User talk:ZimZamZang: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
ZimZamZang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
ZimZam, I came back just to address this as Mal emailed me. There was an article here about Chuck, but it was deleted as failing WP:BIO. An admin advised me to put him in the article you are trying to alter and that is what I did. You are reverting something done at an ADMIN'S suggestion. What Mal has said about WP:BIO is the reason why an article on Chuck can not be created. He is still an important part of wrestling history in this country in spite of this - and if WP weren't so gung ho about WP:BIO we wouldn't have this problem. I hope you understand and accept that the section is notable and verified. That is all I have to say - I'm gone. [[User:Curse of Fenric|Curse of Fenric]] 01:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
ZimZam, I came back just to address this as Mal emailed me. There was an article here about Chuck, but it was deleted as failing WP:BIO. An admin advised me to put him in the article you are trying to alter and that is what I did. You are reverting something done at an ADMIN'S suggestion. What Mal has said about WP:BIO is the reason why an article on Chuck can not be created. He is still an important part of wrestling history in this country in spite of this - and if WP weren't so gung ho about WP:BIO we wouldn't have this problem. I hope you understand and accept that the section is notable and verified. That is all I have to say - I'm gone. [[User:Curse of Fenric|Curse of Fenric]] 01:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
What I understand is that you think I am a sockpuppet and that your edits are in bad faith. |
Revision as of 01:22, 26 January 2007
Do not revert the Chuck Chaos references again - at all. This is an important part of Australian wrestling history.
I repeat - do not revert this. This is information that is important to Australian wrestling history and it has been verified. 124.181.198.198 20:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks! Mal Case 00:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
ZimZam, I came back just to address this as Mal emailed me. There was an article here about Chuck, but it was deleted as failing WP:BIO. An admin advised me to put him in the article you are trying to alter and that is what I did. You are reverting something done at an ADMIN'S suggestion. What Mal has said about WP:BIO is the reason why an article on Chuck can not be created. He is still an important part of wrestling history in this country in spite of this - and if WP weren't so gung ho about WP:BIO we wouldn't have this problem. I hope you understand and accept that the section is notable and verified. That is all I have to say - I'm gone. Curse of Fenric 01:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC) What I understand is that you think I am a sockpuppet and that your edits are in bad faith.