Jump to content

Talk:Diastereomer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assess
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


* The distinction is exactly one for an epimer and one or more stereocenters for the Diastereomer, I have added your reference and definition [[User:V8rik|V8rik]] 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
* The distinction is exactly one for an epimer and one or more stereocenters for the Diastereomer, I have added your reference and definition [[User:V8rik|V8rik]] 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)



== congrads ==
== congrads ==


--[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
--[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

== Problem with Fischer Projections ==

Either the Fisher Projections are not following convention (vertical, into page; horizontal, out of page), is plain wrong, or conflicts with the article on Fisher Projections. Can someone fix the pictures.

Revision as of 02:21, 12 December 2007

WikiProject iconChemistry Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following explanation given in the article is wrong: "In simple terms two stereoisomers are said to be diastereoisomers of each other if only one stereogenic centre differs between the two stereoisomers. It's a definition of an epimer.

References:

- Garrett, Grisham "Biochemistry" ("Pairs of isomers that have opposite configurations at one or more of the chiral centers but are not mirror images of each other are called diastereoisomers", 2nd ed., 1999, p. 213)

- McMurray "Organic Chemistry"


congrads

--212.49.92.124 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --212.49.92.124 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Fischer Projections

Either the Fisher Projections are not following convention (vertical, into page; horizontal, out of page), is plain wrong, or conflicts with the article on Fisher Projections. Can someone fix the pictures.