Jump to content

Talk:Diamond: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Reply
Reverted 1 edit by 194.78.170.80 (talk): Removed off-topic post
Line 78: Line 78:
:Thanks for your concern. I'm not aware of any policy that says that images in this Wikipedia have to be in English. Of course, it is preferable, so I did a quick search for an alternative and didn't find one. If you're able to find or make one yourself, you're welcome to substitute it. But for now, I think the text is easy for an English speaker to understand, and of course it's reinforced by the map itself. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:grey;">[[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]]([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]])</span> 16:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
:Thanks for your concern. I'm not aware of any policy that says that images in this Wikipedia have to be in English. Of course, it is preferable, so I did a quick search for an alternative and didn't find one. If you're able to find or make one yourself, you're welcome to substitute it. But for now, I think the text is easy for an English speaker to understand, and of course it's reinforced by the map itself. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:grey;">[[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]]([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]])</span> 16:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
:: Agreed. One of the biggest challenges for Wikipedia is finding suitable images on acceptable licensing terms to illustrate concepts in articles. For this reason, the rules governing images are more relaxed than those for contributed text (except for copyright, which is strictly enforced.) It's a necessity one hopes is temporary. --[[User:Kent G. Budge|Kent G. Budge]] ([[User talk:Kent G. Budge|talk]]) 17:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
:: Agreed. One of the biggest challenges for Wikipedia is finding suitable images on acceptable licensing terms to illustrate concepts in articles. For this reason, the rules governing images are more relaxed than those for contributed text (except for copyright, which is strictly enforced.) It's a necessity one hopes is temporary. --[[User:Kent G. Budge|Kent G. Budge]] ([[User talk:Kent G. Budge|talk]]) 17:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
:::"The Image" in English :
::::::: Origins of kimberlite pipes on planet Earth. In the old - old time. Immemorial times. In the Age of Dinosaur's and Reptiles. Dragons, pterodactels usw. When the surface of the Earth was hot. From thermonuclear reaction. Not so deep at all. Underground. Mind appeared on our planet. Intelligents. Dinosaurs! They were not so stupid. Predatory dinosaurs. Organized into tribes. Herds of herbivorous giants began to graze. Also, however, dinosaurs. But, meat breeds. AND , this Time. An expedition of aliens has come to Earth. Intelligent but predatory Dinos. Expressed- Wery greetings to the aliens. And, then, - they attacked, and, ate! Discouraged by such a "move". From the underdeveloped civilization of the Dinos. Alien super-intelligentsia. Shelled the planet Earth. Destroyed the entire intelligent sub-species of Dinosaurs. Nuclear, or, thermonuclear charges. Perhaps even an electromagnetic beam. "Pumping" the Energy - and, bang! super powerful explosion. Yes! After the super-powerful explosion. kimberlite pipes remain. Diamonds.
::::The size, - barrel of gasoline.
::::Of course!
::::This is just one of the theories.
::::'''Origins of kimberlite pipes with big-diamonds.'''
:::[[Special:Contributions/194.78.170.80|194.78.170.80]] ([[User talk:194.78.170.80|talk]]) 16:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


== Synthetic diamonds. ==
== Synthetic diamonds. ==

Revision as of 17:31, 11 January 2023

Featured articleDiamond is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 11, 2005.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
April 16, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
January 23, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
August 25, 2009Featured article reviewKept
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 17, 2010.
Current status: Featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2021

Near the bottom of the article, under "Etymology," we have:

"The name diamond is derived from the ancient Greek Ancient Greek: ἀδάμας (adámas), 'proper, unalterable, unbreakable, untamed'"

The first instance of "ancient Greek" (the one that is not a hyperlink) should be removed to avoid repetition. 93.41.2.30 (talk) 07:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image not in english

The image showcasing major diamond mining countries is in French and not in English, despite of being on the English version of the page. 117.194.52.236 (talk) 11:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern. I'm not aware of any policy that says that images in this Wikipedia have to be in English. Of course, it is preferable, so I did a quick search for an alternative and didn't find one. If you're able to find or make one yourself, you're welcome to substitute it. But for now, I think the text is easy for an English speaker to understand, and of course it's reinforced by the map itself. RockMagnetist(talk) 16:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. One of the biggest challenges for Wikipedia is finding suitable images on acceptable licensing terms to illustrate concepts in articles. For this reason, the rules governing images are more relaxed than those for contributed text (except for copyright, which is strictly enforced.) It's a necessity one hopes is temporary. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Synthetic diamonds.

Who is the world leader? How advanced is the technology of production?Neo Zweite (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exports treemap

The caption below the graph of exporting countries says: "Diamond exports by country (2014) from Harvard Atlas of Economic Complexity"

However when I click on this link I see totally different data, for instance 14.71% for the US instead of 5% on our image. I played with the settings (e.g., "Diamonds, industrial, unworked", "SITC rev.2 (1962-2020)", "Net" instead of "Gross", other years, etc.) but I couldn't generate an identical tree map.

Should we remove this image?

We could also replace it by the 2020 data but I'm not even sure the data makes sense for readers as the tree map seems to merge worked diamonds and unworked diamonds. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 13:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]