Talk:Wilhelm Schmidt (linguist): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:05, 24 November 2021

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christianity: Catholicism Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion Start‑class High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Did Schmidt say the various cultures had the common idea of a benevolent Creator or that they "created a God"? I don't have Karen Armstrong's book in front of me. --Uncle Ed (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, dubious

"Schmidt managed to prove that Mon–Khmer language has inner connections with other languages of the South Seas, one of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics." What does "inner connections" mean? What "other languages of the South Seas" does this refer to? If this is what Schmidt claimed, do modern studies confirm it? (I suspect not.) "One of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics"? Nonsense: even if it is valid, and very important for Austroasiatic studies, it is of practically no significance to other linguists, made no great advance in methodology or knowledge about language in general.Linguistatlunch (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==Untitled==
 Did Schmidt say the various cultures '''had''' the common idea of a benevolent Creator or that they "created a God"? I don't have Karen Armstrong's book in front of me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] ([[User talk:Ed Poor|talk]]) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
+==Unsourced, dubious==
+"Schmidt managed to prove that Mon–Khmer language has inner connections with other languages of the South Seas, one of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics." What does "inner connections" mean? What "other languages of the South Seas" does this refer to? If this is what Schmidt claimed, do modern studies confirm it? (I suspect not.) "One of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics"? Nonsense: even if it is valid, and very important for Austroasiatic studies, it is of practically no significance to other linguists, made no great advance in methodology or knowledge about language in general.[[User:Linguistatlunch|Linguistatlunch]] ([[User talk:Linguistatlunch|talk]]) 15:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)