Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action (gaming): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete |
m →[[Action (gaming)]]: more refs |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Then be prepared to delete [[signature move]], [[finishing move]], [[combo (video games)]], [[desperation attack]], and [[special attack]], too. Why should fighting games have any special treatment? The action gaming article isn't indiscriminate; it consolidates existing action articles and expands onto them with a historical perspective in the context of greater gaming actions. ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 20:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
::Then be prepared to delete [[signature move]], [[finishing move]], [[combo (video games)]], [[desperation attack]], and [[special attack]], too. Why should fighting games have any special treatment? The action gaming article isn't indiscriminate; it consolidates existing action articles and expands onto them with a historical perspective in the context of greater gaming actions. ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 20:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as [[WP:NOR|original research]]. I may change my mind if the article can be properly cited to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] (I can't find any myself, but it's something that's hard to Google). -- [[User:MisterHand|MisterHand]] 21:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as [[WP:NOR|original research]]. I may change my mind if the article can be properly cited to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] (I can't find any myself, but it's something that's hard to Google). -- [[User:MisterHand|MisterHand]] 21:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
::More refs were added. It's not hard if you try... ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 02:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' as original research, unsourced, indiscriminate collection of information, trivial, etc. And someone throw some baked [[WP:BEANS]] at Masaruemoto for that red-link :) [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as original research, unsourced, indiscriminate collection of information, trivial, etc. And someone throw some baked [[WP:BEANS]] at Masaruemoto for that red-link :) [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:33, 9 July 2007
- Action (gaming) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:NOT#IINFO; just a list of movements that can be done in video games; you can run... you can jump... in some games you can walk. Any potential encyclopedic information is covered in the articles in the "See also" section. How about an Action (real life) article? You can walk... you can eat... you can edit Wikipedia. Masaruemoto 02:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Not only is this a fantastic example of WP:NOT#IINFO, but the information itself is completely worthless.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Calgary (talk • contribs).
- Delete I can't tell if it's a joke or serious, either way it's rubbish. JohnnyMrNinja 02:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, being an article by Eep², this isn't a joke. This editor has a reputation for creating "unconventional" articles which frequently get deleted, but he continues to create them. Masaruemoto 02:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. You can delete non-encyclopedic articles form Wikipedia. --Evb-wiki 03:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oysterguitarist 05:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and salt as inherently unencyclopedic. Blueboy96 12:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as silly. How about actions in movies? Do they run sometimes in movies too? What about TV movies? Do they ever run in those? Or jump? Do they jump? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: This article is a stub of a history of arcade/computer/video game actions that has progressed over the course of time and is completely encyclopedic (as much as any historical account of anything else is). Just because you people aren't into gaming doesn't mean other people are and will find this information interesting and encylopedic. ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 19:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT#IINFO, I really don't under the purpose of this in the context of an encyclopedia and I AM into gaming. --Fredrick day 20:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Then be prepared to delete signature move, finishing move, combo (video games), desperation attack, and special attack, too. Why should fighting games have any special treatment? The action gaming article isn't indiscriminate; it consolidates existing action articles and expands onto them with a historical perspective in the context of greater gaming actions. ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 20:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as original research. I may change my mind if the article can be properly cited to reliable sources (I can't find any myself, but it's something that's hard to Google). -- MisterHand 21:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- More refs were added. It's not hard if you try... ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 02:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as original research, unsourced, indiscriminate collection of information, trivial, etc. And someone throw some baked WP:BEANS at Masaruemoto for that red-link :) Stifle (talk) 21:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)