Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Africa: Difference between revisions
Wcquidditch (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Africa== |
==Africa== |
||
<!-- New AFD discussions should be placed on top of the list, directly below this line --> |
<!-- New AFD discussions should be placed on top of the list, directly below this line --> |
||
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-rupt}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edgar_Chibaka}} |
{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edgar_Chibaka}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kodjo_Aziangbe}} |
{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kodjo_Aziangbe}} |
Revision as of 05:50, 19 July 2024
Points of interest related to Africa on Wikipedia: Outline – Index – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Africa. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Africa|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Africa. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
watch |
- See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa
Africa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- K-rupt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NMUSICBIO as search turns up barely two pages of local coverage of his death with next to nothing about his music. No notable discography, chart activity or awards over the course of his brief career. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 05:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Africa. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 05:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: basically no coverage apart from his death, which is not enough for reliability, although will probably change my vote if the claims for a single being charted can be sourced. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Nyasa Times as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Edgar Chibaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
should be deleted due to the lack of significant independent coverage that meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG), relying instead on primary sources, company related news and not significant mentions. LusikSnusik (talk) 10:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Africa, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or redirect: to Nyasa Times, the company that the subject found. Subject has enough WP:GNG. For example here reported by the Telegraph, subject won the Black British Business Person of the Year award in 2021. I also found this where subject is being the founder and the Chief Executive Officer of Malawi's leading online publication, the Nyasa Times that he found in 2006. This could be used to sustain the article per (WP:NEXIST). --Tumbuka Arch (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete interviews are a poor way to establish notability and if he owns the Nyasa Times then it isn't independent enough to establish notability. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle Alternatively, it makes sense to redirect it to their company on Wikipedia that the subject found, thus Nyasa Times. Again, not all sources are interviews. Furthermore, this AfD was made by someone at random who was even reported at ANI here and there is even a discussion on their talk page about their nominations. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 07:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't oppose a redirect. I looked at the references now. I presumed the sources you mentioned were the strongest sources. The strongest source appears to be the Yorkshire Evening Post but it isn't enough for notability in my opinion. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle did you happen to look at the Telegraph source I linked in my !vote? It’s comparable to the Evening Post as SIGCOV in my view. Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see it now, but I don't think it's sufficiently independent here: 'The annual event, for which The Telegraph is a media partner'. Traumnovelle (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Dagnabbit, didn’t see that on my first read. Switching my !vote now. Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see it now, but I don't think it's sufficiently independent here: 'The annual event, for which The Telegraph is a media partner'. Traumnovelle (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle did you happen to look at the Telegraph source I linked in my !vote? It’s comparable to the Evening Post as SIGCOV in my view. Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't oppose a redirect. I looked at the references now. I presumed the sources you mentioned were the strongest sources. The strongest source appears to be the Yorkshire Evening Post but it isn't enough for notability in my opinion. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle Alternatively, it makes sense to redirect it to their company on Wikipedia that the subject found, thus Nyasa Times. Again, not all sources are interviews. Furthermore, this AfD was made by someone at random who was even reported at ANI here and there is even a discussion on their talk page about their nominations. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 07:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
*Week keep. The Yorkshire Evening Post and Daily Telegraph profiles bring it just over the line of WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources for a WP:GNG pass. I would oppose a redirect; I think the Nyasa Times may be less notable than its founder. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. I'd like to close this as a Redirect but there is strong opposition to that outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The Telegraph source I linked in my struck !vote above is insufficiently independent, which leaves a single instance of SIGCOV. I cannot find evidence of the Nyasa Times’ notability and may bring that page to AfD in the near future, but if others wish to redirect there for now, I won’t oppose it. Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Subject of the article has enough WP:SIGCOV to barely establish notability [1] [2] Silvymaro (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- I thought so too at first, but see the discussion above about the lack of independence in the Telegraph piece. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was draftify. Complex/Rational 15:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Kodjo Aziangbe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. Sources are limited to databases and routine match coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Africa. Shellwood (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Much of the sourcing would be in Arabic, Ukrainian and Japanese. Not exactly easy for an English speaker to search Geschichte (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 20:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would accept draftify as an AtD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify – Per above. Svartner (talk) 19:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Miraboi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A biographical article about a Nigeria man that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Music, Africa, and Nigeria. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Critically fails WP:NCREATIVE or WP:GNG, utterly nonsense and promotional article that serves no purpose whatsoever than to promote the subject. No credible claim of importance. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 20:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep : as per nomination by various editors in terms of the same GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Miraboi Mark (2nd nomination). Clean up is just required which I would be contributing later due to my time schedule. In 2021 appeared at the Ghana national TV as a musician with one of his top song featuring Peruzzi [1]and no longer do music. In 2022, he was dragged by Nigerians for a political act [2] further details nomination 2 can be cited [3]. Nominator 2 has also been a block user for 4 years now I just noticed that. Theirs no point AFD nominator replying. Look forward to other editors as I will be busy. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Gabriel601, I don't understand this sentence:
Nominator 2 has also been a block user for 4 years now I just noticed that. Theirs no point AFD nominator replying. Look forward to other editors as I will be busy.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Gabriel601, I don't understand this sentence:
- Keep : Passes WP:SIGCOV.--Afí-afeti (talk) 00:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- You need to explain how it meets WP:SIGCOV; the sources are promotional and bears the subject's quotes like "how I am being motivated by God–Miraboi", etc. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The sourcing is kind of ridiculous -- a Commons photo purporting to be an award he received is not a reliable source -- and what in-depth coverage exists appears to be tabloid coverage, which, per WP:SBST is not WP:SIGCOV. Other sources appear to be WP:INTERVIEWs and thus ineligible as primary sources. Even though many sources appear in major Nigerian news outlets, the nature of the coverage limits their use to qualify for WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. (I see no evidence he meets any criterion under WP:CREATIVE.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Interviews and him giving money to charity aren't the kind of sourcing we're looking for. More of the typical Nigerian media hype for an otherwise non-notable individual. I don't see anything here we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 03:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - The sources are standard Nigerian pay-to-play websites that look like newspapers but actually reprint promotional releases. Note the frequent weasel words, while some are written in the first person. Those were meant to promote this guy's music and business but none count as reliable sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Mostly sourced interviews and run-on-the-mill publications. They do not meet the general notability standards. Best, Reading Beans 23:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Nation (Malawi). Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nations Publications Limited of Malawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or Sng. Tagged by others for this since April. Misses ncorp by far. Zero references other than their own website and I couldn't find any GNG references. North8000 (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, and Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: to The Nation (Malawi), since this (AfD subject) is the parent company that owns The Nation, which is probably Malawi's oldest and generally reliable daily and weekly newspaper since 1993 being distributed locally around the country.--Tumbuka Arch (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- @North8000 Tumbuka Arch (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Tumbuka Arch: Sounds like a good idea. North8000 (talk) 01:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @North8000 Tumbuka Arch (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as suggested by Tumbuka Arch. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was draftify with protection. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- List of country subdivision flags in Africa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just closed to draftify and immediately recreated by the same editor. Thanks to the merged content it is no longer a G4, but none of the material added addresses the issues raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of country subdivision flags in Africa. If this closes as draftify or delete, suggest protection to avoid this situation again. Star Mississippi 23:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 23:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The title is "flags of country subdivisions of Africa", and what is shown are the flags of country subdivisions of Africa. By draftifying it, you are removing a whole list of flags that some people may find useful. Eehuiio (talk) 02:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- This page is not a gallery anymore, I converted into informative tables. I hope this will help 2A02:A453:D05E:0:7859:2E95:3DE6:2A4A (talk) 11:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- It remains un sourced, which is the chief issue. Please log in when you edit. Star Mississippi 13:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- many sources have been added now. This should not be deleted. Eehuiio (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please review sourcing guidelines. fotw.info is not an acceptable source, nor are many of the others. This is why it remains functionally unsourced. Star Mississippi 13:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Even if it is unsourced, it still has information that fits the title. Deleting it would be useless and unnecessary. Eehuiio (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please review sourcing guidelines. fotw.info is not an acceptable source, nor are many of the others. This is why it remains functionally unsourced. Star Mississippi 13:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- many sources have been added now. This should not be deleted. Eehuiio (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- It remains un sourced, which is the chief issue. Please log in when you edit. Star Mississippi 13:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- This page is not a gallery anymore, I converted into informative tables. I hope this will help 2A02:A453:D05E:0:7859:2E95:3DE6:2A4A (talk) 11:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify over current draft with historymerge (the current list article at least looks better). Eehuiio, as Star Mississippi notes, neither fotw.info nor crwflags.com nor others are reliable sources. For the purpose of this list's entries, I believe official government sources would be reasonable to use despite not necessarily being independent. The alternative is that every entry that is not reliably sourced is removed/commented out per WP:V/WP:BURDEN, which would remove most content from this article; historymerge would be needed in this case anyway. If this is moved to draft, then please put it through the Articles for Creation process per the AFC template once you believe that the flags are properly sourced; please don't move this back to mainspace in a deficient state where it is likely to be speedily deleted, etc. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 01:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- This page also has other sources, so it isnt completely unsourced. Also, it still fulfills the title and is useful. Eehuiio (talk) 02:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- post-relisting, confirm my draftification !vote, ref per comments of BD2412, etc. If it's fixed in draft and sent through AFC, then good. If it's left unfixed then so be it. If it's moved back to somewhere in mainspace in a deficient form (yes, protect away), then consider that a WP:G4 with broad latitude ref this AFD. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator commentyes, the reopening was Involved, but I do not believe that is an issue as it's clearly not a discussion for a NAC. Cleaning up redirects now Star Mississippi 14:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think we're all tired of whack a sock. @Eehuiio if you run into issues editing here, just remember to log in first. This has nothing to do with your edits. I've protected against logged out edits. If any admin thinks this is Involved, feel free to revert me. Star Mississippi 18:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: and salt. Draftification makes sense when
an editoreditors familiar with our notability guidelinesoffersare available to work on the article. Draftification makes no sense when a single-purpose account cares more about having their pet page on WP than they do about any P&G. If we draftify this again, it'll bounce right back to mainspace as soon as we turn our head away, and we'll be back here in a couple of weeks for the 3rd nomination. Salting in this case is only meant to force the author to go throuigh AfC. Owen× ☎ 21:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC) - Delete The rationale by Own makes sense to me and as a NP patroller I am frustrated when an editor ignores process. Lightburst (talk) 01:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify. Move-lock the draft and create-lock the page. The draft will either be worked on in draftspace or die on the vine. Deletion should be reserved for cases where we should never have such an article. BD2412 T 21:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify: I agree with BD2412 that the page should be SALTed until the draft is accepted at AfC. I also believe that a comment to that effect, with a link to this discussion, should be added to the draft for the benefit of AfC reviewers. I disagree with OwenX that
Draftification makes sense when an editor familiar with our notability guidelines offers to work on the article.
Anyone can edit a draft in the draftspace. As a result of this AfD, there will also now be likelly be a set of eyes on the draft. Someone could also agree to work with the author. Edited 23:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC). I also disagree with the contention thatDraftification makes no sense when a single-purpose account cares more about having their pet page on WP than they do about any P&G.
Draftification is actually the best way to force that editor to try to learn those P&Gs so that they can get the article through AfC. I share Lightburst'sfrustrat[ion] when an editor ignores process
, but I do not believe that it is a valid reason to delete an article. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- You make some good points, voorts, and I partially amended my !vote above accordingly. Yes, drafts are available for everyone to work on, and this AfD may very well bring more attention to the page. But while the AfC process was indeed intended to teach editors our P&G, the ability to move drafts into mainspace without going through AfC effectively negates that objective, allowing a SPA to circumvent the process. I'd gladly undelete the page to draft if a non-SPA requests it, or even history-merge with a new draft. But realistically, I doubt anyone but the original author has any interest in this page. I agree with BD2412's statement that
Deletion should be reserved for cases where we should never have such an article
, but contend that this is exactly the case here, where sources do not establish notability, and the only one requesting a draft is an editor who doesn't seem concerned with our notability guidelines, and is simply waiting for an opportune moment to sneak the page back to mainspace. Owen× ☎ 12:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- Just a quick side note. Flags of regions of Egypt is completely unsourced. The absence of sourcing in the nominated article revealed that, and if the latter article were fixed, it could transclude into this one as is. BD2412 T 21:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- You make some good points, voorts, and I partially amended my !vote above accordingly. Yes, drafts are available for everyone to work on, and this AfD may very well bring more attention to the page. But while the AfC process was indeed intended to teach editors our P&G, the ability to move drafts into mainspace without going through AfC effectively negates that objective, allowing a SPA to circumvent the process. I'd gladly undelete the page to draft if a non-SPA requests it, or even history-merge with a new draft. But realistically, I doubt anyone but the original author has any interest in this page. I agree with BD2412's statement that
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This article it is a part of the List of country subdivision flags, which is split into continents due to its size. If this article were deleted, this makes the list of country subdivision flags incomplete, while this is useless to readers. I'm converting from galleries to tables with reliable sources. 2A02:A453:D05E:0:8431:8C89:A5D1:202C (talk) 10:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Africa Proposed deletions
- Evans Brima Gbemeh (via WP:PROD on 11 September 2023)
Algeria
- Ibrahim Agha (Algeria) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article sounds more like a book than a Wikipedia article. Henry (talk) 00:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Royalty and nobility, and Algeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the subject is plainly notable. Some of the article needs to be rewritten and looks to me like a cooyvio anyway, though I can’t get the source to load. Mccapra (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- The "Hussein's reaction" section was translated directly from this page: https://web.archive.org/web/20130612123908/https://www.algerie-ancienne.com/Salon/Galib/8France/01expedit/17staoueli.htm I also checked the "Early life" section but did not find copying there. Other sections may also have copyright violations or close paraphrasing, but it's unlikely the entire article has been copied or translated directly here, Rjjiii (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
<--
Algeria Proposed deletions
Please hide entire section when there are no articles nominated for WP:PROD -->
Angola
Cameroon
- MC Charlene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is back following its deletion in 2022 and not improved. Leaving aside its WP:PROMO nature and peacocking words ("hype queen," "energy goddess"), the vast majority of sources on this individual are promotional WP:CHURNALISM, WP:INTERVIEWS and tabloid coverage excluded as WP:SIGCOV under WP:SBST. I found only one example of WP:SIGCOV qualifying toward notability (in the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet) and we'd need to see more to keep this page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, Health and fitness, Cameroon, and Norway. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete: For a Norwegian/Cameroonian musical individual, there is a lack of coverage in both countries, only in Nigeria [4] which has the usual puffy language. I'd expect something from the home crowd if this person was notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)- Weak keep Colour me surprised. Coverage in Norwegian median [5], [6]. Not a ton of coverage, but with the zillion Nigerian sources, I'd give it a pass. Oaktree b (talk) 00:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- The two Norwegian links are more or less the same article, built on a third piece, the original in Bergensavisen. There was another piece by the same journalist in Bergensavisen in 2020. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep Colour me surprised. Coverage in Norwegian median [5], [6]. Not a ton of coverage, but with the zillion Nigerian sources, I'd give it a pass. Oaktree b (talk) 00:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Egypt
- Abdullah Hashem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of the founder of a religious sect. The sect itself appears to be notable but it does not seem that the leader himself is. I think a redirect to Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light would probably be best. Mccapra (talk) 22:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Religion. Mccapra (talk) 22:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Egypt, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Google searches easily turn up hundreds of high-profile mentions. There are articles from Amnesty International, the UN, and various governments, and dozens of major newspapers that all mention him. Easily meets WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV criteria. For sects with that many media mentions, their founders and leaders would usually also be notable enough. There is also plenty of information about Hashem that would fit well into a standalone article. DjembeDrums (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- ok which three of these do you think provide the best in-depth coverage? Mccapra (talk) 21:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Merge Article only cited one source almost which shows they still need to meet WP:GNG to stand alone Tesleemah (talk) 20:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If merge, merge where?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 22:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Egypt Proposed deletions
Ethiopia
Ethiopia Proposed deletions
Ghana
- Akrokre Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any mention of this festival. "Akrokre" appears to be an isiXhosa word meaning something like "suspect" or "suspicious"; the word appears in this travelogue, but in a context unrelated to any festival. I was unable to find any other mentions of the word, let alone the festival. Suriname0 (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The festival actually exists, I just watched a Facebook video on it. However, the festival lack the sources that can make it notable on the Wikipedia, Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Africa, and Ghana. Suriname0 (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Isaac Anderson (model) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All the sourcing on this fashion model is over-the-top promotional material, un-bylined, in sources of questionable independence and reliability (example: "Isaac isn’t just another fashion model; he’s a revolutionary force.") In my WP:BEFORE search, I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources and so I don't see a pass of WP:GNG (much less WP:NMODEL). Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Ghana. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Stop Galamsey Now Protest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the article includes a number of references, the topic itself—a 3-day, low-consequence protest—doesn't seem notable enough to warrant an independent article. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to Galamsey: As it is relevant there --- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 14:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge: to the Galamsey article as suggested. This is a rather brief account of a protest, that only seems notable within the larger context of the story. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Kenya
- High Commission of Kenya, Ottawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG, only a primary source provided. LibStar (talk) 07:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Kenya, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 07:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- AZA Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
it lacks sufficient reliable secondary sources to establish the company's notability under Wikipedia's guidelines. Additionally, the article mostly relies on primary sources, making it difficult to verify its claims and meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability and neutrality. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Clear GNG fail, all coverage is routine and/or insignificant. Macktheknifeau (talk) 07:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Libya
Mauritius
Morocco
Nigeria
- Hildi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources on page, fails WP:GNG. benǝʇᴉɯ 04:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. benǝʇᴉɯ 04:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nnamdi Nwizu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of a person with a successful career, supported by primary sources and PR profiling. There is no claim to notability here and Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Mccapra (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, and Nigeria. Mccapra (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete this person is not notable in terms of WP BIO and GNG. Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, all I could find on him was ROTM coverage, and a few softball interviews mostly aimed at promoting his company. Paid editing is obvious from article creator's edit history and user talk. Wikishovel (talk) 10:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2019 African Entertainment Awards USA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sensational and routine coverages. Fails the inclusion criteria for events. Best, Reading Beans 00:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am bundling these two here per my nomination statement.
- 2020 African Entertainment Awards USA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2021 African Entertainment Awards USA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Events, Nigeria, and United States of America. Reading Beans 00:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ogbe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find sources to establish that this meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete Subject lack references to establish their notability Tesleemah (talk) 08:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Brosthrone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fail WP:NSINGER. There is literally nothing to inherently confer that here, and no source to establish WP:GNG. I looked through the sources and all I could find is unreliable PRs and advertorials for a more or less up-and-coming singer-songwriter. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep : Subject notable with their major 'single' release, also few reliable independent sources mention them in their newspapers. Tesleemah talk 07:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment sources aren't great, might be WP:TOOSOON.-KH-1 (talk) 01:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep : Subject is notable as per WP:SINGER. Mevoelo talk 08:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elo, which criteria does it satisfy? Best, reading beans 11:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- The subject has received coverage of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country; has a song that gained national recognition; and has even featured several other independent top-rated artists, sources also show notability. Still working on improving the article by adding more sources. Best, Mevoelo (talk) 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elo, which criteria does it satisfy? Best, reading beans 11:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Do we have sources to back up these keep !votes?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ochicha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find sources to verify that this meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Nigeria. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Passes WP:NPLACE based on [7] and [8]. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Would have voted a ‘keep’ but the article contains no citation or reference. Needs to be developed and improved. Mevoelo (talk) 02:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete : No reliable source about this village. Just fails WP:GEOLAND.--Gabriel (……?) 16:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 18:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Gabriel601: You might want to revisit the article (and your !vote) now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Meets WP:NPLACE. Best, Reading Beans 05:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chimele Usuwa Abengowe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Firstly, the content on ref 1 which is a magazine can't be verified by any reliable source same as ref 5. Ref 2 and ref 5 are also the same link on the article current state. The only source here was this which just only talk about his death. Ref 7 which is a YouTube video showcasing a church service cant be use as a source neither any YouTube link can be use as a source. Ref 3 which just only mentioned his name as part of the medical list and not like he was talked about. Subject just totally fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Nigeria. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly a much respected citizen but WP:NOTMEMORIAL Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC).
- thank you for your response. Please note that @Gabriel601 has been trolling my articles and marking them for deletion. There's an established case of "nominations in bad faith here". Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- welcome again for marking another article of mine for deletion. After the last episode, you should have recused yourself from my articles and leave other editors to go through and arrive at their own conclusions. Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't verify certain details about this person like the date of birth and death. My search for the various information yielded "result not found" and I was wondering about the origin of other information like the award, OFR. After all these, I can say that the article doesn't meet WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV. Also, Gabriel's source analysis is thorough and well-documented. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Due to being a recipient of one of Nigeria's highest national awards (WP:ANYBIO The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor) National Honour of Member of the Order of the Niger (OON) by President Olusegun Obasanjo on the 16th November, 2000 - now sourced to Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC))
- The link you provided still doesn’t have his name on it that the president honors him with the title of OON. I opened the link used the control+F to find and paste his name still zero not found. Subject still fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 10:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- It has on page 605 as the third entry.... under the heading OFFICER OF THE ORDER OF THE NIGER (OON) Professor C. U. Abengowe ... Abia
- https://archive.gazettes.africa/archive/ng/2000/ng-government-gazette-dated-2000-10-09-no-69.pdf Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC))
- @Msrasnw, winning an award is a WP policy/guide that WP:SIGCOV may exist for an article. Oppositely, there isn't any coverage for this article, hence doesn't meet our general notability guidelines. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think there is significant coverage in Nigerian media for eg in an important newspaper Independent Nigeria ... we have Emejor, Chibuzor (2023) NGO Immortalises Prof Abengowe, Featured News, Independent Sep 4 [9]
- and Vision Africa (2013) Professor Abengowe Chimele Usuwa: Pragmatic Icon In The Field Of Teaching And Guidance, Profiles, Vision Africa 08/04 [10] And here (https://archive.upf.org/united-nations/international-day-of-peace/2013/5312-conference-in-abuja-on-education-and-national-development) he is giving a keynote at a serious conference. And there is lots more. I think it is shame that too many Wikipedia editors are too willing to delete what are to my mind clearly notable people that can with a little effort be reasonably sourced. (Msrasnw (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC))
- Vision Africa is a non notable platform. Upf is a non notable platform. There is till nothing notable about this man as per Wikipedia notability. If he was that respected a lot of news papers would have carried his news death. But nothing rather than just one news that’s not even all about his death. Gabriel (……?) 13:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://archive.gazettes.africa/archive/ng/2000/ng-government-gazette-dated-2000-10-09-no-69.pdf Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC))
- Keep. Subject satisfies notability guidelines as have been severally outlined above. Cfaso2000 (talk) 13:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- One source ain't enough to justify notability. Other editors needs to be aware ‘Cfaso2000’ was the article creator. Gabriel (……?) 11:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a disagreement over the quality of sourcing. A source assessment at this point would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)- Keep. Seems to me he has distinguished service. Notable award too methinks.Unfortunate coverage isn’t wider. 102.91.4.54 (talk) 18:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- You should have just created an account to vote a keep. All this keep from newbies are now just suspicious. Gabriel (……?) 18:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Been here for 12 yrs. 102.91.4.54 (talk) 19:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- You should have just created an account to vote a keep. All this keep from newbies are now just suspicious. Gabriel (……?) 18:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to me he has distinguished service. Notable award too methinks.Unfortunate coverage isn’t wider. 102.91.4.54 (talk) 18:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep : Subject meet WP:Notable and there are enough references to back it up Tesleemah (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The sources provided are not enough to meet WP:GNG. VisionAfrica seems to be the most in-depth, but I could not verify its reliability - it's not listed on the RS Noticeboard. There's no WP:SIGCOV to justify an article at this time.DesiMoore (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- You don't just make claims, @Tesleemah. You may need to present the sources you're speaking of. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: SOURCE ANALYSIS:
1. Vision Africa is an unreliable source per WP:NGRS. ✗ Fail
2. gazettes.africa is an archive of the government gazettes of African countries, hence, it's reliable and correctly defined the content. ✓ Pass
3. I will conder BLERF as reliable because it's been published by Nyaknno Osso, but it lacks indepth coverage and it's a listing of primary generated information. In other words, a database cannot be used as a source. ✗ Fail
4. It lists medical practitioners registered in Nigeria, but it wasn't independent of Jim, and doesn't show his career. It was only a list. ✗ Fail
5.Same as source 1
6. same as source 3
7. Without having doubts, and although Independent Newspaper (Nigeria) is reliable, the article reads like a paid publication. It's a coverage and statements by the organization who made a statue/thereabout for him.✗ Fail
8. YouTube is unreliable and the source (username that it was gotten from) of the video is very very unreliable ✗ FailFinal analysis: being awarded an award may meet WP:ANYBIO. However, all these SNGs are ways to know that there may exist likely coverage about the person. Here, there is no coverage (significant) of this individual. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)- @SafariScribeThanks for your source analysis. I have concerns regarding No 7 analysis. Your statement "the organization who made a statue/thereabout for him" appears to attribute the statue to the organization mentioned in the article. This is not the case based on my reading of the article again. Nowhere in the Independent Newspaper(Nigeria) article was it mentioned that the organization created a statue for him, and I haven't found that in any other sources analysed above. The organization mentioned in this article immortalized him by naming their lecture/conference series after the subject. Regarding being a paid publication, I'm not sure about that. The subject was resting on his deathbed and an organization "probably sponsored" news articles about him, or another probability is "they attracted news attention" to his death. I really can't vouch for any organization regarding how news content emanated. But I would give the benefit of doubt, given that the subject was deceased, and being a prominent person, would attract some coverage. Whether the coverage is facilitated or not is uncertain. I don't think this source should be considered as having failed. Cfaso2000 (talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cfaso2000, about source 7, see WP:PRSOURCE. Best, Reading Beans 08:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @SafariScribeThanks for your source analysis. I have concerns regarding No 7 analysis. Your statement "the organization who made a statue/thereabout for him" appears to attribute the statue to the organization mentioned in the article. This is not the case based on my reading of the article again. Nowhere in the Independent Newspaper(Nigeria) article was it mentioned that the organization created a statue for him, and I haven't found that in any other sources analysed above. The organization mentioned in this article immortalized him by naming their lecture/conference series after the subject. Regarding being a paid publication, I'm not sure about that. The subject was resting on his deathbed and an organization "probably sponsored" news articles about him, or another probability is "they attracted news attention" to his death. I really can't vouch for any organization regarding how news content emanated. But I would give the benefit of doubt, given that the subject was deceased, and being a prominent person, would attract some coverage. Whether the coverage is facilitated or not is uncertain. I don't think this source should be considered as having failed. Cfaso2000 (talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Nigeria proposed deletions
Nigeria miscellany for deletion
Rwanda
- Kagarama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This possibly passes WP:NGEO but would be far better servied merged inside Kicukiro District due to lack of sourcing or possibility to expand prose here. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rwanda. Shellwood (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Rwanda proposed deletions
Senegal
Somalia
- Ahmed Jila'ow Adow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This bio stub is supported by a single source, but that source doesn’t substantiate the claims in the article. I was originally going to redirect this to National Security Service (Somalia) as this article claims he was the service director. However that article lusts others as directors, not this subject. Possibly the article creator mixed two different people up, I don’t know. Anyway we are left with a biostub in which the claim to notability is not supported by the single source. Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Somalia. Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mahad Wasuge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of a researcher who does not appear to pass WP:NPROF and is not otherwise notable. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Somalia. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Off to a good start but far WP:Too soon to pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC).
- Delete. If we judge by WP:PROF, he is not there yet. Sometimes academics who are moderately successful by western standards, from countries whose academic system has not reached the same level, can be notable through WP:GNG and national news coverage, but I didn't find any of that in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per David Eppstein. Passes neither the PROF test nor general notability. Too soon for now. Bearian (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletions
South Africa
- Rachel Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only one reference on the page and it's a dead link to a bio of her from the government organization she works for. A quick search shows a decent amount of articles about and by a South African woman named Rachel Adams regarding AI (here, here, and here) but this seems to be a completely different woman who just happens to share a name and nationality. benǝʇᴉɯ 04:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and South Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep She doesn't "work for a government organization", she's an elected member of the National Assembly of South Africa, the parliament of South Africa. Easily meets WP:NPOL. Quite easy to find the correct link. AusLondonder (talk) 04:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as parliamentarian, but the article really needs more info e.g. her terms. Geschichte (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Lots of coverage for the AI person as mentioned, I don't see anything about a politician. Happy to revisit if we find new sources. Oaktree b (talk) 12:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- She certainly exists, she has a profile on the parliamentary website, she's also in a list of candidates elected in 2019. AusLondonder (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. She is a member of a national parliament which meets WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. The article is poorly written, but WP:IMPROVE.--Mpen320 (talk) 14:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here is another variant of webpage regarding her parliamentary duties. Geschichte (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Simon Crosby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 08:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant coverage for this person exists. Wired[11], The Register[12], eWeek[13], Computerwoche[14], InfoWorld[15], CRN[16], TechTarget[17], Csoonline.com[18] Frost 16:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, South Africa, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Almost everyone of these references are interviews of one sort or another and can't be used to prove notability. Gbooks is probably the best bet for establishing it. There is a couple of profiles there that are no good either. scope_creepTalk 07:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- John Moore (South African artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has no sources and no indication of notability. It only contains a link to the artist's online store. The subject does not meet the guidelines of WP:ARTIST nor WP:NBIO. Aneirinn (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and South Africa. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I am not finding any RS for this promotional article. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mark Lamberti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are interviews, WP:SPS sources and passing mentions. UPE. scope_creepTalk 08:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, South Africa, and Italy. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Obie Oberholzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient references to establish notability. -- Beland (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:BEFORE doe not reveal any RS for this commercial photographer. Fails WP:ARTIST. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- SouthSouthNorth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NORG. No in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources. C F A 💬 01:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and South Africa. C F A 💬 01:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
South Africa Proposed deletions
Also check the list at WP:PRODSUM
Sudan
Tanzania
Tanzania proposed deletions
Tunisia
- Battle of Sebiba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. M.Bitton (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (with improvements) - appears potentially notable based on scale of the battle. Second source seems to be The Complete History which is a significant work. Probably needs some "according to" etc. given that we are inevitably dealing with historical accounts. Per WP:NONENG if any of the statements are controversial, some translated quotation of the original source(s) might be helpful. YFB ¿ 17:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Tunisia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Can't find any mention of this in reliable (English) secondary sources, so it's certainly not a major or noteworthy engagement. Ibn al-Athir (The Complete History) and al-Idrisi (quoted in text) are primary sources, so even if there's no WP:OR involved here (which I'm not confident about), its mere mention in primary sources, in the absence of any mentions in secondary sources, means it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Overall, it just looks like another pseudo-puffery piece squeezed out of an obscure historical military engagement. R Prazeres (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's not easy to research this topic as most of the Arabic-language texts I can access e.g. via Google Books don't seem to support text selection (to check translation). However I found the following paper in the Algerian Historical Journal (for example) via a quick search for معركة سبيبة (Battle of Sebiba) https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/224926
- I'm not sure how Ibn al-Athir can be considered a primary source in this context? He wasn't born until 95 years after this battle took place and he doesn't appear to have been directly connected to either of the combatant tribes. But IANA historian so perhaps I'm misunderstanding how this works. YFB ¿ 20:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I found a French translation of Ibn al-Athir which is a bit more accessible to me at least. There is a whole section devoted to this battle, the context and its aftermath so it does seem fairly significant. Quick Google translation below of an extract:
- "Then the Riyâh' and the Zenâta all set out together, and on his side En-Naçir having advanced at the head of the Çanhȧdja, the Zenâta and the Benoû Hilal, the two armies met [ P. 31 ] near the town of Sebiba ( 1 ) . Following the charge which the Riyâh' and El-Moʻizz made respectively against the Benoû Hilal and the Zenâta, these last two groups fled, and the troops of En-Naçir imitated their example. The fugitives were pursued with swords at their backs, and twenty-four thousand Çanhâdja and Zenâta were massacred. El-K'ȧsim ben 'Alennâs (2) , brother of En-Nåçir, was also killed, but the latter himself was able to flee with a small number of his men. The Arabs thus became masters of a rich booty consisting of everything that belonged to the vanquished, money, weapons, horses, etc., the sharing of which was carried out as agreed. This affair completed the Arabs' complete mastery of the country; having arrived without resources, poor and having very few horses, they then found themselves rich, abundantly provided with weapons and mounts, in the presence of a country almost without defenders. They sent the standards, the drums, the tents of En-Nâçir and the horses they contained, to Temim, who sent them back to them, saying that it would be shameful for him to seize the spoils of his cousin. The Arabs greatly appreciated this act of generosity."
- I also found the following in https://www.persee.fr/doc/ccmed_0007-9731_1968_num_11_43_1452
- "La défaite de Sabîba (1065), qui fait au Magrib Central pendant à celle de Haydarân, constraint bientôt al-Nâsir d'abandonner la Qal'a pour Bougie, qu'il vient de fonder (1068-9). Vannée suivante, il conclut avec Tamïm une paix que lui et ses successeurs respecteront jusqu'à la mort de Tamïm (1108)."
- This is another secondary source that ascribes significance to the event. Definitely enough for GNG in my view. The article needs a lot of work, I will see what I can do to bring it up to scratch if retained or moved to Draft space.
- YFB ¿ 00:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Another source, in English, which devotes more than two whole pages to this specific battle: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BvTjCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA43 (pages 43-45) YFB ¿ 01:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking. That last source (Baadj 2015) is the only one that gives me pause about notability, but it's still just one book, which doesn't fully solve the WP:GNG problem because you'd have to write most of the article from this single detailed source. (As for Ibn al-Athir and Idrisi, as asilvering notes below they are primary sources in the sense that they are medieval accounts from the same era, so they should be mediated by professional historians.) A quick reading of Baadj's account also makes it clear that this article, as is, would need to be completely re-written to even be understandable. I'd support draftifying at best, if there's a chance a competent editor would rewrite it, but WP:TNT otherwise. R Prazeres (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Happy with WP:TNT. I will write a new article using the above sources plus this one https://ixtheo.de/Record/792329171 which dedicates three sub-chapters (6 whole pages) to the battle, its aftermath and a comparison to the Battle of Haydaran which was part of the same conflict. @M.Bitton would you be content with moving to Draft space for me to do that? YFB ¿ 21:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking. That last source (Baadj 2015) is the only one that gives me pause about notability, but it's still just one book, which doesn't fully solve the WP:GNG problem because you'd have to write most of the article from this single detailed source. (As for Ibn al-Athir and Idrisi, as asilvering notes below they are primary sources in the sense that they are medieval accounts from the same era, so they should be mediated by professional historians.) A quick reading of Baadj's account also makes it clear that this article, as is, would need to be completely re-written to even be understandable. I'd support draftifying at best, if there's a chance a competent editor would rewrite it, but WP:TNT otherwise. R Prazeres (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Another source, in English, which devotes more than two whole pages to this specific battle: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BvTjCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA43 (pages 43-45) YFB ¿ 01:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yummifruitbat well, he's a secondary source in the sense that he wasn't at the battle, but from the perspective of writing history, we don't want to be basing articles on what someone said several hundred years ago, with no interpretation by modern historians. -- asilvering (talk) 03:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. YFB ¿ 21:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2024 state visit by Kais Saied to China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no indication of notability for this visit. The sources are almost entirely government press releases and should be more WP:DIVERSE for independent notability. The page should be deleted and perhaps parts merged into the main Kais Saied article. Amigao (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Events, Tunisia, and China. Skynxnex (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP - Kais Saied is the President of Tunisia. This is an official State visit and as such, notability is an extremely big deal. I linked an independent English language source (2024 China-United States Exchange Foundation) under External links. I also linked a Brookings Institution commentary under External Links. They're building valuable contacts in a world that seems to be exploding, "Although there is no visible alienation between Tunisia and the European Union, the gradual distancing between Tunisia and the United States has become increasingly apparent." — Maile (talk) 00:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep, with no prejudice against a merge to the very empty China–Tunisia relations. The coverage and arguments provided by Maile to me, indicate that this event is likely to be notable (but not guaranteed) under WP:GEOSCOPE. I can see a benefit for having a summary of the event merged into the China-Tunisia relations article, (lack of analysis by secondary sources leaves this article as mostly a summary of what each government said about the event) but I view that more as an editorial decision than an AFD one. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merging this into the almost empty China–Tunisia relations makes sense. - Amigao (talk) 00:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- The more I'm thinking about it, the more it makes sense. The two countries have diplomatic relations, but they seem very minimal. Documenting the visit in that article would help provide a clearer picture to the readers - especially because my keep vote is based more on the fact that I think secondary sources analysing this event are more likely going to exist in the near future than not. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 19:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merging this into the almost empty China–Tunisia relations makes sense. - Amigao (talk) 00:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP Kais Saied is the president of Tunisia, and the president's visit to China in 2024 has brought diplomatic relations to the level of a "strategic partnership", meaning that future communication between the two sides will no longer be limited to the central government, but can be decentralized to the level of provincial and municipal cooperation, with direct cooperation in trade and military affairs as well. The same applies to direct cooperation in trade and military matters. China–Tunisia relations for sure, I think it could be worth significantly upgrading the content, and I will add it soon. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to China–Tunisia relations. This is a news article and lacks proper coverage, absolutely no reason for it to have its own article independently of the main subject. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Uganda
Zimbabwe
- Tendai Ruben Mbofana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are WP:SPS and paid PR. No indication of significance. Fails WP:BIO scope_creepTalk 19:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Politics, and Zimbabwe. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)