Talk:Moors murders: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Eric Corbett (talk | contribs) →Brady's general election rant: fucking ridiculous |
→Brady's general election rant: ""a Norse raven, closely associated with the ancient kingdom of Northumbria (today's North of England) and the struggle for autonomy" |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:::::::But it's not just Phil, is it. At my count it's currently 5:1 against. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 21:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC) |
:::::::But it's not just Phil, is it. At my count it's currently 5:1 against. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 21:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::::::Make that six against; this is just fucking ridiculous. [[User:Eric Corbett| <span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:900; color:green;">Eric</span>]] [[User talk:Eric Corbett|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:500;color: green;">Corbett</span>]] 21:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC) |
::::::::Make that six against; this is just fucking ridiculous. [[User:Eric Corbett| <span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:900; color:green;">Eric</span>]] [[User talk:Eric Corbett|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:500;color: green;">Corbett</span>]] 21:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::::::*<small>(The above edit generously sponsored by the [[Northern Party]].) [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC) </small> |
Revision as of 22:07, 5 May 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moors murders article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 31 days ![]() |
![]() | Moors murders is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 27, 2010. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | Ian Brady was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 September 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Moors murders. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 12, 2013. |
Brady's general election rant
This is in the news, although it probably isn't notable enough for the article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- That won't stop some editors trying to add it. Kind of fits, I guess. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think it is notable enough for a single lineAusLondonder (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Then you need to look up the definition of "notable", clearly. CassiantoTalk 20:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- It fails WP:10YT. Brady has ranted about all sorts of things in letters in the past.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- User:Cassianto - and you need to read WP:CIVIL and WP:NNCAusLondonder (talk) 20:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I did once, and I vowed never to read it again. CassiantoTalk 20:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- User:Cassianto - and you need to read WP:CIVIL and WP:NNCAusLondonder (talk) 20:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- It fails WP:10YT. Brady has ranted about all sorts of things in letters in the past.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Then you need to look up the definition of "notable", clearly. CassiantoTalk 20:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think it is notable enough for a single lineAusLondonder (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Charming. I can tell. AusLondonder (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- As indicated above, Brady mentioning the election is not sufficiently notable to be worth including in the article. SagaciousPhil - Chat 20:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think it might be more notable if he was a Green supporter. Currently, of course, he can't vote. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Absolutely agree with User:Sagaciousphil, this is not notable and should have never been inserted in the article. David J Johnson (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I can't help but me amazed by your dictatorial attitude User:Sagaciousphil - what gives you the right to declare 'Brady mentioning the election is not sufficiently notable to be worth including in the article'? AusLondonder (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- But it's not just Phil, is it. At my count it's currently 5:1 against. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Make that six against; this is just fucking ridiculous. Eric Corbett 21:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- (The above edit generously sponsored by the Northern Party.) Martinevans123 (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Make that six against; this is just fucking ridiculous. Eric Corbett 21:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- But it's not just Phil, is it. At my count it's currently 5:1 against. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Biography articles of living people
- FA-Class Greater Manchester articles
- Mid-importance Greater Manchester articles
- FA-Class Crime-related articles
- Top-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- FA-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- Selected anniversaries (July 2013)