User talk:Jusprimaenoctis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Incorrect information added. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Stop removing material from [[Droit du seigneur]]. [[User:GBRV|GBRV]] ([[User talk:GBRV|talk]]) 19:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC) |
Stop removing material from [[Droit du seigneur]]. [[User:GBRV|GBRV]] ([[User talk:GBRV|talk]]) 19:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
A majority of historians have concluded that the idea is a myth, and that all references to it are from later periods. Over the centuries, it became commonly portrayed in European literature as a practice that had occurred in earlier times or other places. In practice, it may have been the feudal lords using their power and influence over serfs to sexually exploit the women free of consequences, as opposed to a legitimate legal right. |
|||
Revision as of 19:49, 1 February 2022
February 2022
Hello, I'm Awesome Aasim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Droit du seigneur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 18:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Stop removing material from Droit du seigneur. GBRV (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
A majority of historians have concluded that the idea is a myth, and that all references to it are from later periods. Over the centuries, it became commonly portrayed in European literature as a practice that had occurred in earlier times or other places. In practice, it may have been the feudal lords using their power and influence over serfs to sexually exploit the women free of consequences, as opposed to a legitimate legal right.