User talk:CushionMail: Difference between revisions
CushionMail (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
Thank you. |
Thank you. |
||
*Your entire history here has been to edit war starting with [[Sardarji joke]], [[Guru Nanak]] etc, removing sourced content in favor of copyright violations at [[Sikhism]]. Every time you come up with the "can you specify" and [[WP:IDHT|refuse to listen to]] any opinions offered. It is quite clear now that you don't want to adhere to our policies or guidelines, but are here to get your word. You've been alerted multiple times by multiple editors on specific problems, that you don't listen to it, isn't an excuse. —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 08:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:36, 25 August 2015
Welcome!
|
Hi CushionMail!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by Human3015 knock knock • 22:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harmandir Sahib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Sikhism
Why are you removing large bits of sourced content from Sikhism? Please leave an edit summary. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Final warning
You've been disruptive across multiple articles now, edit warring with many editors, and now you're copy-pasting content from other locations on to here, all this while refusing to adhere to our policies and guidelines on verifiability, reliable sources, neutral point of view, among others. You've been warned many times, the next time it will be a block. —SpacemanSpiff 08:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you please specify, in the current context, where I have not followed the policies and guidelines. I have given all the required references. One or two sentences are verbatim, I agree, but I can try to alter them. Referring to that as a blanket "I am copy pasting" is insulting. Is there anything else that you have issues with ? My only intention is to provide a more accurate and better articulated lead to some of the articles of interest.
And when did I edit war now ?
Thank you.
- Your entire history here has been to edit war starting with Sardarji joke, Guru Nanak etc, removing sourced content in favor of copyright violations at Sikhism. Every time you come up with the "can you specify" and refuse to listen to any opinions offered. It is quite clear now that you don't want to adhere to our policies or guidelines, but are here to get your word. You've been alerted multiple times by multiple editors on specific problems, that you don't listen to it, isn't an excuse. —SpacemanSpiff 08:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)