Talk:Shrek Forever After: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:24, 23 June 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shrek Forever After article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Filmimage Template:Film needs cast section Template:Film needs synopsis

Shrek 5?

Who put up Shrek 5 on the Infobox? There is not even proof of it.

It was recently changed. Thanks for the correction. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone put Shrek 5 there again. Let's not get to far into the future. Could someone change it back?

Feel free to change it back. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well, i think there will be a shrek 5, but i'm inexperienced in this department, so forget my opinion.--a bag filled with crapped on nachos 00:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Shrek (series)

I'd like to recommend that this article is merged and redirected to Shrek (series) because there is very little context to substantiate an entire article at the present. References about the beginnings of development can be placed there instead. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 23:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with that. My reasoning for removing the CSD tag was that none of the arguments for deletion still apply to this version of the article. WP is not a crystal ball doesn't really apply because it has been announced by the studio. Although, I am fine with another AfD nomination and I fully support a redirect to Shrek (series). --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, it's just that articles that are underdeveloped tend to attract a lot of unsubstantiated rumors, so from what I've seen, housing content such as the announcement of development under a fuller article helps preserve encyclopedic integrity. Let's just say you should've seen The Dark Knight back in its first days... —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 23:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there should be some merging of the Shrek information. The original Shrek page, for example, contains all the sequel information. Duplicating the sequel information on each individual Shrek # page is redundant and can lead to citation and editing errors/mistakes/lack of updates/etc. SpikeJones 15:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3-D

I changed the 2-D in the whole, "it's gonna be 3-D" to "regular" because saying 2-D will lead people to believe that we mean like a regular cartoon (17:05, 20 May 2007) 71.225.206.193

We need to be sure to clarify in the text somehow that Dreamworks' announcement was that the 3D releases would be "in addition" to the standard format releases, not a substitue/replacement. SpikeJones 02:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shrek: Ever After

Change the title Shrek 4 to Shrek: Ever After

The NY licensing show was today and we now have the title - Shrek: Ever After. Here is the poster:

http://picsmcgee.com/albums/Licensing%202007/normal_IMG_0228.jpg 75.75.76.110 21:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]