Talk:European Space Agency Science Programme: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:20, 6 July 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the European Space Agency Science Programme article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Europe: ESA Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by ESA task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Spaceflight Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Full list

Do we need a list with all proposed missions?

http://www.sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=41177

Astrophysics

Luciola: Hyper telescope Space Observatory
SPICA: The next generation IR space observatory
XEUS: Physics of the Hot Evolving Universe
PEGASE : an IR interferometer to study stellar environments and low mass companions around nearby stars.
PLATO - Planetary Transits and Oscillations of stars
SEE- COAST (Super-Earth Explorer - Coronographic Off Axis Space telescope)
The Gamma-Ray Imager mission
FIRI - the Far-Infrared Interferometer
DUNE: The Dark Universe Explorer
GRIPS - Gamma Ray Burst Investigations via Polarimetry and Spectroscopy
Darwin - infrared interferometer
SPACE : the Spectroscopic All-sky Cosmic Explorer
B-Pol: gravitational waves detector
Millimetron: sub-millimeter and far-infrared Space Observatory
Fresnel Interferometric Imager
Stellar and Galactic Environment Survey (SAGE)
EDGE, Explorer of Diffuse Emission and Gamma Ray Burst Explosions
The Molecular Hydrogen Explorer (H2EX)
Sample Return of Interstellar Matter (SARIM)

Fundamental Physics

Direct search for deviation of the one-way speed of the light
Kant Mission - space and time relation
Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices (ASTROD)
Laser Astrometric Test Of Relativity (LATOR)
Solar System ODYSSEY - laws of gravity
GAUGE (GrAnd Unification and Gravity Explorer)
EGE (Einstein Gravity Explorer)
MWEG (Matter Wave Explorer of Gravity)
S-EUSO (Space Observatory for the study of the Universe at Ultra High Energies)
SAGAS (Search for Anomalous Gravitation using Atomic Sensors)
Fundamental Physics Platform - Critical Phenomena in Space
GALILEO GALILEI (GG) - A small satellite to test the equivalence principle of Galileo, Newton & Einstein.

Solar System

(EVE) European Venus Explorer: an in-situ mission to Venus
(WARP) - Waves And Relativistic Particles
LunarEx - A Lunar Penetrator Mission
Mars Origins Mission to Noachian-Mars: exploring the southern hemisphere of Mars in search of traces of life
Mars Environment and Magnetic Orbiter
NEO Sample Return Mission (MARCO-POLO)
Comet Sample Return Mission (TRIPLE-F)
A Mission to Europa and the Jupiter System
KRONOS : Saturn atmospheric probe and deep atmosphere and interior remote sounding
Titan and Enceladus Mission (TANDEM)
DuneXpress
Cross-Scale
The Interstellar Heliopause probe
DynaMICCS
PHOIBOS (Probing Heliospheric Origins with an Inner Boundary Observing Spacecraft)^[1]^[2]
HIRISE - HIgh Resolution Imaging and Spectroscopy Explorer.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).
'''MetNet''' — A network of measurements on Mars^[3] <ref>"MetNet Precursor - Network Mission to Mars" (PDF).

References

^ . doi:10.1007/s10686-008-9113-x. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
^ . Bibcode:2007AGUFMSH21A0281M. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
^ . Bibcode:2006epsc.conf..432H. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

Requested move 13 March 2019

There is no consensus due to lack of participation. Proposer is recommended to be WP:BOLD and move it themselves, per WP:CONSENSUS. --QEDK (後 ☕ 桜) 14:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Template:Requested move/end must be substituted

The request to rename this article to European Space Agency Science Programme has been carried out.

Cosmic Vision → European Space Agency Science Programme – I'm proposing a change in scope to not only document the Cosmic Vision programme, but also the preceding Horizon 2000 and Horizon 2000+ programmes, and the upcoming Voyage 2050 programme. The European Space Agency likes to refer to these programmes generally as "planning cycles" in the "Science Programme" [1][2][3][4], so this new name seems to be the most appropriate name for such an article. I intend to do most of the heavy lifting if this is agreed upon. All sixteen members listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/ESA have been pinged to this discussion. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 01:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 16:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ESA has several science programs. Your suggestion is ridiculous. Sincerely, Rowan Forest (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowan Forest: Excuse me? May I ask what about it is ridiculous? – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 06:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowan Forest: My guess is that you're confused by the naming, even though I had clarified this in my original proposal, along with four citations from ESA. Here's another two citations that I hope clarifies it even more; this page from the ESA Industry Portal [5] discusses how "The Science Programme has a long and successful history, starting with the Horizon 2000 Programme that lasted 20 years, from 1985–2005. This was followed by the Horizon 2000+ Programme from 2005–2015, leading to the current Cosmic Vision Programme to 2025.", and this ESA Media Page [6] that describes Horizon 2000, Horizon 2000+, Cosmic Vision, and Voyage 2050 as "planning cycles" of "The Science Programme of the European Space Agency (ESA)". – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 13:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Post-discussion

Unilateral and spurious move The editor ignored opposition. The Cosmic Vision program exists as such. This is akin to going to some random NASA program (Discovery, New Frontiers, etc) and renaming it "NASA Science program", AND spending absolutely no effort in editing the article itself or justifying the move in any coherent way. As NASA, ESA has hundred of "science programs", and this one is called Cosmic Vision. The history section gives a good overview. Rowan Forest (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowan Forest: I apologise that I didn't attend to updating the page sooner than I did, as I had simply forgotten about this page as I had been swamped with other priorities. A simple message fired my way reminding me about this article would've been appreciated, though – your improper cut-and-paste job unnecessarily split the revision history of the article. Hopefully my {{Histmerge}} request will fix that problem. It should also be noted that I hadn't "ignored opposition", as I had replied to you twice asking for both clarification and to better understand my proposal, and you never responded, as evidenced in the archived move discussion above. In addition, the original move was not "unilateral and spurious", as I had simply followed the recommendation of the discussion's closer, QEDK, who wrote "Proposer is recommended to be [bold] and move [the page] themselves..." – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 08:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is a hypocritical apology of a spurious move and revert. The "European Space Agency Science Programme" you mention does not exist as you present it. But I can't fight SToOpid any longer. I know you. Go at it. Rowan Forest (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] . doi:10.1007/s10686-008-9113-x. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[2] . Bibcode:2007AGUFMSH21A0281M. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[3] . Bibcode:2006epsc.conf..432H. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 Unilateral and spurious move The editor ignored opposition. The Cosmic Vision program exists as such. This is akin to going to some random NASA program (Discovery, New Frontiers, etc) and renaming it "NASA Science program", AND spending absolutely no effort in editing the article itself or justifying the move in any coherent way. As NASA, ESA has hundred of "science programs", and this one is called Cosmic Vision. The history section gives a good overview. [[User:Rowan Forest|Rowan Forest]] ([[User talk:Rowan Forest|talk]]) 21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 :{{Reply to|Rowan Forest}} I apologise that I didn't attend to updating the page sooner than I did, as I had simply forgotten about this page as I had been swamped with other priorities. A simple message fired my way reminding me about this article would've been appreciated, though – your {{Diff||904392898|903644746|improper cut-and-paste job}} unnecessarily split the revision history of the article. Hopefully my {{tl|Histmerge}} request will fix that problem. It should also be noted that I hadn't "{{xt|ignored opposition}}", as I had replied to you twice asking for both clarification and to better understand my proposal, and you never responded, as evidenced in the archived move discussion above. In addition, the original move was not "{{xt|unilateral and spurious}}", as I had simply followed the recommendation of the discussion's closer, {{User link|QEDK}}, who wrote "{{xt|Proposer is recommended to be [bold] and move [the page] themselves...}}" – <span style="color:#124385;">PhilipTerryGraham</span> ([[User talk:PhilipTerryGraham|talk]]&nbsp;<b>&middot;</b>&#32;[[User:PhilipTerryGraham/Articles|articles]]&nbsp;<b>&middot;</b>&#32;[[User:PhilipTerryGraham/Reviews|reviews]]) 08:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
+:That is a hypocritical apology of a spurious move and revert. The "European Space Agency Science Programme" you mention does not exist as you present it. But I can't fight SToOpid any longer. I know you. Go at it. [[User:Rowan Forest|Rowan Forest]] ([[User talk:Rowan Forest|talk]]) 15:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)