Jump to content

Talk:Qaraimits: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Resolve of the Dustriputive Messwith RS .
Line 11: Line 11:


::::Meanwhile have a look at this [http://bulgakov_heretics.academic.ru/104/%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8B][[User:YuHuw|YuHuw]] ([[User talk:YuHuw|talk]]) 22:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
::::Meanwhile have a look at this [http://bulgakov_heretics.academic.ru/104/%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8B][[User:YuHuw|YuHuw]] ([[User talk:YuHuw|talk]]) 22:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::You as usual messed everything ,I learned the issue '''without Google Translate bugs''' -please look at this [https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%AD%D0%91%D0%95/%D0%96%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D1%83%D1%8E%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%B5 comprehensive RS] . There 3 '''different''' kinds of Жидовствующие
::::: а) '''Молокане-субботники'''(Molokans). Они, признавая Евангелие, считают, однако, необходимым исполнять в точности все правила и заповеди Ветхого Завета. Позднейшей традиции (святоотеческая литература и соборные постановления) они не признают. —
::::: б) Геры (см.). Они также называются талмудистами или шапочниками, так как не сидят дома без шапок. —
::::: в) Субботники (в миссионерской литературе — '''субботники-караимиты'''(Qaraimits is Missioner name for Subbotniks); в Тамбовской губ. их называют староиудеями или бесшапочными. Бесшапочные не признают Талмуда, а считают единственным источником веры Ветхий Завет.

::::: So Qaraimits are not Molokans ,they are identical to [[Subbotniks]],and they did not came from Lithuania but were affected by Kiev Karaite Jew Zaharia(Actually there indeed Karaite Jews in Lithuana (Crimean Karaites)[[User:Неполканов|Неполканов]] ([[User talk:Неполканов|talk]]) 15:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 18 March 2016

New article for expansion

I have starting the article based mainly upon information from the books by Bulgakov and Т.И. Буткевич. However, the topic looks quite vast and I have found the following searches which might provide suitable places to mine some data [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. YuHuw (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank User:Неполканов for producing most of the sources for this article. Despite your belligerent accusative style the discussions on the many pages of Wikipedia were very useful. I hope you will accept this Olive branch in the spirit it is intended and finally bury the hatchet. I am clearly not who you thought I was. I have always paid attention to your comments to work towards consensus and tried my best to absorb all the new information you presented to me while filtering out the insults and contradictions perhaps due to English not being your first language and I have changed my position again and again to try and understand your points. I also want to thank User:Dbachmann for teaching me the value of Google translate. User:R'n'B and User:Midas02 for teaching me about DAB pages without which I would never have realized this article was necessary. Also all the friendly supporters at the Teahouse who have been so nice to me. This article would not have been possible without all of your input. :) YuHuw (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you wrote you took these sources from me. I am really familiar with this sources. You faked them Firkovich and Grigorjev did not intend Subbotniks but from Crimean Karaites. Kushul intend Crimean Karaites claiming their Turkic but not Slavic origin, If these edits are not disruptive edits what are disruptive edits? Неполканов (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, your recent WP:BOLD edits were rejected. Now according to the guidelines you must discuss your objections here below. YuHuw (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lets discuss.Please give me exact cite approving removed by me noncences (e.g that Subbotniks came from Lithuania). Nobody claimed this except User:Kaz Неполканов (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please clarify exactly what User:Kaz claimed and please demonstrate exactly where with some diffs. YuHuw (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile have a look at this [8]YuHuw (talk) 22:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You as usual messed everything ,I learned the issue without Google Translate bugs -please look at this comprehensive RS . There 3 different kinds of Жидовствующие
а) Молокане-субботники(Molokans). Они, признавая Евангелие, считают, однако, необходимым исполнять в точности все правила и заповеди Ветхого Завета. Позднейшей традиции (святоотеческая литература и соборные постановления) они не признают. —
б) Геры (см.). Они также называются талмудистами или шапочниками, так как не сидят дома без шапок. —
в) Субботники (в миссионерской литературе — субботники-караимиты(Qaraimits is Missioner name for Subbotniks); в Тамбовской губ. их называют староиудеями или бесшапочными. Бесшапочные не признают Талмуда, а считают единственным источником веры Ветхий Завет.
So Qaraimits are not Molokans ,they are identical to Subbotniks,and they did not came from Lithuania but were affected by Kiev Karaite Jew Zaharia(Actually there indeed Karaite Jews in Lithuana (Crimean Karaites)Неполканов (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]