Talk:David Duke: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:David Duke/Archive 7) (bot |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
BTW I hope to start working on this article soon. The state of this article is shameful and we need to drastically improve the public knowledge of this evil man. |
BTW I hope to start working on this article soon. The state of this article is shameful and we need to drastically improve the public knowledge of this evil man. |
||
::: That is so weird. Duke was never an overly handsome man. |
|||
[[User:Jon698|Jon698]] ([[User talk:Jon698|talk]]) 15:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC) |
[[User:Jon698|Jon698]] ([[User talk:Jon698|talk]]) 15:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:49, 16 August 2022
Floyd Parker was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 November 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into David Duke. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Duke article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
David Duke was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about David Duke. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about David Duke at the Reference desk. |
To-do list for David Duke:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
To add to article
To add to this article: information about why Duke lived in Moscow for five years, and what he did while he was there. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Replacing infobox image
Hello, I found Duke's junior class image from the Riverside Military Academy. Copyright is annoying and has so far prevented us from using many images for this article. I am wondering if we could use that image in place of the low-quality 2020 version we have. Here are the reasons why I want to do so.
1. Duke became an active white supremacist during his teenage years, joined the Klan in the 1970s, became a Grand Wizard in 1974, ran for president in 1980, and ran for state senate twice in the 1970s. This image from 1967 is only a decade away from those activities while the one we are currently using is around fifty years afterwards.
2. This image is higher-quality than the one we are currently using.
3. Many news reports from his time in politics constantly talked about his good looks (even though to me he seems to look like anybody else) such as this: "He is a tall man of 40 with tousled, sandy-colored hair and pale-blue eyes. He has soft, disarming good looks which in recent years have been reshaped by several bouts with a plastic surgeon."[1] Therefore we should show a picture more representative of that image than of a more recent image.
BTW I hope to start working on this article soon. The state of this article is shameful and we need to drastically improve the public knowledge of this evil man.
- That is so weird. Duke was never an overly handsome man.
Jon698 (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "EVOLUTION OF A BIGOT DAVID DUKE WENT FROM GRAND WIZARD OF THE KU KLUX KLAN TO NEAR-SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE FOR THE U.S. SENATE. ARE HIS DAYS OF NAZISM AND WHITE SUPREMACY A THING OF THE PAST, OR IS THE HOODED ROBE STILL HANGING IN HIS CLOSET?". Sun-Sentinel. February 10, 1991. Archived from the original on May 10, 2020.
Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the early life section of Duke's page, in the third paragraph, second and third line, there is unneeded language ("in 1970" appears twice in the same sentence) and in the case of the first "in 1970," if that one is kept, the "in" should be lowercased since it's part of the section before the comma. Thesleepingjournalist (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Done --Hemanthah (talk) 06:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
"Neo-nazi" description
Added the description of "neo-Nazi" to the opening cited to the SPLC profile article, but this was reverted. The 1992 article by Julia Reed in The New York Review of Books only ever describes David Duke as being a Nazi or having such sympathies, which is not quite close enough or too interpretative to use the term "neo-Nazi". Reed's article can support describing Duke as a "white supremacist", I was wrong to assert this in an edit summary a couple of days ago.Philip Cross (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Changes need to be made about Election Page
Whomever wrote the David Duke page seriously had some glaring errors in the elections. There's also a subtle bias there painting Duke as more flattering but wrong. For instance, the U.S. Senate (1990) states he's the only Republican and three Democrats. Then it contradicts and says Ben Bagert was nominated. Then it tries to infer Bagert was pushed out by the party. In the Governor 1991, it implies Roemer was squeezed only by Duke and ignores the effect of Clyde Holloway, who was the official endorsed GOP candidate. I think the whole page deserves and auditing and realism given to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acpritt (talk • contribs) 08:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Current photo?
Can anybody confirm that the photo is really from 2022? Pretty sure he looks nothing like that anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.90.151 (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Old requests for Biography peer review
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Oklahoma articles
- Low-importance Oklahoma articles
- B-Class Tulsa articles
- Low-importance Tulsa articles
- Tulsa articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Louisiana articles
- Mid-importance Louisiana articles
- WikiProject Louisiana articles
- Louisiana articles with to-do lists
- B-Class New Orleans articles
- Mid-importance New Orleans articles
- WikiProject New Orleans articles
- New Orleans articles with to-do lists
- B-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Low-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- United States presidential elections articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report