Wikipedia:Featured article review/1930 FIFA World Cup/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→1930 FIFA World Cup: Re: Co-ords usually keep FARs open if improvments are ongoing |
→1930 FIFA World Cup: Reply |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I would like to address the issues, but if this process is already a week into a two week time frame I have no chance of making much headway in that time. Compared to 2009 (was it really 13 years ago?) I have [[Children|significant pressures on my time]] and will only be able to make progress at a glacial rate. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 05:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
I would like to address the issues, but if this process is already a week into a two week time frame I have no chance of making much headway in that time. Compared to 2009 (was it really 13 years ago?) I have [[Children|significant pressures on my time]] and will only be able to make progress at a glacial rate. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 05:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|Oldelpaso}} FAR co-ords are usually amenable to keeping FARs open as long as improvements are continuing in the article. Feel free to ping me when improvements are complete and I will take another look. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
:{{re|Oldelpaso}} FAR co-ords are usually amenable to keeping FARs open as long as improvements are continuing in the article. Feel free to ping me when improvements are complete and I will take another look. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
::Comparing to the promoted version, the questionable sources appear to be subsequent additions. Looks like a case of going through the newer additions line by line and either integrating with better sources or discarding. The most substantive change is the bit about 3rd/4th place. This is somewhat overexplained, though I understand why. The issue occasionally gets attention in Serbia, leading to well meaning but often inaccurate changes advancing thr view of Yugoslavia being the third placed team. There should be a more elegant rewrite possible. |
|||
::I don't really have any ability to expand a cultural depictions section. Its not something the books covering the tournament go into. I'm wondering if a "Legacy" section might be the way to go for this, and tidying up the last surviving players part. A short summary of how the tournament went on to become the behemoth it is today, into which bits like that could be woven. |
|||
::My knowledge of FA standards is rusty at best - I think this 13 year old effort might be my most recent. Could there be mileage in tag bombing the statements requiring better sourcing? [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 06:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:14, 3 September 2022
1930 FIFA World Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Oldelpaso, WikiProject Uruguay, WikiProject Football, 2021-05-15 2022-08-07
I am nominating this featured article for review because of unsourced statements, the use of low-quality sources (like self-published works and blogs), and sections that can be removed or added (as I indicated on the talk page). Z1720 (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like to address the issues, but if this process is already a week into a two week time frame I have no chance of making much headway in that time. Compared to 2009 (was it really 13 years ago?) I have significant pressures on my time and will only be able to make progress at a glacial rate. Oldelpaso (talk) 05:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Oldelpaso: FAR co-ords are usually amenable to keeping FARs open as long as improvements are continuing in the article. Feel free to ping me when improvements are complete and I will take another look. Z1720 (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comparing to the promoted version, the questionable sources appear to be subsequent additions. Looks like a case of going through the newer additions line by line and either integrating with better sources or discarding. The most substantive change is the bit about 3rd/4th place. This is somewhat overexplained, though I understand why. The issue occasionally gets attention in Serbia, leading to well meaning but often inaccurate changes advancing thr view of Yugoslavia being the third placed team. There should be a more elegant rewrite possible.
- I don't really have any ability to expand a cultural depictions section. Its not something the books covering the tournament go into. I'm wondering if a "Legacy" section might be the way to go for this, and tidying up the last surviving players part. A short summary of how the tournament went on to become the behemoth it is today, into which bits like that could be woven.
- My knowledge of FA standards is rusty at best - I think this 13 year old effort might be my most recent. Could there be mileage in tag bombing the statements requiring better sourcing? Oldelpaso (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)