User talk:Loganmac

Welcome!

Hello, Loganmac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Diego (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

They Say

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article They Say, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? gracz54 ^(talk) 22:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of They Say

I have nominated They Say, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/They Say. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? gracz54 ^(talk) 09:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Spreading outright lies about me on twitter

Hi LoganMac. I'm assuming this twitter [1] sharing the same username as your wikiaccount belongs to you. Could you please remove or rectify the lies you have posted about me on twitter, and learn to actually read what someones rights before putting words in their mouth. If you had actually read what I had written you would have known that I was arguing that Erik Kain is not a pro-GG source, and has not been unduly referenced in the article. Stop spreading lies, This is completely out of order. Bosstopher (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Twitter has freedom of expression sorry man, it is true there are people trying to make Erik Kain look like a random blogger while keeping freelancers as sources Loganmac (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

But you are lying and misrepresenting information by claiming that was the purpose of my glorious wall of text. The one you are quoting "Pro-GamerGate" leaning from is me. You have inarguably misrepresented my arguments online, so it would be in infinitely poor taste not to amend or delete your tweet. Also nobody has tried to completely remove Kain as a source, even Baranof merely thinks it's overused.Bosstopher (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

I know how this turns out, some admin claiming he's neutral goes and deletes half the stuff Erik said, as for the tweet, you can go ahead and spread whatever you want about me, I really don't care. Should understand Twitter doesn't abide by any self-censorship polcies like Wikipedia, if you think it violates their TOS, you could report me, again the tweet is just raising awareness to what I think will eventually happen, Eric Kain's source, one of the only neutral articles about the matter, will get half its content deleted on the article Loganmac (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

You are missing the point here. You are spreading misleading information about me that is outright false. You have made a factual error, you did not read what I had writen and before engaging with me escalated this straight to twitter. There is a difference between self censorship and admitting that you have made a mistake. 17:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Bosstopher (talk)

Why are you replying to/messaging everyone except me on this issue? Bosstopher (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Everything related to your complaint I stated on the ANI, I asked other users advise on an unrelated matter regarding Ryuolong Loganmac (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

You are ignoring the fact that I keep on telling you what you have written about me on twitter and reddit is untrue. I am upset with what you have said no because it criticizes wikipedia, but because it lies about my intentions and and portrays me as some sort of evil zealous madman who is incredibly anti-GG beyond all sense and reason. The proper thing to do when you make a mistake is admit wrongdoing. For someone who is pro-GG you seem to have failed to notice that owning up to wrongdoings instead of shutting your ears and shouting accusations of persecution is one of the main demands the movement's been making of people. So if you wont clarify that you made a factual error out of common decency, at least do it for the sake of ideological consistency. Bosstopher (talk) 22:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

I wrote a lenghty explanation and I didn't copy from the edit conflict with The Devil Advocate oh well, you state in that message that some citations from Erik's article should be deleted, and other editors agree. In any case that's why I provide a screencap, people reading it can take their own conclusion. If you took the tweet as a personal attack I apoligize but it was meant to show the state of the Wikipedia article, not to attack you personally, since noone actually goes and says "oh wow bosstopher is such and such", everyone that replied to that link on reddit and twitter criticizes Wikipedia. Your message is the least of that article's page faults, and your complaint was taken by Ryoulong as an excuse to have me topic banned, as some editors have done with Titanium Dragon, and several editors outing noobs in an extreme uncivil manner. This Ryoulong guy has called us extremely offensive slurs yet his bias is never put in doubt. My few edits to that article have been neutral as it gets, I never tried and delete misogyny and harassment mentions, which a lot of editors there seem to think GamerGate is all about Loganmac (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

The problem I have is that you still misunderstand what I was trying to say, when I said "remove citations." I did not mean remove information, Kain had put into the article. I meant replace that tiny little number box representing Kain's article with one of another person where another person could be used. This would be to prove this article is not actually oversaturated with Kain, but merely looked as if it was. The problems people had was that Kain was being spammed because so much of the article couldnt be sourced from elsewhere. My post was meant to be an attempt to prove this wrong. You made a post on twitter implying my post was arguing the exact opposite of what I was saying without asking me first to check if you were mistaken. This is what annoys me. Thanks for the apology though. Bosstopher (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

I think you jumped the gun on those comments and should clarify. There are definitely some who want to remove most of the citations to Erik Kain in the article, but Bosstopher is not one of them. We already have enough misinformation being spread around on Twitter, like the stuff about WikiProject Feminism. No need to add to the confusion.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 23:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Loganmac. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Github?

I don't understand your comment to my talk page. What does Github have to do with GamerGate, and how does it relate to me? Diego (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

No I meant on the Github article talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GitHub#Sexist_Culture_Accusations, nothing to do with GamerGate. Just asking why are reliable sources sometimes left out when its editors think what they say is not true Loganmac (talk) 11:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

When "editors think what they say is not true", by definition they don't consider it reliable. If other editors nevertheless disagree and think it's true, then we have an editorial dispute; eventually it should be decided by consensus whether to use it or not. Diego (talk) 11:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nip Gamergate in the bud. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gamergate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,

Pardon my French

Why the fuck is the Japanese word for "desire to murder" next to my name on this Reddit thread you began?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

You mean the flair? I don't control it, that's admins, I will request them to remove it now, didn't even know what it meant. Also that account might not be mine... Loganmac (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

If you're not Redditor "Logan_Mac" then I don't run @Ryulong on Twitter.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

General Sanctions Notification

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Hasteur (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments about others

Do not discuss other editors on article talk pages as you did here per WP:TPNO, WP:CIV and WP:NPA - follow WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE instead. If you persist you risk being sanctioned per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate, which is very clear about strictly folliwng The Purpose of Wikipedia. Dreadstar ☥ 19:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration case request(Gamergate) declined

An arbitration case request(Gamergate), involving you, has been archived, because the request was declined.

The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee,--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom notification

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GamerGate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 00:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Its on me. :D DSA510 Pls No H8 07:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi there

Don't believe or repeat the shit written about me at Encyclopedia Dramatica. I've never used "bugs" to hide edits or used sockpuppet accounts.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

How about you stop harassing me and looking at everything I do offsite, several people have said that, I didn't get it from ED, also that account might not be mine mate Loganmac (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

How about you stop spreading lies about me offsite in your ongoing attempt to get the whole of the movement against me as if they weren't already. That account is definitely you and it's been established onsite already when you posted about that other person and you didn't deny owning the account then. The only place where any of those statements exist is either Encyclopedia Dramatica or the insane rankings and ravings of all the people who were banned and use Wikipedia Review to attack editors that piss them off. I do not appreciate the fact that you are doing this, coaching a party who is being wrongly led to believe that I have an agenda to slander him into getting me removed from Wikipedia, and acting as if I'm the one to blame just because I tried to ensure that the article on Gamergate met the guidelines of Wikipedia and if that makes me biased then I guess I'm biased.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

What I do offsite it's not of your matter, I never encourage people to come here so I'm not breaking any rules, you've admitted already that you're biased. And on the reddit account, silence doesn't mean admission, you've battled countless people, even outside of GamerGate that time and time again tell you the same thing and yet you fail to realize who's fault is it Loganmac (talk) 21:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)