Talk:Diastereomer: Difference between revisions
Richard001 (talk | contribs) Assess |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* The distinction is exactly one for an epimer and one or more stereocenters for the Diastereomer, I have added your reference and definition [[User:V8rik|V8rik]] 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
* The distinction is exactly one for an epimer and one or more stereocenters for the Diastereomer, I have added your reference and definition [[User:V8rik|V8rik]] 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
== congrads == |
== congrads == |
||
--[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
--[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --[[User:212.49.92.124|212.49.92.124]] 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Problem with Fischer Projections == |
|||
Either the Fisher Projections are not following convention (vertical, into page; horizontal, out of page), is plain wrong, or conflicts with the article on Fisher Projections. Can someone fix the pictures. |
Revision as of 02:21, 12 December 2007
Chemistry Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
The following explanation given in the article is wrong: "In simple terms two stereoisomers are said to be diastereoisomers of each other if only one stereogenic centre differs between the two stereoisomers. It's a definition of an epimer.
References:
- Garrett, Grisham "Biochemistry" ("Pairs of isomers that have opposite configurations at one or more of the chiral centers but are not mirror images of each other are called diastereoisomers", 2nd ed., 1999, p. 213)
- McMurray "Organic Chemistry"
- The distinction is exactly one for an epimer and one or more stereocenters for the Diastereomer, I have added your reference and definition V8rik 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
congrads
--212.49.92.124 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)ithink the article in diastereomer is a great one and actually easy to understand. grreat job --212.49.92.124 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Problem with Fischer Projections
Either the Fisher Projections are not following convention (vertical, into page; horizontal, out of page), is plain wrong, or conflicts with the article on Fisher Projections. Can someone fix the pictures.