User talk:The virtuous man: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi Virtous. Im not sure how else to contact you, so apologies that this is the wrong forum. A growing number of users are dissatisfied with the way fisherqueen has been 'administrating'/edinting sites in such a rude/uncaring way that completly contradicts the wiki community feel. I would be interested to know your thoughts/if you would be prepared to join in complaining. |
Hi Virtous. Im not sure how else to contact you, so apologies that this is the wrong forum. A growing number of users are dissatisfied with the way fisherqueen has been 'administrating'/edinting sites in such a rude/uncaring way that completly contradicts the wiki community feel. I would be interested to know your thoughts/if you would be prepared to join in complaining. Although she suggests you wrote something very rude and that you were actually just vandalising, so if thats the instance, dont bother to reply. |
||
Revision as of 19:16, 6 June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anglican Church Grammar School, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Virtous. Im not sure how else to contact you, so apologies that this is the wrong forum. A growing number of users are dissatisfied with the way fisherqueen has been 'administrating'/edinting sites in such a rude/uncaring way that completly contradicts the wiki community feel. I would be interested to know your thoughts/if you would be prepared to join in complaining. Although she suggests you wrote something very rude and that you were actually just vandalising, so if thats the instance, dont bother to reply.