Jump to content

User talk:Keremmaarda: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎ANI: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
→‎ANI: blocked for one week
Tag: Reverted
Line 34: Line 34:


[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur|talk]]) 12:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur|talk]]) 12:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

===Block===
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''one week''' for [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] or violations of the [[WP:HA|harassment]] policy. Look, you need to stop insulting content opponents, but instead engage in constructive and dispassionate discussion at designated talk pages (and ''not'' through [[WP:ES|edit summaries]], that's not what they're for). Because the way you're going is simply unfeasible, and there will not be many more chances, if at all. So please be mindful. Perhaps edit less contentious subjects for a while, at least until you gain more experience and a better sense of the [[WP:CIVIL]] tone and tenor that's expected (and in fact required) on the English Wikipedia. Since, as mentioned, your current conduct falls ''way'' outside of these norms. Thanks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:El_C|El_C]] 13:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 13:26, 13 August 2023

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Burshek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Burshek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Burshek, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Burshek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Derna (1912), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Negroponte (1470), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of Jehol

Information icon Hello, Keremmaarda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of Jehol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for personal attacks or violations of the harassment policy. Look, you need to stop insulting content opponents, but instead engage in constructive and dispassionate discussion at designated talk pages (and not through edit summaries, that's not what they're for). Because the way you're going is simply unfeasible, and there will not be many more chances, if at all. So please be mindful. Perhaps edit less contentious subjects for a while, at least until you gain more experience and a better sense of the WP:CIVIL tone and tenor that's expected (and in fact required) on the English Wikipedia. Since, as mentioned, your current conduct falls way outside of these norms. Thanks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 13:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]