In addition, occasional outbursts of the old Danzig/Gdansk problem. &nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small>&nbsp;Discuß&nbsp;</small></font>]]&nbsp; 18:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
'''Indefinite semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', Frequent target of childish vandalism. In addition, occasional outbursts of the old Danzig/Gdansk problem. &nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small>&nbsp;Discuß&nbsp;</small></font>]]&nbsp; 18:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} -'''[[User:Fastily|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#4B0082'><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Fastily|<font color="#4B0082">(T<small>ALK</small>)</font>]]</small></sup></span> 18:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

==== {{la|Vladimir Lukov}} ====
==== {{la|Vladimir Lukov}} ====
'''Temporary create-protection''', repeatedly recreated. [[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 18:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
'''Temporary create-protection''', repeatedly recreated. [[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 18:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:44, 15 April 2010

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for protection

    Indefinite semi-protection Persistent unhelpful IP edits. I have literally begged users to discuss the current edit dispute on the talk page but IP users simply keep making the article say what they want it to say. Please make it stop. Abc30 (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Frequent target of childish vandalism. In addition, occasional outbursts of the old Danzig/Gdansk problem.  Matthead  Discuß   18:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary create-protection, repeatedly recreated. RadioFan (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. 2 weeks TbhotchTalk C. 18:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. vandalism The page been receiving IP vandalism with very little productive editing going on. --Stepheng3 (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Hooon (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Indefinite full protection user talk of blocked user, User continues to remove warnings on the page, even the "blocked indefinitely" warning.  GSK (talk ● evidence) 17:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined If the user continues, report this at WP:ANI so that the editor's talk page access can be removed. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    full protection dispute. nableezy - 15:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 15:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If consensus is reached before the two weeks is up, let me know and I'll unprotect. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. vandalism The page been on the reciving end of numerous IP vandalism recently and I expect there may be more from some gloating tottenham fans after yesterday's result. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. Is constantly being vandalized by IPs.

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Please keep an eye out if the rate significantly increases and rereport. Valley2city‽ 18:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. An anonymous editor, from various IP addresses, continually reverts almost any material related to the subject's wife. This editor has overtly threatened to keep hitting his/her "delete button," and has taken to calling others "idiots," etc. This editor has also tried to represent himself/herself as registered under the user name "Anonymous." Please see article's discussion page for more info. --Vaudedoc (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, There is an edit war occurring from IP address 163.153.216.177 of this article. Spitfire19 (Talk) 12:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. The page is consistantly being nominated for deletion by socks of Dalejenkins and in the most recent Afd, he has threatened to return until the page is deleted. ShockMetric 11:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Already done by administrator Tnxman307. for 2 weeks -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection. Edit warring while no consensus on a talk page is reached. Please revert to a version before edit warring and protect the page for a week. --windyhead (talk) 08:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection - Various IPs (presumably the same user) have been editing this article to imply that Scholes has paedophilic tendencies. Since the IPs are random, blocking them will not help, so I suggest a temporary semi-protection of the article. – PeeJay 12:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - if it continues after the 3 days is up, report it here again. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite full protection vandalism, Continuous, persistent vandalism. Just check the page logs for the number of times this page has had to be protected in some form. Mokele (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, There are a large number of IP address edits vandalizing the page with unsourced information. The page was previously protected but this protection has since expired. I am therefore requesting indefinite protection of the main page. The talk page is also protected, and I am recommending that this protection be removed so IP addresses may still provide relevant information for discussion. N419BH (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also Unprotected for the talk page. Talking to protecting admin -- Flyguy649 talk 15:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Unprotected Talk page now unprotected. But if misuse resumes it can always be re protected. -- Flyguy649 talk 15:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. Repeated messing around with existing images and addition of copyvio images from multiple IPs. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Off2riorob (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Requesting semi protection/auto confirmed, indefinite or if not possible at least temp for a couple of weeks, repeat attacks from uncomfirmed user. Off2riorob (talk) 13:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for three months. Tan | 39 16:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection Anonymous IP editors are still making unsourced additions, and wild guesses to the page and won't stop. The page has already been semi-protected three times because of the same issue. Heavydata (talk) 06:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  07:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Temporary full protection dispute, Another editor is assuming bad faith and not discussing this improvement to the use of a template. Please see Talk:Vancouver Whitecaps FC‎. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. He's trying to nominate it for deletion, which he should be able to do unless there's some background issue. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection Some vandalism, (cleaned by another IP). TbhotchTalk C. 06:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected. Doesn't seem too bad, so three days for now. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection Excessive vandalism. TbhotchTalk C. 05:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a month as it seems persistent. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Airplaneman ✈ 04:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection dispute, some sorta edit-war w/ personal attacks in the edit summaries. Let's give it a rest. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin talk contribs 06:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection, Subject had minor, quickly resolved "accidental twitter celebrity feud" that was quickly resolved, vandals keep on putting vulgar insult that other celebrity used, or simply giving way too much wp:undue to the twitter feud. Thanks. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 02:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Though it would be very helpful if someone raised the issue on the talk page. GedUK  07:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection Some vandalism. TbhotchTalk C. 02:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  07:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism mostly on weekends. Nascar1996 02:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's not really a high level. GedUK  07:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection Vandalism per day since protection run. TbhotchTalk C. 02:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  07:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi- protection BLP violations. Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  06:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection - various IPs keep blanking the well-sourced criticism section without discussion in spite of attempts at creating a dialogue on their talk pages. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  06:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=356224553"