User talk:QuackGuru

John is an involved admin

In May, I complained to the admin John that he was reverting on my talk page. He then immediately blocked me. This appears to be a violation of WP:INVOLVED.

In November, after I reverted my edit at Ayurveda and was waiting for consensus I got blocked without any prior warning of the 0RR restrictions at the article. I think this was a violation of WP:BEFOREBLOCK. Note: The admin John has been notified of the sanctions. I previously explained that any uninvolved admin can sanction the admin John from this topic area at this point. Roxy the dog disagreed with the actions by the admin John. Now the admin John suggests there should further sanctions against both me and Roxy the dog. User:Kww explained John's comment was "problematic".

I was in a content dispute with John. I reverted the original research he added to a BLP. I even explained it to him on John's talk page.

User:Doc_James explained on December 4, 2014 "Yup. Likely we need someone neutral / not involved to look at this. John and QG are involved"[1]

John was previously warned not to restore comments on my talk page. John agreed. Later John restored comments after I deleted them.[2][3] Please remember that John has been notified of the sanctions. QuackGuru (talk) 21:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)