Jump to content

User talk:Rajlaxmi2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
note
Line 69: Line 69:
::: I found this image via a whatsapp group so no link available. Thanks for asking interested question about images. --[[User:Rajlaxmi2|<span style='color: #cefefe;background-color: #1e1e1e;'><b>&nbsp;Rajlaxmi&nbsp;</b></span>]] [[User Talk:Rajlaxmi|<sup><span style='color: #ceff00;background-color: #1e1ele;'><b>''Talk''?</b></span></sup>]] 17:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
::: I found this image via a whatsapp group so no link available. Thanks for asking interested question about images. --[[User:Rajlaxmi2|<span style='color: #cefefe;background-color: #1e1e1e;'><b>&nbsp;Rajlaxmi&nbsp;</b></span>]] [[User Talk:Rajlaxmi|<sup><span style='color: #ceff00;background-color: #1e1ele;'><b>''Talk''?</b></span></sup>]] 17:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
::::The problem is that you misrepresented where you got those images from. That destroys the credibility of everything else you have said above. Therefore:
::::The problem is that you misrepresented where you got those images from. That destroys the credibility of everything else you have said above. Therefore:
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|advertising or self-promoting]] in violation of the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|notability]] guidelines. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 18:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)</div></div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for advertising|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-adblock -->
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|advertising or self-promoting]] in violation of the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|notability]] guidelines. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 18:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

:What should I do about [[Draft:Kavita Joshi]] which they submitted for review? [[User talk:Eyebeller|<span style="color:#8A2DB8"><b>Eyebeller</b></span>]] 18:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
</div></div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for advertising|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-adblock -->

Revision as of 18:39, 12 January 2021

Hi, My Name is Ajay Singh and i love travel and write poems and now i want to start wikipedia edit. kindly educate and help me to get batter understanding on this awesome platform.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavita Joshi (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rajlaxmi2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavita Joshi (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KartikeyaS (talk) 07:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavita Joshi (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS💬 08:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon

Hello Rajlaxmi2. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rajlaxmi2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rajlaxmi2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 GSS💬 13:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Rajlaxmi2, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rajlaxmi2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Template:Z160 GSS💬 17:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS, I just started my editing and found a subject and thought to create a article. I usually watch dehati films which make me feel good so i choose Draft:Kavita Joshi and process it declined about 3 month ago and i thought she have enough media coverage that is the reason I keep Searching for more resources to make it better. If this is not enough to convince you that I am not a paid for this and its my hobby to write biographies about living person. if you think i'm continuously extending the article so i will stop it and pick another subject or person to pursuing my interest. lets me know I should improve this and start another article creation. --Rajlaxmi2 (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Raj[reply]

Thank you for replying. Can you please explain how you own these images and what is your connection with these people? GSS💬 17:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I found these images via internet and facebook. I joined some groups which shared photos of Dehati film celebrities. --Rajlaxmi2 (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I tried but can't find these images anywhere so can you provide a link to those web pages? GSS💬 17:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I found this image via a whatsapp group so no link available. Thanks for asking interested question about images. -- Rajlaxmi  Talk? 17:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that you misrepresented where you got those images from. That destroys the credibility of everything else you have said above. Therefore:
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What should I do about Draft:Kavita Joshi which they submitted for review? Eyebeller 18:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]