User talk:184.147.109.215: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
At this stage I think [[wp:spa]] and [[wp:nothere]] might be worth your time to read.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 19:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
At this stage I think [[wp:spa]] and [[wp:nothere]] might be worth your time to read.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 19:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::: RS is clearly just code for "websites that heed the US government line", as the previous revisions were sourced and yet |
:::: RS is clearly just code for "websites that heed the US government line", as the previous revisions were sourced and yet Snoog rewrote them anyways, and then went so far as to try to cover up that there was any dispute about the new revision's neutrality [[Special:Contributions/184.147.109.215|184.147.109.215]] ([[User talk:184.147.109.215#top|talk]]) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:33, 16 December 2021
December 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Politics of Cuba. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13(talk) 19:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. clpo13(talk) 19:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
- Thank you for once again proving Wikipedia's "neutrality policy" is a lie 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe you should have heeded the warning. clpo13(talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- We go with what RS say. If you want to challenge wp:consensus you make a case at talk you do not wp:editwar.Slatersteven (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for once again proving Wikipedia's "neutrality policy" is a lie 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
At this stage I think wp:spa and wp:nothere might be worth your time to read.Slatersteven (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- RS is clearly just code for "websites that heed the US government line", as the previous revisions were sourced and yet Snoog rewrote them anyways, and then went so far as to try to cover up that there was any dispute about the new revision's neutrality 184.147.109.215 (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)